; Jensen Verdicts
Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out
Your Federal Quarterly Tax Payments are due April 15th Get Help Now >>

Jensen Verdicts

VIEWS: 5 PAGES: 20

  • pg 1
									                                             V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                                   E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                      ______________________________________________

                              200 Russell Street / P.O. Box 6328      9101 North Wesleyan Road
                                      Hammond, Indiana 46325          Indianapolis, Indiana 46268
                                    Telephone: (219) 931-0560         Telephone: (317) 228-9670
                                    Telecopier: (219) 931-5370        Telecopier: (317) 228-9569



TRIAL DATE       CAPTION (client in bold)           VENUE                          CLAIM                                OUTCOME
March 2008       Riley Chilton, Indiv. and o/b/o    Marion Superior Court          Whether the defendant breached       Defense Verdict
                 Chance Chilton, deceased           Indianapolis, Indiana          the standard of care in failing to
                 v.                                                                diagnose that plaintiff’s decedent
                 Defendant Neurologist, et al                                      was the victim of child abuse.
September 2006   Charles Peterson and Gladys        United States District Court   Personal Injury                      Verdict for
                 Peterson                           Northern District of Indiana                                        Plaintiff
                 v.                                 Hammond, Indiana                                                    Eichhorn &
                 Nasir Farrakhan                                                                                        Eichhorn
                                                                                                                        counsel for
                                                                                                                        Plaintiff




                                                    WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                            V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                                 E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                      ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE       CAPTION (client in bold)         VENUE                         CLAIM                                OUTCOME
March 2006       Estate of Micaela Rodriguez,     Lake Superior Court           Whether the defendants breached      Defense Verdict
                 et al                            Crown Point, Indiana          the standard of care in their
                 v.                                                             treatment of plaintiff’s decedent,
                 Defendant Physician,                                           Micaela Rodriguez.
                 Defendant
                 Gastroenterologist,
                 Defendant Family Physician,
                 Defendant Nephrologist, et al
September 2005   Tracy Ryan                       Lake Superior Court           Whether defendant attorney was       Defense Verdict
                 v.                               Crown Point, Indiana          negligent in accepting settlement
                 Defendant Attorney                                             in underlying sexual harassment
                                                                                case.
December 2003    Nigel B. Newlin                  Marion Superior Court         Whether the defendant, breached      Settled during
                 v.                               Indianapolis, Indiana         the standard of care in his          trial for $50,000
                 Defendant                                                      prescription of gentamycin,
                 Gastroenterologist                                             which caused ototoxicity.
August 2003      Estate of Dorma Foreman, et      Circuit Court for the Sixth   Whether the defendant, an            Defense Verdict
                 al                               Judicial Circuit, Champaign   ophthalmologist, utilized due
                 v.                               County, Urbana, Illinois      care in diagnosing the plaintiff’s
                 Defendant Ophthalmologist,                                     decedent’s bitemporal
                 et al                                                          hemianopsia caused by a
                                                                                pituitary tumor.


                                                  WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                             V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                                   E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                        ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE       CAPTION (client in bold)           VENUE                          CLAIM                               OUTCOME
May 2003         James B. Shoemaker and Beth        Marion Superior Court          Whether the defendant, an           Defense Verdict
                 Shoemaker                          Indianapolis, Indiana          orthopedic surgeon, correctly
                 v.                                                                diagnosed and treated the
                 Defendant Orthopedic                                              plaintiff’s partially ruptured
                 Surgeon                                                           triceps tendon.
September 2002   Elizabeth Stryczek                 Lake Superior Court            Whether defendants were             Defense Verdict
                 v.                                 Crown Point, Indiana           negligent in treating plaintiff's
                 Defendant Hemagologist/                                           non Hodgkins-Lymphoma.
                 Oncologist and Defendant
                 Radiation Oncologist
September 2002   Discovery House                    United States District Court   Zoning matter for a Methadone       Verdict for
                 v.                                 Northern District of Indiana   Clinic.                             Plaintiff
                 Consolidated City of               Hammond, Indiana                                                   Eichhorn &
                 Indianapolis, et al                                                                                   Eichhorn
                                                                                                                       counsel for
                                                                                                                       Plaintiff
June 2001        Lucretia Little, John Davis and    Lake Superior Court            Whether defendant obstetrician      Defense Verdict
                 John L. Davis                      Crown Point, Indiana           was negligent in rendering
                 v.                                                                prenatal care.
                 Defendant OB/GYN




