No Path Name Unit Votes_No Source Layer Type
Path: Damage to coastal barriers | rate of
1 1 erosion
USGS Coastal Vulnerability
2 1 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3 Line
Index for shoreline
Unit: amount eroded
Indicator: erosion
3 1 per year Votes:2
4 2 Path: Deforestation Rates | forest density
5 2 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3
6 2 Indicator: forest density Unit: % Votes:0 OR 2006 Land use/land cover Raster
Unit: decrease in
Indicator: forest
7 2 trees per year Votes:1
Path: Capacity of wastewater system | change in
8 3 pollution from runoff OR streams water quality Line
9 3 Indicator: surface pollution runoff Unit: ppm Votes:1
10 3 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:5
Path: Changes in environmental chemistry | pH
11 4 of estuaries OR streams water quality (pH
12 4 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3 is only readily available for Line
13 4 Indicator: acidity Unit: pH level Votes:1 streams, not the estuary itself)
14 4 Indicator: PH Unit: N/A Votes:0
15 5 Path: change maximum rainfall
16 5 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:4
Precip Change 2010-2030
Unit: centimeters per Raster
Indicator: precipitation from Coastal Impacts Group
17 5 year Votes:0
18 5 Indicator: rain Unit: cm per year Votes:1
Path: Land use issues | susceptibility to flooding
19 6
20 6 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:2
Oregon Coastal Atlas FEMA Q3
Unit: meters above Line
Indicator: elevation flood map (see also Path 6)
21 6 sea level Votes:2
Unit: susceptibility
Indicator: flooding
22 6 index Votes:1
Path: Changes in environmental chemistry |
23 7 Water Quality OR streams water quality (see
Line
24 7 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3 Path 3)
25 7 Indicator: oxygen Unit: BOD changes Votes:0
Path: Changes in environmental chemistry |
26 8 salinity of estuaries
27 8 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:0
NOAA Sailinity Zones Polygon
Unit: Practical
Indicator: salinity NOAA Sailinity Zones Polygon
28 8 Salinity Unit Votes:0
Unit: parts per
Indicator: Change in Salinity thousand (grams per
29 8 liter) Votes:5
Path: Changes in fauna | salmonid rearing
30 9 habitat
31 9 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:0
Unit: meters squared
Indicator: Change in Salmonid Rearing Habitat
32 9 per year Votes:1
Oregon Department of Fish
Unit: births per Line(s)
Indicator: salmonids and Wildlife fish habitat use
33 9 season Votes:2
Unit: meter squared
Indicator: habitat habitat (nearshore,
grassbeds, etc)
34 9 Votes:2
35 10 Path: change in average temperature | change
36 10 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:2 Precip Change 2010-2030
37 10 Indicator: rainfall Unit: cm per year Votes:5 from Coastal Impacts Group Raster
(see also Path 5)
Indicator: rain Unit: inches per year
38 10 Votes:1
Path: health of marine ecosystem | shellfish
39 11 beds
40 11 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3
Indicator: shellfish beds Unit: % of 2000 level NOAA shellfish zones Polygon
41 11 Votes:1
Unit: coverage area
Indicator: habitat
in square miles
42 11 Votes:0
Path: change in average temperature | Average
43 12 ocean temperature
(Not considered at this time
Indicator: temperature Unit: Celsius per year
44 12 Votes:2 because offshore and out of N/A
45 12 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:4 range of Coos Bay watershed.)
