IRG Working Document Maintenance Procedure
Stages Processes
After IRG Meeting No.
N-1
PDF files constitue of the following:
IWD Editor: IWD Editor: * (c.f. IRG N1483 B1)
Update and distribute the Distribute New M-Set and *IRGSD_UCV (c.f. IRG N1483 B3)
latest IRGSD files in pdf D-Set of Candidate * Over-Unification List (c.f. IRG N 1483
format via IRG Web site Ideographs B2)
* Mis-Unification List (c.f. IRG N 1395)
4 months before IRG
* Non-Unification List
Meeting No. N
Report should be something like:
Member Bodies:
Check for Duplicates or
* XXXX and YYYY are duplicate.
Unifiability based on UCV
* XXXX and YYYY are unifiable in
List. Any reports of
accordance with Rule SU-ZZZ.
Duplicate or Unifiable
* XXXX and YYYY are unifable as shown in
Ideographs should be put
2 months before IRG
Meeting No. N
IRG Technical Editor:
Check and compile the
submitted reports from
member bodies.
Distribute compiled
reports to member bodies
1 month before IRG
Meeting No. N
Discuss the duplication/
At IRG Meeting No. N unifiability reports and
make the following
C1: They C3: They are C6: They are not
C2: They are C4: They are C5: An existing
are Misunified. unifiable.
unifiable in unifiable and the rule is
duplicate Report to WG for IRG agreed to add innappropriate. May need to update
accordance with possible source NUC. Or, remove
them to the UCV Remove or
separateion proposal for further
list and update modify the rule
update (MUI) check.
After IRG Meeting
IWD Editor IWD Editor
IRG Rapporteur: Record the conclusion to the Perhaps consider adding the
Report to WG for original XLS file, distribute it to new case to the non-unification
source seperation
member bodies.
IRG Technical Editor
Remove target character from M-set or D-set. Member Bodies
Check for the quality of the original
Review the conclusions (new UCV
proposition.
If such cases exceed 5% of total, the proposal to be added to the list, etc.). If
may be removed as a whole. not acceptable, report and
Duplication and Unification Report and Discussion Form
M.B.Member Report Kind Nature Rule No. Character A
Body Date
C 10/11/2009 Duplicate J-XXXX
J 10/12/2009 Unifiable SU001 TC-XXXX
K 10/12/2009 Unifiable J-XXXX
T 10/12/2009 New UCV Proposition TD-XXXX
T 10/12/2009 New UCV Proposition
ort and Discussion Form
Character B Additional Component Glyphs Discussion Discussion
Comments (to propose new Date Conclusion
U+YYYY 12/1/2009 Accepted to remove.
UTC-YYYY 12/2/2009 Accepted to unify.
KX-YYYY 12/3/2009 Not Accepted
U+ZZZZ
TD-YYYY 12/3/2009 Accepted to unify,
update UCV List.
Accepted to unify, but
not update UCV list.
Further Actions and
memoRemarks
Check for 5% rule
Under review by each
N.B.Member Body
It is the same as SU-
YYYY
Proposal for Classification of UCV List.
a) Differences in rotated strokes/dots
a-1) Differences in stroke initiation direction
a-2) Differences in open direction of two strokes
a-3) Differences of stroke or dot
a-4) Differences in connection of two strokes or dots
a-5) Differences of stroke or dot
b) Differences in overshoot at the stroke initiation and/or termination
b-1) Differences in intersection at the stroke initiation and/or termination
b-2) Differences in contact of strokes
b-3) Differences in crossing of strokes
b-4) Differences in contact point of two strokes
c) Differences in contact of strokes
c-1) Differences in horizontal connectivity
c-2) Differences in connectivity and angle of intersection
c-3) Differences of two dots or single stroke
c-4) Differences in contact point of two strokes
d) Differences in protrusion at the folded corner of strokes
e) Differences in bent strokes
f) Differences in folding back at the stroke termination
g) Differences in accent at the stroke initiation
h) Differences in "rooftop" modification
i) Differences in minor omission or addition of strokes
i-1) Differences in extra or reduced stroke or dot
i-2) Differences of separated stroke or not
i-3) Differences of connectivity of two separate strokes or dots.
j) Miscellaneous
k) Combinations of the above differences