                                                    WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                            V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                               E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                     ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE      CAPTION (client in bold)        VENUE                    CLAIM                                OUTCOME
October 1998    Kathleen Johnston               Lake Superior Court      Whether defendant plastic            Defense Verdict
                v.                              Hammond, Indiana         surgeon was negligent in view of
                Defendant Plastic Surgeon                                plaintiff's failure to follow
                                                                         postoperative instructions to quit
                                                                         smoking.
October 1998    Dorothy Ward, as guardian of    Lake Superior Court      Whether plaintiff's decedent, who    Defense Verdict
                Roger Roundtree                 East Chicago, Indiana    suffered severe peripheral
                v.                                                       vascular disease, would have had
                Defendant Family Physician                               a better outcome if the defendant
                                                                         doctor complied with the
                                                                         standard of care and skill.
February 1998   Robert Politano                 Porter Superior Court    Whether the defendant oral           Defense Verdict
                v.                              Valparaiso, Indiana      surgeon failed to diagnose the
                Defendant Oral Surgeon                                   plaintiff's jaw fracture.
October 1997    Jacklyn Gonzales                Lake Superior Court      Whether failure to perform           Defense Verdict
                v.                              Hammond, Indiana         ultrasound during first admission
                Defendant                                                for gallstone pancreatitis was a
                Gastroenterologist                                       factor in second admission for
                                                                         gallstone.




                                                WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                             V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                                 E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                      ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE       CAPTION (client in bold)         VENUE                    CLAIM                               OUTCOME
October 1997     Carl Bowden                      Porter Superior Court    Whether the defendant               Defense Verdict
                 v.                               Valparaiso, Indiana      physician's failure to diagnose
                 Defendant Family Physician                                decedent's cancer caused or
                                                                           contributed to cause the death of
                                                                           plaintiff's decedent.
October 1997     Gwyn Polick                      LaPorte Superior Court   Whether plaintiff passenger was     Defense Verdict
                 v.                               LaPorte, Indiana         rendered quadriplegic as a result
                 Indiana Toll Road                                         of alleged negligent road design.
September 1996   Pollution Control Industries,    Lake Superior Court      Whether newspaper articles          Defense Verdict
                 Inc.                             East Chicago, Indiana    defamed and libeled plaintiff.
                 v.
                 Howard Publications d/b/a
                 The TIMES
March 1996       Carl Davis and Erma Davis        Lake Circuit Court       Whether defendant's failure to      Defense Verdict
                 v.                               Crown Point, Indiana     admit patient immediately for
                 Defendant Doctor                                          myocardial infarction was
                                                                           malpractice when patient refused
                                                                           admission.




                                                  WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                             V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                                   E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                        ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE       CAPTION (client in bold)           VENUE                          CLAIM                               OUTCOME
Argued January   Michael W. Back                    United States District Court   Whether race and gender quotas      Court granted
26, 1996,        v.                                 Northern District of Indiana   for attorney membership of          injunction
Decision May     Pamela Carter, et al               Hammond, Indiana               judicial nominating committee       See, 933 F.
30, 1996                                                                           are discriminatory under Equal      Supp. 738
                                                                                   Protection Clause.
August 1995      Greta Crosslin, Administratrix     Lake Superior Court            Whether plaintiff could prevail     Defense Verdict
                 of the Estate of James Crosslin    Hammond, Indiana               on a wrongful death claim where
                 v.                                                                defendant dentist's failure to
                 Defendant Dentist                                                 diagnose squamous cell
                                                                                   carcinoma of the tongue had no
                                                                                   adverse effect on patient's life
                                                                                   span.
June 1995        Helen Mooney, Administratrix       Porter Superior Court          Whether defendant general           Verdict for
                 of the Estate of Jacob Mooney      Valparaiso, Indiana            practitioner used reasonable care   plaintiff against
                 v.                                                                in treatment of patient with        all defendants
                 Defendant General                                                 perforated stress ulcer.            except General
                 Practitioner, et al                                                                                   Practitioner, in
                                                                                                                       whose favor the
                                                                                                                       jury returned a
                                                                                                                       verdict.




