Embed
Email

Mucosal Immunology and Vaccine Development

Document Sample
Mucosal Immunology and Vaccine Development
Why Mucosal Immunization?

• Mucosal surface is major portal of entry for pathogens

• Mucosa contains highest concentration of lymphocytes

Mucosal Immunology

6 x 1010 antibody-forming cells in mucosa-associated

and lymphoid tissue (MALT)

Vaccine Development versus

2.5 x 10 10 lymphocytes in lymphoid organs

• Mucosal immunization

- mucosal immunity

Mary Petzke, Ph.D. - systemic immunity

- prevents infection

Harvard Medical School

Systemic immunization

Children’s Hospital

- no mucosal immunity

- resolves infection before disease develops









Bordetella pertussis Bordetella pertussis

Parenteral Vaccination

• gram-negative coccobacillus Humans

• etiological agent of whooping cough Immunity diminishes in early adulthood

- serious childhood disease Only IgG is detected in nasal secretions

Mice

• colonizes respiratory mucosa

Only IgG is detected in respiratory tract

- systemic effects produced by toxins

- severe paroxysmal cough = convulsions, cyanosis,

Natural Infection/ Mucosal Vaccination

Humans

neurological damage, death

Natural infection = longterm immunity

• whole-cell vaccine introduced in 1950s

High titers of specific IgG and IgA in nasal secretions

- DPT = diphtheria toxoid, whole-cell pertussis,

Mice

tetanus toxoid

Mucosal vaccination generates specific IgG and IgA in

• no serological correlate of protection respiratory tract









Mucosal Immune System Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue (MALT)



• an integrated network of tissues, lymphoid and Gastrointestinal tract

constitutive cells and effector molecules which (gut-associated lymphoid tissue

= GALT) Mammary glands

protect the host from infection of the mucous

membrane surfaces

• separate from the peripheral (systemic) immune

system

• characterized by MALT

- production of secretory IgA (3 g/day)

- Th1 and Th2-type CD4+ responses

- CD8+ CTL responses

Respiratory tract Reproductive tract

(bronchus- and nasal-associated lymphoid tissues

= BALT and NALT)

Brush border and glycocalyx of intestinal

Mucosa: Diffuse lymphoid tissue enterocytes acts as a barrier



Brush border CD4+ T cell Glycocalyx



Epithelium B cell Microvilli brush border







Lamina propria

(connective tissue,

blood vessels, lymph)







Muscularis

mucosae

Submucosa Enterocyte

(collagen, glands,

large blood vessels)









Organized Lymphoid Tissue: Follicle

Follicle-associated epithelium M (Membraneous) Cells

(FAE)

M cell enterocyte •“Portals of entry” to the mucosal immune system

Villus

epithelium Dome Lumen

Microorganisms

Intraepithelial pocket

Corona

Villus (B cells)

lamina propria



M B T

Enterocyte

cell



Germinal center

Interfollicular area

(T cells)





Dendritic cell



Muscularis mucosae









M cells are a major component of follicle-

M cell apical surface lacks brush border and glycocalyx

associated epithelium

Dome Enterocyte M cell

glycocalyx

brush border membraneous folds

Villus

(partial) M cells









Intraepithelial pocket

Crypt



Lymphocyte









Anti-vimentin staining for M cells in rabbit intestinal FAE

Antigen

Mucosal Immune Response Lamina propria



Effector

• Inductive phase functions

(sIgA

- priming of lymphocytes = antigen presentation production)

- migration of lymphocytes from inductive sites in mucosa

(eg., Peyer’s patches)



regional lymph nodes

Vein

Lymphatic

blood circulation

High endothelial venules

of inductive site Lymphocyte activation

mucosal effector sites (eg., lamina propria) Homing receptors completed BLOOD

(mannose 6-phosphate Spleen,

& other sugars) lymph nodes

High endothelial venules

of distal mucosal sites









Common Mucosal Immune System (CMIS) Mucosal Immune Response



• Immunological induction at one mucosal site often • Effector phase

results in immune responses at distal mucosal sites - production of antibodies

- Lymphocyte migration via the high endothelial venules _ predominantly secretory IgA (sIgA)

