Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out
Get this document free

SIRS Data_ Fall 2009 - Jackson State University

VIEWS: 1 PAGES: 171

									Variables, Labels and Scale

No. Variable Label                              Question                                                                Rating Scale
Learning Value
  1 Learned Something Valuable                  I learned something valuable.                                           Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)   Strongly Agree (4)
  2 Interest in Subject Increased               My interest in the subject increased.                                   Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)   Strongly Agree (4)
  3 Learned & Understood Subject Matter         I learned/understood the subject matter.                                Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)   Strongly Agree (4)
  4 Rating of Learning Value                    Overall, I rate the learning value of the course as …                   Poor (1)           Fair (2)       Good (3)    Excellent (4)
Instructor Enthusiasm
  5 Instructor Appeared Sincere                 Instructor appeared sincere about teaching.                             Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)   Strongly Agree (4)
  6 Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          Instructor was dynamic and energetic                                    Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)   Strongly Agree (4)
  7 Instructor Style Held Interest              Instructor's style of teaching held my interest.                        Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)   Strongly Agree (4)
  8 Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             Overall, I rate the instructor's enthusiasm as …                        Poor (1)           Fair (2)       Good (3)    Excellent (4)
Instructional Methods
                                             Instructor implemented the course objectives and semester plan as
  9 Course Implemented According to Syllabus outlined in the course syllabus.                                           Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
                                             The instructor used an electronic medium (e.g. listserv, chat group,
                                             Internet, instant messaging, podcast, WebCT, Blackboard) to present
 10 Instructor Used Electronic Medium        course material.                                                           Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
                                             The course format (e.g. lecture, survey, online, hybrid) was appropriate
 11 Course Format Was Appropriate            for course content.                                                        Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
 12 Rating of Instructional Methods          Overall, I rate the instructional methods as …                             Poor (1)         Fair (2)     Good (3) Excellent (4)
Instructor Organization
 13 Material Presented Clearly & Logically   Instructor presented the course material clearly and logically.            Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)   Strongly Agree (4)
 14 Course Materials Were Prepared           Course materials were prepared.                                            Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)   Strongly Agree (4)
 15 Materials were Celar & Understandable    Course materials were clear/understandable.                                Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)   Strongly Agree (4)
 16 Course Objectives Were Stated            Course objectives were stated.                                             Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)   Strongly Agree (4)
                                             Instructor implemented the course obectives and semester plan as
 17 Course Implemented According to Syllabus outlined in the course syllabus.                                           Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
 18 Rating of Organization of Course         Overall, I rate the instructor's organization of the course as …           Poor (1)         Fair (2)     Good (3) Excellent (4)
Group Interaction
 19 Class Discussion Encouraged              Class discussion was encouraged by the instructor.                         Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)

20 Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class Students shared ideas/knowledge during class.                              Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
21 Instructor Encouraged Questions           Instructor encouraged questions and answers.                               Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)

 22 Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   Instructor encouraged students' expression of ideas.                    Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
 23 Rating of Interaction                       Overall, I rate group interaction in the course as …                    Poor (1)         Fair (2)     Good (3) Excellent (4)
Individual Rapport
 24 Instructor Was Friendly to Students         Instructor was friendly towards students.                               Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
    Students Seeking Help and Advice
 25 Welcomed                                    Instructor welcomed students seeking help/advice.                       Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
                                                Instructor was interested in each students' success without showing
26 Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism       favoritism to any student.                                              Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
                                                Instructor was available to students during posted office hours or by
27 Instructor Available During Office Hours     appointment.                                                            Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
28 Instructor Was Accessible to Students         Instructor was accessible to students.                                      Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
29 Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport       Overall, I rate the instructor's individual rapport with students as…       Poor (1)         Fair (2)     Good (3) Excellent (4)
Breadth of Coverage
                                               Instructor related the course to other fields and/or to life/career
30 Course Related to Other Fields & Situations situations as appropriate.                                                    Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)

31 Background of Ideas and Concepts Given        Instructor gave background ideas and concepts.                              Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
32 Instructor Gave Different Points of View      Instructor gave different points of view.                                   Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
                                                 Instructor discussed how course concepts could be used in real life
33 Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed         situations.                                                                 Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
                                                 Overall, I rate the instructor's breadth of knowledge of regarding course
34 Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge        content as …                                                                Poor (1)           Fair (2)       Good (3)     Excellent (4)
Assignments
35 Course Assignments Clear & Precise            Instructor's course assignments were clear and precise.                     Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)

 36 Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable Readings and texts required in the course were valuable.                         Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
     Assignments Provided Better
 37 Understanding                            Assignments provided better understanding of the course.                        Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
                                             Instructor's examination questions and graded assignments were
 38 Exam & Assignments Related to Course     related to course content.                                                      Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
                                             Instructor's course examinations/projects were graded and returned in
 39 Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner a timely manner.                                                                Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
Workload/Difficulty
 40 Course Difficulty                        Course difficulty (easy-hard)                                                   Very Easy (1)      Easy (2)       Difficult (3) Very Difficult (4)
 41 Course Workload                          Course workload (light-heavy)                                                   Very Light (1)     Light (2)      Heavy (3) Very Heavy (4)
 42 Course Pace                              Course pace (too slow-too fast)                                                 Too Slow (1)       Slow (2)       Fast (3) Too Fast (4)
Instructor Behavior
 43 Instructor Used Class Time Effectively   Instructor used class time effectively.                                         Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)    Strongly Agree (4)
 44 Instructor Was Punctual with Class       Instructor was punctual in meeting and dismissing classes.                      Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)    Strongly Agree (4)
 45 Instructor Was Respectful                Instructor treated students with respect.                                       Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)    Strongly Agree (4)
 46 High Level of Excellence Expected        Instructor expected a high level of academic excellence from students.          Strong Agree (1)   Disagree (2)   Agree (3)    Strongly Agree (4)
Student Academic Behavior
 47 Attend Class Rgeularly                   I regularly attend class.                                                       Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
                                             I devote the necessary time outside of the classroom to prepare for
 48 Devote Time for Class Preparation        each class.                                                                     Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
 49 Hours per Week Spent Preparing           Hours/weeks I spent outside of class studying/preparing for class.              0 to 3 (1)       4 to 7 (2)   8 to 11 (3) 12 to 15 (4)
 50 Complete Course Assignments on Time      I complete all course assignments on time.                                      Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
     Approached Course Ready to Meet
 51 Demands                                  I approached this course ready to meet college-level demands.                   Strong Agree (1) Disagree (2) Agree (3) Strongly Agree (4)
UNIVERSITY MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               Fall 2009
Variable                                    Mean Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31       0.84
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22       0.86
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28       0.78
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33       0.84
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42       0.73
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33       0.78
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21       0.86
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38       0.82
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36       0.70
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07       0.93
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35       0.71
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36       0.82
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31       0.76
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38       0.69
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32       0.75
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41       0.66
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38       0.69
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42       0.78
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37       0.74
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class 3.37         0.73
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43       0.69
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39       0.72
Rating of Interaction                       3.37       0.82
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43       0.69
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43         0.70
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40       0.72
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39       0.68
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40       0.68
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42       0.78
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34       0.72
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38       0.69
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35       0.71
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35       0.72
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49       0.72
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35       0.72
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38       0.70
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35         0.72
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41       0.66
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner 3.37          0.71
Course Difficulty                           2.63       0.77
Course Workload                             2.56       0.71
Course Pace                                 2.77       0.59
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58
Number of Observations                           9637
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University        College
Variable                                    Mean Std. Dev.    Mean Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31       0.84   3.26      0.86
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22       0.86   3.14      0.89
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28       0.78   3.17      0.82
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33       0.84   3.22      0.89
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42       0.73   3.37      0.74
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33       0.78   3.27      0.80
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21       0.86   3.09      0.90
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38       0.82   3.29      0.84
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36       0.70   3.31      0.70
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07       0.93   3.11      0.93
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35       0.71   3.32      0.71
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36       0.82   3.26      0.86
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31       0.76   3.22      0.78
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38       0.69   3.34      0.67
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32       0.75   3.23      0.77
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41       0.66   3.37      0.65
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38       0.69   3.34      0.69
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42       0.78   3.35      0.78
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37       0.74   3.31      0.77
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class 3.37         0.73   3.32      0.75
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43       0.69   3.41      0.69
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39       0.72   3.34      0.73
Rating of Interaction                       3.37       0.82   3.28      0.87
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43       0.69   3.42      0.67
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43         0.70   3.40      0.71
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40       0.72   3.39      0.70
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39       0.68   3.38      0.67
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40       0.68   3.38      0.66
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42       0.78   3.37      0.78
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34       0.72   3.33      0.72
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38       0.69   3.34      0.69
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35       0.71   3.32      0.71
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35       0.72   3.37      0.72
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49       0.72   3.48      0.72
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35       0.72   3.30      0.74
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38       0.70   3.36      0.69
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35         0.72   3.32      0.72
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41       0.66   3.41      0.64
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner 3.37          0.71   3.36      0.70
Course Difficulty                           2.63       0.77   2.77      0.74
Course Workload                             2.56       0.71   2.62      0.69
Course Pace                                 2.77       0.59   2.87      0.58
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.40         0.64
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.43         0.61
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.51         0.62
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.48         0.60
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.59         0.55
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.33         0.67
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.14         0.89
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.38         0.65
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43         0.60
Number of Observations                           9637                 835
       College of Business Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.55

3.50

3.45

3.40

3.35
                                                                     University
3.30
                                                                     College
3.25

