Embed
Email

Eduyoth_ Chapter Three_ Mishnayoth Seven and Eight

Document Sample

Shared by: cuiliqing
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/10/2011
language:
English
pages:
1
Eduyoth, Chapter Three, Mishnah Seven

Introduction

Mishnayoth seven and eight both list cases in which one Sage declares something

pure and the other Sages declare it impure.



Mishnah Seven

1) Four cases of doubt Rabbi Joshua pronounces impure, and the Sages pronounce

them pure.

One) How is this so?

a) If the impure person stands and the pure person passes by him;

b) or if the pure person stands and the impure person passes by him;

c) or if impurity is in the private domain and something pure is in the public

domain;

d) Or if something pure is in the private domain and something impure is in

the public domain;

Two) If it is doubtful [in all of these case] whether one touched or did not touch the

other, or if it is doubtful whether one formed a tent over the other or did not

form a tent over the other, or if it is doubtful whether one moved or did not

move the other—

Three) Rabbi Joshua pronounces such a case impure, and the Sages pronounce it pure.



Explanation

In this mishnah are listed four situations in which there is a doubt whether or not the

pure person was touched by the impure person, or one of them formed a tent over the

other (which would cause impurity to be transmitted, even without contact) or one of

them moved the other (which would also transmit impurity, even without contact). In

all of these situations Rabbi Joshua rules that the previously pure person is now

impure, whereas the Sages hold that he is still pure.

The cases are:

i + ii) A case where one of the people is moving and one is stationary. In this case

Rabbi Joshua pronounces the person impure due to the general rule that doubtful

cases of impurity which occur in the private domain are ruled impure. The Sages say

that he is pure. Although there is a general rule that doubtful cases of impurity that

occur in the private domain are ruled impure, this is true only when the pure and the

impure are either both moving or both stationary. If their status is different, then the

rule is not applicable.

iii + iv) The pure and impure are in different domains, one in the public domain and

one in the private domain. According to Rabbi Joshua, since at least one of the two is

in the private domain, he is impure, due to the above mentioned rule. According to

the Sages, since one is in the public domain, the rule that doubtful cases of impurity in

the private domain does not apply.



Related docs
Other docs by cuiliqing
11.1 Exploring Area and Perimeter
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Volusia County
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
choosing_topics_and_y10
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CLE Credit - rscrpubs.com
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Meeting Minutes September 8 Final
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
nov2411
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
EKG Spreadsheet - Geocities.ws
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Gift from Christ to the Church
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!