Section A. Specific Aims
This competing continuation proposal examines a developmental model of adolescents‘ peer and family
experiences as predictors of long-term psychosocial outcomes in adulthood. The ongoing study represents
one of the most intensive extant observational assessments of adolescent social development within the
family and peer group. It includes in-depth, multi-method assessments of 184 adolescents obtained
annually from ages 13 to 22, including sociometric assessments, repeated observations of teen-parent and
teen-peer social interactions, and interview data from teens, parents, close and distal peers, and teen
romantic partners.
We propose to follow this original sample from ages 23 to 27 to examine theoretically-predicted links
from adolescent socialization experiences with peers and parents to psychosocial functioning in adulthood.
We focus upon two stage-salient tasks of adolescence—establishing autonomy and maintaining and building
social bonds—and we hypothesize that the resolution of these tasks will be fundamental to successful adult
psychosocial functioning. We also assess theoretically-salient cognitive, affective, and contextual factors that
may account for continuities and discontinuities from adolescent to adult relationship quality and functioning,
and that may potentially serve as targets for intervention efforts.
This study is designed not only to advance our theoretical understanding of adult social development, but
also to add an essential component to our understanding of adolescent development. We build on the large
body of research that has examined relational predictors of functioning within adolescence, but we now seek to
extend and ground this research by determining which of the many qualities of social relationships identified as
important within adolescence are actually predictive of long-term, life outcomes in adulthood. We organize our
efforts into three primary Aims identifying long-term relationship continuities, their mediators, and their ultimate
functional outcomes:
Aim 1: Parent and Peer Predictors of Adult Relationship Quality: We begin by seeking to identify critical
continuities and discontinuities in adolescent relationship qualities that persist into early adulthood. We focus
upon identifying predictors of aspects of adult relationships—particularly social isolation and hostility—known
to be closely linked to both mental and physical health. We will assess theoretically hypothesized continuities
across time, across relationship types, and across stage-salient patterns of behavior, in an effort to identify the
qualities of adolescent relationships with the greatest import for adult psychosocial functioning.
Aim 2: Mediators & Moderators of Continuities and Discontinuities from Adolescence to Adulthood:
We next examine several processes that potentially mediate the continuities or account for the discontinuities
identified in Aim 1. We focus on three specific factors that each have the potential to mediate or alter the
effects of critical adolescent experiences on future adult functioning. These include the individual‘s attachment
organization, rejection sensitivity, and major developmental/contextual transitions.
Aim 3: Early Adult Adaptational Outcomes: Direct & Mediated Pathways from Adolescence: Ultimately,
we are interested in the ways in which relationship continuities and intrapsychic and contextual factors
identified in the first two Aims ―flow through‖ to predict broader qualities of adult mental health and functioning.
In this Aim, we consider adolescent-era peer and family predictors of three key adult outcomes: internalizing
symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and the development of functional autonomy (e.g., the capacity to manage
one‘s own career, financial, and residential needs). We assess both direct predictions from adolescent
relationship qualities, as well as predictions mediated via adult relationship qualities (Aim 1) and intrapsychic
and contextual factors (Aim 2).
We address all of these questions with observational and multi-reporter data from a socio-
demographically heterogeneous final sample of 172 adolescents, their parents, peers, and romantic partners
followed across a fifteen-year span. Overall, this study seeks to identify essential qualities of adolescents‘
relationships with peers and parents that predict long-term success or failure in adult functioning so as to
inform: a) parents, educators, and clinicians working with adolescents and young adults; b) interventions
targeting parenting behaviors and/or peer influences (e.g., delinquency, aggression, and substance abuse
prevention and treatment programs); and c) developing theories of the links between social relationships and
functional outcomes across this critical portion of the lifespan.
Section B. Background & Significance
Early adulthood appears as a critical choice point in social development. The decrease in normative
role structures in this period is dramatic as individuals move from the universal schooling of adolescence to
diverse paths that may include marriage, full-time employment, continued educational pursuits, and residence
with parents, peers, a spouse, or on one‘s own (Arnett, 2000; Schulenberg et al., 2006). Residential and
geographic instability during this period also brings about rapid changes in peer networks (Osgood et al., 2005;
Schulenberg et al., 2005). Although these transitions are often positive, they become a source of stress for
those who have reached this point less prepared, and not surprisingly the incidence of mental health problems
increases steadily during this period (Gore & Aseltine, 2003; Osgood et al., 2005; Schulenberg et al., 2005;
Schulenberg et al., 2006).
The costs of failures to establish positive social relationships in early adulthood are staggering. As the
structured interactions of secondary schooling give way to the more diffuse social contacts provided by work or
higher education, social isolation becomes a major (albeit rarely studied) risk. Remarkably, meta-analyses
indicate that adult social isolation creates a greater overall risk of future mortality than does cigarette
smoking (House et al., 1988), with effects ranging from endothelial injury to disturbances in endocrine and
immune systems (Cacioppo et al., 2002; Knox & Uvnas-Moberg, 1998; Phillips et al., 2006; Uchino et al.,
1996). Social isolation has been linked to numerous psychosocial problems as well, ranging from anxiety,
depression, and risk of suicide, to long-term family problems (Barber et al., 2001; Kawachi, 2001; Newcomb &
Bentler, 1988). Levels of adult social isolation have increased dramatically in the United States over the past
two decades, with 1 in 4 adults now reporting they have no one with whom they can discuss important matters
in their lives—a phenomenon that crosses both gender and racial/ethnic lines (McPherson et al., 2006).
Although a lack of relationships can be debilitating, the presence of relationships characterized by high
degrees of hostile, conflictual behavior has equally troubling long-term ramifications. Enduring patterns
of hostility in relationships are linked not only to multiple DSM-IV Personality Disorder diagnoses, work
difficulties, and risk of completed suicide (Duberstein et al., 1996; McCann et al., 1997; Rutter & Behrendt,
2004; Virtanen et al., 2005), but also to negative physical health outcomes ranging from coronary heart
disease to immunological suppression (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 1993; Smith et al., 2003; Whiteman et al., 2000).
The magnitude of the problem is reflected in current estimates that 35% to 65% of young adults have been
involved in romantic relationships marked by violence between partners—rates that increase steadily from late
adolescence into the early twenties (Magdol et al., 1997).
Developmental Continuities & Discontinuities from Adolescence to Adulthood
To fully understand and prevent these negative adult outcomes requires understanding their links to
the developmental processes that preceded them. This proposed continuation is explicitly designed as a
study of both adolescence and adulthood. Most of our theoretical understanding of the principles of
adolescent development—from the push for autonomy to the intense focus on peer relationships—presumes
that this development is ultimately oriented toward preparing the adolescent to meet the challenges of
adulthood. Given the difficulties of conducting lifespan studies, however, the vast bulk of adolescent
research does not examine these actual adult outcomes, but rather identifies predictors of functioning within
adolescence. A critical challenge for our field, particularly in a world with limited resources for intervention, is
to distinguish those adolescent behaviors that are temporarily disturbing or troublesome from those that will
predict serious dysfunction in adulthood. Research on adult outcomes thus becomes essential for
understanding the long-term developmental import of many adolescent social experiences.
The proposed study will test a developmental conceptualization that considers relationship problems
in early adulthood as linked to two critical tasks in adolescence: the need to establish autonomous decision-
making capacity and the importance of developing and maintaining supportive social bonds. Figure 1 below
provides a broad heuristic overview of this conceptualization.
The experience of managing conflict in relationships so as to develop personal autonomy while
maintaining relationships has long been identified as a key feature of adolescent development (Allen et al.,
1994a; Hill & Holmbeck, 1986). Although there are a number of ways of conceptualizing such autonomy, we
have focused in adolescence upon the process of establishing verbal and emotional autonomy—assessed in
terms of the capacity to state one‘s own views during disagreements while maintaining a sense of
relatedness with one‘s partner in the discussion. Conceptualized in this way, autonomy in adolescent-parent
Early Adulthood
and adolescent-peer
Adolescence
relationships has been linked to
Parental Relationships Peer Relationships Relationships Behavioral Adaptation short-term outcomes such as
Verbal Behavioral Conflict lower levels of depression and
Functional
Autonomy vs. Autonomy Management Autonomy problem behaviors, and to
Enmeshment vs. Peer Pressure vs. Hostility
longer-term outcomes including
attachment security, reduced
Cognitive,
Externalizing susceptibility to peer pressure,
Affective,
& Contextual Symptoms and stronger peer relationships
Factors (Allen et al., 2006a; Allen &
Hauser, 1996; Allen et al.,
Social Support
Social Support Social Support
Internalizing 1994b; Allen et al., 2002a;
vs. Peer vs. Social
vs. Alienation
Rejection Isolation
Symptoms Chango et al., 2007).
Autonomy issues are
Figure 1 – Heuristic Overview of Social Developmental Tasks of Adolescence and Early Adulthood central to adolescent
development in large part
because the adolescent is preparing to transition not only to establishing new relationships characterized by
verbal and emotional autonomy but also to establishing behavioral autonomy across diverse contexts as an
adult. The verbal and emotional autonomy assessed in adolescence is thus thought to be the developmental
precursor of the capacity to act autonomously and self-sufficiently while establishing close relationships in
adulthood (O'Connor et al., 1996). Remarkably, however, almost no research to date has examined the
extent to which adolescent verbal and emotional autonomy processes lead not only to similar processes in
adult relationships, but also to broader elements of autonomous functioning within and beyond close adult
relationships.
Similarly, establishing supportive social relationships beyond the family is a central task of adolescence
that has also been theoretically linked to emotion regulation and social functioning across the lifespan
(Berscheid, 2003; Collins, 1997). Ironically, the same factors that increase the need for autonomous decision-
making and social support in early adulthood (e.g., geographic mobility, residential changes, major impending
life decisions) also make it more challenging to form and utilize stable close relationships to provide that
support. Thus, while the ability to establish supportive peer relationships is of great import during adolescence,
the template that these relationships establishes may become truly critical in early adulthood as peers become
primary sources of support. Surprisingly, this transition in support processes from adolescence to adulthood
has also only been minimally studied.
In assessing continuities and discontinuities from adolescence to adulthood, we adopt a critical
developmental tasks perspective on long-term continuities (Sroufe, 1997). This perspective recognizes that it
is under developmental stress—facing a conflict, a new social situation, or a personal challenge—that
profound difficulties in functioning are most likely to become manifest and lead to long-term negative
outcomes. We also recognize that to optimally inform both intervention and theory development, we need to
not only identify long-term continuities and discontinuities in development but also to begin to understand the
processes that can account for these continuities and discontinuities. This approach will permit greater
understanding both of factors in adolescence that have long-term prognostic value and of factors that may
help explain discontinuities in functioning over time—whether these discontinuities are manifest as resilience
in the face of prior risks or as deterioration relative to prior levels of functioning and experience.
