Embed
Email

Amicus Brief Status2048

Document Sample
Amicus Brief Status2048
Shared by: HC11111013551
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
11/10/2011
language:
English
pages:
8
NASP Amicus Briefs Status Pending 1 of 1

Committee Amicus

Case Name Rep. Counsel for NASP Issue in Case Granted Brief Revwd.







Deductible

reimbursement

Harrnick v. State Will Syliantaeng, when the injured

Farm Mutual Auto, Bennett Bricklin & party claims to not

3rd Cir. Fed Ct. Daran Saltzburg be made whole? Yes, 2009 Yes





Can Nevada

Welday v. Health plan

Summerline Health, contract away the

Nevada Supreme "made whole"

Court John doctrine? Yes, 2009 Yes









NASP Amicus Briefs Status Decisions 1 of 2





Committee Amicus

Case Name Rep. Counsel for NASP Issue in Case Granted Brief Revwd.





Constitutionality of

Holten v. Crouse Ohio Work Comp.

Cartage Co., Ohio Elliott, David Matejczyk & Statute Subro

Supreme Court John Glenna Roberts Rights Yes, 2001 Yes







Great West v. ERISA enforcement

Knusdon, U.S. Elliott, of reimbursement

Supreme Court John Marc D. Spenser in Federal Court Yes, 2001 Yes





Can an insurer

Northern Buckeye v. contract away the

Lawson, Ohio Elliott, made-whole

Supreme Court John Daran Kiefer doctrine Yes, 2004 Yes

Is a subrogation/

reimbursement

Fortis Benefits v. clause restricted

Cantu, Texas Daran & by the made

Supreme Court John Gary Wickert whole doctrine? Yes, 2005 Yes



Statute of

Principal Life v. Limitations and

Mega Life Ins., direct action by

Oklahoma S. Ct. Elliott Elliott Feldman Health Ins. Yes, 2005 No









Evidence of other

City Madison Hts. V. sweeper fires no

Elgin Sweeper, Mi Ct admissible in

of Appeals John subrogation case Yes, 2005 No









Federal Jurisdiction

Mid-Atlantic v. John Kolb, Daran for reimbursement

Sereboff, U.S. John & Kiefer Tom actions under

Supreme Court Daran Lawrence ERISA Yes, 2006 Yes



Reverse

Condemnation suit

Ca State Auto Ass v. for sewage

Palo Alto, CA backup in

Supreme Ct. John Alan Jang subrogation Yes, 2006 No









NASP Amicus Briefs Status Decisions 2 of 2

Committee Amicus

Case Name Rep. Counsel for NASP Issue in Case Granted Brief Revwd.







Worker's

compensation

Gillette v. Wurst v. subrogation rights

Utica, PA Supreme John & Mark Schultz of and wrongful

Court Daran Cozen & O'Conner death allocation. Yes, 2006 Yes





Can an injured

Muller v. Society party not be made

Insurance Co., whole even when

Wisconsin Supreme Daran, Gary Wickert & they accept less

Ct. John Kevin Differt than policy limits Yes, 2007 Yes

Can State

Consumer

Protection Act be

Stephens v. Omni Tom Wolfe & applied to tort

Ins. Co., Washington Daran, Melissa O-Loughlin subrogation

Supreme Court John White claims? Yes, 2007 Yes









Does calculation

21st Century Ins. Co. of "made whole"

v. Superior Court, Joshua Kirsch of look at "gross"

California Supreme Daran, Gibson, Robb & recovery or "net"

Court John Lindh recovery? Yes, 2007 Yes









What notice must

American Family v. be given before

Golke, Wisconsin destroying

Sup. Ct. Daran Gary Wickert product? Yes, 2008 Yes









NASP Amicus Briefs Status Not Filed 1 of 1





Committee Amicus

Case Name Rep. Counsel for NASP Issue in Case Granted Brief Revwd.



Can Work Comp

carrier enforce lien

Summit Claims v. if they don't file

Lawyers Express, Fl notice in 3rd prty

Sup. Court Elliott None suit? No, 2005





Cons Protection

Act violation by

collection letters

Washington St. from Subrogation

Court CPA Cases Elliott None Atty. No, 2005





Rooker-Feldman

Doctrine

Todd v. Weltman, application to bar

Weinberg, U.S. FDCPA suit for false

Supreme Ct Daran None affidavit No, 2006

Federal Admiralty

Suit for state

drawbridge

Northern Ins. Of N.Y. damage to boat,

v. Chatham Ct, U.S. 11th & Sov

Supreme Daran None Immunity No, 2006





Steele v. AultCare Can ERISA plan

Corp, Ohio sue for subrogation

Supreme Ct. John Daran Kiefer in state court? Yes, 2006 No





Immunity for Public

New Jersey Daran, Utility Companies

Appellate Court John None from tort laibility No, 2007





Amount due WC

subro lien from

Daran, settlemetns with

NC Supreme Court John None some defendants. No, 2009







Statute of

Limitations does

nto start to run until

they pay and

Colorado Supreme expert issues report

Court Daran None of defect. No, 2009

January 11, 2010



Outcome/ Status









Stayed pending

outcome of state court

cases. NASP to join in

State Court appeals









Pending









January 11, 2010









Outcome/ Status



Ohio Supreme Court

ruled Work Comp.

statute unconstitutional.

We lost.



Supreme Court found

no jurisdiction to seek

reimbursement in

federal Court. We Lost.



Ohio Supreme Court

agreed that Insurance

contract can abrogate

made-whole rule. We

won.

Texas Suprem Court

ruled Insurers can

contract the make

whole rule. We won







NASP not allowed to file

brief.









Michigan Court did not

allow us to file an

Amicus Brief. Not filed.





Supreme Court ruled

jurisdiction exists under

ERISA to enforce

reimbursement

provision. We won.



Ca Supreme Court let

stand a appellate

decision allowing subro

suit against city. We

won.









January 11, 2010



Outcome/ Status







PA Supreme Court

agreed with NASP that

allocation could not be

made to avoid

subrogation. Won









Made whole did nto

apply to separate

settlement by Subro

carrier. We Won

WA Supreme Court

affirmed claim for

consumer tortfeasor

against collection

agency & insurer under

State CPA. Lost







Ca Supreme Court

agreed with NASP that

"made whole" looks at

gross recovery $$ and

not net of attorey fees.

Won.



Wisconsin Supreme

Court said Am Fam did

enough with letters to

potential parties to

destory product. We

Won









January 11, 2010









Outcome/ Status





NASP requested more

info. Certified conflict.

NASP not asked to get

involved.









NASP involvement not

requested.









NASP not involved,

narrow question of

federal court jurisdiction

& immunity.

NASP not involved,

supreme court ruled 11

Amend not protect

political sub.only state



NASP brief not filed,

parties settled case and

Ohio Supreme Ct.

dismissed appeal.







tabled for now as only

at the appeal stage.









Too narrow an issue on

appeal for NASP

involvement.









Statute of Limitaion

blown by counsel as

trial level. Not good

arguments to extend.


Related docs
Other docs by HC11111013551
WC_Automation_Design
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CMSUpdateMedTradeFall2008
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
chuyende_SOYBEAN
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
7aBankClosingChecklist
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
3029
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
FHA_PowerPoint_Training 60204730
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Where Can I Find Practice Tools IC
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Overman_Library_Catalog
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!