3.20

3.15

3.10

3.05
DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University        College         Department
Variable                                    Mean Std. Dev.    Mean Std. Dev.   Mean Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31       0.84   3.26      0.86   3.23     0.87
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22       0.86   3.14      0.89   3.02     0.92
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28       0.78   3.17      0.82   3.04     0.83
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33       0.84   3.22      0.89   3.08     0.96
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42       0.73   3.37      0.74   3.29     0.77
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33       0.78   3.27      0.80   3.12     0.86
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21       0.86   3.09      0.90   2.87     0.94
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38       0.82   3.29      0.84   3.14     0.93
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36       0.70   3.31      0.70   3.27     0.66
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07       0.93   3.11      0.93   2.98     0.95
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35       0.71   3.32      0.71   3.23     0.71
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36       0.82   3.26      0.86   3.12     0.94
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31       0.76   3.22      0.78   3.08     0.85
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38       0.69   3.34      0.67   3.29     0.69
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32       0.75   3.23      0.77   3.12     0.79
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41       0.66   3.37      0.65   3.35     0.64
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38       0.69   3.34      0.69   3.32     0.67
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42       0.78   3.35      0.78   3.23     0.84
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37       0.74   3.31      0.77   3.17     0.82
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class 3.37         0.73   3.32      0.75   3.17     0.80
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43       0.69   3.41      0.69   3.32     0.74
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39       0.72   3.34      0.73   3.22     0.79
Rating of Interaction                       3.37       0.82   3.28      0.87   3.05     0.98
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43       0.69   3.42      0.67   3.28     0.76
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43         0.70   3.40      0.71   3.30     0.76
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40       0.72   3.39      0.70   3.30     0.76
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39       0.68   3.38      0.67   3.34     0.64
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40       0.68   3.38      0.66   3.31     0.68
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42       0.78   3.37      0.78   3.23     0.88
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34       0.72   3.33      0.72   3.25     0.72
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38       0.69   3.34      0.69   3.24     0.71
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35       0.71   3.32      0.71   3.22     0.76
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35       0.72   3.37      0.72   3.29     0.73
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49       0.72   3.48      0.72   3.39     0.77
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35       0.72   3.30      0.74   3.19     0.77
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38       0.70   3.36      0.69   3.30     0.72
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35         0.72   3.32      0.72   3.25     0.79
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41       0.66   3.41      0.64   3.37     0.67
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner 3.37          0.71   3.36      0.70   3.29     0.72
Course Difficulty                           2.63       0.77   2.77      0.74   3.01     0.68
Course Workload                             2.56       0.71   2.62      0.69   2.90     0.68
Course Pace                                 2.77       0.59   2.87      0.58   3.08     0.53
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.40         0.64   3.37         0.66
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.43         0.61   3.44         0.62
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.51         0.62   3.40         0.70
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.48         0.60   3.44         0.65
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.59         0.55   3.57         0.58
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.33         0.67   3.24         0.71
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.14         0.89   2.32         0.92
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.38         0.65   3.23         0.72
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43         0.60   3.34         0.65
Number of Observations                           9637                 835                 189
       Department of Accounting Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.60


3.50


3.40


3.30
                                                                          University
3.20                                                                      College
                                                                          Department
3.10


3.00


2.90


2.80
BEAS MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University        College         Department
Variable                                    Mean Std. Dev.    Mean Std. Dev.   Mean Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31       0.84   3.26      0.86   3.56     0.58
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22       0.86   3.14      0.89   3.31     0.80
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28       0.78   3.17      0.82   3.38     0.60
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33       0.84   3.22      0.89   3.45     0.68
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42       0.73   3.37      0.74   3.62     0.49
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33       0.78   3.27      0.80   3.61     0.49
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21       0.86   3.09      0.90   3.41     0.65
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38       0.82   3.29      0.84   3.57     0.54
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36       0.70   3.31      0.70   3.42     0.66
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07       0.93   3.11      0.93   3.59     0.50
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35       0.71   3.32      0.71   3.50     0.51
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36       0.82   3.26      0.86   3.48     0.59
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31       0.76   3.22      0.78   3.42     0.54
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38       0.69   3.34      0.67   3.45     0.55
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32       0.75   3.23      0.77   3.38     0.58
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41       0.66   3.37      0.65   3.44     0.50
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38       0.69   3.34      0.69   3.49     0.55
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42       0.78   3.35      0.78   3.44     0.59
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37       0.74   3.31      0.77   3.56     0.50
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class 3.37         0.73   3.32      0.75   3.55     0.50
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43       0.69   3.41      0.69   3.56     0.50
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39       0.72   3.34      0.73   3.54     0.51
Rating of Interaction                       3.37       0.82   3.28      0.87   3.49     0.65
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43       0.69   3.42      0.67   3.68     0.47
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43         0.70   3.40      0.71   3.65     0.48
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40       0.72   3.39      0.70   3.58     0.50
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39       0.68   3.38      0.67   3.46     0.56
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40       0.68   3.38      0.66   3.49     0.51
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42       0.78   3.37      0.78   3.54     0.56
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34       0.72   3.33      0.72   3.51     0.51
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38       0.69   3.34      0.69   3.51     0.51
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35       0.71   3.32      0.71   3.57     0.50
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35       0.72   3.37      0.72   3.51     0.78
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49       0.72   3.48      0.72   3.66     0.59
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35       0.72   3.30      0.74   3.46     0.61
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38       0.70   3.36      0.69   3.53     0.51
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35         0.72   3.32      0.72   3.46     0.56
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41       0.66   3.41      0.64   3.60     0.50
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner 3.37          0.71   3.36      0.70   3.38     0.78
Course Difficulty                           2.63       0.77   2.77      0.74   2.48     0.80
Course Workload                             2.56       0.71   2.62      0.69   2.62     0.70
Course Pace                                 2.77       0.59   2.87      0.58   2.79     0.54
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.40         0.64   3.45        0.62
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.43         0.61   3.35        0.60
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.51         0.62   3.65        0.49
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.48         0.60   3.53        0.51
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.59         0.55   3.56        0.61
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.33         0.67   3.52        0.62
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.14         0.89   2.21        0.86
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.38         0.65   3.42        0.56
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43         0.60   3.50        0.67
Number of Observations                           9637                 835                 26
        Department of Entrepreneurship and Professional Development (Business
       Education and Administrative Services) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall
                                         2009

3.70


3.60


3.50


3.40                                                                               University
                                                                                   College
3.30                                                                               Department


3.20


3.10


3.00
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, GENERAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.26         0.86     3.11      0.90
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.14         0.89     2.96      0.93
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.17         0.82     2.98      0.87
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.22         0.89     2.97      0.97
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.37         0.74     3.26      0.78
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.27         0.80     3.10      0.85
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.09         0.90     2.89      0.96
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.29         0.84     3.10      0.91
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.31         0.70     3.19      0.74
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.11         0.93     2.89      0.96
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.32         0.71     3.18      0.73
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.26         0.86     3.04      0.91
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.22         0.78     3.06      0.83
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.34         0.67     3.21      0.69
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.23         0.77     3.06      0.84
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.37         0.65     3.23      0.69
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.34         0.69     3.21      0.71
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.35         0.78     3.20      0.84
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.31         0.77     3.16      0.85
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.32         0.75     3.19      0.81
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.41         0.69     3.29      0.72
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.34         0.73     3.21      0.79
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.28         0.87     3.11      0.95
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.42         0.67     3.33      0.67
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.40         0.71     3.28      0.74
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.39         0.70     3.24      0.74
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.38         0.67     3.24      0.69
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.38         0.66     3.26      0.67
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.37         0.78     3.25      0.81
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.33         0.72     3.17      0.80
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.34         0.69     3.23      0.73
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.32         0.71     3.19      0.75
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.37         0.72     3.22      0.80
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.48         0.72     3.38      0.79
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.30         0.74     3.17      0.77
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.36         0.69     3.23      0.75
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.32         0.72     3.16      0.79
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.41         0.64     3.28      0.69
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.36         0.70     3.26      0.71
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.77         0.74     2.85      0.74
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.47      0.67
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.87         0.58     2.86      0.63
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.40         0.64   3.29         0.67
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.43         0.61   3.32         0.64
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.51         0.62   3.42         0.66
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.48         0.60   3.37         0.64
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.59         0.55   3.52         0.58
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.33         0.67   3.21         0.69
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.14         0.89   2.00         0.87
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.38         0.65   3.33         0.63
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43         0.60   3.37         0.58
Number of Observations                           9637                 835                 299
       Department of Economics, Finance and General Business Comparative SIRS
                               Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.60

3.50

3.40

3.30

3.20                                                                            University
                                                                                College
3.10                                                                            Department

3.00

2.90

2.80

2.70
CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College                 Year
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.26         0.86     3.37        0.87
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.14         0.89     3.35        0.80
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.17         0.82     3.41        0.74
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.22         0.89     3.56        0.65
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.37         0.74     3.50        0.70
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.27         0.80     3.48        0.70
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.09         0.90     3.43        0.70
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.29         0.84     3.56        0.59
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.31         0.70     3.42        0.73
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.11         0.93     3.59        0.65
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.32         0.71     3.51        0.67
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.26         0.86     3.61        0.61
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.22         0.78     3.48        0.64
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.34         0.67     3.45        0.67
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.23         0.77     3.43        0.66
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.37         0.65     3.51        0.66
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.34         0.69     3.43        0.75
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.35         0.78     3.57        0.61
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.31         0.77     3.54        0.62
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.32         0.75     3.54        0.64
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.41         0.69     3.57        0.62
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.34         0.73     3.53        0.62
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.28         0.87     3.61        0.55
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.42         0.67     3.56        0.62
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.40         0.71     3.52        0.64
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.39         0.70     3.51        0.64
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.38         0.67     3.46        0.71
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.38         0.66     3.45        0.67
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.37         0.78     3.57        0.59
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.33         0.72     3.60        0.51
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.34         0.69     3.61        0.52
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.32         0.71     3.51        0.53
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.37         0.72     3.60        0.52
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.48         0.72     3.71        0.49
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.30         0.74     3.53        0.56
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.36         0.69     3.50        0.52
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.32         0.72     3.58        0.50
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.41         0.64     3.52        0.55
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.36         0.70     3.46        0.72
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.77         0.74     2.43        0.76
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.63        0.69
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.87         0.58     2.78        0.49
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.40         0.64   3.59        0.53
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.43         0.61   3.51        0.54
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.51         0.62   3.65        0.48
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.48         0.60   3.61        0.49
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.59         0.55   3.66        0.49
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.33         0.67   3.41        0.66
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.14         0.89   2.06        0.85
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.38         0.65   3.32        0.67
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43         0.60   3.48        0.54
Number of Observations                           9637                 835                 87
         Department of Entrepreneurship and Professional Development
       (Entrepreneurship Only) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.80

3.70

3.60

3.50

3.40                                                                     University
                                                                         College
3.30                                                                     Department