In the proposed study, we begin by seeking to identify several specific, fundamental continuities in
autonomy and connection processes across a fifteen-year span from adolescence to adulthood (Aim 1). We
then examine affective, cognitive, and contextual mediators and moderators of the continuities and
discontinuities we observe (Aim 2). Ultimately, we consider both relationship processes and intrapsychic and
contextual factors as predictors of early adult mental health and broader patterns of functioning (Aim 3).
Aim 1: Parent and Peer Predictors of Early Adult Relationship Quality
Strikingly, the overwhelming majority of prospective studies of continuities and discontinuities in
relationship quality from adolescence onward leave off by age 23. This is the starting point of this
continuation and an age at which many adults are just beginning to make autonomous decisions with lifelong
ramifications, and to form close relationships that will be potentially lifelong in nature. Our first Aim is
designed to clarify the primary types of continuity that exist in relationship qualities from adolescence into
adulthood. As outlined in Figure 2 below, we propose a series of theoretically-derived hypotheses about
continuities across relationship types, across different types of behavior, and across developmental epochs.
Hypotheses for Aim 1:
1.1 Continuities in relationship qualities will be observed from parent-teen relationships in adolescence to peer
relationships in adulthood, and from non-romantic peer interactions in adolescence to romantic partner
interactions in adulthood.
In addition, specific behavioral continuities will be observed from:
1.2 Adolescent failure to establish autonomy in conflicts to hostility in adulthood;
1.3 Adolescent failure to obtain social support to both hostility and social isolation in adulthood.
Continuities Across Relationship Types. The transition from adolescence to adulthood is
accompanied by dramatic changes in both peer and parent
relationships. Peer relationships evolve from adolescent Expected Relationship Continuities:
chumships to lifelong romantic relationships, while relationships Adolescence to Early Adulthood
with parents are transitioning from dependent relationships to
equal (or even caretaking) relationships. We thus do not expect Continuities Across Relationship Type:
continuities across this period necessarily to be homotypic in Adolescence Adulthood
nature—a search for such homotypic continuity might well yield Parental Peer
more apparent discontinuity than continuity. Rather, consistent Relationships Relationships
with our focus on the critical developmental tasks of this period,
we expect to find heterotypic continuity in which success meeting Same Gender Romantic
salient social developmental tasks in adulthood is best predicted Friendships Relationships
by success meeting developmentally analogous tasks of
adolescence—even if these play out in different relationships with Continuities Across Relationship Behavior:
different challenges across these two eras. Adolescence Adulthood
We are increasingly finding that within adolescence, for Lack of Relationship
Autonomy Hostility
example, peer relationship qualities do not emerge de novo, but
rather display striking continuities with parent-teen relationship Lack of Social
qualities in domains ranging from warmth in interactions to Support/ Social
Rejection Isolation
management of conflicts (see Progress Report). We hypothesize
that this transfer from parent to peer interaction qualities will
Figure 2
continue into adulthood.
Similarly, we do not expect adult romantic relationship qualities necessarily to be best predicted by
qualities of early adolescent romantic relationships. In part, romantic relationships in early adolescence are
likely to lack the longevity necessary to allow true give-and-take intimacy and autonomy negotiations to fully
emerge, and the onset of these relationships appears more determined by local school and neighborhood
norms than by developmental status (Dornbusch, 1981; Roisman et al., 2004b). We do, however, expect
qualities of intimacy and autonomy in non-romantic close friendships and in parent-teen relationships to tap
developmental processes with great relevance for adult romantic relationship quality. Although peer
predictors of adult romantic relationship functioning have not been examined, this proposed link finds support
from studies within adolescence in which peer interactions outside of a romantic context predict qualities of
behavior within romantic relationships (Conger et al., 2001; Connolly et al., 2000a; Furman & Wehner, 1994;
Prinstein & La Greca, 2004). Initial evidence also suggests links between parenting and later romantic
relationship functioning (Donnellan et al., 2005). Qualities of these parent and peer relationships are
expected to account for aspects of adult romantic relationships over and above predictions from adolescent-
era romantic relationships—one example of the ways in which our developmental perspective can help
explain apparent discontinuities in different domains of functioning (e.g., in romantic behavior) over time.
Within early adulthood we also recognize that for many individuals, this is appropriately a time of exploration.
Thus, again using our developmental perspective, we focus not only on discrete outcomes (e.g., marriage)
but also on the task of engagement in relationships characterized by significant intimacy and support and by
absence of severe levels of hostile conflict and aggression.
Continuities from Undermined Autonomy to Adult Hostility. Although autonomy achievement
appears to be a fundamental task of adolescent development, the converse of autonomy over time does not
appear to be dependence, but hostility. In a prior, long-term follow-up with a clinical sample, adolescents
lacking verbal autonomy in observed interactions with their parents at age 16 were rated as significantly more
hostile (r = .50***) by their peers 9 years later at age 25 (Allen et al., 2002a). Similarly, others have found that
difficulties with separation/individuation from parents predicts poor adjustment in young, newly married couples
(Haws & Mallinckrodt, 1998; Kim et al., 2001). A lack of autonomy appears to set up the adolescent or early
adult to see any conflict in relationships as a threat to a fragile sense of personal autonomy and to respond
hostilely in return.
We thus hypothesize that one of the primary predictors of later hostility across an array of relationships
will be difficulty achieving autonomy vis a vis parental and peer relationships. We also expect considerable
stability in levels of hostile behavior over time based on existing findings regarding hostility in both intimate
partner relationships (Connolly et al., 2000a; Connolly & Goldberg, 1999; Connolly et al., 2000b; Furman et al.,
2002) and same gender relationships (Nelson & Dishion, 2004). Gender, socioeconomic status, and
racial/ethnic main effects also appear potentially linked to future hostility (Caetano et al., 2000; Rennison &
Planty, 2003; Rosen et al., 2002), and we will incorporate these factors into our analyses as covariates and
potential moderators.
Continuities in Social Support Processes. While at least some research has focused on
continuities in patterns of conflict from adolescence onward, there has been a dearth of research examining
predictions from adolescent experiences of social support or rejection to later adult social isolation or hostility.
Attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969/1982, 1988) suggests that experiences of support under stress are likely to
have enduring impacts upon future social cognition and behavior. Parents who provide a secure base of
support for their adolescents may leave them with a fundamental comfort and desire to seek out similar
relationships throughout the lifespan, including the formation of secure intimate partner relationships in
adulthood (Donnellan et al., 2005; Sroufe, 2005; Sroufe et al., 2005b). Beyond the family, close adolescent
friendships—in addition to serving as significant contemporaneous sources of support—also serve as a
training ground for navigating adult-like relationships among equals.
In contrast to supportive relationships, the experience of social rejection can be one of the most
searing negative experiences in the adolescent‘s social world. Rejection by peers in childhood or
adolescence is linked to outcomes within adolescence ranging from depressive symptoms to antisocial
behavior and aggression (Laird et al., 2001; Nelson & Dishion, 2004; Prinstein et al., 2005). Adults, unlike
adolescents, can more readily select their peer groups—thus the risk of rejection by one‘s peers may be
comparatively less—but this risk of rejection may simply be replaced by greater risks of social isolation for
adults seeking to avoid peer rejection. Also, as development progresses, peers can simply ‗vote with their
feet‘ by avoiding contact with other undesired peers. Sroufe and colleagues (2005b) report significant links
between prior parent and peer relationships and social functioning up through age 21. Two long-term
longitudinal studies have found continuities from positive childhood interactions with peers to positive adult
peer relationships (Bagwell et al., 1998; Eisenberg et al., 2002). These provide at least inferential evidence
that qualities of peer relationships in adolescence will predict ability to form and maintain subsequent close
adult peer relationships. Accordingly, we expect to find continuity from both absence of social support and
from experiences of social rejection in adolescence to increased risk for adult social isolation and for ongoing
hostility in adult social relationships that do become established.
Aim 2: Mediators and Moderators of Continuities and Discontinuities from Adolescence to
Adulthood
Although identifying key relationship continuities across the critical transition from adolescence to
early adulthood is an important first step, several essential follow-up questions immediately arise: How are
long-term continuities in relationship behaviors maintained? And in the absence of long-term continuities,
what factors can predict or explain disruptions in such continuities over time? The mediators and moderators
of such continuities and discontinuities, if they can be identified, provide promising targets for both preventive
and remedial interventions to improve adult outcomes. We view mediation from the vantage point of theories
of cumulative continuity (Caspi et al., 1989; Rutter & Sroufe, 2000), which suggest that adolescent-era
experiences will predict adult outcomes in part because the consequences of these experiences accumulate
so as to make similar future experiences more likely. Rather than trying to assess every potential mediator,
we hew closely to our theoretical focus by assessing ways in which processes of negotiating autonomy and
support in relationships become internalized or instantiated in social contexts to mediate relationship
continuities over time (see Figure 3 below). We assess factors that may explain continuities and
Adolescent Relationships Adult Relationships discontinuities in autonomy and support processes at
Internal & Contextual Mediators
multiple levels of analysis, from intrapsychic factors such as
Verbal
Autonomy vs.
Attachment Relationship attachment states of mind and rejection sensitivity to
Security Hostility
Enmeshment broader contextual factors such as entry into marriage or
independent residential status, recognizing that these levels
of analysis are interrelated.
Rejection
Sensitivity Hypotheses for Aim 2:
2.1: Attachment security will mediate links from social
Social Social support and verbal autonomy in adolescence to social
Contextual
Support
Changes
Support support and avoidance of hostility in adulthood.
vs. Rejection vs. Isolation
2.2: Rejection sensitivity will mediate links from adolescent
Figure 3 – Proposed Mediators of Relationship Continuities & Discontinuities experiences of parental and peer rejection to adult hostility
and social isolation.
2.3: Contextual changes will partially account for both continuities and discontinuities from adolescent-era
experiences to adult hostility, social isolation, and psychosocial functioning.
Attachment security. As noted above, Bowlby‘s attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969/1982; Bowlby, 1980)
posits a fundamental human orientation toward utilizing others to manage experiences of stress, challenge,
and potential danger. By adolescence, it is possible to assess internalized states of mind regarding
attachment to capture the individual‘s basic orientation toward attachment relationships (Hesse, 1999). A
vast body of work over the past two decades has established links from security in this state of mind to
markers of functioning, including severe mental illness, hostility in relationships, social isolation, and
intergenerational transmission of patterns of childrearing (Kobak & Sceery, 1988; Rosenstein & Horowitz,
1996; Sroufe et al., 2005a; van IJzendoorn & Bakermans-Kranenburg, 1997). Although sometimes stable
across multiple generations (Benoit & Parker, 1994), attachment security also appears to be susceptible to
influence by environmental factors (Waters et al., 2000; Weinfield et al., 2000). Within adolescence, both
intrapsychic and family relationship factors can predict change (i.e., discontinuity) in levels of security (Allen
et al., 2004). No research, however, has examined changing attachment representations across the
transition to adulthood, even though this period is marked by fundamental shifts in attachment as peers and
romantic partners ultimately replace parents as primary attachment figures. We posit that changes in
security in an individual‘s model of attachment will be predicted by qualities of autonomy and social support in
relationships with parents and close peers in adolescence. Further, internalized attachment security is
expected to mediate links from these relationship qualities to the ability to attain social support, establish
secure attachment relationships with intimate partners, and avoid hostility in social relationships in adulthood.