Indicator: oceans Unit: degrees Celsius
46 12 Votes:0
47 13 Path: change in fishing revenue
Unit: annual revenue
Indicator: fish revenue
48 13 in $ Votes:0
49 13 Indicator: Fisheries Unit: Annual $ Votes:0 Statistical table
"56_Monthly_value_Charlesto
n.pdf" on fishing revenue by Table
species for Port of Charleston
(Coos Bay)
Statistical table
50 13 Indicator: fishing revenue Unit: dollars Votes:0
"56_Monthly_value_Charlesto
51 13 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3
n.pdf" on fishing revenue by Table
Indicator: economic Unit: dollars per year species for Port of Charleston
52 13 Votes:0
(Coos Bay)
Indicator: Fishing revenue Unit: dollars per year
53 13 Votes:4
Unit: dollars in tax
Indicator: fishing
54 13 revenue Votes:0
55 14 Path: dissolved oxygen levels
56 14 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:5
Unit: milligrams
Indicator: dissolved oxygen oxygen per liter OR streams water quality Line
57 14 water Votes:0
Unit: oxygen
Indicator: decreased dissolved oxygen
58 14 molarity Votes:0
59 15 Path: infrastructure | transportation | roads
60 15 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:2
Census TIGER roads for Coos
Line
Unit: average hourly County (FIPS 41011)
Indicator: roads damaged
capacity loss
61 15 Votes:2
Path: infrastructure | Watershed management |
62 16 susceptibility to flooding
63 16 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3
Unit: flood events
Indicator: watershed flooding
64 16 per year Votes:2 Oregon Coastal Atlas FEMA Q3
Polygon
flood map (see also Path 6)
Indicator: floods Unit: floods per year
65 16 Votes:0
Unit: Flood damage
Indicator: flooding
per year in dollars
66 16 Votes:2
Path: Indicator 'weather patterns' | Seasonal
67 17 rainfall in mm
Precip Change 2010-2030
68 17 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3
from Coastal Impacts Group Raster
Unit: Total seasonal (see also Paths 5 and 10)
Indicator: rain
rainfall in cm
69 17 Votes:3
Path: Changes in environmental chemistry |
70 18 Ocean pH level
71 18 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3 (Not considered at this time
72 18 Indicator: ocean pH Unit: pH Votes:2 because offshore and out of N/A
range of Coos Bay watershed.)
(Not considered at this time
because offshore and out of N/A
73 18 Indicator: acidification Unit: pH per year Votes:0 range of Coos Bay watershed.)
74 18 Indicator: acidity Unit: pH level Votes:0
75 18 Indicator: PH Unit: N/A Votes:0
Path: Changes in fauna | Biological productivity
76 19 of estuary
77 19 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:1
NOAA shellfish zones Polygon
Unit: kcal/ squared
Indicator: Biological productivity
meters/ year
78 19 Votes:4
Path: Changes in the overall economy | change
79 20 in agricultural production
80 20 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3 OR 2006 Land use/land cover Raster
Indicator: agricultural production per acre, 2010
Unit: $
81 20 dollars Votes:1
Path: Changes in the overall economy | change
82 21 in fishing revenue
83 21 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3 Statistical table
Indicator: Change in Fishing Revenue Unit: dollars per year "56_Monthly_value_Charlesto
84 21 Votes:2
n.pdf" on fishing revenue by Table
Unit: Fisheries
Indicator: business species for Port of Charleston
85 21 revenue in dollars Votes:0
86 21 Indicator: fishing Votes:0 (Coos Bay)
Unit: $ per year
Indicator: local fishing revenue, 2010 dollars Unit: $
87 21 Votes:1
Path: Changes in environmental chemistry |
88 22 dissolved oxygen levels
89 22 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:2
Indicator: Change in Dissolved Oxygen Unit: grams per liter OR streams water quality Line
90 22 Votes:0
Unit: milligram per
Indicator: dissolved oxygen
91 22 liter Votes:4
92 22 Indicator: decreased dissolved oxygen Unit: percentage Votes:0
Path: change in average temperature | Storm
93 23 strength and frequency
94 23 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:6 Tsunami inundation zone line Line
Unit: Wind speed in
Indicator: storm
95 23 miles Votes:0
Path: Changes in environmental chemistry |
96 24 Deforestation Rates
OR 2006 Land use/land cover Raster
Unit: hectares per
Indicator: deforestation
97 24 year Votes:2
98 24 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:2
Unit: meters squared
Indicator: Deforestation
99 24 per year Votes:0 OR 2006 Land use/land cover Raster
Unit: trees felled per
Indicator: timber
100 24 acre Votes:1
101 24 Indicator: degradation Unit: acre per year Votes:1
Unit: forest density
Indicator: forest
(% of area coverage)
102 24 Votes:0
Path: coastal and estuary damage | wave height USGS Coastal Vulnerability
103 25
104 25 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:2 Index for shoreline (see also Line
others)
Indicator: wave height Unit: average meters
105 25 Votes:2
Path: Effects on infrastructure | Damage to
106 26 coastal barriers
107 26 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3