_ site-specific “homing”receptors on mucosal _ all isotypes expressed in lamina propria

lymphoid cells

- CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity (intraepithelial pocket)

- CD4+ T cell cytokine production (lamina propria)

∴Immunization of one mucosal inductive site may

induce mucosal immune responses in all mucosal

effector tissues









Distribution of IgA-, IgM-, IgG-, and IgD- Production of secretory IgA

producing B cells in human secretory tissues

Secretory IgA Secretory

componen

t



IgA IgA

Proteolytic cleavage

Enterocyte





Polymeric

Immunoglobulin

J-chain Receptor (pIg)



Dimeric IgA





B cell

Neutralization of antigens by mucosal IgA Strategies for Mucosal Immunization

LUMEN



• Mucosal adjuvants/delivery systems

- cholera toxin, lymphotoxin

- targeted delivery to M cells

M cell

- biodegradable microparticles

Enterocyte • Attenuated bacterial and viral vectors

- Salmonella

- adenovirus

• Site of antigen administration

B cell

B cell

- Utilization of Common Mucosal Immune System



LUMENAL INTRACELLULAR Neutralization in

neutralization neutralization LAMINA PROPRIA









Mucosal Adjuvants: Cholera toxin and lymphotoxin

Cholera toxin (CT) and E. coli lymphotoxin (LT) ADVANTAGES:

• circumvent the need for prolonged administration

• members of A-B toxin family of antigen, and for large doses of antigen, which

• highly immunogenic may induce oral tolerance

• when co-administered with antigen by mucosal • extremely effective mucosal adjuvants



route: PROBLEMS:

- induce strong systemic and mucosal T H2-type cytokine ! highly toxigenic: not acceptable for human use

responses to antigen - 5 ug CT = mild diarrhea

• IL-4, IL-5 - 25 ug CT = full 20-L cholera purge

IFN-γ, IL-2

• mechanism of adjuvanticity undefined

• serum IgG1 and mucosal sIgA

- enhanced intestinal permeability?

• induce prolonged mucosal memory to antigen - depletion of CD8+ intraepithelial T-cells?

- upregulate antigen presentation?









Mechanism of cholera toxin and lymphotoxin action Possible alternatives to holotoxin:

cholera toxin B subunit (CTB)

Intestinal epithelial cell



Trypsin ADP

ribosylation Intestinal epithelial cell

digestion

B B Adenylate

A1 A1 NAD Gs cyclase

A2 A1 B B

(OFF)

B A2 B ADPR Adenylate

cyclase

B B B (OFF)

ADPR B

Gs Adenylate

cAMP cyclase

GM1 H2O Sodium, chloride cAMP cAMP (ON) CTB

ganglioside loss transport cAMP cAMP

• Cholera toxin B subunit nontoxic

• In mice, loss of adjuvant activity compared to holotoxin

Diarrhea • Adjuvant activity in humans unknown

Dehydration

Possible alternatives to holotoxin:

Site-directed mutagenesis of A subunit M Cell Targeting

Amino acid change in Intestinal epithelial cell

NAD-binding site

Trypsin NAD Lumen

digestion binding

CT B

A1

B

A2 A1 NAD Gs

Adenylate

cyclase

Antigen

Intraepithelial pocket

A1 (OFF)

B A2 B

B







Single amino acid change

M B T

Enterocyte

in trypsin-sensitive region cell

ADP Mφ

Trypsin ribosylation

LT B

A1

B

A2

digestion



A1 A2 A1

?