Rejection sensitivity. Sensitivity to rejection has recently emerged as a primary marker of risk for a
broad array of negative psychosocial outcomes. Rejection sensitivity captures a cognitive and affective
orientation toward social relationships in which the individual has heightened expectations of rejection, a
tendency to perceive rejection in ambiguous situations, and hypersensitivity to actual experiences of rejection
(Downey & Feldman, 1996; Downey et al., 1998a). Rejection sensitivity appears to function as a broad
interpersonal vulnerability that distorts social behavior and creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of rejection in
relationships (Downey et al., 1999; Downey et al., 2000; Downey et al., 1998b; Pietrzak et al., 2005).
Rejection sensitivity and related attributional biases have been linked to a wide array of negative outcomes
ranging from depression and avoidance of social situations, to conflict and aggression in close relationships
(Downey & Feldman, 1996; Downey et al., 2004; Prinstein & Aikins, 2004). Although we know a great deal
about what rejection sensitivity predicts, aside from one study linking rejection sensitivity to insecure
attachment (Downey et al., 1998b), we know very little about the relationship experiences that lead an
individual to develop rejection sensitivity over time. We hypothesize that parental and peer rejection of
adolescents‘ efforts to attain social support will predict increasing rejection sensitivity which in turn will mediate
continuities to later social isolation and/or hostility in relationships in adulthood.
Contextual changes and developmental continuities and discontinuities. As noted above, early
adulthood is marked by significant shifts in social context, some of which actually reflect developing functional
autonomy, and each of which potentially affects psychosocial functioning. Our approach recognizes that
major contextual changes in early adulthood (ranging from leaving home and entering full-time employment
to becoming a parent) may serve as potential sources of both continuity and discontinuity in relationship
qualities and in psychosocial functioning (Schulenberg et al., 2006).
Certain contextual transitions (e.g., becoming and remaining married in early adulthood) are expected
to reflect continuity in development if they grow out of prior positive relationship experiences (e.g., adolescent
friendship qualities) and predict similar future relational outcomes. This may occur in part because
individuals select similar relational contexts over time (Furman et al., 2002). Alternatively, contextual changes
are also expected to account for some discontinuities that reflect resilience. For example, desistance from
adolescent-era patterns of criminal behavior often follows entry into marriage, which in turn may reflect an
underlying capacity to form positive social relationships (Roisman et al., 2004a; Uggen & Massoglia, 2003).
Thus, even in the midst of behavior problems during adolescence, factors such as a developing capacity to
establish positive relationships may serve as an underlying source of future resilience (Kandel & Raveis,
1989; Masten et al., 2004). Conversely, relationship dissolution through divorce has been consistently
associated with increases in depression and life stress (Maciejewski et al., 2001; Whisman et al., 2006).
Divorce and/or high degrees of relationship instability may thus help explain increasing symptom trajectories
for individuals who were not particularly depressed in adolescence, but who were establishing unstable
relationship patterns that would ultimately create future risks for depressive symptoms.
Moderating effects of contextual factors also warrant consideration. For example, leaving home is
associated with a reduction in the predictive value of parent-teen relationship qualities (Aquilino, 1997). Still
other contextual factors may not serve as mediators or moderators, but are expected to simply increase our
ability to explain variance in key outcomes over and above predictions from adolescence. For example,
childbirth and the early years of parenting are associated with slight increases in distress and risk for
depression on the part of both parents; the physical separations of leaving home have been associated with
positive changes in relations to parents and reduced depression; and entry into marriage and full-time
employment predicts closer, less conflicted parent-offspring relationships (Aquilino, 1997; Dubas & Petersen,
1996; Mayseless, 1998; Ross et al., 1991).
Aim 3: Early Adult Adaptational Outcomes: Direct & Mediated Pathways from Adolescence
In our final Aim, we examine the ways in which the relational and intrapsychic processes identified in
the first two Aims ultimately lead to mental health and adaptational outcomes of consequence in early
adulthood. We examine three main classes of outcomes: functional autonomy, internalizing behaviors, and
externalizing behaviors. We account for past levels of these behaviors in analyses and we repeatedly assess
these outcomes in adulthood, recognizing that they are still unfolding during this period. We consider both
direct predictions from adolescence as well as ways in which both adult relationship qualities (Aim 1) and
internal states and contextual factors (Aim 2) may mediate observed predictions and carry continuities or help
explain meaningful discontinuities in functioning—recognizing that each type of pathway has significant
implications for prevention efforts. Given the nascent state of developmental theory regarding early
adulthood, we do not attempt to frame all predicted relations within a single overarching model. Instead, we
test carefully circumscribed models delineating what we hypothesize to be the most important and
theoretically-supported specific pathways from adolescence to adult functioning.
Hypotheses for Aim 3:
3.1: Developing Functional Autonomy will be predicted by verbal autonomy in adolescent-parent relationships
as mediated via ongoing support in both peer and parent relationships in adulthood.
3.2: Internalizing symptoms will be predicted by lack of supportive parent and peer relationships in
adolescence as mediated via attachment insecurity, rejection sensitivity, and adult social isolation.
3.3: Externalizing behaviors will be predicted by rejection and autonomy difficulties in parent and peer
relationships in adolescence, as mediated via rejection sensitivity and lack of supportive adult peer and
romantic relationships.
3.4 Gender effects will be observed for both internalizing and externalizing symptoms and will be partially
mediated via markers of relationship functioning; moderating effects are expected in several discrete areas.
Functional autonomy. Perhaps the single greatest developmental task of early adulthood is
establishing functional autonomy, as manifest in career development, financial self-sufficiency, and
residential independence. Our approach recognizes that struggles to develop such autonomy may take
many shapes ranging from heightened attention to education at the temporary expense of financial
independence, to early marriage and complete financial independence, to poverty and continued
dependence upon parents. We conceptualize functional autonomy broadly, considering both continuous
indicators of increasing competence in key domains as well as progress through specific key transitions of
early adulthood (e.g., taking on full-time career pursuits via employment or pursuit of advanced degrees;
residential independence; entry into long-term intimate partner relationships; etc.). Overall, there is evidence
that the sheer number of positive transitions toward functional autonomy is a reasonable marker of positive
adaptive outcomes (Schulenberg et al., 2005).
In early adulthood, parental relationships, when available, can span the gamut from serving as
unwavering sources of support for developing independence to anxiety-provoking sources of distress (Rossi &
Rossi, 1990; Umberson, 1992). Even aside from theoretical, clinical, and policy considerations, many parents
are eager (if not desperate) for guidance as to how to facilitate the continued development of their offspring
beyond adolescence. Studies with college students link parental relationship quality to career development
(Blustein et al., 1991; Ryan et al., 1996), and our own research on a clinical population finds links between
adolescent-parent interactions and later educational attainment (Bell et al., 1996). Unfortunately, the quality of
parental relationships as a predictor of independent functioning beyond the college years has received virtually
no attention in research to date.
Adult peer relationships can also be an important source of both information and social motivation
toward achieving self-sufficiency. In adolescence, we have identified strong socializing influences of peers,
though not always in desirable directions (Allen et al., 2005). In adulthood, at least one peer behavior—
formation of a stable, long-term romantic relationship—has been linked to significant moves toward functional
autonomy and desistance of antisocial behavior (Christensen, 2003; Giordano et al., 2004; Meeus et al., 2004;
Robbins, 1991; Sampson & Laub, 2005). Conversely, rejection by peers as early as age 9 has been found to
predict poor young adult career and educational outcomes for males up through age 23, even after controlling
for baseline academic skills (Nelson & Dishion, 2004).
We hypothesize that the development of early adult functional autonomy will be predicted by both
verbal autonomy in prior parent-teen relationships and adolescent experiences developing supportive peer
relationships, and that these predictions will be mediated via supportive peer and parent relationships in
adulthood.
Internalizing symptoms. Several lines of research suggest that adult internalizing symptoms are
likely to be predicted by adolescent relationship experiences. An extensive body of research within adulthood
links internalizing behaviors to problematic and stressful qualities of concurrent peer and parental relationships
(Amato, 1994; Amato & Sobolewski, 2001; Barnett et al., 1991; Davila, 2001a, 2001b; Davila et al., 2003;
Pearson et al., 1993). Within adolescence, social interaction patterns have been linked to depressive
symptoms, with a combination of withdrawal, anger and rejection predicting increases in depressive symptoms
over time (Allen et al., 2006b; Galambos et al., 2004; Harter & Whitesell, 1996; Nolan et al., 2003; Prinstein &
Aikins, 2004; Prinstein et al., 2005). One small, long-term study of 30 individuals predicted self-worth (an
inverse correlate of depression) at age 28 from problems in early adolescent peer relationships (Bagwell et al.,
1998; Bagwell et al., 2001). Beyond this one study, however, almost no research has examined whether adult
internalizing symptoms are linked to qualities of social relationships in adolescence.
Aggressive/Externalizing behaviors. Social relationships appear to play an important role in the
cessation of patterns of externalizing behavior in early adulthood. Given that this is a period during which
many antisocial behaviors decrease rapidly or desist entirely (Moffitt, 1993), it is noteworthy that romantic
relationship formation appears linked to these declines (Giordano et al., 2004; Meeus et al., 2004; Sampson
& Laub, 1993, 2005). Similarly, at least through age 23, positive peer relationships have been shown to play
an ameliorative role with respect to aggressive behavior (Capaldi et al., 2001; Lackey & Williams, 1995;
Williamson & Silverman, 2001). At the same time, association with deviant peers remains linked to
externalizing behavior in adulthood just as it is in adolescence (Shortt et al., 2003), and rejection by peers in
middle childhood has been found to predict male antisocial behavior through age 23 (Nelson & Dishion,
2004). Our expectation is that qualities of support in parent and non-romantic peer relationships in
adolescence will predict decreased rejection sensitivity and increased capacity to move successfully into
supportive (vs. hostile) peer and romantic relationships in adulthood which in turn will predict decreases in
externalizing behavior across this period. Similarly, just as social relationships appear linked to higher levels
of substance use for some groups in adolescence (Allen et al., 2005), by early adulthood, these relationships
may play a protective role, with factors such as marriage and the transition to full-time work coinciding with
decreasing levels of use (Schulenberg et al., 2005). This study will be well positioned to identify the
distinction between these short- vs. long-term predictions from adolescent social relationship qualities to
future levels of alcohol and substance use and related problems.
