Embed
Email

confidentiality

Document Sample
confidentiality
Shared by: HC11111018387
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
11/10/2011
language:
English
pages:
34
Confidentiality and the

HIV positive client

Allison J. Rice

Supervising Attorney

Duke AIDS Legal Project



September 18, 2008

Confidentiality: What’s at stake?

 There are Positive & Negative effects of

disclosure of HIV status

 Goal: To the extent possible, the person

with HIV should decide who gets

information

 Reality: There are limits to the patient’s

right to control information about HIV

Potential Consequences of

Disclosure

 Rejection, embarrassment, ostracism, harm to

relationships, social isolation, emotional

rejection, threats to personal safety

 Same as above for client’s children

 Discrimination – job, housing, public services,

insurance, education, etc.

 One person tells another – further breaches of

confidentiality & above consequences

 Potential loss of custody of child

Potential Benefits of Disclosure

 Better access to services, health care

 Emotional & social support

 Possible job accommodation

 Public health benefits (Compliance with

control measures, improved health)

Sources of Law

 North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, 1.6

 HIPPA (Health Insurance Privacy & Portability Act)

(Privacy Rules: 45 CFR Part 164)

 Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et

seq.

 North Carolina laws

 Control Measures, 10 NCAC 41A

 Confidentiality law, NCGS §130A-143

 Medical malpractice

 N.C. “Common” Law (“Torts”)

 N.C. Criminal Law

Lawyer’s Obligation of

Confidentiality

 Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information

 (a) A lawyer shall not reveal information

acquired during the professional

relationship with a client unless the client

gives informed consent, the disclosure is

impliedly authorized in order to carry out

the representation or the disclosure is

permitted by paragraph (b).

Heightened confidentiality

 Go beyond standard client confidentiality procedures

 Practices to protect confidentiality of HIV information

 Never assume client’s friends/family know about HIV

 Even if client has given the name of someone as a witness, don’t

assume the witness knows about the HIV. ALWAYS ask the

client

 Disability third party witness; potential standby guardian

 Be careful with any paperwork in your office that references HIV

status

 Don’t refer to HIV in correspondence unless authorized by client

(explicitly or impliedly)

 Be extra careful in discussing HIV with other staff members

 Train staff about HIV stigma, procedures to protect

confidentiality,

Exceptions to Confidentiality

 (b) A lawyer may reveal information protected from disclosure by

paragraph (a) to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes

necessary:

(1) to comply with the Rules of Professional Conduct, the law or

court order;

(2) to prevent the commission of a crime by the client;

(3) to prevent reasonably certain death or bodily harm;

(4) to prevent, mitigate, or rectify the consequences of a client's

criminal or fraudulent act in the commission of which the lawyer's

services were used;

So, what about this?

 You are representing a client in a disability

case. The client has a partner with whom

he’s living. You ask the client about

having the partner as a witness at the

hearing and the client reveals that he

hasn’t told his partner about his HIV.



 What do you do?

Comments to MRCP 1.6

 [6] . . . Paragraph(b)(2) recognizes that a lawyer should

be allowed to make a disclosure to avoid sacrificing the

interests of the potential victim in favor of preserving the

client's confidences when the client's purpose is

wrongful.

 Similarly, paragraph (b)(3) recognizes the overriding

value of life and physical integrity and permits disclosure

reasonably necessary to prevent reasonably certain

death or substantial bodily harm.

 Such harm is reasonably certain to occur if it will be

suffered imminently or if there is a present and

substantial threat that a person will suffer such harm at a

later date if the lawyer fails to take action necessary to

eliminate the threat.

Control Measures - HIV

 10A NCAC 41A.0202:

(1)Infected persons shall:

a) Refrain from sexual intercourse unless

condoms are used…..

*****

e) Notify future sexual intercourse partners of

the infection;

NCGS § 130A-25

 “A person who violates a provision of this

Chapter or the rules adopted by the

Commission or a local board of health

shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.”