3.20

3.10

3.00

2.90
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.26         0.86     3.37      0.81
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.14         0.89     3.35      0.80
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.17         0.82     3.41      0.72
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.22         0.89     3.46      0.71
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.37         0.74     3.51      0.65
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.27         0.80     3.47      0.66
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.09         0.90     3.37      0.74
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.29         0.84     3.48      0.71
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.31         0.70     3.46      0.64
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.11         0.93     3.27      0.87
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.32         0.71     3.47      0.65
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.26         0.86     3.48      0.71
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.22         0.78     3.42      0.66
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.34         0.67     3.50      0.59
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.23         0.77     3.45      0.64
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.37         0.65     3.52      0.55
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.34         0.69     3.49      0.60
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.35         0.78     3.53      0.64
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.31         0.77     3.50      0.61
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.32         0.75     3.50      0.63
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.41         0.69     3.54      0.60
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.34         0.73     3.51      0.61
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.28         0.87     3.53      0.68
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.42         0.67     3.57      0.58
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.40         0.71     3.55      0.62
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.39         0.70     3.57      0.56
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.38         0.67     3.53      0.60
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.38         0.66     3.56      0.57
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.37         0.78     3.53      0.67
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.33         0.72     3.47      0.66
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.34         0.69     3.45      0.65
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.32         0.71     3.46      0.63
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.37         0.72     3.50      0.61
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.48         0.72     3.57      0.63
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.30         0.74     3.43      0.69
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.36         0.69     3.50      0.62
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.32         0.72     3.47      0.62
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.41         0.64     3.52      0.56
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.36         0.70     3.48      0.64
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.77         0.74     2.65      0.70
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.59      0.66
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.87         0.58     2.75      0.56
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.40         0.64   3.47         0.61
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.43         0.61   3.54         0.57
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.51         0.62   3.61         0.54
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.48         0.60   3.57         0.55
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.59         0.55   3.66         0.51
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.33         0.67   3.51         0.59
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.14         0.89   2.18         0.87
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.38         0.65   3.56         0.58
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43         0.60   3.55         0.58
Number of Observations                           9637                 835                 233
       Department of Management and Marketing Comparative SIRS Mean Scores,
                                    Fall 2009

3.60


3.50


3.40

                                                                              University
3.30                                                                          College
                                                                              Department

3.20


3.10


3.00
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.44         0.80
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.41         0.77
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.44         0.72
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.54         0.70
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.53         0.68
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.50         0.69
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.43         0.73
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.69
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.46         0.66
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.22         0.86
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.47         0.67
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.54         0.70
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.46         0.68
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.47         0.65
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.47         0.66
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.52         0.61
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.49         0.64
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.56         0.70
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.55         0.64
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.55         0.63
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.58         0.62
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.56         0.63
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.59         0.67
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.56         0.61
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.55         0.63
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.54         0.63
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.49         0.63
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.52         0.62
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.57         0.68
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.60
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.52         0.63
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.51         0.63
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.54         0.61
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.63         0.62
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.49         0.64
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.51         0.62
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.51         0.62
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.53         0.61
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.47         0.67
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.56         0.74
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.75         0.53
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.46          0.63
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.50          0.62
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.57          0.58
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.59          0.57
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.62          0.55
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.51          0.59
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.35          0.96
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.51          0.60
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.58          0.54
Number of Observations                           9637                 1665
       College of Education and Human Development Comparative SIRS Mean Scores,
                                       Fall 2009

3.70

3.65

3.60

3.55

3.50

3.45                                                                              University

3.40                                                                              College

3.35

3.30

3.25

3.20

3.15
COUNSELING MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.44         0.80     3.42      0.81
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.41         0.77     3.32      0.84
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.44         0.72     3.38      0.69
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.54         0.70     3.52      0.66
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.53         0.68     3.43      0.70
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.50         0.69     3.36      0.78
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.43         0.73     3.22      0.86
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.69     3.41      0.80
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.46         0.66     3.42      0.61
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.22         0.86     3.08      0.94
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.37      0.63
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.54         0.70     3.48      0.74
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.46         0.68     3.33      0.73
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.47         0.65     3.40      0.69
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.47         0.66     3.40      0.72
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.52         0.61     3.53      0.52
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.49         0.64     3.51      0.58
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.56         0.70     3.54      0.73
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.55         0.64     3.48      0.68
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.55         0.63     3.47      0.73
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.58         0.62     3.47      0.73
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.56         0.63     3.49      0.75
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.59         0.67     3.46      0.75
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.56         0.61     3.47      0.74
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.55         0.63     3.51      0.69
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.54         0.63     3.52      0.71
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.49         0.63     3.44      0.67
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.52         0.62     3.43      0.71
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.57         0.68     3.43      0.80
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.60     3.49      0.64
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.52         0.63     3.45      0.69
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.51         0.63     3.42      0.71
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.54         0.61     3.48      0.71
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.63         0.62     3.49      0.75
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.49         0.64     3.43      0.66
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.51         0.62     3.47      0.55
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.51         0.62     3.44      0.59
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.53         0.61     3.49      0.63
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.48      0.63
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.56         0.74     2.56      0.68
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.63      0.62
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.75         0.53     2.70      0.51
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.46          0.63   3.37        0.64
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.50          0.62   3.42        0.65
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.57          0.58   3.44        0.67
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.59          0.57   3.42        0.61
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.62          0.55   3.54        0.53
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.51          0.59   3.40        0.52
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.35          0.96   2.24        0.90
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.51          0.60   3.40        0.65
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.58          0.54   3.57        0.50
Number of Observations                           9637                 1665                 66
       Department of School, Community and Rehabilitative Counseling (COUNS
                  Code) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.70

3.65

3.60

3.55

3.50
                                                                              University
3.45
                                                                              College
3.40
                                                                              Department
3.35

3.30

3.25

3.20

3.15
DEPARTMENT OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.44         0.80     3.41      0.82
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.41         0.77     3.44      0.73
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.44         0.72     3.45      0.67
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.54         0.70     3.57      0.68
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.53         0.68     3.57      0.65
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.50         0.69     3.53      0.66
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.43         0.73     3.45      0.69
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.69     3.60      0.67
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.46         0.66     3.48      0.64
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.22         0.86     3.37      0.72
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.47      0.65
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.54         0.70     3.57      0.68
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.46         0.68     3.46      0.64
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.47         0.65     3.48      0.62
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.47         0.66     3.47      0.63
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.52         0.61     3.55      0.56
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.49         0.64     3.53      0.59
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.56         0.70     3.57      0.68
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.55         0.64     3.58      0.61
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.55         0.63     3.57      0.62
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.58         0.62     3.58      0.60
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.56         0.63     3.58      0.58
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.59         0.67     3.59      0.66
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.56         0.61     3.57      0.59
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.55         0.63     3.57      0.63
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.54         0.63     3.56      0.60
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.49         0.63     3.51      0.60
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.52         0.62     3.53      0.59
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.57         0.68     3.59      0.67
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.60     3.56      0.54
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.52         0.63     3.52      0.59
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.51         0.63     3.50      0.61
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.54         0.61     3.55      0.57
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.63         0.62     3.66      0.59
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.49         0.64     3.50      0.59
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.51         0.62     3.54      0.56
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.51         0.62     3.52      0.59
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.53         0.61     3.53      0.57
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.46      0.59
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.56         0.74     2.59      0.69
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.70      0.62
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.75         0.53     2.72      0.50
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.46          0.63   3.46         0.62
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.50          0.62   3.52         0.57
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.57          0.58   3.59         0.53
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.59          0.57   3.61         0.52
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.62          0.55   3.62         0.53
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.51          0.59   3.54         0.55
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.35          0.96   2.51         0.90
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.51          0.60   3.48         0.59
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.58          0.54   3.57         0.53
Number of Observations                           9637                 1665                 395
       Department of Elementary and Early Childhood Education (Curriculum and
               Instruction) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.70


3.60


3.50

                                                                                University
3.40                                                                            College
                                                                                Department

3.30


3.20


3.10
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONS AND LEADERSHIP MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.44         0.80     3.54      0.72
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.41         0.77     3.47      0.76
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.44         0.72     3.42      0.75
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.54         0.70     3.54      0.71
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.53         0.68     3.61      0.67
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.50         0.69     3.56      0.68
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.43         0.73     3.45      0.74
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.69     3.62      0.68
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.46         0.66     3.47      0.70
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.22         0.86     3.22      0.87
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.53      0.62
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.54         0.70     3.57      0.71
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.46         0.68     3.49      0.73
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.47         0.65     3.52      0.67
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.47         0.66     3.48      0.69
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.52         0.61     3.55      0.63
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.49         0.64     3.50      0.71
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.56         0.70     3.57      0.74
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.55         0.64     3.63      0.60
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.55         0.63     3.61      0.59
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.58         0.62     3.65      0.60
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.56         0.63     3.62      0.61
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.59         0.67     3.67      0.65
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.56         0.61     3.65      0.58
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.55         0.63     3.63      0.59
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.54         0.63     3.63      0.57
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.49         0.63     3.58      0.61
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.52         0.62     3.61      0.60
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.57         0.68     3.67      0.62
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.60     3.55      0.61
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.52         0.63     3.59      0.61
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.51         0.63     3.61      0.57
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.54         0.61     3.50      0.59
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.63         0.62     3.72      0.55
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.49         0.64     3.52      0.69
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.51         0.62     3.53      0.66
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.51         0.62     3.56      0.62
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.53         0.61     3.57      0.62
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.45      0.75
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.56         0.74     2.84      0.68
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.90      0.63
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.75         0.53     2.86      0.48
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.46          0.63   3.54         0.64
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.50          0.62   3.57         0.64
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.57          0.58   3.69         0.52
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.59          0.57   3.73         0.51
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.62          0.55   3.77         0.45
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.51          0.59   3.68         0.48
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.35          0.96   2.70         0.95
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.51          0.60   3.64         0.55
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.58          0.54   3.70         0.47
Number of Observations                           9637                 1665                 268
           Department of Educational Foundations and Leadership Comparative SIRS
                                   Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.80



3.70



3.60



3.50
                                                                                                                  University
                                                                                                                  College
                                                                                                                  Department
3.40