                                                    WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                              V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                                E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                    ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE      CAPTION (client in bold)         VENUE                          CLAIM                                OUTCOME
June 1995       Mary Hill, widow of Robert       United States District Court   Whether defendant internists         Verdict for
                Hill                             Northern District of Indiana   used reasonable care during          defendants.
                v.                               Hammond, Indiana               emergency intubation of patient      Affirmed on
                Defendant Internists, et al                                     in code blue following CVA and       appeal, July 19,
                                                                                head injury from fall.               1996.
May 1995        Florian Wojcik                   Lake Superior Court            Whether defendant                    Defense Verdict
                v.                               Hammond, Indiana               anesthesiologist used reasonable
                Defendant Anesthesiologist,                                     care during surgery for dissecting
                et al                                                           ascending aortic aneurysm
February 1995   AIAC                             United States District Court   Whether defendant was guilty of      Plaintiff's
                v.                               Northern District of Indiana   legal malpractice in defending       verdict $1.25
                Frank Galvin                     Hammond, Indiana               plaintiff in underlying personal     million on
                                                                                injury/wrongful death case.          February 14,
                                                                                                                     1995;
                                                                                                                     reversed and
                                                                                                                     remanded on
                                                                                                                     appeal, June 20,
                                                                                                                     1996, rehearing
                                                                                                                     denied, August
                                                                                                                     2, 1996




                                                 WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                          V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                            E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                   ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE     CAPTION (client in bold)      VENUE                          CLAIM                                OUTCOME
January 1995   Blankenship                   United States District Court   Nature and extent of plaintiff's     Verdict for
               v.                            Northern District of Indiana   injuries as a result of a motor      Plaintiff:
               Trism                         Hammond, Indiana               vehicle accident: liability          $22,000
                                                                            admitted.
August 1994    Hull                          Porter Superior Court          Whether defendant used due care      Defense Verdict
               v.                            Valparaiso, Indiana            in the diagnosis and treatment of
               Defendant Cardiologist                                       plaintiff
July 1994      Blasko                        Marshall Superior Court        Whether defendant attorney was       Dismissed on
               v.                                                           negligent in not calling plaintiff   Motion for
               Sweeney                                                      as witness in underlying case        Summary
                                                                            where plaintiff was too cross-       Judgment for
                                                                            examinable.                          Defendant




                                             WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                            V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                              E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                    ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE      CAPTION (client in bold)       VENUE                          CLAIM                               OUTCOME
October 1993    Eric Gibbs, Ph.D.              United States District Court   Whether undue influence             Eichhorn &
                v.                             Northern District of Indiana   occurred in executing real estate   Eichhorn as
                The Nature Conservancy         Hammond, Indiana               trust documents                     counsel for
                                                                                                                  plaintiffs
                                                                                                                  obtained a jury
                                                                                                                  verdict
                                                                                                                  commanding
                                                                                                                  return of parcel
                                                                                                                  of land to
                                                                                                                  plaintiffs -
                                                                                                                  trustees.
February 1993   Pandorf                        Lake Superior Court            Whether defendant breached the      Defense Verdict
                v.                             East Chicago, Indiana          standard of care in performing a
                Defendant Plastic Surgeon                                     rhinoplasty and face lift




                                               WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                            V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                              E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                     ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE       CAPTION (client in bold)      VENUE                          CLAIM                              OUTCOME
October 1992 &   Bonnes                        Porter Superior Court          Whether defendant doctors met      Jury trial
October 1996     v.                            Valparaiso, Indiana            the standard of care in treating   resulted in
                 Defendant General                                            plaintiff.                         directed verdict
                 Practitioner and Defendant                                                                      for General
                 Internist                                                                                       Practitioner and
                                                                                                                 defense verdict
                                                                                                                 for Internist.
                                                                                                                 General
                                                                                                                 Practitioner's
                                                                                                                 case reversed
                                                                                                                 on appeal,
                                                                                                                 retried and
                                                                                                                 resulted in
                                                                                                                 defense verdict.
October 1992     Gallo                         United States District Court   Whether defendant was negligent    Verdict or
                 v.                            Northern District of Indiana   in motor vehicle accident.         Plaintiff:
                 Roadway Trucking              Hammond, Indiana                                                  $22,000.
July 1992        Aubrey                        Porter Superior Court          Whether defendant met the          Settled after
                 v.                            Valparaiso, Indiana            standard of care in his prenatal   hung jury.
                 Defendant Physician                                          and delivery care of plaintiff's
                                                                              mother. Whether any of plaintiff
                                                                              minor's medical problems
                                                                              resulted from defendant's care.