Unavoidable Disclosures

North Carolina

Public Health Law

 Public Health Laws – Gen Statutes Ch 130A,

Administrative Code: 10A NCAC 41A

 Confidential Testing

 Testing requires informed consent

 Names-based reporting to the State Public Health

Department (name address, demographics)

 Public health investigation and contact tracing

 Mandatory notification of spouse and partners

 Mandatory control measures for infected persons

 The name-based system and contact tracing

contribute to fear and reluctance to test

Failure to disclose to partners:

 Failure to abide by control measures is

misdemeanor punishable by up to 2 years in

prison, NCGS § 130A-26

 Potential for other criminal charges for

unprotected sex, spitting, etc.

 Example: In a court-martial, an HIV+ Army Private

pled guilty to assault and other charges based on

having unprotected sex with a 17-year-old.

(November 2007)

When HIV information can legally

be sought and considered

 Life insurance:

 Insurer can ask. Applicant must answer

truthfully. Mostly likely will be denied if HIV+

 Individual health insurance:

 Plan can refuse to cover or have high

premiums

 (but not employee group health insurance)

 Group insurance – can’t refuse coverage

Employer Medical Inquiries

 ADA: 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)

 29 CFR §§ 1630.13, 1630.14

 EEOC Enforcement Guidance

 Health information can only be requested

 after job offer

 if required of all employees in the class

 If business necessity

 If employee is asking for a “reasonable accommodation”

 Information obtained: 29 CFR 1630.14(d)(1)

 “shall be collected and maintained on separate forms

and in separate medical files and treated as a

confidential medical record”

Privacy Protections

Confidentiality Law in NC

 “All information and records, whether

publicly or privately maintained, that

identify a person who has AIDS virus

infection . . . Shall be strictly confidential.

The information shall not be released

except under the following

circumstances…”

 NCGS §130A-143

Penalty for violation of NC law

 Misdemeanor (NCGS §130A-25)

 “A person who violates a provision of this

Chapter….shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.”

 Enforcement problems

 District Attorney must agree to prosecute

 To my knowledge, this misdemeanor has never

been prosecuted in NC

HIV in Schools:

 No requirement to tell school or day care

about HIV, but doctor must inform local

health director if child poses significant

risk of transmission (e.g. open sores,

biting) (10A NCAC 41A.0202 (3))

 If school is informed, information should

only be shared on a “need to know” basis.

Federal Laws – HIPPA

 Who is covered by HIPPA?

 Health care providers (doctors, nurses, other

employees) that transmit info electronically

 Some Ryan White grantees may be covered – e.g. if you

submit to Medicaid

 Health insurance plan

 Any person or organization that provides or pays cost of

medical care, including Medicare, Medicaid, HMO, PPO

 Health care clearinghouse

 Organizations that process data or transactions

 “Business Associates” of covered entities also

have to agree to keep information private

What does HIPPA do?

 Limits disclosure of “individually identifiable health

information”

 Includes info in paper, electronic, or oral form

 Includes information that was created or received from another

source

 Relates to physical or mental health, condition, or payment for

health care

 Identifies a person, or can be used to identify a person

 Allows certain disclosures without patient’s consent:

 Among health care providers

 To health insurance companies for claims documentation

 Public health

 Research uses

Key Requirements

 Allows uses or disclosures of health information

incidental to providing medical care

 As long as:

 Only “minimum disclosure” necessary

 “Reasonable safeguards” are in place to protect

information

 Definition of “reasonable safeguard” leaves wide open what

is reasonable – not clear whether this rule will have any teeth

What complies with standards?

 Providers can leave phone messages on

answering machine or with family members

 But use professional judgment to assure that such

disclosures are in best interest of individual and that

information is limited

 Can mail appointment or prescription refill

reminders to patient’s homes

 But: if patient has requested communication in

confidential manner (eg alternative means or

location) request must be accommodated “if

reasonable”

HIPPA Compliance

 Can use patient sign-in sheets or call out names

of patients in waiting rooms

 But must have reasonable safeguards

 No medical info displayed that’s not necessary for the

purpose of signing in.