3.30



3.20



3.10
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
PROGRAM IN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College                 Unit
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.44         0.80     3.50        0.83
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.41         0.77     3.41        0.82
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.44         0.72     3.47        0.76
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.54         0.70     3.65        0.70
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.53         0.68     3.59        0.64
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.50         0.69     3.55        0.70
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.43         0.73     3.51        0.69
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.69     3.66        0.64
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.46         0.66     3.52        0.67
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.22         0.86     3.25        0.87
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.54        0.72
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.54         0.70     3.74        0.54
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.46         0.68     3.52        0.70
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.47         0.65     3.52        0.66
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.47         0.66     3.53        0.68
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.52         0.61     3.56        0.67
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.49         0.64     3.56        0.63
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.56         0.70     3.68        0.63
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.55         0.64     3.55        0.64
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.55         0.63     3.55        0.67
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.58         0.62     3.58        0.62
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.56         0.63     3.56        0.62
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.59         0.67     3.73        0.51
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.56         0.61     3.61        0.60
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.55         0.63     3.61        0.61
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.54         0.63     3.59        0.62
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.49         0.63     3.58        0.64
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.52         0.62     3.57        0.64
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.57         0.68     3.73        0.63
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.60     3.55        0.64
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.52         0.63     3.51        0.67
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.51         0.63     3.55        0.64
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.54         0.61     3.55        0.63
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.63         0.62     3.71        0.54
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.49         0.64     3.60        0.59
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.51         0.62     3.57        0.66
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.51         0.62     3.60        0.59
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.53         0.61     3.59        0.61
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.58        0.59
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.56         0.74     2.38        0.62
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.55        0.59
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.75         0.53     2.70        0.50
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.46          0.63   3.47        0.63
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.50          0.62   3.58        0.56
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.57          0.58   3.59        0.55
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.59          0.57   3.62        0.55
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.62          0.55   3.62        0.55
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.51          0.59   3.48        0.60
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.35          0.96   2.15        0.95
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.51          0.60   3.48        0.71
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.58          0.54   3.53        0.60
Number of Observations                           9637                 1665                 78
       Program in Educational Technology Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.80


3.70


3.60


3.50                                                                               University
                                                                                   College
3.40                                                                               Department


3.30


3.20


3.10
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND RECREATION MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.44         0.80     3.35      0.82
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.41         0.77     3.32      0.81
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.44         0.72     3.37      0.74
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.54         0.70     3.45      0.76
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.53         0.68     3.42      0.73
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.50         0.69     3.41      0.72
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.43         0.73     3.36      0.75
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.69     3.46      0.76
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.46         0.66     3.32      0.70
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.22         0.86     3.02      0.94
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.32      0.72
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.54         0.70     3.42      0.76
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.46         0.68     3.36      0.70
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.47         0.65     3.37      0.67
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.47         0.66     3.39      0.68
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.52         0.61     3.38      0.66
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.49         0.64     3.35      0.68
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.56         0.70     3.44      0.74
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.55         0.64     3.41      0.68
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.55         0.63     3.43      0.68
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.58         0.62     3.44      0.67
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.56         0.63     3.42      0.71
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.59         0.67     3.47      0.72
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.56         0.61     3.44      0.65
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.55         0.63     3.42      0.68
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.54         0.63     3.40      0.70
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.49         0.63     3.38      0.68
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.52         0.62     3.41      0.67
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.57         0.68     3.46      0.73
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.60     3.39      0.67
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.52         0.63     3.40      0.68
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.51         0.63     3.38      0.68
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.54         0.61     3.42      0.67
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.63         0.62     3.50      0.70
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.49         0.64     3.39      0.67
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.51         0.62     3.38      0.69
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.51         0.62     3.39      0.68
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.53         0.61     3.42      0.65
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.35      0.70
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.56         0.74     2.40      0.81
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.41      0.78
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.75         0.53     2.71      0.60
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.46          0.63   3.34         0.66
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.50          0.62   3.37         0.67
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.57          0.58   3.46         0.65
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.59          0.57   3.43         0.62
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.62          0.55   3.49         0.60
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.51          0.59   3.36         0.65
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.35          0.96   2.01         0.96
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.51          0.60   3.46         0.60
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.58          0.54   3.46         0.57
Number of Observations                           9637                 1665                 430
       Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation Comparative SIRS
                                Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.70

3.65

3.60

3.55

3.50
                                                                                  University
3.45
                                                                                  College
3.40
                                                                                  Department
3.35

3.30

3.25

3.20

3.15
PE MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College                 Unit
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.44         0.80     3.26        1.04
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.41         0.77     3.26        0.69
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.44         0.72     3.35        0.59
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.54         0.70     3.38        0.67
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.53         0.68     3.33        0.58
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.50         0.69     3.40        0.68
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.43         0.73     3.38        0.67
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.69     3.29        0.85
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.46         0.66     3.38        0.59
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.22         0.86     3.43        0.68
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.47        0.60
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.54         0.70     3.40        0.68
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.46         0.68     3.30        0.73
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.47         0.65     3.40        0.60
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.47         0.66     3.33        0.49
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.52         0.61     3.42        0.51
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.49         0.64     3.28        0.67
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.56         0.70     3.42        0.61
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.55         0.64     3.17        0.71
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.55         0.63     3.21        0.63
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.58         0.62     3.26        0.65
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.56         0.63     3.32        0.58
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.59         0.67     3.33        0.84
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.56         0.61     3.33        0.59
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.55         0.63     3.33        0.49
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.54         0.63     3.22        0.65
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.49         0.63     3.33        0.59
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.52         0.62     3.28        0.57
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.57         0.68     3.44        0.62
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.60     3.47        0.51
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.52         0.63     3.41        0.51
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.51         0.63     3.41        0.62
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.54         0.61     3.35        0.61
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.63         0.62     3.41        0.62
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.49         0.64     3.37        0.62
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.51         0.62     3.53        0.52
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.51         0.62     3.56        0.51
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.53         0.61     3.56        0.51
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.13        1.13
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.56         0.74     2.73        0.46
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.75        0.45
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.75         0.53     2.81        0.40
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.46          0.63   3.31        0.48
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.50          0.62   3.25        0.58
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.57          0.58   3.50        0.52
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.59          0.57   3.75        0.45
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.62          0.55   3.62        0.62
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.51          0.59   3.44        0.63
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.35          0.96   2.00        0.82
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.51          0.60   3.00        0.73
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.58          0.54   3.44        0.51
Number of Observations                           9637                 1665                 11
       Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation (Physical Education)
                        Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.80

3.70

3.60

3.50
                                                                                      University
3.40                                                                                  College
                                                                                      Department
3.30

3.20

3.10

3.00
DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL, EDUCATIONAL AND REHABILITATION COUNSELING MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.44         0.80     3.59      0.72
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.41         0.77     3.56      0.72
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.44         0.72     3.54      0.70
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.54         0.70     3.70      0.57
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.53         0.68     3.65      0.55
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.50         0.69     3.57      0.64
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.43         0.73     3.54      0.63
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.69     3.71      0.53
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.46         0.66     3.64      0.56
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.22         0.86     3.38      0.77
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.66      0.52
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.54         0.70     3.68      0.60
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.46         0.68     3.61      0.60
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.47         0.65     3.64      0.56
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.47         0.66     3.60      0.62
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.52         0.61     3.67      0.51
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.49         0.64     3.68      0.51
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.56         0.70     3.72      0.51
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.55         0.64     3.73      0.48
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.55         0.63     3.75      0.47
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.58         0.62     3.75      0.48
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.56         0.63     3.72      0.47
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.59         0.67     3.73      0.50
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.56         0.61     3.65      0.54
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.55         0.63     3.67      0.55
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.54         0.63     3.67      0.53
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.49         0.63     3.62      0.53
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.52         0.62     3.60      0.53
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.57         0.68     3.69      0.58
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.60     3.68      0.47
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.52         0.63     3.66      0.51
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.51         0.63     3.66      0.51
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.54         0.61     3.70      0.48
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.63         0.62     3.76      0.44
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.49         0.64     3.63      0.54
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.51         0.62     3.67      0.48
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.51         0.62     3.60      0.55
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.53         0.61     3.68      0.47
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.67      0.51
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.56         0.74     2.66      0.72
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.72      0.63
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.75         0.53     2.77      0.52
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.46          0.63   3.62         0.53
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.50          0.62   3.64         0.52
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.57          0.58   3.68         0.48
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.59          0.57   3.74         0.45
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.62          0.55   3.76         0.44
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.51          0.59   3.68         0.48
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.35          0.96   2.64         0.92
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.51          0.60   3.72         0.48
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.58          0.54   3.71         0.45
Number of Observations                           9637                 1665                 141
       Department of School. Community and Rehabilitative Counseling (SERS Code)
                        Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.80


3.70


3.60


3.50                                                                               University
                                                                                   College
3.40                                                                               Department


3.30


3.20


3.10
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL EDUCATION MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.44         0.80     3.59      0.68
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.41         0.77     3.59      0.67
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.44         0.72     3.58      0.65
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.54         0.70     3.71      0.52
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.53         0.68     3.61      0.65
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.50         0.69     3.63      0.64
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.43         0.73     3.61      0.66
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.69     3.75      0.48
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.46         0.66     3.56      0.59
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.22         0.86     3.35      0.82
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.64      0.52
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.54         0.70     3.68      0.54
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.46         0.68     3.63      0.57
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.47         0.65     3.61      0.56
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.47         0.66     3.62      0.56
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.52         0.61     3.64      0.55
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.49         0.64     3.64      0.54
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.56         0.70     3.74      0.50
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.55         0.64     3.71      0.53
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.55         0.63     3.70      0.52
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.58         0.62     3.74      0.47
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.56         0.63     3.68      0.54
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.59         0.67     3.77      0.46
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.56         0.61     3.73      0.46
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.55         0.63     3.75      0.45
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.54         0.63     3.72      0.53
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.49         0.63     3.64      0.50
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.52         0.62     3.68      0.48
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.57         0.68     3.72      0.53
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.60     3.72      0.45
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.52         0.63     3.70      0.48
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.51         0.63     3.69      0.50
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.54         0.61     3.74      0.44
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.63         0.62     3.78      0.43
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.49         0.64     3.68      0.50
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.51         0.62     3.67      0.47
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.51         0.62     3.75      0.44
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.53         0.61     3.72      0.47
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.68      0.55
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.56         0.74     2.36      0.63
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.49      0.60
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.75         0.53     2.72      0.47
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.46          0.63   3.63        0.55
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.50          0.62   3.67        0.54
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.57          0.58   3.71        0.51
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.59          0.57   3.71        0.52
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.62          0.55   3.63        0.55
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.51          0.59   3.48        0.63
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.35          0.96   2.36        0.87
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.51          0.60   3.45        0.63
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.58          0.54   3.64        0.56
Number of Observations                           9637                 1665                 92
       Department of Special Education Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.90


