Embed
Email

The Mormon Review

Document Sample

Shared by: xiaopangnv
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
11/8/2011
language:
English
pages:
3
The Mormon Review

Books and culture from an LDS Perspective



The Redemption of Eve: Joseph Smith and Goethe’s Faust

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, evil—being committed against knowing good and evil.” (Gen.

Faust: A Tragedy, ed. Cyrus Love and Perfection 3:5)

Hamlin & tr. Walter W. Arndt, personified—of such infinite,

Norton Critical Edition, 2nd unspeakable betrayal that the “God hath said, ye shall not

ed. (W.W. Norton & Co.: New universe itself could not contain eat of it.” (Gen. 3:3)

York, 2000 [orig. pub. 1832]) it; the evil of Eve’s primeval

gesture overflows itself into “The woman saw that the tree

By Terryl Givens generations millennia removed, was good for food, and that it

children and children’s children was pleasant to the eyes, and a

I. yet unborn. The original sin was a tree to be desired to make one





L iterature, being more

imaginatively expansive

than theology, was the first

to recognize the impossibility of

the predicament.

straightforward choice of the

ultimate evil over transcendent

good.

But literature, insofar as it may

treat of the human qua human, in

wise.” (Gen. 3:6)





Editor-in-Chief

Richard Bushman

Perdition, ultimate loss, lies on a universe free of moral

either side as Eve considers her prejudgments and theological Managing Editor

options in the Garden. She imperatives, sees a very different Nathan B. Oman

stymies the infinite expansion of scenario. What it sees in the

Assistant Managing Editors

selfhood, thwarts her own soul’s Adam and Eve story is the primal Kaimipono Wenger

insatiability, murders her own human predicament. And it is a Benjamin Huff

human potential. Or she violates fundamentally tragic predicament.

the bonds of filial regard, alienates Which means, the human finds Editorial Board

herself from her God and himself in a world not of Richard Bushman

Creator, and defies the divine. equilibrium, but of cosmic James Faulconer

The question is not if she will conflict, where the alignments are Daniel Fairbanks

transgress, but how. Not if she not the simple alignments of Terryl Givens

will choose the Good, but which Good and Evil, or ones where Benjamin Huff

Nathan B. Oman

Good she will embrace, and neatly sequestered alternatives Jana Riess

which she will shun. attach to neatly opposed choices. Jonathan Stapley

The voice of religious In this universe, supreme virtues Kaimipono Wenger

orthodoxy, beginning with the clash and collide; absolute values Margaret Blair Young

simple premise of a universe in array themselves in dramatic

peaceful equilibrium, must contestation. The Mormon Review publishes

perforce assume, in C. S. Lewis’s This is the universe revealed in reviews of all aspects of

formulation, that obedience to Genesis, when not viewed contemporary culture from a

God would ultimately have through the narrowing prism of Mormon perspective. Back

proven obedience to the best in religious convention. issues are available online at

human nature. Any felix in the www.mormonreview.org

culpa deriving from humankind’s “Ye shalt not eat of it.” (Gen.

sin attaches to the sublime act of 3:3) Unsolicited submissions are

Christ, not the perfidious act of welcome. Please email us at

Eve. The fall was a catastrophe. A “Your eyes shall be opened, mormonreview@gmail.com.

mitigated catastrophe, but a and you shall be as the gods,

catastrophe nonetheless, and an



www.mormonreview.org September 14, 2009, vol.1 no.4, page 1

The Mormon Review

They start in soul-agony, and end faint sense that in suffering the

Obedience was an incontestable in moralistic over-simplification. constraints of mortality, he is

good. Emblematic of this trajectory is suffocating a soul with roots in

The tree was good for food, it the first English translation of the the heavenly realms:

was pleasant to the eyes, it did German Faustbuch. However

make one wise. compelling we find the doctor’s Two souls, alas, are dwelling in

initial dilemma, the English title my breast,

II. betrays both the protagonist’s And either would be severed

Perhaps the earliest literary final disposition—and his offense from its brother;

type in Western literature against orthodox morality. It is The one holds fast with joyous