Indicator: replacement costs-damage to coastal USGS Coastal Vulnerability
Unit: $
108 26 barriers Votes:4 Index for shoreline (see also Line
Path 1)
Indicator: damage Unit: dollars per year
109 26 Votes:0
Indicator: Loss Due to Damage to Coastal Barriers Unit: dollars per year
110 26 Votes:1
Path: Capacity of wastewater system | change in
111 27 pollution from sewer overflows OR streams water quality Line
112 27 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3
113 27 Indicator: sewer overflows Unit: ppm Votes:6
Path: Indicator 'weather patterns' | Storm
114 28 strength and frequency Tsunami inundation zone line
115 28 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3 Line
(see also Paths 23 and 25)
Indicator: storm Unit: counts per year
116 28 Votes:2
Path: Indicator 'weather patterns' | peak rainfall
117 29
Precip Change 2010-2030
118 29 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:2
from Climate Impacts Group Raster
Unit: Highest
(see also Paths 5, 10 and 17)
Indicator: rain recorded rainfall per
119 29 year in cm Votes:4
Path: Effects on infrastructure | wastewater
120 30 facilities | Capacity of wastewater system
121 30 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:3 (Location and capacity of Coos
Indicator: Capacity of wastewater system index Unit: % of demand Bay wastewater treatment
122 30 Votes:1 N/A
plants as point file not
Indicator: Capacity of Wastewater System Unit: gallons per day currently available)
123 30 Votes:3
Indicator: wastewater Unit: gallons per year
124 30 Votes:0
Path: Effects on infrastructure | Structural USGS Coastal Vulnerability
125 31 integrity
Index for shoreline (see also Line
126 31 Indicator: Recommend none of the following Unit: Votes:5
Paths 1 and 26)
127 31 Indicator: total infrastructure damages Unit: $ Votes:1
128 Reference Layer Coos Bay Watershed Polygon
129 Reference Layer Coos County Polygon
Color Receptor-Climate No. MapChat Group MapChat Layer Name See This Link for More Information
Receptor 2.4 Coastal
Green to red scale from "Very Shorelands; Receptor
Shoreline_Erosion_MetersPerYe
Low" to "Very High" rate of 1.2 Shore Protection Receptor
erosion in "EROSION"
ar
and Flood Control
Structures
Colored by land use/cover class
3.3 Forestry Receptor Land Use/Cover 2006
"Class_Name"
No stream segments in Coos
Bay watershed are in Category 2.1 Rivers and http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/
Receptor River Water Quality
1 for all parameters, including streams; 2.2 Estuaries wq/303d/WQAssessmentCats.html
dissolved oxygen, pH, fecal
No stream segments in Coos
Bay watershed are in Category http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/
1 for all parameters, including 2.2.5 Acidification Receptor N/A
wq/303d/WQAssessmentCats.html
dissolved oxygen, pH, fecal
coliform, etc.
Greyscale by precipitation Climate D
Climate Precip Change 2010 to 2030
change in mm Precipitation
(across all receptors);
Colored by "ZONE" in three
1.2 Shore protection
classes: "A" is red, "ANI" is Receptor Flood Zone
and flood control
grey, and "X500" is yellow.
structures
No stream segments in Coos
Bay watershed are in Category 2.1 Rivers and http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/
Receptor River Water Quality
1 for all parameters, including streams; 2.2 Estuaries wq/303d/WQAssessmentCats.html
dissolved oxygen, pH, fecal
Greenish-blue to blue by three
salinity zone classes in 2.2 Estuaries Receptor Salinity Zones
"SZNAME"
Greenish-blue to blue by three
salinity zone classes in 2.2 Estuaries Receptor Salinity Zones
"SZNAME"
Separate layer for each fish
species, colored by habitat use
in value field "fhdUseTy": Receptor 3.1.1 [Three layers]: Coho, Chinook,
Receptor
"Rearing" is red, "Spawning" is Salmonids Steelhead
yellow, "Migration" is black,
and "Unknown" is grey.
Greyscale by precipitation Climate D
Climate Precip Change 2010 to 2030
change in mm Precipitation
Red and green by
"SHELLCLASS" as to whether
2 Coastal natural
shellfishing is approved or Receptor Shellfish
systems (various)
prohibited based on point and
non-point source pollution
N/A 2.3 The Pacific Ocean Receptor N/A
http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/c
http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/comm
ommercial/landing_stats/2009Ann
Rep/56_Monthly_value_Charlesto
3.1 Ocean fisheries Receptor N/A ercial/landing_stats/2009AnnRep/56_
Monthly_value_Charleston.pdf
n.pdf
http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/c
http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/comm
ommercial/landing_stats/2009Ann
Rep/56_Monthly_value_Charlesto
3.1 Ocean fisheries Receptor N/A ercial/landing_stats/2009AnnRep/56_
Monthly_value_Charleston.pdf
n.pdf
No stream segments in Coos
Bay watershed are in Category
2.1 Rivers and http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/
1 for all parameters, including Receptor River Water Quality
streams; 2.2 Estuaries wq/303d/WQAssessmentCats.html
dissolved oxygen, pH, fecal
coliform, etc.