                                               WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                             V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                               E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                     ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE       CAPTION (client in bold)       VENUE                          CLAIM                                OUTCOME
                 Mathias                        Porter Superior Court          Whether defendant met the            Verdict for
                 v.                             Valparaiso, Indiana            standard of care in diagnosing       Plaintiff of
                 Defendant Family Physician                                    and treating embolism of             $30,000.
                                                                               plaintiffs' right lower extremity.
November 1989    Cheryl Burns                   Porter Superior Court          Whether defendant informed           Defense Verdict
                 v.                             Valparaiso, Indiana            plaintiff of the risks of surgery
                 Defendant Plastic Surgeon                                     and met the standard of care in
                                                                               performance of Z-plasty.
September 1988   Bennie Bailey                  United States District Court   Whether plaintiff's termination      Verdict for
                 v.                             Northern District of Indiana   was racially motivated.              Plaintiff:
                 Northern Indiana Public        Hammond, Indiana                                                    $22,000.
                 Service Company                                                                                    Reversed on
                                                                                                                    appeal
April 1988       Sanders                        United States District Court   Whether plaintiff's                  Defense Verdict
                 v.                             Northern District of Indiana   disqualification from apprentice
                 Northern Indiana Public        Hammond, Indiana               lineman's program was racially
                 Service Company                                               motivated.




                                                WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                           V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                               E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                     ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE      CAPTION (client in bold)        VENUE                    CLAIM                                OUTCOME
February 1988   Kelly Glowacki                  Newton Circuit Court     Whether defendant met the            Defense Verdict
                v.                              Kentland, Indiana        standard of care in treating
                Defendant Physician                                      plaintiff's decedent who died as a
                                                                         result of long-term ingestion of
                                                                         unprescribed anabolic steroids.
October 1987    John Mohr & Sons                Lake Superior Court      Whether defendant breached its       Verdict for
                v.                              Hammond, Indiana         contract for the design and          Plaintiff:
                Inland Steel Company, et al.                             manufacture of blast furnace         $685,000
                                                                         stove valves.                        Eichhorn &
                                                                                                              Eichhorn,
                                                                                                              attorneys for
                                                                                                              Plaintiff
October 1986    Paul Fardy                      Starke Circuit Court     Breach of Contract                   Defense Verdict
                v.                              Knox, Indiana
                Physician Health
                Rehabilitation Services
                Maddox                          Porter Superior Court    Whether due care was used to         Defense Verdict
                v.                              Valparaiso, Indiana      prevent a diabetic's loss of a
                Defendant Physcian                                       lower extremity.




                                                WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                        V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                           E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                 ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE   CAPTION (client in bold)       VENUE                    CLAIM                                  OUTCOME
             Irv Lynn                       LaPorte Circuit Court    Whether defendants negligently         Defense Verdict
             v.                             LaPorte, Indiana         failed to diagnose plaintiff's
             Defendant Family Physicians                             decedent's perforated duodenal
                                                                     ulcer.
             Schuyler                       Benton Circuit Court     Whether defendants' negligence         Defense Verdict
             v.                             Fowler, Indiana          caused plaintiff to sustain injuries
             Defendant Physician                                     during laparoscopic tubal
                                                                     ligation.
             Howard Williams                Porter Superior Court    Whether defendant's negligence         Verdict for
             v.                             Valparaiso, Indiana      caused plaintiff's decedent's death    plaintiff:
             Defendant Physician                                     during laparoscopic tubal ligation     $275,000
             Searcy                         Porter Superior Court    Whether defendants used                Defense Verdict
             v.                             Valparaiso, Indiana      reasonable care in the diagnosis
             Defendant Physicians                                    and treatment of a hiatal hernia.
             Labahn                         Porter Superior Court    Whether the defendants failed to       Defense Verdict
             v.                             Valparaiso, Indiana      use reasonable care and skill in
             Defendant Physicians                                    diagnosing and treating
                                                                     ventriculitis which arose
                                                                     following the insertion of a
                                                                     ventricular - peritoneal shunt to
                                                                     treat hydrocephalus.