3.80


3.70


3.60
                                                                                 University
3.50                                                                             College
                                                                                 Department
3.40


3.30


3.20


3.10
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCE EDUCATION MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College                 Unit
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.44         0.80     3.42        0.80
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.41         0.77     3.37        0.80
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.44         0.72     3.45        0.73
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.54         0.70     3.52        0.73
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.53         0.68     3.53        0.68
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.50         0.69     3.51        0.67
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.43         0.73     3.41        0.77
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.69     3.56        0.71
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.46         0.66     3.51        0.63
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.22         0.86     3.21        0.90
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.49        0.71
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.54         0.70     3.51        0.75
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.46         0.68     3.44        0.70
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.47         0.65     3.46        0.66
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.47         0.66     3.47        0.66
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.52         0.61     3.52        0.63
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.49         0.64     3.51        0.63
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.56         0.70     3.55        0.74
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.55         0.64     3.57        0.70
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.55         0.63     3.58        0.64
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.58         0.62     3.61        0.65
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.56         0.63     3.59        0.65
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.59         0.67     3.54        0.74
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.56         0.61     3.51        0.66
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.55         0.63     3.52        0.69
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.54         0.63     3.51        0.65
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.49         0.63     3.41        0.66
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.52         0.62     3.46        0.69
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.57         0.68     3.50        0.75
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.60     3.53        0.61
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.52         0.63     3.54        0.65
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.51         0.63     3.49        0.71
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.54         0.61     3.51        0.64
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.63         0.62     3.58        0.69
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.49         0.64     3.47        0.70
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.51         0.62     3.52        0.67
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.51         0.62     3.46        0.68
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.53         0.61     3.49        0.68
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.47         0.67     3.49        0.72
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.56         0.74     2.55        0.74
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.62         0.69     2.54        0.67
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.75         0.53     2.73        0.56
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.46          0.63   3.45   0.63
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.50          0.62   3.45   0.68
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.57          0.58   3.52   0.64
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.59          0.57   3.57   0.62
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.62          0.55   3.60   0.57
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.51          0.59   3.50   0.61
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.35          0.96   2.26   0.90
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.51          0.60   3.48   0.63
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.58          0.54   3.59   0.54
Number of Observations                           9637                 1665
             Program in Social Science Education Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.70


3.65


3.60


3.55


3.50


3.45                                                                                                                University
                                                                                                                    College
3.40                                                                                                                Unit


3.35


3.30


3.25


3.20


3.15
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
GRADUATE STUDIES MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University               Unit
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.10        0.77
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     2.92        0.80
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.04        0.71
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.26        0.81
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.00        0.71
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     2.90        0.72
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     2.90        0.72
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.26        0.81
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.00        0.75
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00        0.75
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.11        0.46
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.32        0.58
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.16        0.50
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.17        0.51
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.17        0.51
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.12        0.49
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.06        0.54
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.28        0.57
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.17        0.51
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.11        0.47
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.11        0.47
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.11        0.47
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.39        0.50
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.06        0.42
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     2.94        0.42
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.00        0.49
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     2.94        0.54
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     2.94        0.54
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.22        0.55
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.06        0.42
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.06        0.42
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.06        0.42
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.00        0.49
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.28        0.46
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.06        0.42
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.00        0.49
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.06        0.42
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.00        0.49
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.06        0.54
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.00        0.77
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.06        0.73
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.22        0.55
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.00        0.52
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.06        0.43
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.06        0.42
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.06        0.42
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   2.94        0.64
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   2.94        0.66
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   1.67        0.77
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.06        0.73
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.00        0.69
Number of Observations                           9637                 16
                        Graduate Studies Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.60



3.50



3.40



3.30


                                                                                                                    University
3.20
                                                                                                                    College


3.10



3.00



2.90



2.80
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979
                     College of Liberal Arts Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.55



3.50



3.45



3.40
                                                                                                                    University
                                                                                                                    College
3.35



3.30



3.25



3.20
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF ART MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.50      0.71
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.42      0.74
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.45      0.69
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.58      0.64
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.57      0.65
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.54      0.60
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.51      0.67
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.61      0.62
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.51      0.59
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     3.15      0.89
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.49      0.64
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.57      0.65
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.53      0.62
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.59      0.54
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.54      0.60
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.54      0.54
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.49      0.57
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.67      0.56
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.54      0.55
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.56      0.54
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.57      0.60
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.59      0.53
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.56      0.58
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.61      0.53
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.58      0.54
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.58      0.57
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.49      0.59
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.52      0.56
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.65      0.58
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.51      0.57
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.56      0.54
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.56      0.55
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.50      0.56
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.70      0.49
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.54      0.53
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.44      0.66
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.56      0.53
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.57      0.51
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.55      0.60
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.33      0.80
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.41      0.62
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.62      0.56
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.52         0.57
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.55         0.59
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.59         0.52
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.61         0.51
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.62         0.50
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.51         0.58
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.31         1.02
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.53         0.57
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.51         0.53
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 129
                       Department of Art Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.80



3.70



3.60



3.50
                                                                                                                  University
                                                                                                                  College
                                                                                                                  Department
3.40



3.30



3.20



3.10
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOLOGY (CRIMINAL JUSTICE ONLY) MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.23      0.92
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.35      0.79
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.35      0.71
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.39      0.71
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.47      0.67
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.36      0.71
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.34      0.78
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.45      0.70
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.42      0.65
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     2.95      0.89
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.36      0.69
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.44      0.72
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.31      0.78
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.40      0.70
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.38      0.76
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.46      0.64
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.39      0.68
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.52      0.69
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.46      0.66
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.52      0.64
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.55      0.61
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.52      0.64
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.59      0.63
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.47      0.65
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.46      0.69
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.40      0.70
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.40      0.71
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.44      0.66
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.52      0.71
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.41      0.66
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.47      0.61
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.50      0.61
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.47      0.59
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.59      0.62
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.42      0.72
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.38      0.73
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.34      0.69
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.44      0.59
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.44      0.60
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.71      0.69
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.72      0.70
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.82      0.53
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.49         0.59
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.46         0.66
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.58         0.54
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.59         0.61
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.58         0.63
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.45         0.59
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.42         0.90
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.50         0.57
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.51         0.56
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 117
           Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice (Criminal Justice Only)
                       Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.65


3.60


3.55


3.50


3.45                                                                                                                University
                                                                                                                    College
3.40                                                                                                                Unit



3.35


3.30


3.25


3.20
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH AND MODERN FOREIGN LANGUAGES MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.25      0.85
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.11      0.86
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.23      0.78
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.28      0.84
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.37      0.75
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.26      0.79
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.15      0.87
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.30      0.83
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.30      0.72
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     2.86      0.99
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.27      0.74
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.30      0.83
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.27      0.76
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.32      0.71
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.29      0.75
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.35      0.69
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.32      0.73
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.36      0.81
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.37      0.73
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.38      0.71
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.38      0.72
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.36      0.74
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.34      0.82
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.34      0.76
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.36      0.74
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.33      0.75
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.32      0.71
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.34      0.70
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.35      0.81
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.26      0.75
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.32      0.71
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.32      0.71
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.28      0.73
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.44      0.74
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.29      0.75
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.37      0.69
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.29      0.73
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.36      0.67
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.31      0.73
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.60      0.76
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.54      0.70
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.76      0.59
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.32          0.68
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.32          0.69
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.39          0.69
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.43          0.63
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.48          0.66
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.33          0.66
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.16          0.94
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.33          0.69
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.43          0.62
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 1147
            Department of English and Modern Foreign Languages Comparative SIRS Mean
                                         Scores, Fall 2009

3.55



3.50



3.45



3.40

                                                                                                                  University
3.35                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department

3.30



3.25



3.20



3.15
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.29      0.85
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.20      0.90
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.29      0.81
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.35      0.82
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.44      0.71
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.36      0.75
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.22      0.89
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.43      0.79
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.39      0.68
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     3.20      0.88
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.36      0.73
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.38      0.83
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.34      0.75
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.39      0.69
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.35      0.75
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.42      0.65
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.41      0.68
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.46      0.77
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.42      0.72
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.39      0.72
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.42      0.70
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.41      0.69
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.38      0.82
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.48      0.64
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.46      0.65
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.41      0.69
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.44      0.62
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.46      0.62
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.47      0.73
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.29      0.76
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.41      0.66
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.38      0.68
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.32      0.73
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.50      0.71
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.37      0.72
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.42      0.68
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.35      0.73
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.41      0.66
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.37      0.70
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.54      0.78
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.54      0.72
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.78      0.58
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.37         0.65
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.42         0.66
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.50         0.60
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.45         0.62
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.52         0.62
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.33         0.67
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.10         0.92
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.35         0.66
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.44         0.60
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 490
           Department of History and Philosophy Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall
                                            2009
3.55



3.50



3.45



3.40
                                                                                                                  University
                                                                                                                  College
                                                                                                                  Department
3.35



3.30



3.25



3.20
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF MASS COMMUNICATIONS MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.31      0.80
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.24      0.89
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.32      0.79
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.39      0.84
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.36      0.74
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.33      0.78
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.17      0.89
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.38      0.81
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.22      0.83
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     3.27      0.83
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.36      0.70
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.42      0.81
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.28      0.78
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.28      0.78
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.38      0.70
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.36      0.72
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.28      0.74
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.39      0.83
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.42      0.61
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.39      0.68
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.39      0.68
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.42      0.62
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.45      0.78
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.37      0.73
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.41      0.67
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.35      0.76
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.27      0.77
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.39      0.71
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.44      0.79
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.39      0.64
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.38      0.64
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.36      0.65
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.36      0.67
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.49      0.71
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.26      0.79
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.23      0.78
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.33      0.67
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.38      0.60
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.25      0.77
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.65      0.82
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.67      0.83
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.86      0.64
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.18        0.75
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.33        0.67
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.37        0.67
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.42        0.62
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.50        0.57
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.38        0.62
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.61        1.05
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.35        0.65
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.48        0.62
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 92
            Department of Mass Communications Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall
                                           2009
3.55