NAD Gs

Adenylate

cyclase

(OFF)

B A2 B

B



Dendritic cell

NO toxicity in animal models

Currently being evaluated in two phase-I safety trials in humans









Macromolecules and microorganisms which bind

exclusively or preferentially to M-cells Reovirus binds selectively to M cells

• Macromolecules Enterocyte M cell

- IgA --secretory, monoclonal or Ag-complexed

Virus

• Viruses

- reovirus

- poliovirus

- HIV ? Virus



• Bacteria

- Vibrio cholerae

- Salmonella typhi and S. typhimurium Lymphocyte



- Shigella species

- Yersinia pseudotuberculosis

- pathogenic E. coli strains









Do M cells have specific receptors for Are M-cell surfaces more accessible than enterocyte

microorganisms and macromolecules? surfaces?

• Macromolecules Receptor Frey, Neutra et al. (1996)

- IgA --secretory, monoclonal or Ag-complexed ? • GM1 ganglioside

• Viruses - receptor for cholera toxin subunit B (CTB)

- reovirus ? - found on membranes of diverse cell types, including enterocytes

- poliovirus ? - 2.5 nm above surface of membrane = cholera toxin must come

- HIV ? ? into close contact with membrane

• Bacteria Binding to:

- Vibrio cholerae ? Conjugate Size enterocytes M-cells

- Salmonella typhi and S. typhimurium ? CTB-fluorescein 6.4 nm + +

- Shigella species ? CTB-colloidal gold 28 nm - +

- Yersinia pseudotuberculosis ? CTB-latex particles 1000 nm - -

- pathogenic E. coli strains ?

M cell Targeting: Microparticle delivery systems Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microparticles

• Encapsulation of antigen(s) within biodegradable

particles • PLGA = primary candidate for vaccine development

- antigens are protected from degradation in the gut - safety established by prior use of PLGA polymers in

following oral administration humans (resorbable sutures, bone plates, drug delivery

- facilitate uptake into M cells vehicles)

• Particles known to be transported through M cells: - biodegradable

Latex Poly(butyl-cyanoacrylate) - adjuvant activity comparable to Complete Freund’s

Carbon Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Adjuvant (CFA)

Liposomes Poly(styrene) - controlled release of antigen due to polymer degradation

• Size of particles determines response • eliminates need for booster doses

in mice, particles >5 um remain in mucosa 1 dose = elevated antibody titers 1 year later



= mucosal antibody response

particles <5 um are transported to lymph nodes and spleen

= both systemic and mucosal antibody responses









Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microsphere-

Structure of PLGA microparticles encapsulated influenza vaccine





Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)







Antigen









Microcapsule Microsphere









Adjuvanticity of PLGA microspheres

• Bordetella pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA)

- virulence factor--mediates attachment of bacterium to epithelium • Major disadvantage of microparticles and

- administered to mice intranasally in either PBS or encapsulated in

poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microspheres

traditional mucosal adjuvants:

- 2 doses, 4 weeks apart

- serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) assayed for antibody

response 4 weeks after second vaccination Do not elicit CTL response

Mean endpoint titer

Immunization group Serum IgG BAL IgA ∴ Not effective against viruses and invasive

PBS control --- --- bacteria

10 ug FHA in PBS 70,000 (1/5) 25 (1/5)

10 ug PLGA-encapsulated FHA 330,000 (5/5) 300 (5/5)

1 ug FHA in PBS --- ---

1 ug PLGA-encapsulated FHA 90,000 (5/5) 100 (5/5)

Attenuated bacterial vaccines: Salmonella Salmonella typi Ty21a

• Salmonella • biosynthetic mutant

S. typhi: human pathogen - multiple deletions in the galE gene

S. typhimurium: mouse pathogen - defective in the enzyme uridine diphospho-(UDP)-

- colonizes intestine galactose-4-epimerase

- invades and destroys M cells • avirulent in humans

- migrates via macrophages to spleen and liver - 5 x 1010 organisms given orally = no adverse reactions