 Can place patient charts on exam room door

 As long as reasonable and appropriate measurers to

safeguard information, e.g., limiting access to certain

areas, placing chart in box with front cover facing

wall.

 Can put patient’s name on door of hospital room

HIPPA Compliance

 Offices don’t have to be soundproof

 Consider privacy vs patient care, financial

burden

 Reasonable:

 Pharmacies – ask waiting customers to stand back a

few feet from counter used for patient counseling

 Curtains, screens, dividers may be reasonable

 Providers can talk to one another – eg at

nursing station, in semi-private hospital room,

 Reasonable precautions:

 Lowered voices, talking apart from others.

Enforcement of HIPPA

 Complaint to provider/health plan

 Complaint to the Office of Civil Rights,

Department of Health & Human Services

 http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/

 Complaint form in materials and available over

internet (and at end of these materials)

 Must be made within 180 days of learning of violation

(unless good cause shown)

 Penalties = fines of up to $100 per incident (paid to

government, not to patient) up to $25,000 per person

per year per violation.

Tort remedies

 If health care provider discloses, could sue

for medical malpractice

 Other Torts

 No tort for invasion of privacy by public

disclosure of private facts.

 There is a privacy tort for intrusion into

seclusion

 Available tort theories: negligent or intentional

infliction of extreme emotional distress

Obstacles to Legal Recourse

 Further invasion of privacy through filing lawsuit

or making complaint

 Fear of alienating important resources, e.g.

health care or service provider, DSS, etc.

 Availability of lawyers

 Time & cost of legal help, especially lawsuit.

 Inadequacy of remedies –

 have to have severe harm, which can be documented

 difficulties of proving case – her word against his word

 Can’t put the cat back in the bag

To tell or not to tell:

What we advise clients

 Short answer: From a legal standpoint,

when in doubt, don’t tell

 there are some protections for misuse of info re

HIV+ status, or discrimination against person with

HIV, but

 protections are few, weak, and probably will take a

lawyer to enforce – if they can be enforced at all.

 Enforcement likely to result in further disclosure

Summary: Protecting Privacy

 Clients must understand customs and practices

of medical personnel re privacy –

 Adjust expectations; request special confidentiality

measures re HIV

 limit disclosure to absolutely those necessary –

trusted friends, relatives, providers, public

health officials, legal requirements

 don’t disclose to employer unless seeking accommodation

under ADA or legally required (e.g. health care workers

doing exposure prone procedures), or part of legal medical

inquiry by employer

 make timely complaints under HIPPA, ADA,

when violations occur

What lawyers can do for

HIV+ clients

 Challenge those in charge of agency/facility privacy policies to go

beyond HIPPA requirements in safeguarding sensitive medical

information such as HIV+ status.

 Help clients understand the risks of disclosure and counsel to make

the right disclosures in a safe way

 For disclosures by health care providers:

 HIPPA complaint & letter to health care provider

 Seek discipline for employees involved

 Policy changes

 Training for staff

 Disclosures in employment:

 If appropriate, EEOC complaint

 Consider tort theories if serious injuries

 Others - Stern letter from lawyer to person disclosing

 Reference criminal statute, tort law

Contact Information

 Allison Rice

Supervising Attorney

Duke AIDS Legal Assistance Project

Box 90360

Durham, NC 27708



(919) 613-7169

rice@law.duke.edu


Related docs
Other docs by HC11111018387
PolicyBook2006
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Spaulding
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
SocialSecurity
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
VIKANG NEWS OCT 2010 word
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
philosophy
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
whitepaperfinal
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
wGEr65B1niPNyeOCL2u3x93Pj
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Principal_Subject_Taught
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
04pa
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
20080328114735_large
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!