3.50



3.45



3.40
                                                                                                                  University
                                                                                                                  College
                                                                                                                  Department
3.35



3.30



3.25



3.20
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
MODERN FOREIGN LANGUAGES MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.32      0.95
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.25      1.00
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.00      0.93
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.36      0.84
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.64      0.63
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.57      0.65
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.36      0.84
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.57      0.65
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.36      0.63
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     3.33      0.89
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.55      0.52
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.55      0.82
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.55      0.69
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.56      0.73
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.36      0.92
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.50      0.71
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.50      0.71
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.55      0.82
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.44      0.73
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.40      0.70
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.60      0.52
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.67      0.50
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.44      0.88
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.89      0.33
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.89      0.33
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.89      0.33
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.78      0.44
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.78      0.44
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.56      0.73
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.67      0.50
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.67      0.50
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.44      0.73
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.44      0.53
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.67      0.71
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.50      0.76
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.62      0.52
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.37      1.06
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.62      0.52
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.50      0.53
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.87      0.64
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.87      0.64
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.50      0.76
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.37       0.52
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.37       0.52
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.75       0.46
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.62       0.52
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.62       0.52
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.75       0.46
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.50       1.07
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.00       0.76
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.50       0.53
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 8
MILITARY SCIENCE (ARMY ROTC) MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.59      0.59
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.67      0.48
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.67      0.47
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.79      0.42
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.68      0.53
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.73      0.45
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.59      0.60
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.70      0.57
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.43      0.65
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     3.44      0.69
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.56      0.51
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.73      0.53
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.65      0.49
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.60      0.50
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.62      0.49
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.61      0.50
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.39      0.50
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.61      0.50
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.57      0.59
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.59      0.50
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.75      0.44
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.68      0.58
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.68      0.58
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.74      0.45
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.74      0.45
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.53      0.51
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.74      0.45
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.79      0.42
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.68      0.48
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.58      0.51
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.74      0.45
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.63      0.50
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.58      0.51
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.53      0.51
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.74      0.45
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.67      0.49
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.72      0.46
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.56      0.51
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.50      0.51
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.78      0.81
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.17      0.79
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.72      0.57
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.28        0.67
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.39        0.50
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.50        0.51
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.44        0.51
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.50        0.51
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.22        0.65
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.00        0.84
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.50        0.51
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.39        0.50
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 15
           Department of Military Science (Army ROTC) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores,
                                            Fall 2009



3.90


3.80


3.70


3.60

                                                                                                                  University
3.50                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department

3.40


3.30


3.20


3.10
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF MUSIC MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.42      0.81
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.39      0.81
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.43      0.73
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.51      0.74
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.50      0.70
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.46      0.72
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.40      0.77
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.57      0.70
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.38      0.72
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     3.10      0.92
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.41      0.73
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.53      0.73
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.45      0.71
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.46      0.69
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.46      0.70
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.45      0.68
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.43      0.71
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.51      0.73
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.45      0.68
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.43      0.67
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.47      0.67
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.43      0.69
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.49      0.68
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.48      0.69
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.46      0.68
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.46      0.68
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.40      0.71
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.44      0.68
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.56      0.68
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.42      0.67
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.50      0.64
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.44      0.65
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.41      0.66
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.60      0.62
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.47      0.67
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.42      0.72
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.44      0.67
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.47      0.64
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.42      0.68
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.45      0.80
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.44      0.76
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.69      0.62
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.41         0.64
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.42         0.65
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.48         0.66
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.49         0.64
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.56         0.59
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.41         0.63
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   1.98         0.97
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.41         0.61
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.46         0.59
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 292
                      Department of Music Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.65


3.60


3.55


3.50


3.45
                                                                                                                  University
3.40                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department
3.35


3.30


3.25


3.20


3.15
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.26      0.87
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.20      0.85
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.29      0.79
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.30      0.86
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.36      0.78
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.25      0.88
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.14      0.89
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.21      0.92
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.17      0.81
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     2.85      1.02
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.25      0.80
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.22      0.87
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.18      0.76
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.20      0.77
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.18      0.80
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.28      0.75
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.17      0.76
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.27      0.83
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.31      0.76
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.31      0.74
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.35      0.72
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.33      0.70
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.30      0.84
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.35      0.67
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.39      0.71
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.36      0.69
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.37      0.67
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.38      0.64
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.33      0.84
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.29      0.71
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.34      0.66
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.31      0.71
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.39      0.67
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.37      0.77
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.23      0.74
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.32      0.74
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.30      0.69
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.34      0.68
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.22      0.80
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.67      0.79
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.59      0.76
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.75      0.61
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.27        0.69
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.21        0.73
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.34        0.71
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.43        0.65
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.47        0.58
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.27        0.60
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.34        0.96
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.37        0.60
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.47        0.52
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 86
                   Department of Political Science Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.55


3.50


3.45


3.40


3.35
                                                                                                                    University
3.30                                                                                                                College
                                                                                                                    Department
3.25


3.20


3.15


3.10


3.05
       Rating of       Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning       Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value        Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                             Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.39      0.85
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.31      0.85
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.33      0.80
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.34      0.86
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.46      0.73
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.28      0.87
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.22      0.92
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.33      0.92
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.37      0.72
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     2.86      1.03
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.33      0.77
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.32      0.91
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.27      0.84
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.38      0.72
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.33      0.79
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.37      0.71
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.36      0.74
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.34      0.87
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.43      0.77
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.45      0.76
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.43      0.77
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.42      0.82
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.41      0.85
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.39      0.80
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.39      0.81
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.34      0.84
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.37      0.73
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.37      0.76
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.35      0.91
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.40      0.76
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.42      0.74
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.41      0.75
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.40      0.74
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.47      0.79
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.32      0.81
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.40      0.74
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.35      0.79
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.41      0.70
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.29      0.85
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.78      0.75
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.59      0.69
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.77      0.61
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.38         0.78
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.39         0.78
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.46         0.76
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.51         0.66
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.61         0.58
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.45         0.63
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.21         0.97
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.52         0.58
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.55         0.58
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 276
                   Department of Psychology Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.55



3.50



3.45



3.40
                                                                                                                  University
                                                                                                                  College
                                                                                                                  Department
3.35



3.30



3.25



3.20
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND SOCIOLOGY (SOCIOLOGY ONLY) MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.52      0.73
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.44      0.76
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.48      0.66
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.57      0.66
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.55      0.66
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.54      0.67
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.47      0.73
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.62      0.61
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.50      0.59
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     3.34      0.80
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.52      0.65
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.59      0.63
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.52      0.63
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.55      0.57
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.55      0.60
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.58      0.56
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.59      0.55
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.61      0.61
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.61      0.53
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.59      0.57
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.62      0.55
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.59      0.58
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.60      0.60
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.54      0.60
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.59      0.59
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.58      0.60
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.50      0.62
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.54      0.60
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.62      0.59
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.55      0.53
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.58      0.55
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.59      0.54
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.59      0.55
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.66      0.54
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.59      0.54
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.58      0.58
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.52      0.59
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.56      0.56
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.55      0.53
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.49      0.68
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.50      0.63
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.68      0.54
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.53         0.56
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.55         0.57
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.62         0.50
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.59         0.53
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.60         0.55
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.55         0.54
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.29         0.94
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.53         0.59
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.59         0.52
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 172
           Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice (Sociology Only) Comparative
                                 SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.70




3.60




3.50


                                                                                                                  University
3.40                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department



3.30




3.20




3.10
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF SPEECH AND DRAMATIC ARTS MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.32         0.84     3.32      0.87
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.23         0.85     3.25      0.84
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31         0.77     3.36      0.76
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.81     3.31      0.87
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.42         0.73     3.34      0.83
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.78     3.33      0.83
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.24         0.86     3.20      0.89
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39         0.81     3.35      0.91
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.34         0.72     3.25      0.85
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.00         0.96     2.94      1.01
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34         0.73     3.30      0.79
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.30      0.93
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.32         0.76     3.20      0.86
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.37         0.71     3.24      0.85
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.74     3.24      0.80
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.39         0.68     3.29      0.78
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.36         0.72     3.19      0.90
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.28      0.95
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.41         0.72     3.32      0.86
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.41         0.70     3.33      0.82
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.43         0.70     3.36      0.80
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.41         0.72     3.33      0.87
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.40         0.79     3.30      0.93
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.41         0.72     3.24      0.90
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.41         0.72     3.24      0.89
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.38         0.73     3.28      0.88
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.37         0.70     3.23      0.84
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.26      0.83
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.79     3.23      0.98
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.34         0.72     3.33      0.76
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40         0.68     3.36      0.76
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.38         0.69     3.32      0.75
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.35         0.71     3.31      0.77
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.50         0.71     3.44      0.82
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.35         0.73     3.21      0.85
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39         0.71     3.20      0.88
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.35         0.72     3.25      0.85
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.66     3.22      0.83
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.35         0.72     3.27      0.83
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.58         0.77     2.53      0.75
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.53         0.71     2.40      0.72
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.74         0.59     2.61      0.65
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.36          0.68   3.22         0.80
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.38          0.69   3.30         0.78
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.44          0.67   3.22         0.86
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.47          0.63   3.39         0.74
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.53          0.62   3.49         0.65
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.37          0.65   3.35         0.67
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.18          0.96   2.23         0.99
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.39          0.65   3.43         0.58
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.47          0.59   3.50         0.56
Number of Observations                           9637                 2979                 155
             Department of Speech and Dramatic Arts Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall
                                              2009

3.55


3.50


3.45


3.40


3.35
                                                                                                                  University
3.30                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department
3.25