                                            WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                           V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                             E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                 ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE   CAPTION (client in bold)         VENUE                   CLAIM                              OUTCOME
             Hamilton                         Benton Circuit Court    Whether the defendant failed to    Defense Verdict
             v.                               Fowler, Indiana         use reasonable care and skill in
             Defendant Physician, et al.                              evaluating and treating a soft
                                                                      tissue crush injury of the lower
                                                                      extremity.
             Colby                            Jasper Circuit Court    Whether the defendant failed to    Defense Verdict
             v.                               Rensselaer, Indiana     use reasonable care and skill in
             Defendant Dentist                                        extracting an impacted wisdom
                                                                      tooth.
             Bennett                          Jasper Circuit Court    Whether the defendant failed to    Verdict for
             v.                               Rensselaer, Indiana     use reasonable care and skill in   Plaintiff: $7,500
             Defendant Plastic Surgeon                                performing a rhinoplasty.
             Walters                          Porter Superior Court   Whether the defendant failed to    Defense Verdict
             v.                               Valparaiso, Indiana     use reasonable care and skill
             Defendant Physician, et al.                              when he did not diagnose
                                                                      decedent's diabetes and
                                                                      pancreatitis.
             Jennings                         Benton Circuit Court    Whether the defendant was          Defense Verdict
             v.                               Fowler, Indiana         negligent in failing to diagnose
             Defendant Physician, et al                               an acute myocardial infarction.



                                              WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                           V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                             E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                 ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE   CAPTION (client in bold)         VENUE                   CLAIM                                 OUTCOME
             Smith                            Porter Superior Court   Whether the defendant                 Verdict for
             v.                               Valparaiso, Indiana     obstetrician negligently rendered     plaintiff:
             Defendant OB/GYN                                         prenatal care to plaintiff's mother   $ 50,000
                                                                      causing profound mental
                                                                      retardation.
             Guzzino                          Porter Superior Court   Whether the defendants used           Defense Verdict
             v.                               Valparaiso, Indiana     reasonable care to detect
             Defendant Physicians, et al.                             fractures in a multiply injured
                                                                      patient.
             Rooney                           Porter Superior Court   Whether the defendants used           Defense Verdict
             v.                               Valparaiso, Indiana     reasonable care and skill in
             Defendant Physician, et al.                              assessing the vascular status of a
                                                                      leg following a comminuted
                                                                      fracture of the fibula and tibia.
             Green                            Porter Superior Court   Whether the defendant used            Verdict for
             v.                               Valparaiso, Indiana     reasonable care and skill in          plaintiff:
             Defendant Physician                                      diagnosing and treating the           $7,500.00
                                                                      plaintiff's Class II
                                                                      malocclusion.




                                              WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                          V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                            E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                 ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE   CAPTION (client in bold)        VENUE                          CLAIM                                 OUTCOME
             Matthews                        Starke Circuit Court           Whether the defendants used           Defense Verdict
             v.                              Knox, Indiana                  reasonable care in treating a
             Defendant Physician, et al                                     fracture of the medial third of the
                                                                            clavicle and subluxation of the
                                                                            sternoclavicular joint.
             Coleman                         Benton Circuit Court           Whether the defendant used            Verdict for
             v.                              Fowler, Indiana                reasonable care to diagnose and       plaintiff:
             Defendant Physician                                            treat osteomyelitis subsequent to     $30,000.00
                                                                            an infrapatellar tendon transfer
                                                                            operation.
             Fahler                          St. Joseph Superior Court      Whether defendant was negligent       Defense Verdict
             v.                              South Bend, Indiana            in inspecting and maintaining a
             Northern Indiana Public                                        gas line which exploded and
             Service Company                                                burned plaintiff.
             Bethlehem Steel                 United States District Court   Whether the defendant caused an       Settled at Trial.
             v.                              Northern District of Indiana   electrical outage at plaintiff's
             Northern Indiana Public         Hammond, Indiana               steel mill.
             Service Company