(especially if we find Eve its first titled, “the damnable life and earthy lust

incarnation), certainly the most deserved death of Faustus.” We Onto the world of man with

pervasive, is Faust. Faust’s may pity Faust’s difficulty, but organs clinging;

dilemma is not just another right and wrong define the The other soars impassioned

vexing human predicament. It is options. from the dust,

the human predicament. (Of But change is in the wind. To realms of lofty forebears

course, this presumes the anti- Christopher Marlowe’s reworking winging. [lines 1112-1117]

orthodox reading of Genesis I shows a greater appreciation for

have proposed. Which is, again of the impossibility of the Faustian But this Faust labors in a

course, the reading the Book of predicament, a tentative mortal sphere presided over by a

Mormon and the Pearl of Great recognition of the sympathy due God who is most emphatically

Price give us of Genesis). Faust is our own race. “The Tragical not the God of Genesis. Devoid

just a middle-aged Eve, with a History of Dr. Faustus,” he of jealousy, incapable of

long life in the garden and a few tellingly recasts the title. Dr. gratuitous tyranny, this God fully

diplomas to show for it. Faustus conveys the pathos of acknowledges the impossibility of

How long were Adam and what it means to be Eve in a Faust’s dilemma. Following his

Eve in the garden before Satan’s claustrophobic garden: Logic, oft-rehearsed script, Goethe’s

address? Narrative compression medicine, law—the entire Faust chooses to transgress the

should not be mistaken for an medieval curriculum he has limits of law, rather than succumb

indication of brief duration. Long mastered. His narrow study, like to the safety of stasis. He leaves a

enough to be sated, surely. Faust the boundaries of Eden, fits only sobering trail of destruction in his

has acquired all the learning his “a mercenary drudge . . . too wake: broken hearts and shattered

garden has to offer. He knows servile and illiberal for me.” So lives lie scattered about him. At

every tree, shrub, and garden finding his only road to self- the bitter end, as his eyes close on

path. Like Eve, he has seen the actualization is the path of sin, he his mortal sojourn, and devils

same sun rise over the same takes it. Nevertheless, even rush in to seize his soul, God

grassy hillock on countless winter Renaissance humanism bows to intervenes. “Faust is saved,” the

morns and summer daybreaks, the imperious limitations of voice from heaven proclaims.

while listening to the same dutiful religion. This Faust, alas, ends in “He ever sins, who ever strives.”

companion (Faust has his the same fires of hell as all other Did Goethe have Eve in

Wagner) recite the same litany of Fausts. mind? It doesn’t matter. Because

another day’s chores under the In 1832, the greatest man of in Faust’s redemption, we clearly

same cloudless skies. Like Eve, letters of Joseph Smith’s era, see Eve’s redemption as well. For

Faust faces the same two sets of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust’s choice is, of course, Eve’s

alternatives. Soul-starvation, or published Faust: Part II. Inspired choice. And Eve’s song, is

God-alienation. Or put in positive by Goethe’s guiding genius, this Faust’s song:

terms: Knowledge, wisdom, and version gives the human

the soul’s unfettered ascent, or a condition its first full due. Faust is And in that day, Adam blessed

different kind of assent—to the same man, consumed by God and [said] . . . Blessed be

God’s dictates. titanic passion, insatiable appetite, the name of God, for because

All versions of Faust begin as unconquerable will. Even more of my transgression, my eyes

literature and end as theology. fully realized in his person, is the are opened.... And Eve...heard



www.mormonreview.org September 14, 2009, vol.1 no.4, page 2

The Mormon Review

all these things, and was glad, theology, was the first to imagination behind their creation

saying: Were it not for our recognize the impossibility of the is more artistic than priestly.

transgression we never should predicament. Until now, even

have had seed, and never treatments of Faust, that most Terryl Givens holds the James A.

known good and evil, and the iconoclastic of literary types, Bostwick Chair of English at the

joy of our redemption. (Moses began as literature, but end as University of Richmond, where he is a

5:10) theology. Goethe’s Faust, like Professor of Literature and Religion.

Joseph Smith’s Eve, breaks free

Literature, being more of theology, because the

imaginatively expansive than









www.mormonreview.org September 14, 2009, vol.1 no.4, page 3



Related docs
Other docs by xiaopangnv
Synchronicity Performance Group
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
Tabelle1 - VfL Bensheim Basketball
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
seguridad en un sistema informatico
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2010-216 LUZ amd-Corrected-Not Used
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
9768118_9768160
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Applied and Net Force
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
MONTAG
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
National Taiwan University_Macbeth
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
docjeotbAONe1
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
TEMPLATE--EAUpdate--Sept2007
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!