3.20


3.15


3.10


3.05
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
COLLEGE OF LIFE LONG LEARNING MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.45         0.70
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.48         0.71
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.50         0.68
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.60         0.66
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.55         0.62
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.48         0.63
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.44         0.67
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.59
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.53         0.57
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.43         0.68
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.55         0.52
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.62         0.56
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.57         0.52
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.57         0.52
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.55         0.55
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.57         0.50
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.57         0.51
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.63         0.54
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.65         0.49
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.61         0.52
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.65         0.48
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.63         0.49
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.63         0.53
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.59         0.53
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.62         0.50
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.58         0.50
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.60         0.51
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.57         0.53
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.61         0.57
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.53
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.54         0.53
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.56         0.52
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.55         0.53
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.65         0.53
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.58         0.53
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.56         0.53
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.49         0.54
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.55         0.50
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.52         0.56
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.41         0.65
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.47         0.59
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.66         0.52
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.51         0.53
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.55         0.50
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.58         0.49
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.57         0.51
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.61         0.49
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.52         0.51
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.55         0.99
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.48         0.57
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.55         0.51
Number of Observations                           9637                 136
                     College of Lifelong Learning Comparative SIRS Means, Fall 2009

3.70




3.60




3.50



                                                                                                                    University
3.40
                                                                                                                    College




3.30




3.20




3.10
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
COLLEGE OF LIFELONG LEARNING (CTED CODE) MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College                 Unit
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.45         0.70     3.37        0.88
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.48         0.71     3.46        0.80
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.50         0.68     3.49        0.75
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.60         0.66     3.58        0.75
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.55         0.62     3.51        0.69
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.48         0.63     3.51        0.65
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.44         0.67     3.48        0.72
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.59     3.57        0.64
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.53         0.57     3.55        0.57
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.43         0.68     3.68        0.47
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.55         0.52     3.58        0.50
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.62         0.56     3.60        0.59
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.57         0.52     3.61        0.49
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.57         0.52     3.58        0.50
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.55         0.55     3.54        0.60
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.57         0.50     3.63        0.49
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.57         0.51     3.61        0.53
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.63         0.54     3.60        0.62
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.65         0.49     3.65        0.48
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.61         0.52     3.61        0.53
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.65         0.48     3.64        0.48
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.63         0.49     3.63        0.49
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.63         0.53     3.63        0.55
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.59         0.53     3.62        0.52
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.62         0.50     3.60        0.53
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.58         0.50     3.56        0.53
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.60         0.51     3.64        0.52
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.57         0.53     3.60        0.56
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.61         0.57     3.59        0.62
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.53     3.50        0.57
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.54         0.53     3.53        0.60
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.56         0.52     3.48        0.57
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.55         0.53     3.50        0.54
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.65         0.53     3.66        0.54
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.58         0.53     3.53        0.57
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.56         0.53     3.54        0.54
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.49         0.54     3.55        0.53
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.55         0.50     3.56        0.50
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.52         0.56     3.47        0.63
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.41         0.65     2.34        0.58
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.47         0.59     2.40        0.53
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.66         0.52     2.57        0.53
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.51         0.53   3.51        0.54
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.55         0.50   3.53        0.50
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.58         0.49   3.61        0.49
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.57         0.51   3.59        0.53
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.61         0.49   3.53        0.50
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.52         0.51   3.47        0.50
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.55         0.99   2.57        0.92
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.48         0.57   3.32        0.63
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.55         0.51   3.59        0.50
Number of Observations                           9637                 136                 41
             College of Lifelong Learning (CTED Code) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall
                                                 2009

3.70




3.60




3.50


                                                                                                                    University
3.40                                                                                                                College
                                                                                                                    Unit



3.30




3.20




3.10
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
COLLEGE OF LIFELONG LEARNING (LFLG CODE) MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College                 Unit
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.45         0.70     3.48        0.71
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.48         0.71     3.49        0.67
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.50         0.68     3.50        0.65
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.60         0.66     3.61        0.61
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.55         0.62     3.56        0.59
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.48         0.63     3.47        0.62
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.44         0.67     3.42        0.65
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.57         0.59     3.56        0.57
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.53         0.57     3.53        0.58
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.43         0.68     3.32        0.72
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.55         0.52     3.53        0.53
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.62         0.56     3.63        0.55
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.57         0.52     3.56        0.53
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.57         0.52     3.56        0.53
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.55         0.55     3.55        0.53
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.57         0.50     3.54        0.50
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.57         0.51     3.56        0.50
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.63         0.54     3.64        0.51
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.65         0.49     3.64        0.50
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.61         0.52     3.61        0.52
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.65         0.48     3.65        0.48
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.63         0.49     3.63        0.50
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.63         0.53     3.63        0.53
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.59         0.53     3.57        0.54
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.62         0.50     3.64        0.48
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.58         0.50     3.60        0.49
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.60         0.51     3.58        0.51
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.57         0.53     3.56        0.51
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.61         0.57     3.62        0.54
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.53         0.53     3.54        0.51
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.54         0.53     3.55        0.50
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.56         0.52     3.60        0.49
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.55         0.53     3.58        0.53
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.65         0.53     3.65        0.52
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.58         0.53     3.60        0.51
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.56         0.53     3.56        0.53
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.49         0.54     3.47        0.54
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.55         0.50     3.54        0.50
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.52         0.56     3.54        0.53
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.41         0.65     2.44        0.68
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.47         0.59     2.50        0.61
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.66         0.52     2.70        0.51
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.51         0.53   3.51        0.53
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.55         0.50   3.56        0.50
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.58         0.49   3.57        0.50
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.57         0.51   3.56        0.50
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.61         0.49   3.64        0.48
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.52         0.51   3.54        0.52
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.55         0.99   2.54        1.02
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.48         0.57   3.55        0.53
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.55         0.51   3.54        0.52
Number of Observations                           9637                 136                 95
             College of Lifelong Learning (LFLG Code) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall
                                                 2009

3.70




3.60




3.50


                                                                                                                  University
3.40                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department



3.30




3.20




3.10
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
COLLEGE OF PUBLIC SERVICE MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.38         0.81
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.33         0.80
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.30         0.77
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.83
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.44         0.73
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.76
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.21         0.86
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.37         0.82
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.36         0.73
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.17         0.86
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.36         0.70
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.34         0.84
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.30         0.77
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40         0.70
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.76
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.46         0.63
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.39         0.70
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.41         0.82
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.44         0.69
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.44         0.65
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.48         0.65
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.46         0.68
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38         0.79
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.46         0.68
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.47         0.67
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.44         0.71
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.40         0.69
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.41         0.69
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.80
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.43         0.65
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.44         0.65
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.41         0.65
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.45         0.65
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.55         0.68
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.31         0.77
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.38         0.70
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.36         0.72
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.69
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.79
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.71         0.71
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.71         0.67
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.80         0.56
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.38         0.68
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.44         0.67
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.49         0.68
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.55         0.61
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.65         0.54
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.48         0.58
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.40         0.95
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.55         0.58
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.60         0.53
Number of Observations                           9637                 979
                   College of Public Service Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.60



3.55



3.50



3.45


                                                                                                                    University
3.40
                                                                                                                    College


3.35



3.30



3.25



3.20
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIVE DISORDERS MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.38         0.81     3.46      0.66
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.33         0.80     3.34      0.64
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.30         0.77     3.32      0.65
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.83     3.40      0.77
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.44         0.73     3.46      0.63
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.76     3.43      0.64
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.21         0.86     3.28      0.71
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.43      0.74
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.36         0.73     3.29      0.74
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.17         0.86     3.27      0.73
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.36         0.70     3.33      0.65
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.34         0.84     3.36      0.78
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.30         0.77     3.30      0.67
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40         0.70     3.32      0.69
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.76     3.30      0.70
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.46         0.63     3.41      0.54
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.39         0.70     3.28      0.72
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.41         0.82     3.40      0.80
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.44         0.69     3.45      0.57
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.44         0.65     3.43      0.54
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.48         0.65     3.53      0.53
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.46         0.68     3.47      0.53
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38         0.79     3.40      0.68
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.46         0.68     3.41      0.71
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.47         0.67     3.42      0.67
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.44         0.71     3.36      0.73
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.25      0.75
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.41         0.69     3.25      0.74
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.80     3.39      0.80
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.43         0.65     3.42      0.56
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.44         0.65     3.43      0.55
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.41         0.65     3.39      0.58
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.45         0.65     3.46      0.53
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.55         0.68     3.65      0.52
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.31         0.77     3.25      0.71
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.38         0.70     3.37      0.61
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.36         0.72     3.31      0.65
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.69     3.37      0.62
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.79     3.16      0.84
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.71         0.71     2.90      0.61
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.71         0.67     2.83      0.65
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.80         0.56     2.83      0.50
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.38         0.68   3.28         0.67
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.44         0.67   3.26         0.75
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.49         0.68   3.41         0.69
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.55         0.61   3.55         0.50
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.65         0.54   3.68         0.51
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.48         0.58   3.46         0.57
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.40         0.95   2.41         0.90
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.55         0.58   3.61         0.50
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.60         0.53   3.58         0.53
Number of Observations                           9637                 979                 132
             Department of Communicative Disorders Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall
                                              2009

3.70




3.60




3.50


                                                                                                                  University
3.40                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department



3.30




3.20




3.10
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.38         0.81     3.14      0.98
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.33         0.80     3.10      0.97
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.30         0.77     3.11      0.98
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.83     3.12      1.00
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.44         0.73     3.32      0.80
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.76     3.24      0.82
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.21         0.86     3.03      0.96
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.24      0.90
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.36         0.73     3.21      0.82
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.17         0.86     3.22      0.71
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.36         0.70     3.25      0.76
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.34         0.84     3.20      0.97
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.30         0.77     3.11      0.92
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40         0.70     3.22      0.81
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.76     3.14      0.91
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.46         0.63     3.31      0.74
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.39         0.70     3.26      0.80
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.41         0.82     3.21      0.97
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.44         0.69     3.28      0.85
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.44         0.65     3.29      0.79
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.48         0.65     3.34      0.72
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.46         0.68     3.28      0.83
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38         0.79     3.21      0.99
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.46         0.68     3.31      0.81
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.47         0.67     3.45      0.63
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.44         0.71     3.33      0.82
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.42      0.65
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.41         0.69     3.46      0.63
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.80     3.28      0.93
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.43         0.65     3.31      0.75
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.44         0.65     3.32      0.76
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.41         0.65     3.30      0.73
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.45         0.65     3.34      0.76
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.55         0.68     3.35      0.88
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.31         0.77     3.22      0.82
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.38         0.70     3.26      0.81
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.36         0.72     3.24      0.84
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.69     3.24      0.82
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.79     3.30      0.78
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.71         0.71     2.61      0.80
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.71         0.67     2.62      0.71
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.80         0.56     2.82      0.59
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.38         0.68   3.35         0.75
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.44         0.67   3.51         0.62
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.49         0.68   3.30         0.78
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.55         0.61   3.43         0.72
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.65         0.54   3.64         0.53
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.48         0.58   3.44         0.60
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.40         0.95   2.35         0.91
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.55         0.58   3.47         0.58
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.60         0.53   3.59         0.54
Number of Observations                           9637                 979                 142
            Department of Health Care Administration Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall
                                               2009