Gender and Adaptational Outcomes. Gender differences in early adult outcomes appear most
pronounced with respect to main effects on the incidence of major depression and antisocial behavior.
Females display a higher incidence of major depression and males display higher levels of antisocial
behaviors, although both effects diminish greatly under some conditions (e.g., if continuous measures of
depressive symptoms are used, or if milder forms of aggression in romantic relationships are examined)
(Angold et al., 2002; Compas et al., 1997; Kovacs, 1992; Moffitt et al., 2001).
Efforts to examine psychosocial mediators of gender differences have included a promising focus on
ruminative approaches to handling stress as helping to account for gender differences in depression (Nolen-
Hoeksema, 2001, 2006; Treynor et al., 2003). Anxious attachment models may create particular
susceptibility to ruminative approaches and have also been linked directly to depressive symptoms (Allen et
al., 1998; Birnbaum et al., 1997; Marsh et al., 2003; Mikulincer, 1995; Pistole, 1989). For aggressive
behavior, males‘ higher rates appear potentially linked to greater exposure to provocative situations
(Bettencourt & Miller, 1996), which may follow from patterns of difficulty handling autonomy negotiations.
Efforts to examine gender as a moderator of processes leading to negative outcomes have yielded
more conflicting results, although some areas of consensus are emerging. For both depressive and
externalizing symptoms, several multi-site studies and meta-analyses have found similarity across genders
(i.e., lack of moderation) for the vast majority of predictors of future functioning (Bettencourt & Miller, 1996;
Hyde, 1984; Hyde, 2005; Moffitt et al., 2001; Sternberg et al., 2006). In particular, the effects of contextual
transitions on functioning thus far appear similar for males and females (Schulenberg et al., 2005). Some
findings of apparent gender moderation (e.g., that females are more affected by romantic partners‘ criminal
behavior (Moffitt et al., 2001)) are contradicted by other studies that find the opposite (Capaldi et al., 2007).
Nonetheless, several discrete areas of potential gender moderating effects appear more consistently.
Females appear more susceptible to disruptions in everyday social interactions than males and may respond
with increases in depressive symptoms (Crawford et al., 2001; Davies & Lindsay, 2004; Leadbeater et al.,
1999; Taylor et al., 2000). For antisocial behavior, predictions for males appear to be strongest from
problems in work and legal areas, whereas for females such predictions may be stronger from lack of family
support and depression (Moffitt et al., 2001; Windle, 1992). Exploration into potential gender moderation in
other areas, such as romantic relationship behavior is just beginning. These moderating effects are modest
overall, in that effects for males and females are typically in the same direction but simply of different
magnitude; some have argued that these effects may even be decreasing over time (Hyde, 2005; Whisman &
Beach, 2001; Whisman et al., 2006).
With this study‘s proposed intensive assessment of both interpersonal and attachment processes, it
will be well situated to examine main effects of gender as well as psychosocial factors that mediate gender
effects. Although this study is not designed to conduct highly powered explorations of moderating effects of
gender, power will be sufficient to detect small-to-medium-sized or greater moderating effects that could
potentially alter interpretations of other observed relations and these will be consistently explored.
Other demographic covariates and moderators. For the majority of the predicted continuities in
this Aim, demographic factors other than gender display occasional main effects on outcomes of interest,
though only very inconsistent evidence of moderating effects. Family of origin socioeconomic status and
race/ethnicity display main effects, for example, for internalizing symptoms (Aneshensel & Sucoff, 1996;
Birnbaum et al., 1997; Elliot, 2001; Miech et al., 1999; Smith et al., 2006; Zimmerman et al., 2004),
educational attainment (McLoyd, 1998), and externalizing behaviors (Redding et al., 2005; Rutter et al., 1998;
Skinner et al., 1992). Given these findings, we assess each of these factors as potential covariates in all
analyses. Given broader theoretical interest in the possible moderating effects of social context (e.g., see
Quintana et al., 2006), we also test for such moderating effects, but we do not begin with a priori hypotheses
regarding such effects.
Conclusions
The proposed study is designed to break new scientific ground by: 1) bringing a large body of
adolescence research to fruition by establishing links from previously identified adolescent behaviors of
interest to ultimate success or failure in adult functioning up to 15 years later; and 2) developing a theoretical
model for understanding social functioning in the early adult years that places it in the context of prior
developmental experience. The specific framework utilized (i.e., intensive analysis of autonomy and
connection negotiations in adolescent relationships) is already informing intervention efforts in families and in
secondary schools (Allen et al., 1994c; Allen & Pianta, 2006; Cummings, 2006; Pianta & Allen, 2006). The
proposed study is designed to enhance this and related work by extending our understanding of adolescent
development to increase our understanding of its connections to future adult functioning.
Section C. Progress Report
To assure continuity in data collection and sample retention, this competing continuation proposal is
being submitted 3 ¾ years into the current 5-year funding period. In this time, we have met all major goals
from our most recent proposal. Data collection is ahead of schedule: We collected a planned 4 waves of
data in the first funding period, and we have virtually completed our 4th wave (of 5) of data collection in this
current period, and our 8th overall. We began with a sample of 184 eligible target adolescents and have
retained over 97% as active participants in the study to date. We also promptly code multiple types of
observed interactions with parents, with peers, and with romantic partners on an ongoing basis. As a result,
we are able to report on published data up through wave 6, and conference data and recent analyses
through wave 7 (our most recently completed wave of data collection).
Given that the affectively charged social situations of greatest interest in adolescence are those in
which self-reports are considered least likely to be consistently reliable (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977), our
assessment strategy emphasizes use of observational methods and multi-reporter strategies to allow us to
triangulate in on critical phenomena. We also recognize that even with careful measurement, social
experiences are less likely to be formative for future development if they are transient. We address this issue
by obtaining repeated measurements of our critical constructs, as outlined below. The result is a uniquely
detailed picture of our target participants‘ relationship experiences over the course of their adolescence.
We approach dissemination by focusing upon producing broad, high-impact, empirical papers in top-
tier journals (e.g., Child Development, Development & Psychopathology, Journal of Consulting & Clinical
Psychology, etc.). In the past 5 years, this grant has led to over 105 publications, presentations, or
dissertations. These include: the publication of 34 papers plus an additional 8 papers under review (Of these
42 papers, 34 are empirical.); one book (published by Harvard University Press); 6 doctoral theses; and 65
presentations at national conferences.
All relations that we report below are significant at least at the p .82) even down to small-to-medium
effect sizes (equivalent to =.23). Even in the atypical case in which the sample would need to be split to
examine effects across different levels of a moderator variable (e.g., gender), power will be 85% for medium
effects (not tabled). Interactions are effects in a multiple regression and so the table above continues to
apply. Power should be adequate to detect small-to-medium sized and greater interactions (e.g., interactions
large enough to significantly alter the substantive interpretation of any main effects observed).
Power in multivariate models. Although assessment of statistical power within SEM, LGCM & HLM is
exceedingly complex and diverse approaches exist (Gerbing & Anderson, 1985; MacCallum et al., 1996;
Tanaka, 1987), Bentler (1989) suggests that acceptable parameters can be obtained with ratios of subjects to
estimated parameters of at least 5:1 (with 10:1 being a more conservative estimate), if using normal and
elliptical theory assumptions. For our sample, this leaves 17 to 34 free parameters that can be estimated in
any given model. Given the current state of the literature, we have intentionally designed this study not to test
comprehensive models of development, but rather to carefully and precisely examine a set of discrete
hypotheses about individual pathways between adolescent experience and adult outcomes. As a result, the
highly delimited questions addressed by this study fall within these guidelines. If SEM fails to produce
convergent or satisfactory models for some analyses, we will fall back to a multiple regression strategy,
addressing the same questions albeit from a somewhat less rich perspective. Moreover, these models can, if
necessary, be further simplified by fixing error terms for latent variables and parameters for loadings of
manifest variables onto latent variables across time. Demographic effects, where present, can be fixed
based on prior estimates from OLS regression analyses when these are not directly relevant to a hypothesis.
The discussion above is not meant to imply that we see ourselves as having carte blanche to pursue
these data with an LGC/SEM approach. Rather, it shows that our approaches are feasible for the type of
relatively simple, tightly specified models that we plan to use to test the main hypotheses of this study. We
recognize that power will always be constrained in research of this type, but we believe that our record of
working with this and other similar-sized data sets demonstrates that we can effectively utilize this sample to
glean tremendous knowledge about predictors of critical outcomes across a significant part of the lifespan.
Type I error rates. We fully recognize the danger of inflating Type I error rates in a study as rich and
intensive as we are proposing, and the need for care in interpreting results even after efforts are taken to
minimize the number of hypotheses tested. The plan outlined above is designed to reduce these concerns
by ultimately focusing all hypothesis testing on constructs derived from multiple measures, thus minimizing
the actual number of constructs and hypotheses to be examined, and increasing the care with which they can
each be assessed. Where multiple analytic methods are used, we will interpret findings only when a
consistent pattern of results emerges across methods. After testing the proposed hypotheses, it is of course
not only possible but desirable to fully utilize the richness of the obtained data to engage in secondary and
exploratory analyses to generate additional hypotheses. We expect ultimately to engage in this process, but
plan to keep it clearly distinct from our pursuit of the basic aims of this study.
Literature Cited
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the child behavior checklist. Burlington, VT:
University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Achenbach, T. M., & McConaughy, S. H. (2003). The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment.
In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment
of children: Personality, behavior, and context (2nd ed., pp. 406-430). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional
problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin,
101, 213-232.
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2003). Manual for the ASEBA Adult Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT:
University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
Allen, J. P. (2006). Teens, Peers, & Driving: The Perfect Storm? Paper presented at the National Research
Council of the National Academy of Science, Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Committee on
the Contributions from the Behavioral Sciences in Reducing and Preventing Teen Motor Crashes,
Washington, D. C.
Allen, J. P., & Antonishak, J. (In Press). Adolescent Peer Influences: Beyond the Dark Side. In M. J. Prinstein
& K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Peer Influence Processes Among Youth. New York: Guilford Press.
Allen, J. P., Antonishak, J., McFarland, F. C., & Meyer, J. R. (2006a). Parents Influencing Peers and/or Peers
Influencing Parents? Transactional Model of Autonomy Development from Age 13 to 18. Paper
presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Francisco,
California.
Allen, J. P., & Hall, F. D. (2002). Observed autonomy and connection with parents and peers as predictors of
early adolescent sexual adaptation. Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for
Research in Adolescence, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Allen, J. P., & Hauser, S. T. (1996). Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors
of young adults' states of mind regarding attachment. Development & Psychopathology, 8, 793-809.
Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K., Boykin, K. A., & Tate, D. C. (1996a). Autonomy and relatedness coding
system manual. Charlottesville, Virginia: University of Virginia.
Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O'Connor, T. G. (1994a). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and
relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-
esteem. Child Development, 65, 179-194.
Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Eickholt, C., Bell, K. L., & O'Connor, T. G. (1994b). Autonomy and relatedness in
family interactions as predictors of expressions of negative adolescent affect. Journal of Research on
Adolescence, 4, 535-552.
Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., O'Connor, T. G., & Bell, K. L. (2002a). Prediction of peer-rated adult hostility from
autonomy struggles in adolescent-family interactions. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 123-
137.
Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., O'Connor, T. G., Bell, K. L., & Eickholt, C. (1996b). The connection of observed
hostile family conflict to adolescents' developing autonomy and relatedness with parents.
Development & Psychopathology, 8, 425-442.
Allen, J. P., Insabella, G. M., Porter, M. R., Smith, F. D., Land, D. J., & Phillips, N. K. (2006b). A Social-
Interactional Model Of The Development Of Depressive Symptoms In Adolescence. Journal of
Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 74, 55-65.
Allen, J. P., Kuperminc, G., Philliber, S., & Herre, K. (1994c). Programmatic prevention of adolescent problem
behaviors: The role of autonomy, relatedness, and volunteer service in the Teen Outreach Program.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 617-638.
Allen, J. P., Leadbeater, B. J., & Aber, J. L. (1990). The relationship of adolescents' expectations and values
to delinquency, hard drug use, and unprotected sexual intercourse. Development & Psychopathology,
2, 85-98.
Allen, J. P., Leadbeater, B. J., & Aber, J. L. (1994d). The development of problem behavior syndromes in at-
risk adolescents. Development & Psychopathology, 6, 323-342.
Allen, J. P., Marsh, P., McFarland, C., McElhaney, K. B., Land, D. J., Jodl, K. M., et al. (2002b). Attachment
and autonomy as predictors of the development of social skills and delinquency during
midadolescence. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 70, 56-66.
Allen, J. P., McElhaney, K. B., Kuperminc, G. P., & Jodl, K. M. (2004). Stability and change in attachment
security across adolescence. Child Development, 75, 1792-1805.
Allen, J. P., McElhaney, K. B., Land, D. J., Kuperminc, G. P., Moore, C. M., O'Beirne-Kelley, H., et al. (2003).
A Secure Base in Adolescence: Markers of Attachment Security in the Mother-Adolescent
Relationship. Child Development, 74, 292-307.
Allen, J. P., Moore, C., Kuperminc, G., & Bell, K. (1998). Attachment and adolescent psychosocial
functioning. Child Development, 69, 1406-1419.
Allen, J. P., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Recasting the Secondary School Classroom as a Context for Positive
Youth Development: 3-Year Grant Proposal Awarded Funding by the William T. Grant Foundation.
Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., & McFarland, C. F. (2006c). Leaders and Followers in Adolescent Close
Friendships: Susceptibility to Peer Influence as a Predictor of Peer Pressure, Risky Behavior, and
Depression. Development & Psychopathology, 18, 155-172.
Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, C. F., Marsh, P. A., & McElhaney, K. B. (2005). The Two Faces of
Adolescents' Success with Peers: Adolescent Popularity, Social Adaptation, and Deviant Behavior.
Child Development, 76, 747-760.
Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, F. C., McElhaney, K. B., & Marsh, P. A. (in press). The Relation of
Attachment Security to Adolescents‘ Paternal and Peer Relationships, Depression, and Externalizing
Behavior. Child Development.
Amato, P. R. (1994). Father-child relations, mother-child relations, and offspring psychological well-being in
early adulthood. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 56, 1031.
Amato, P. R., & Sobolewski, J. M. (2001). The effects of divorce and marital discord on adult children's
psychological well-being. American Sociological Review, 66, 900.
Aneshensel, C. S., & Sucoff, C. A. (1996). The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. Journal of
Health and Social Behavior, 37, 293.
Angold, A., Erkanli, A., Silberg, J., Eaves, L., & Costello, E. J. (2002). Depression scale scores in 8-17-year-
olds: effects of age and gender. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 1052-1063.
Antonishak, J., Allen, J. P., & McFarland, F. C. (2006). Social Competencies and Peer Relationships:
Longitudinal Associations with Peer Group and Adolescent Aggression. Paper presented at the
Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Francisco, California.
Antonishak, J., Schlatter, A. K. W., & Allen, J. P. (2005). Instability in Adolescent Peer Groups: Predictors
and Problem Behavior Outcomes. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting for the Society for
Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA (2005).
Appleby, L., Dyson, V., Altman, E., & Luchins, D. J. (1997). Assessing substance use in multiproblem
patients: Reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index in a mental hospital population. Journal
of Nervous and Mental Disease, 185, 159-165.
Aquilino, W. S. (1997). From Adolescent to Young Adult: A Prospective Study of Parent-Child Relations
during the Transition to Adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 670-686.
Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. M. R. E.
Schumaker (Ed.), Advanced structural modeling: Issues and Techniques (pp. 243-277). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual
differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth &
Adolescence, 16, 427-454.
Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1989). Inventory of parent and peer attachment.Unpublished
manuscript, Seattle, Washington.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.
American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
Bagwell, C. L., Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1998). Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as
predictors of adult adjustment. Child Development, 69, 140-153.
Bagwell, C. L., Schmidt, M. E., Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (2001). Friendship and peer rejection as
predictors of adult adjustment. In D. W. Nangle & C. A. Erdley (Eds.), The role of friendship in
psychological adjustment. (pp. 25-49). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Barber, B. L., Eccles, J. S., & Stone, M. R. (2001). Whatever happened to the jock, the brain, and the
princess? Young adult pathways linked to adolescent activity involvement and social identity. Journal
of Adolescent Research, 16, 429-455.
Barnett, R. C., Kibria, N., Baruch, G. K., & Pleck, J. H. (1991). Adult daughter-parent relationships and their
associations with daughters' subjective well-being and psychological distress. Journal of Marriage &
the Family, 53, 29.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety:
Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 576, 893-897.
Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York:
Guilford.
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Beck Depression Inventory Manual. New York: The Psychological
Corporation.
Bell, K. L., Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., & O'Connor, T. G. (1996). Family factors and young adult transitions:
Educational attainment and occupational prestige. In J. A. Graber & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.),
Transitions through adolescence: Interpersonal domains and context. (pp. 345-366). Mahwah, NJ,
USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Benoit, D., & Parker, K. C. H. (1994). Stability and transmission of attachment across three generations.
Child Development, 65, 1444-1456.
Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS: Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
Berger, L. E., Jodl, K. M., Allen, J. P., McElhaney, K. B., & Kuperminc, G. P. (2005). When Adolescents
Disagree With Others About Their Symptoms: Differences in Attachment Organization as an
Explanation of Discrepancies Between Adolescent-, Parent-, and Peer-Reports of Behavior Problems.
Development & Psychopathology, 17, 489-507.
Berscheid, E. (2003). The human's greatest strength: Other humans. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger
(Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive
psychology. (pp. 37-47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: a meta-
analysis. Psychol Bull, 119, 422-447.
Biesanz, J. C., Deeb-Sossa, N., Papadakis, A. A., Bollen, K. A., Curran, P. J., & Biesanz, J. C. (2004). The
Role of Coding Time in Estimating and Interpreting Growth Curve Models. Psychological Methods, 9,
30-52.
Birnbaum, G. E., Orr, I., Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1997). When marriage breaks up: Does attachment
style contribute to coping and mental health? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 643-
654.
Blustein, D. L., Walbridge, M. M., Friedlander, M. L., & Palladino, D. E. (1991). Contributions of psychological
separation and parental attachment to the career development process. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 38, 39.
Boker, S. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). A Method for Modeling the Intrinsic Dynamics of Intraindividual
Variability: Recovering the Parameters of Simulated Oscillators in Multi-Wave Panel Data. Multivariate
Behavioral Research, 37, 127-160.
Boker, S. M., Xu, M., Rotondo, J. L., & King, K. (2002). Windowed cross-correlation and peak picking for the
analysis of variability in the association between behavioral time series. Psychological Methods, 7,
338-355.
Boone, S. L., & Flint, C. (1988). A Psychometric Analysis of Aggression and Conflict-Resolution Behavior in
Black Adolescent Males. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 215-226.
Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3: Loss, sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York:
Basic Books.
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An
integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close
relationships. (pp. 46-76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Bukowski, W. M., Gauze, C., Hoza, B., & Newcomb, A. F. (1993). Differences and consistency between
same-sex and other-sex peer relationships during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29,
255-263.
Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting
Psychology, 21, 343.
Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Crawford, L. E., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M. H., Kowalewski, R. B., et al.
(2002). Loneliness and Health: Potential Mechanisms. Psychosom Med, 64, 407-417.
Caetano, R., Cunradi, C. B., Schafer, J., & Clark, C. L. (2000). Intimate partner violence and drinking patterns
among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the U.S. Journal of Substance Abuse, 11, 123.
Capaldi, D., Kim, H. K., & Owen, L. D. (2006). Romantic partners' influence on men's crime in early
adulthood: A test of a life-span dynamic developmental systems model. Manuscript submitted for
publication.
Capaldi, D. M., Dishion, T. J., Stoolmiller, M., & Yoerger, K. (2001). Aggression toward female partners by at-
risk young men: The contribution of male adolescent friendships. Developmental Psychology, 37, 61-
73.
Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H., Shortt, J. W., Crosby, L., & Owen, L. D. (2007). Women's influence on men's crime
and aggression in early adulthood: Love can hurt! Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the
Society for Research on Child Development, Boston, MA, March 2007.
Caspi, A., Bem, D. J., & Elder, G. H. (1989). Continuities and consequences of interactional styles across the
life course. Journal of Personality, 57, 375-406.
Chango, J., Allen, J. P., Antonishak, J., & McFarland, C. F. (2007). The Darker Side of Romantic
Relationships: Family and Peer Predictors of Relational Aggression. Paper presented at the Biennial
Meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, MA (April 2007).
Christensen, J. L. (2003). The marriage effect among college student drinkers: Mechanisms of change.
ProQuest Information & Learning.
Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Stewart, B., L. (1990). Cognitive specificity and positive negative affectivity:
Complementary or contradictory views on anxiety and depression? Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
99, 148-155.
Coan, J. A., & Allen, J. P. (2006). Grant Proposal Submitted to National Institute of Mental Health (September
2006).