- causes bacteremia and death • immunogenic in humans

• Immune response - protective efficacies in field trials range from 43-96%

- elicits humoral, secretory and CMI responses - 100% of North American volunteers had detectable CMI

- live Salmonella are very effective inducers of mucosal response following oral ingestion of 10 9 live organisms

immune responses; killed Salmonella are poor

immunogens









S. typhi TY21a as a vector for vaccine antigens Salmonella typhi hybrid vaccines

• Salmonella typhi-Shigella hybrid vaccine

S. typhi TY21a expressing

Bacterium A Bacterium A antigen

- S. typhi TY21a expressing Shigella group D somatic

S. typhi TY21a

antigen

- safe and immunogenic in North American volunteers

- inconsistent protective efficacy = unstable association of

Antigen

the group D antigen with bacterial surface



Gene

• Salmonella typhi-Vibrio cholerae hybrid vaccine

- S. typhi TY21a expressing the O antigen polysaccharide

Plasmid of V. cholerae LPS

- safe and immunogenic in volunteers using doses of up to

6 x 106 viable organisms

- no significant degree of protection (25%) conferred,

although diarrhea volume was reduced

∴Although promising, no unequivocal results yet.









Recombinant viral vaccines: adenovirus Recombinant Adenovirus Vaccines

• Adenovirus

• Mucosal viral vaccines - high cloning capacity: can accomodate 8.3 kb of foreign

- stimulate both mucosal and systemic humoral and CMI DNA

responses - can be made replication deficient

- generate long-lasting immunity (Sabin oral polio vaccine) Mammalian cell

• Adenovirus Adenovirus

- double-stranded DNA virus Foreign gene

- structure and biology well characterized Gene expression

Infection

- infects and replicates in mucosal tissues: GI tract, upper Viral

DNA

respiratory tract, eye and urinary bladder

- some serotypes cause mild respiratory disease in humans

- safety established Oral and intranasal vaccination of rhesus macaques with

- delivery of antigens to oral or respiratory mucosa adenovirus expressing SIV envelope protein

= cellular and humoral systemic responses, mucosal response

= reduced viral load after vaginal challenge

Route of antigen delivery Nasal and oral vaccination of humans

• Compartmentalization occurs within the Common Maximal Fold Increase In:

Mucosal Immune System Vaccination Nasal Vaginal

-some sites better at inducing responses at distal sites Secretions Secretions

-not all distal sites respond equally IgA IgG IgA IgG

∴ Deliver vaccine at site which will induce response in

desired location Nasal 9.3 56 5.7 30

• Nasal and oral vaccination of humans to generate Oral --- 6.2 4.9 20

antibody responses in vaginal tract • Conclusions:

- 2 doses of cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) - Oral vaccination does not generate an IgA response in

- female volunteers aged 19-36 years nasal secretions

- secretions collected at 1,2,3,6 weeks and at 6 months - Both oral and nasal vaccination generate IgA and IgG

after second dose responses in vaginal secretions

∴ Not all mucosal sites respond equally to induction

at a distal site!









Strategies for Mucosal Immunization



• Mucosal adjuvants/delivery systems

- cholera toxin, lymphotoxin

- targeted delivery to M cells

- biodegradable microparticles

• Attenuated bacterial and viral vectors

- Salmonella

- adenovirus

• Site of antigen administration

- Utilization of Common Mucosal Immune System


Related docs
Other docs by ChrisCaflish
美国•布朗大学
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
IXION IN HEAVEN
Views: 54  |  Downloads: 0
Dear Rep
Views: 16  |  Downloads: 0
52 PORCH CEILING FAN
Views: 91  |  Downloads: 0
Shepherd 210 Installation Manual
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
RUSSIA IN THE 20TH CENTURY
Views: 153  |  Downloads: 1
第一章
Views: 94  |  Downloads: 0
Verb Forms
Views: 63  |  Downloads: 3
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!