Grey or black but different line
thickness by value field 1.1.1 Coastal roads,
"ROAD_TYPE" where highways, and rail Receptor Roads
"Highway" are thick lines (line lines
thickness 2) and "Other" are
(across all receptors);
Colored by "ZONE" in three
1.2 Shore protection
classes: "A" is red, "ANI" is Receptor Flood Zone
and flood control
grey, and "X500" is yellow.
structures
Greyscale by precipitation Climate D
Climate Precip Change 2010 to 2030
change in mm Precipitation
2.3.5 Ocean
N/A Receptor N/A
acidification
2.3.5 Ocean
N/A Receptor N/A
acidification
Red and green by
"SHELLCLASS" as to whether
shell fishing is approved or 2.2 Estuaries Receptor Shellfish
prohibited based on point and
non-point source pollution.
Colored by land use/cover class Receptor 3.2
Receptor Land Use/Cover 2006
"Class_Name" Agriculture
http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/c
http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/comm
ommercial/landing_stats/2009Ann
Rep/56_Monthly_value_Charlesto
3.1 Ocean fisheries Receptor N/A ercial/landing_stats/2009AnnRep/56_
Monthly_value_Charleston.pdf
n.pdf
No stream segments in Coos
Bay watershed are in Category
2.1 Rivers and http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/
1 for all parameters, including Receptor River Water Quality
streams; 2.2 Estuaries wq/303d/WQAssessmentCats.html
dissolved oxygen, pH, fecal
coliform, etc.
Red B Storms Climate Tsunami Inundation
Colored by land use/cover class
3.3 Forestry Receptor Land Use/Cover 2006
"Class_Name"
Colored by land use/cover class
3.3 Forestry Receptor Land Use/Cover 2006
"Class_Name"
Green to red scale from "Low"
2.4 Coastal
to "Very High" wave heights in Receptor Shoreline_MeanWaveHeight_m
Shorelands
"WAVES"
Green to red scale from "Low" 1.2 Shore Protection
Shoreline_CoastalVulnerabilityIn
to "Very High" composite and Flood Control Receptor
vulnerability in "CVI" Structures
dex
No stream segments in Coos
Bay watershed are in Category 1.3 Municipal services http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/
Receptor River Water Quality
1 for all parameters, including wq/303d/WQAssessmentCats.html
dissolved oxygen, pH, fecal
Red B Storms Climate Tsunami Inundation
Greyscale by precipitation
D Precipitation Climate Precip Change 2010 to 2030
change in mm
1.2.3 Water supply
N/A and wastewater Receptor N/A
treatment
Green to red scale from "Low" 1.2 Shore Protection
Shoreline_CoastalVulnerabilityIn
to "Very High" composite and Flood Control Receptor
vulnerability in "CVI" Structures
dex
Grey or black Receptor CoosBayWatershed
Grey or black Receptor CoosCounty
Dear Robert,
This is what we need for each dataset you want to add to MapChat.
1. The name of the groups we will use for the layers we will include.
2. A projected dataset to epsg2992 (check
http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/2992/ if you have questions).
3. The group each dataset falls into.
4. The name as we wish it to appear.
5. The geographical extent of the dataset (hopefully all are within
the Coos Bay extend - 273148.15 577199.07 355902.78 654050.93).
6. If it is vector data we need type (point, line, polygon) and if you
want it symbolized, then each class needs:
a. A name.
b. An expression on what is in the class (for example '[ESI]' == '10').
c. The style (including color in RGB and size/width of lines).
7. If it is raster data, we need:
a. Type.
b. Transparency.
PROJCS["NAD83 / Oregon Lambert (ft)",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983",DATUM["D_North_American_1983",SPHERO
American_1983",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],UNIT["Degree",0.017453292519943295]],PR
17453292519943295]],PROJECTION["Lambert_Conformal_Conic"],PARAMETER["standard_parallel_1",43],PARAMETER["standard_parall
AMETER["standard_parallel_2",45.5],PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",41.75],PARAMETER["central_meridian",-120.5],PARAMETER["false_
20.5],PARAMETER["false_easting",1312335.958],PARAMETER["false_northing",0],UNIT["Foot",0.3048]]