Coan, J. A., Schaefer, H. S., & Davidson, R. J. (in press). Lending a hand: Social regulation of the neural
response to threat. Psychological Science.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, W. A. (1990). Parent-child relationships in the transition to adolescence: Continuity and change in
interaction, affect, and cognition (pp. 85-106). In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adamas & T. P. Gullotta
(Eds.), From childhood to adolescence: A transitional period? Advances in Adolescent Development,
Volume 2. Newbury Park: Sage.
Collins, W. A. (1997). Relationships and development during adolescence: Interpersonal adaptation to
individual change. Personal Relationships, 4, 1-14.
Compas, B. E., Oppedisano, G., Connor, J. K., Gerhardt, C. A., Hinden, B. R., Achenbach, T. M., et al.
(1997). Gender differences in depressive symptoms in adolescence: comparison of national samples
of clinically referred and nonreferred youths. J Consult Clin Psychol, 65, 617-626.
Conger, R. D., Cui, M., Bryant, C. M., & Elder, G. H. (2001). Competence in Early Adult Romantic
Relationships: A Developmental Perspective on Family Influences. Prevention & Treatment, 4, 11a.
Connolly, J., Furman, W., & Konarski, R. (2000a). The role of peers in the emergence of heterosexual
romantic relationships in adolescence. Child Development, 71, 1395-1408.
Connolly, J., & Goldberg, A. (1999). Romantic relationships in adolescence: The role of friends and peers in
their emergence and development. In W. Furman & B. B. Brown (Eds.), The development of romantic
relationships in adolescence. Cambridge studies in social and emotional development (pp. 266-290).
New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
Connolly, J., Pepler, D., Craig, W., & Taradash, A. (2000b). Dating experiences of bullies in early
adolescence. Child Maltreatment: Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of
Children, 5, 1395-1408.
Crawford, T. N., Cohen, P., Midlarsky, E., & Brook, J. S. (2001). Internalizing symptoms in adolescents:
Gender differences in vulnerability to parental distress and discord. Journal of Research on
Adolescence, 11, 95-118.
Crowell, J., Pan, H., Goa, Y., Treboux, D., O'Connor, E., & Waters, E. B. (1998). The Secure Base Scoring
System for Adults. Version 2.0. Stonybrook, NY: Unpublished manuscript. State University of New
York at Stonybrook.
Cummings, E. M. (2006). Interpersonal Skills and Relationship Training for the Sake of Marital, Adolescent
and Family Well-Being: Proposal submitted to Administration on Children and Families Health
Marriage Demonstration Project.
Cutrona, C. E. (1989). Ratings of social support by adolescents and adult informants: Degree of
correspondence and prediction of depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 57, 723-730.
Cutrona, C. E., Cole, V., Colangelo, N., & Assouline, S. G. (1994). Perceived parental social support and
academic achievement: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 66, 369-378.
Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. In W. H.
Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 37-67). Greenwich, CT:
JAI Press.
Davies, P. T., & Lindsay, L. L. (2004). Interparental Conflict and Adolescent Adjustment: Why Does Gender
Moderate Early Adolescent Vulnerability? Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 160-170.
Davila, J. (2001a). Paths to unhappiness: The overlapping courses of depression and romantic dysfunction.
In S. R. H. Beach (Ed.), Marital and family processes in depression: A scientific foundation for clinical
practice. (pp. 71-87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Davila, J. (2001b). Refining the association between excessive reassurance seeking and depressive
symptoms: The role of related interpersonal constructs. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 20,
538-559.
Davila, J., Karney, B. R., Hall, T. W., & Bradbury, T. N. (2003). Depressive Symptoms and Marital
Satisfaction: Within-Subject Associations and the Moderating Effects of Gender and Neuroticism.
Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 557-570.
Demir, A., & Fisiloglu, H. R. (1999). Loneliness and marital adjustment of Turkish couples. Journal of
Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 133, 230.
Denton, K., & Zarbatany, L. (1996). Age differences in support processes in conversations between friends.
Child Development, 67, 1360-1373.
Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence:
Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Development, 66, 139-151.
Donnellan, M. B., Larsen-Rife, D., & Conger, R. D. (2005). Personality, Family History, and Competence in
Early Adult Romantic Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 562.
Dornbusch, S. M. (1981). Sexual development, age, and dating: A comparison of biological and social
influences upon one set of behaviors. Child Development, 52, 179-185.
Downey, G., Bonica, C., & Rincón, C. (1999). Rejection sensitivity and adolescent romantic relationships. In
W. Furman, B. B. Brown & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in
adolescence. (pp. 148-174). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Downey, G., Feldman, S., & Ayduk, O. (2000). Rejection sensitivity and male violence in romantic
relationships. Personal Relationships, 7, 45-61.
Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of Rejection Sensitivity for Intimate Relationships. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327-1343.
Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (1998a). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in Close
Relationships: Rejection Sensitivity and Rejection by Romantic Partners. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 75, 545.
Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (2004). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in Close
Relationships: Rejection Sensitivity and Rejection by Romantic Partners. In H. T. Reis & C. E. Rusbult
(Eds.), Close relationships: Key readings. (pp. 435-455). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
Downey, G., Lebolt, A., Rincón, C., & Freitas, A. L. (1998b). Rejection sensitivity and children's interpersonal
difficulties. Child Development, 69, 1074-1091.
Dubas, J. S., & Petersen, A. C. (1996). Geographical distance from parents and adjustment during
adolescence and young adulthood. New Directions for Child Development, 71, 3-19.
Duberstein, P. R., Seidlitz, L., Conwell, Y., Masling, J. M., & Bornstein, R. F. (1996). Reconsidering the role
of hostility in completed suicide: A life-course perspective. In Psychoanalytic perspectives on
developmental psychology. (pp. 257): American Psychological Association.
Dunkley, D. M., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M., & McGlashan, T. H. (2006). Perfectionism and depressive
symptoms 3 years later: Negative social interactions, avoidant coping, and perceived social support
as mediators. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 47, 106.
Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Cumberland, A., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Zhou, Q., et al. (2002).
Prosocial development in early adulthood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 82, 993-1006.
Elliot, M. (2001). Gender differences in causes of depression. Women & Health, 33, 163.
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and
mental health problems. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc
Inc.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Childrens' perceptions of the personal relationshipsin their social
networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016-1024.
Furman, W., Simon, V. A., Shaffer, L., & Bouchey, H. A. (2002). Adolescents' working models and styles for
relationships with parents, friends, and romantic partners. Child Development, 73, 241-255.
Furman, W., & Wehner, E. A. (1994). Romantic views: Toward a theory of adolescent romantic relationships.
In R. Montemayor & G. R. Adams (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence. Advances in
adolescent development: An annual book series (Vol. 6, pp. 168-195). Thousand Oaks, CA, US;
Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Galambos, N. L., Leadbeater, B. J., & Barker, E. T. (2004). Gender differences in and risk factors for
depression in adolescence: A 4-year longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral
Development, 28, 16-25.
Gavin, D. R., Ross, H.E. and Skinner, H.A. (1989). Diagnostic validity of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in
the assessment of DSM-III drug disorders. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 301-307.
George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1984). Attachment interview for adults.Unpublished manuscript,
Berkeley, California University of California.
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1985). The effects of sampling error and model characteristics on
parameter estimation for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral
research, 20, 255-271.
Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., Lowery, A. R., Putallaz, M., & Bierman, K. L. (2004). A Long-Term
Follow-Up of Serious Adolescent Female Offenders. In Aggression, antisocial behavior, and violence
among girls: A developmental perspective. (pp. 186): Guilford Publications.
Gore, S., & Aseltine, R. H., Jr. (2003). Race and Ethnic Differences in Depressed Mood Following the
Transition from High School. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 370.
Goswick, R. A., & Jones, W. H. (1982). Components of loneliness during adolescence. Journal of Youth and
Adolescence, 11, 373.
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of Race on Organizational
Experiences, Job Performance Evaluations, and Career Outcomes. The Academy of Management
Journal, 33, 64-86.
Hall, F. D., & Allen, J. P. (2001). Ethnic Identity and Adolescent Adjustment. Paper presented at the Biennial
Conference of the Society for Community Research and Action, Atlanta, GA.
Hall, F. D., Allen, J. P., & Wilson, M. N. (2000). Neighborhood and Family Influences on African American
Adolescent Development. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the the annual convention of
the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver, Colorado: University of
Denver.
Harter, S., & Whitesell, N. R. (1996). Multiple pathways to self-reported depression and psychological
adjustment among adolescents. Development & Psychopathology, 8, 761-777.
Haws, W. A., & Mallinckrodt, B. (1998). Separation-individuation from family of origin and marital adjustment
of recently married couples. American Journal of Family Therapy, 26, 293.
Haynes, J., Antonishak, J., Smith, F., & Allen, J. P. (2006). Peer Relationships and Ethnic Identity
Achievement of African American Adolescents. Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the
Society for Research on Adolescence, San Francisco, CA.
Hesse, E. (1999). The adult attachment interview: Historical and current perspectives. In J. Cassidy & P. R.
Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 395-433).
New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press.
Hill, J. P., & Holmbeck, G. N. (1986). Attachment and autonomy during adolescence. Annals of Child
Development, 3, 145-189.
Ho, M., & Allen, J. P. (2004). Adolescent Attachment to Parents: Predicting later adolescent rejection
sensitivity. Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence,
Baltimore, Maryland.
Ho, M. J. (2003). Dads do matter: Adolescents' relationships with dads predicting later rejection sensitivity.
Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa,
Florida.
Hoffman, J. A. (1984). Psychological separation of late adolescents from their parents. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 31, 170.
Holden, G. W., & Ritchie, K. L. (1991). Linking extreme marital discord, child rearing, and child behavior
problems: Evidence from battered women. Child Development, 62, 311-327.
Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators
and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599-610.
House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540-545.
Hyde, J. S. (1984). How large are gender differences in aggression? A developmental meta-analysis.
Developmental Psychology, 20, 722-736.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581.
Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1987). Psychotherapeutic, licit, and illicit use of drugs
among adolescents: An epidemiological perspective. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 8, 36-51.
Johnston, L. D., O‘Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2006). Monitoring the Future National
Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2005. Volume II: College students and adults age 19-45.
Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 06-5883.
Julien, D., Markman, H., Lindahl, K., Johnson, H., Van Widenfelt, B., & Herskovitz, J. (1997). The
interactional dimensions coding system. Denver, CO: Unpublished manuscript. University of Denver.
Kandel, D. B., & Raveis, V. H. (1989). Cessation of illicit drug use in young adulthood. Archives of General
Psychiatry, 46, 109-116.
Kawachi, I. B., L.F. (2001). Social Ties and Mental Health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York
Academy of Medicine, 78 (3), 458-467.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Malarkey, W. B., Chee, M., Newton, T., Cacioppo, J. T., Mao, H. Y., et al. (1993).
Negative behavior during marital conflict is associated with immunological down-regulation.
Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 395-409.