                                             WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                        V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                          E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                 ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE   CAPTION (client in bold)      VENUE                          CLAIM                                OUTCOME
             Banks                         Porter Superior Court          Whether defendant was liable for     Defense Verdict
             v.                            Valparaiso, Indiana            plant site explosion of flammable
             Northern Indiana Public                                      liquids.
             Service Company
             Steele                        Benton Circuit Court           Whether defendant was liable for     Defense Verdict
             v.                            Fowler, Indiana                injuries sustained in car-train
             Chicago, Milwaukee & St.                                     collision.
             Paul R.R.
             Echterling                    Newton Circuit Court           Whether defendant violated the       Defense Verdict
             v.                            Kentland, Indiana              Indiana Guest Statute in the
             Woodcox                                                      operation of her automobile.
             Olson                         United States District Court   Whether defendant was at fault in    Defense Verdict
             v.                            Northern District of Indiana   the operation of his automobile in
             Pozwarski                     Hammond, Indiana               an intersection collision.
             Roy                           Porter Superior Court          Whether plaintiff was injured in     Defense Verdict
             v.                            Valparaiso, Indiana            alleged battery committed by
             G.G.M.                                                       employee of defendant security
                                                                          service.




                                           WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                        V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                          E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                 ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE   CAPTION (client in bold)      VENUE                          CLAIM                                OUTCOME
             Weidenaar                     Porter Superior Court          Electrical contact.                  Verdict for
             v.                            Valparaiso, Indiana                                                 plaintiff, $8
             Northern Indiana Public                                                                           million
             Service Company                                                                                   Reduced 40%
                                                                                                               for contributory
                                                                                                               fault.
                                                                                                               Settled after
                                                                                                               verdict.
             Northern Indiana Public       United States District Court   Whether defendant breached its       Settled prior to
             Service Company               Northern District of Indiana   warranties in the sale of an         Trial.
             v.                            Hammond, Indiana               electrostatic precipitator.          Eichhorn &
             Envirotech Corporation                                                                            Eichhorn,
                                                                                                               attorneys for
                                                                                                               Plaintiff
             Northern Indiana Public       United States District Court   Whether the defendant breached       Settled prior to
             Service Company               Northern District of Indiana   its warranty to repair and replace   Trial.
             v.                            Hammond, Indiana               defective parts and equipment in     Eichhorn &
             Wheelabrator Frye                                            an electrostatic precipitator.       Eichhorn,
                                                                                                               attorneys for
                                                                                                               Plaintiff




                                           WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                        V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                          E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                 ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE   CAPTION (client in bold)      VENUE                          CLAIM                               OUTCOME
             Wabash Valley Power           United States District Court   Whether defendant violated the      Settled prior to
             Association                   Northern District of Indiana   antitrust laws.                     Trial.
             v.                            South Bend, Indiana
             Northern Indiana Public
             Service Company
             Monon Trailer                 Benton Circuit Court           Whether defendant was guilty of     Settled prior to
             v.                            Fowler, Indiana                breach of warranty; breach of       Trial.
             Alumax                                                       contract and tortious misconduct.
             State of Indiana              Lake Superior Court            Whether the defendants,             Judgment for
             v.                            East Chicago, Indiana          newspaper reporters, were in        defendants,
             William Heltzel and Mark                                     contempt of court.                  newspaper
             Kiesling                                                                                         reporters.
             Northern Indiana Public       United States Tax Court        Whether petitioner owed             Decision for
             Service Company               Washington, D.C.               withholding taxes for interest      petitioner,
             v.                                                           paid to foreign nationals by        Northern
             Commissioner of Internal                                     Netherlands Antilles finance        Indiana Public
             Revenue Service                                              subsidiary.                         Service
                                                                                                              Company
                                                                                                              Affirmed on
                                                                                                              appeal, See, 115
                                                                                                              F.3d 506 (7th
                                                                                                              Cir. 1997)


                                           WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM
                                            V ERDICTS OF D AVID C. J ENSEN
                                              E ICHHORN & E ICHHORN, LLP
                                  ______________________________________________

TRIAL DATE   CAPTION (client in bold)          VENUE                          CLAIM                               OUTCOME
             Alford                            United States District Court   Whether defendant was negligent     Verdict for
             v.                                Northern District of Indiana   in design and operation of marina   Plaintiff
             Lefty's Coho Landing, et al.      Hammond, Indiana               parking lot where plaintiff         Eichhorn &
                                                                              sustained injury.                   Eichhorn
                                                                                                                  counsel for
                                                                                                                  Plaintiff




                                               WWW.EICHHORN-LAW.COM

								
To top