Kim, K. J., Conger, R. D., Lorenz, F. O., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Parent-adolescent reciprocity in negative
affect and its relation to early adult social development. Developmental Psychology, 37, 775-790.
Knox, S. S., & Uvnas-Moberg, K. (1998). Social isolation and cardiovascular disease: An Atherosclerotic
pathway? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 877.
Kobak, R. R. (1990). A q-sort system for coding the adult attachment interview. Unpublished manual,
University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Kobak, R. R., & Sceery, A. (1988). Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation and
representations of self and others. Child Development, 59, 135-146.
Kovacs, M. (1992). Children's Depression Inventory Manual. New York: Multi-Health Systems.
Lackey, C., & Williams, K. R. (1995). Social bonding and the cessation of partner violence across
generations. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 57, 295-305.
Laird, R. D., Jordan, K. Y., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2001). Peer rejection in childhood,
involvement with antisocial peers in early adolescence, and the development of externalizing behavior
problems. Development & Psychopathology, 13, US: Cambridge Univ.
Lapsley, D. K., & Edgerton, J. (2002). Separation-Individuation, Adult Attachment Style, and College
Adjustment. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80, 484-492.
Leadbeater, B. J., Kuperminc, G. P., Blatt, S. J., & Hertzog, C. (1999). A multivariate model of gender
differences in adolescents' internalizing and externalizing problems. Developmental Psychology, 35,
1268-1282.
Lee, H. Y., & Hughey, K. F. (2001). The Relationship of Psychological Separation and Parental Attachment to
the Career Maturity of College. Journal of Career Development, 27, 279-293.
Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: Wiley.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample
size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
Maciejewski, P. K., Prigerson, H. G., & Mazure, C. M. (2001). Sex differences in event-related risk for major
depression. Psychological Medicine, 31, 593-604.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of
methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
Magdol, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Newman, D. L. (1997). Gender differences in partner violence in a birth
cohort of 21-year-olds: Bridging the gap between clinical and epidemiological approaches. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 68-78.
Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1994). Adult attachment rating and classification system, Version 6.0. Unpublished
manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
Manning, N., Allen, J. P., & McElhaney, K. (2006). Maternal Conforming Values and Adolescent Psychosocial
Adjustment. Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence,
San Francisco, California.
Marsh, P., McFarland, F. C., Allen, J. P., McElhaney, K. B., & Land, D. J. (2003). Attachment, autonomy, and
multifinality in adolescent internalizing and risky behavioral symptoms. Development and
Psychopathology, 15, 451-467.
Masten, A. S., Burt, K. B., Roisman, G. I., Obradovic, J., Long, J. D., & Tellegen, A. (2004). Resources and
resilience in the transition to adulthood: Continuity and change. Development and Psychopathology,
16, 1071-1094.
Mayseless, O. (1998). Leaving Home Transition in Israel: Changes in Parent-Adolescent Relationships and
Adolescents' Adaptation to Military Service. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 589-
609.
Mc Ardle, J., & Hamagami, F. (2004). Methods for Dynamic Change Hypotheses. Recent developments on
structural equation models: Theory and applications, 295–335.
McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic analysis. Structural equation
modeling: Present and future, 341–380.
McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (2001). Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses
with incomplete longitudinal data. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis
of change. (pp. 139-175). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
McArdle, J. J., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1994). Using multivariate data to structure developmental change. In S.
H. Cohen & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological contributions.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McArdle, J. J., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). Growth curve analysis in contemporary research.
Comprehensive handbook of psychology, 447–480.
McCann, B. S., Russo, J., & Benjamin, G. A. H. (1997). Hostility, social support, and perceptions of work.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2, 175.
McCloskey, L. A., Figueredo, A. J., & Koss, M. P. (1995). The effects of systemic family violence on
children's mental health. Child Development, 66, 1239-1261.
McElhaney, K. B., & Allen, J. P. (2001). Autonomy and Adolescent Social Functioning: The Moderating Effect
of Risk. Child Development, 72, 220-231.
McElhaney, K. B., Immele, A., Smith, F. D., & Allen, J. P. (2006). Attachment organization as a moderator of
the link between peer relationships and adolescent delinquency. Attachment & Human Development,
8, 33-46.
McElhaney, K. B., Porter, M. R., Thompson, L. W., & Allen, J. P. (in press). Apples and Oranges: Divergent
Meanings of Maternal and Adolescent Perceptions of Parental Influence. Journal of Early
Adolescence.
McFarland, F. C., & Little, K. C. (2004). Links between adolescent popularity and promotion of autonomy and
relatedness with parents and peers. Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for
Research on Adolescence, Baltimore, Maryland.
McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53, 185-
204.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core
discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353-375.
Meeus, W., Branje, S., & Overbeek, G. J. (2004). Parents and partners in crime: A six-year longitudinal study
on changes in supportive relationships and delinquency in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal
of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1288.
Miech, R. A., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Wright, B. R. E., & Silva, P. A. (1999). Low socioeconomic status and
mental disorders: A longitudinal study of selection and causation during young adulthood. American
Journal of Sociology, 104, 1096.
Miga, E., & Allen, J. P. (2007). Attachment Insecurity: Adolescents At-Risk for Problematic Intrapsychic and
Peer Relationship Outcomes. Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research in
Child Development, Boston, MA.
Miga, E., Allen, J. P., & Manning, N. (2007). Attachment Insecurity and Abuse in Adolescent Romantic
Relationships. Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research in Child
Development, Boston, MA.
Mikami, A., Szwedo, D., & Allen, J. P. (2006). Internet Usage and Adolescent Social Development: Ongoing
Study. University of Virginia: Charlottesville, VA.
Mikulincer, M. (1995). Attachment style and the mental representation of the self. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 69, 1203-1215.
Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., Guijarro, M. L., & Hallet, A. J. (1996). A meta-analytic review of
research on hostility and physical health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 322-348.
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental
taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct
disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, D., & Schultz, N. R. (1983). Loneliness at adolescence: Correlates, attributions, and coping. Journal
of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 95.
Moreno, J. K., Selby, M. J., Fuhriman, A., & Laver, G. D. (1994). Hostility in depression. Psychological
Reports, 75, 1391.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus User's Guide, Version 4.1. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén &
Muthén.
Nelson, S. E., & Dishion, T. J. (2004). From boys to men: Predicting adult adaptation from middle childhood
sociometric status. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 441-459.
Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). Interindividual differences in intraindividual change: Best methods for the analysis
of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn
(Eds.), (pp. 92-105). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Nesselroade, J. R., Gerstorf, D., Hardy, S. A., & Ram, N. (2007). A model of idiographic filters for
psychological constructs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Nesselroade, J. R., & Jones, C. J. (1991). Multi-modal selection effects in the study of adult development: A
perspective on multivariate, replicated, single-subject, repeated measures designs. Experimental
Aging Research, 17, 21-27.
Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Impact of adolescent drug use and social support on problems of
young adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 64.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports of mental processes.
Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
Nolan, S. A., Flynn, C., & Garber, J. (2003). Prospective relations between rejection and depression in young
adolescents. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85, 745-755.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2001). Gender differences in depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
10, 173-176.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2006). The Etiology of Gender Differences in Depression. In C. M. Mazure & G. P.
Keita (Eds.), Understanding depression in women: Applying empirical research to practice and policy.
(pp. 9-43). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
O'Connor, T. G., Allen, J. P., Bell, K. L., & Hauser, S. T. (1996). Adolescent-parent relationships and leaving
home in young adulthood. In J. A. Graber & J. S. Dubas (Eds.), Leaving home: Understanding the
transition to adulthood. New directions for child development, No. 71. (pp. 39-52). San Francisco, CA,
USA: Jossey-Bass Inc, Publishers.
Orrego, V. O., & Rodriguez, J. (2001). Family Communication Patterns and College Adjustment: The Effects
of Communication and Conflictual Independence on College Students. Journal of Family
Communication, 1, 175-189.
Osgood, D. W., Ruth, G., Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Barber, B. L. (2005). Six Paths to Adulthood: Fast
Starters, Parents without Careers, Educated Partners, Educated Singles, Working Singles, and Slow
Starters. In R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr. & R. G. Rumbaut (Eds.), On the frontier of
adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. (pp. 320-355). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press.
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer
group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology,
29, 611-621.
Patterson, C. J., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Griesler, P. C. (1990). Children's perceptions of self and of relationships
with others as a function of sociometric status. Child Development, 61, 1335-1349.
Pearson, J. L., Cowan, P. A., Cowan, C. P., & Cohn, D. A. (1993). Adult attachment and adult child-older
parent relationships. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63, 606.
Petretic-Jackson, P., Betz, W., & Pitman, L. J. (1995). The Psychological Maltreatment Experience Scale
(PMES): Assessing psychological maltreatment in childhood and adolescence. In L. VandeCreek & S.
Knapp (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book (Vol. 14. Innovations in clinical practice,
pp. 331-343). Sarasota, FL, US; Sarasota, FL, US: Professional Resource Press/Professional
Resource Exchange, Inc; Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange, Inc.
Phillips, A. C., Carroll, D., Burns, V. E., Ring, C., Macleod, J., & Drayson, M. (2006). Bereavement and
marriage are associated with antibody response to influenza vaccination in the elderly. Brain,
Behavior, and Immunity, 20, 279.
Pianta, R. C., & Allen, J. P. (2006). Building capacity for positive youth development in secondary schools:
Teachers and their interactions with students. To appear in. In William T. Grant Foundation (Ed.),
Intervention to Promote Youth Development.
Pietrzak, J., Downey, G., & Ayduk, O. (2005). Rejection Sensitivity as an Interpersonal Vulnerability. In M. W.
Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition. (pp. 62-84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Pistole, M. C. (1989). Attachment in adult romantic relationships: Style of conflict resolution and relationship
satisfaction. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 6, 505-512.
Prinstein, M. J., & Aikins, J. W. (2004). Cognitive Moderators of the Longitudinal Association Between Peer
Rejection and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 147-
158.
Prinstein, M. J., Borelli, J. L., Cheah, C. S. L., Simon, V. A., & Aikins, J. W. (2005). Adolescent Girls'
Interpersonal Vulnerability to Depressive Symptoms: A Longitudinal Examination of Reassurance-
Seeking and Peer Relationships. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 676-688.
Prinstein, M. J., & La Greca, A. M. (2004). Childhood Peer Rejection and Aggression as Predictors of
Adolescent Girls' Externalizing and Health Risk Behaviors: A 6-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of
Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 72, 103-112.
Quintana, S. M., & Lapsley, D. K. (1987). Adolescent attachment and ego identity: A structural equations
approach to the continuity of adaptation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 393-409.
Quintana, S. M., Quintana, S. M., Aboud, F. E., Chao, R. K., Contreras-Grau, J., Cross, W. E., Jr., et al.
(2006). Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in Child Development: Contemporary Research and Future
Directions. Child Development, 77, 1129-1141.
Redding, R. E., Arrigo, B., Frisby, C. L., & Reynolds, C. R. (2005). Multicultural Perspectives on Delinquency
Among African-American Youths: Etiology and Intervention. In Comprehensive handbook of
multicultural school psychology. (pp. 710): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rennison, C., & Planty, M. (2003). Nonlethal Intimate Partner Violence: Examining Race, Gender, and
Income Patterns. Violence and Victims, 18, 433.
Robbins, C. A. (1991). Social roles and alcohol abuse among older men and women. Family & Community
Health, 13, 37.
Roisman, G. I., Aguilar, B., & Egeland, B. (2004a). Antisocial behavior in the transition to adulthood: The
independent and interactive roles of developmental history and emerging developmental tasks.
Development and Psychopathology, 16, 857-871.
Roisman, G. I., Masten, A. S., Coatsworth, J. D., & Tellegen, A. (2004b). Salient and Emerging
Developmental Tasks in the Transition to Adulthood. Child Development, 75, 123-133.
Rosen, L. N., Parmley, A. M., Knudson, K. H., & Fancher, P. (2002). Intimate partner violence among married
male U.S Army soldiers: Ethnicity as a factor in self-reported perpetration and victimization. Violence
and Victims, 17, 607.
Rosenbaum, M. S., McElhaney, K. B., Williams, F. E., & Allen, J. P. (2006). Looking for love in all the wrong
places: The developmental context of adolescents' early initiation into sexual intercourse: Manuscript
submitted for publication.
Rosenstein, D. S., & Horowitz, H. A. (1996). Adolescent attachment and psychopathology. Journal of
Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 64, 244-253.
Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., & Goldsteen, K. (1991). The impact of the family on health. In A. Booth (Ed.),
Contemporary families: Looking forward, looking back (pp. 341-360). Minneapolis, MN: National
Council on Family Relations.
Rossi, A. S., & Rossi, P. H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent-child relations across the life course.
Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
Russell, D., Cutrona, C. E., Rose, J., & Yurko, K. (1984). Social and emotional loneliness: An examination of
Weiss's typology of loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1313-1321.
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and
discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol, 39, 472-480.
Rutter, M., Giller, H., & Hagell, A. (1998). Antisocial Behavior by Young People: A Major New Review.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rutter, M., & Sroufe, L. A. (2000). Developmental psychopathology: Concepts and challenges. Development
and Psychopathology, 12, 265-296.
Rutter, P. A., & Behrendt, A. E. (2004). Adolescent suicide risk: Four psychosocial factors. Adolescence, 39,
295.
Ryan, N. E., Solberg, V. S., & Brown, S. D. (1996). Family dysfunction, parental attachment, and career
search self-efficacy among community college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 84.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life: Harvard
University Press.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2005). A Life-Course View of the Development of Crime. Annals of the
American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 12.
Sarason, I. G., Johnson, J. H., & Siegel, J. M. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of
the Life Experiences Survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 932-946.
Schaefer, A., Brown, J., Watson, C. G., Plemel, D., DeMilts, J., Howard, M. T., et al. (1985). Comparisons of
the validates of the Beck, Zung, and MMPI depression scales. Journal of Consulting & Clinical
Psychology, 53, 415-418.
Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children's reports of parental behavior: An inventory. Child Development, 36, 413-
424.
Schludermann, E., & Schludermann, S. (1970). Replicability of factors in children's report of parent behavior
(CRPBI). Journal of Psychology, 239-249.
Schulenberg, J., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (2005). Early Adult Transitions and Their
Relation to Well-Being and Substance Use. In R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr. & R. G.
Rumbaut (Eds.), On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. (pp. 417-453).
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Schulenberg, J. E., Zarrett, N. R., Arnett, J. J., & Tanner, J. L. (2006). Mental Health During Emerging
Adulthood: Continuity and Discontinuity in Courses, Causes, and Functions. In Emerging adults in
America: Coming of age in the 21st century. (pp. 135): American Psychological Association.
Schyns, B. (2002). A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and
organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 219-241.
Selby, M. J., & Neimeyer, R. A. (1986). Overt and covert hostility in depression. Psychology: A Journal of
Human Behavior, 23, 23.
Shortt, J. W., Capaldi, D. M., Dishion, T. J., Bank, L., & Owen, L. D. (2003). The Role of Adolescent Friends,
Romantic Partners, and Siblings in the Emergence of the Adult Antisocial Lifestyle. Journal of Family
Psychology, 17, 521-533.
Shulman, S., Collins, W. A., & Dital, M. (1993). Parent-child relationships and peer-perceived competence
during middle childhood and preadolescence in Israel. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 204-218.
Sinha, B. K., & Watson, D. C. (2006). Hostility and personality disorder. Imagination, Cognition and
Personality, 25, 45.
Skinner, H. A. (1979). Multivariate evaluation of the MAST. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 40, 831-844.
Skinner, M. L., Elder, G. H., & Conger, R. D. (1992). Linking economic hardship to adolescent aggression.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 259.
Smith, S. M., Stinson, F. s., Dawson, D. A., Goldstein, R., Huang, B., & Grant, B. F. (2006). Race/ethnic
differences in the prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood
and anxiety disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related
Conditions. Psychological Medicine, 36, 987.
Smith, T. W., Salovey, P., & Rothman, A. J. (2003). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic
hypothesis. In Social psychology of health. (pp. 325): Psychology Press.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and
similar dyads. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 38, 15-28.
Spielberger, C. D., & Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1982). Cross-cultural anxiety: An overview. Cross-cultural anxiety, 2,
3–11.
Spielberger, C. D., Sydeman, S. J., Owen, A. E., & Marsh, B. J. (1999). Measuring anxiety and anger with the
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). The use
of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment, 993–1021.
Sroufe, L. A. (1997). Psychopathology as an outcome of development. Development and Psychopathology,
9, 251-268.
Sroufe, L. A. (2005). Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood.
Attachment & Human Development, 7, 349-367.
Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E., Collins, W. A., Grossmann, K. E., Grossmann, K., et al. (2005a).
Placing Early Attachment Experiences in Developmental Context: The Minnesota Longitudinal Study.
In Attachment from infancy to adulthood: The major longitudinal studies. (pp. 48-70): Guilford
Publications, Inc.
Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E. A., & Collins, W. A. (2005b). The development of the person: The
Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. New York: Guilford.
Steinberg, L., Elmen, J. D., & Mounts, N. S. (1989). Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and
academic success among adolescents. Child Development, 60, 1424-1436.
Stephenson, J. C., Allen, J. P., Antonishak, J., & Porter, M. (2007). Dismissing Adolescents and the Evolution
of their Close Relationships. Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research in
Child Development, Boston, MA (April 2007).
Sternberg, K. J., Baradaran, L. P., Abbott, C. B., Lamb, M. E., & Guterman, E. (2006). Type of violence, age,
and gender differences in the effects of family violence on children's behavior problems: A mega-
analysis. Developmental Review, 26, 89-112.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of
Marriage & the Family, 41, 75-88.
Tanaka, J. S. (1987). How big is big enough? Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models
with latent variables. Child Development, 58, 134-146.
Taylor, K. W., & Kliewer, W. (2006). Violence Exposure and Early Adolescent Alcohol Use: An Exploratory
Study of Family Risk and Protective Factors. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15, 207-221.
Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000).
Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological
Review, 107, 411-429.
Teachman, B. A., & Allen, J. P. (in press). Development of social anxiety: Social interaction predictors of
implicit and explicit fear of negative evaluation. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology.
Teitelbaum, L. M., & Mullen, B. (2000). The Validity of the MAST in Psychiatric Settings: A Meta-Analytic
Integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 254-261.
Tencer, H. T., Allen, J. P., McElhaney, K. B., Moore, C. M., O'Beirne Kelly, H., & Davis, S. (in press). The use
of harsh physical discipline and developmental outcomes in adolescence. Development &
Psychopathology.
Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric
Analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247-259.
Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1996). The Relationship Between Social Support and
Physiological Processes: A Review With Emphasis on Underlying Mechanisms and Implications for
Health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488.
Uggen, C., & Massoglia, M. (2003). Desistance from crime and deviance as a turning point in the life course.
In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 311-329). New York:
Plenum.
Umberson, D. (1992). Relationships between adult children and their parents: Psychological consequences
for both generations. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 54, 664-674.
van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (1997). Intergenerational transmission of attachment:
A move to the contextual level. In L. Atkinson & K. J. Zucker (Eds.), Attachment and psychopathology
(pp. 135-170). New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press.
Virtanen, M., Kivimöki, M., Elovainio, M., Vahtera, J., Kokko, K., & Pulkkinen, L. (2005). Mental health and
hostility as predictors of temporary employment: Evidence from two prospective studies. Social
Science & Medicine, 61, 2084.
Vogel, D. L., & Wei, M. (2005). Adult Attachment and Help-Seeking Intent: The Mediating Roles of
Psychological Distress and Perceived Social Support. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 347-
357.
Waters, E., Merrick, S., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., & Albersheim, L. (2000). Attachment security in infancy and
early adulthood: A twenty-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 71, 684-689.
Weinfield, N. S., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2000). Attachment from infancy to early adulthood in a high-risk
sample: Continuity, discontinuity, and their correlates. Child Development, 71, 695-702.
Whisman, M. A., & Beach, S. R. H. (2001). The association between depression and marital dissatisfaction.
In Marital and family processes in depression: A scientific foundation for clinical practice. (pp. 3-24):
American Psychological Association.
Whisman, M. A., Weinstock, L. M., & Tolejko, N. (2006). Marriage and Depression. In C. L. M. Keyes & S. H.
Goodman (Eds.), Women and Depression (pp. 219-240). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Whiteman, M. C., Deary, I. J., Fowkes, F. G. R., & Hampson, S. E. (2000). Personality and health:
Cardiovascular disease. In Advances in personality psychology, Vol. 1. (pp. 157): Psychology Press.
Williamson, G. M., & Silverman, J. G. (2001). Violence against female partners: Direct and interactive effects
of family history, communal orientation, and peer-related variables. Journal of Social and Personal
Relationships, 18, 535-549.
Windle, M. (1992). A longitudinal study of stress buffering for adolescent problem behaviors. Developmental
Psychology, 28, 522-530.
Wolfe, D. A., Jaffe, P., Wilson, S. K., & Zak, L. (1985). Children of battered women: The relation of child
behavior to family violence and maternal stress. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 53, 657-
665.
Zimmerman, F. J., Christakis, D. A., & Stoep, A. V. (2004). Tinker, tailor, soldier, patient: Work attributes and
depression disparities among young adults. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1889.