3.60



3.50



3.40



3.30
                                                                                                                  University
                                                                                                                  College
                                                                                                                  Department
3.20



3.10



3.00



2.90
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
PHS MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.38         0.81     3.38      0.78
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.33         0.80     3.34      0.72
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.30         0.77     3.28      0.72
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.83     3.31      0.86
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.44         0.73     3.40      0.76
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.76     3.25      0.79
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.21         0.86     3.13      0.89
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.28      0.87
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.36         0.73     3.32      0.76
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.17         0.86     3.04      0.96
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.36         0.70     3.25      0.76
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.34         0.84     3.19      0.92
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.30         0.77     3.18      0.87
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40         0.70     3.42      0.74
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.76     3.30      0.77
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.46         0.63     3.44      0.60
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.39         0.70     3.35      0.71
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.41         0.82     3.37      0.86
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.44         0.69     3.28      0.73
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.44         0.65     3.23      0.73
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.48         0.65     3.34      0.79
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.46         0.68     3.31      0.78
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38         0.79     3.24      0.80
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.46         0.68     3.45      0.68
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.47         0.67     3.34      0.83
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.44         0.71     3.41      0.71
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.25      0.75
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.41         0.69     3.27      0.75
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.80     3.33      0.86
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.43         0.65     3.34      0.72
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.44         0.65     3.30      0.82
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.41         0.65     3.26      0.74
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.45         0.65     3.28      0.78
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.55         0.68     3.51      0.73
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.31         0.77     3.34      0.80
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.38         0.70     3.23      0.83
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.36         0.72     3.35      0.74
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.69     3.36      0.77
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.79     3.36      0.72
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.71         0.71     2.91      0.74
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.71         0.67     2.83      0.69
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.80         0.56     2.96      0.55
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.38         0.68   3.27         0.77
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.44         0.67   3.29         0.79
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.49         0.68   3.43         0.72
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.55         0.61   3.50         0.67
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.65         0.54   3.73         0.55
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.48         0.58   3.57         0.60
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.40         0.95   2.63         0.98
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.55         0.58   3.73         0.51
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.60         0.53   3.71         0.50
Number of Observations                           9637                 979                 107
                      Public Health Science Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.60




3.50




3.40



                                                                                                                  University
3.30                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department



3.20




3.10




3.00
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.38         0.81     3.32      0.80
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.33         0.80     3.27      0.74
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.30         0.77     3.17      0.71
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.83     3.33      0.86
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.44         0.73     3.37      0.76
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.76     3.32      0.72
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.21         0.86     3.26      0.83
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.35      0.86
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.36         0.73     3.37      0.70
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.17         0.86     2.83      0.90
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.36         0.70     3.29      0.69
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.34         0.84     3.29      0.81
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.30         0.77     3.28      0.75
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40         0.70     3.40      0.66
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.76     3.31      0.73
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.46         0.63     3.45      0.62
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.39         0.70     3.36      0.74
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.41         0.82     3.36      0.85
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.44         0.69     3.51      0.60
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.44         0.65     3.49      0.58
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.48         0.65     3.53      0.62
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.46         0.68     3.52      0.69
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38         0.79     3.38      0.74
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.46         0.68     3.50      0.69
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.47         0.67     3.48      0.71
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.44         0.71     3.33      0.84
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.39      0.63
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.41         0.69     3.42      0.67
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.80     3.39      0.85
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.43         0.65     3.43      0.69
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.44         0.65     3.49      0.67
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.41         0.65     3.44      0.70
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.45         0.65     3.42      0.70
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.55         0.68     3.49      0.80
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.31         0.77     3.22      0.83
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.38         0.70     3.36      0.74
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.36         0.72     3.35      0.75
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.69     3.39      0.74
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.79     3.23      0.90
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.71         0.71     2.90      0.61
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.71         0.67     3.04      0.57
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.80         0.56     3.00      0.41
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.38         0.68   3.42        0.63
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.44         0.67   3.42        0.63
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.49         0.68   3.46        0.78
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.55         0.61   3.55        0.63
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.65         0.54   3.59        0.52
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.48         0.58   3.46        0.55
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.40         0.95   2.78        0.85
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.55         0.58   3.46        0.57
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.60         0.53   3.55        0.50
Number of Observations                           9637                 979                 69
            Department of Public Policy and Administration Comparative SIRS Mean
                                       Scores, Fall 2009

3.60


3.55


3.50


3.45


3.40                                                                                                              University
                                                                                                                  College
3.35                                                                                                              Department



3.30


3.25


3.20


3.15
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
PUHS MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.38         0.81     3.22      0.92
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.33         0.80     3.20      0.95
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.30         0.77     3.12      0.90
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.83     3.21      0.93
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.44         0.73     3.37      0.84
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.76     3.12      0.85
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.21         0.86     2.96      0.95
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.20      0.88
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.36         0.73     3.24      0.85
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.17         0.86     3.27      0.84
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.36         0.70     3.33      0.74
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.34         0.84     3.24      0.87
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.30         0.77     3.15      0.79
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40         0.70     3.34      0.74
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.76     3.28      0.80
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.46         0.63     3.40      0.64
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.39         0.70     3.30      0.77
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.41         0.82     3.29      0.89
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.44         0.69     3.40      0.76
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.44         0.65     3.40      0.74
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.48         0.65     3.44      0.69
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.46         0.68     3.43      0.69
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38         0.79     3.31      0.87
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.46         0.68     3.44      0.71
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.47         0.67     3.42      0.73
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.44         0.71     3.41      0.71
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.45      0.64
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.41         0.69     3.40      0.68
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.80     3.36      0.85
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.43         0.65     3.31      0.76
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.44         0.65     3.36      0.72
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.41         0.65     3.35      0.67
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.45         0.65     3.34      0.75
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.55         0.68     3.50      0.73
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.31         0.77     3.24      0.78
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.38         0.70     3.33      0.69
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.36         0.72     3.32      0.75
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.69     3.33      0.69
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.79     3.37      0.78
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.71         0.71     2.59      0.69
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.71         0.67     2.60      0.68
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.80         0.56     2.73      0.60
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.38         0.68   3.29        0.77
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.44         0.67   3.41        0.68
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.49         0.68   3.55        0.65
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.55         0.61   3.44        0.71
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.65         0.54   3.72        0.53
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.48         0.58   3.41        0.63
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.40         0.95   2.35        0.95
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.55         0.58   3.55        0.59
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.60         0.53   3.63        0.56
Number of Observations                           9637                 979                 94
                   Department of Public Health Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.60




3.50




3.40



                                                                                                                  University
3.30                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department



3.20




3.10




3.00
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.38         0.81     3.46      0.74
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.33         0.80     3.42      0.73
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.30         0.77     3.42      0.68
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.83     3.44      0.74
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.44         0.73     3.49      0.70
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.76     3.39      0.76
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.21         0.86     3.31      0.81
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.44      0.79
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.36         0.73     3.44      0.66
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.17         0.86     3.18      0.92
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.36         0.70     3.43      0.68
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.34         0.84     3.42      0.77
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.30         0.77     3.41      0.68
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40         0.70     3.49      0.64
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.76     3.44      0.69
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.46         0.63     3.52      0.61
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.39         0.70     3.49      0.61
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.41         0.82     3.50      0.73
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.44         0.69     3.51      0.63
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.44         0.65     3.53      0.59
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.48         0.65     3.53      0.61
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.46         0.68     3.53      0.62
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38         0.79     3.46      0.73
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.46         0.68     3.50      0.62
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.47         0.67     3.51      0.63
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.44         0.71     3.51      0.64
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.44      0.69
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.41         0.69     3.46      0.68
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.80     3.49      0.72
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.43         0.65     3.51      0.59
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.44         0.65     3.52      0.57
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.41         0.65     3.49      0.60
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.45         0.65     3.54      0.57
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.55         0.68     3.59      0.60
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.31         0.77     3.38      0.73
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.38         0.70     3.44      0.65
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.36         0.72     3.40      0.69
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.69     3.47      0.62
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.79     3.34      0.79
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.71         0.71     2.60      0.69
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.71         0.67     2.60      0.65
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.80         0.56     2.73      0.57
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.38         0.68   3.47         0.60
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.44         0.67   3.50         0.62
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.49         0.68   3.57         0.60
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.55         0.61   3.61         0.55
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.65         0.54   3.60         0.57
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.48         0.58   3.48         0.58
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.40         0.95   2.25         0.93
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.55         0.58   3.51         0.61
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.60         0.53   3.56         0.54
Number of Observations                           9637                 979                 395
                     School of Social Work Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.65


3.60


3.55


3.50


3.45
                                                                                                                    University
3.40                                                                                                                College
                                                                                                                    School
3.35


3.30


3.25


3.20


3.15
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.38         0.81     3.56      0.77
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.33         0.80     3.60      0.81
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.30         0.77     3.56      0.75
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.36         0.83     3.76      0.50
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.44         0.73     3.65      0.67
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.34         0.76     3.61      0.58
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.21         0.86     3.48      0.75
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.37         0.82     3.74      0.54
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.36         0.73     3.57      0.62
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.17         0.86     3.20      0.83
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.36         0.70     3.54      0.60
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.34         0.84     3.65      0.61
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.30         0.77     3.53      0.68
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40         0.70     3.62      0.56
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.34         0.76     3.54      0.66
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.46         0.63     3.70      0.50
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.39         0.70     3.64      0.59
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.41         0.82     3.68      0.58
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.44         0.69     3.70      0.54
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.44         0.65     3.75      0.48
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.48         0.65     3.71      0.49
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.46         0.68     3.75      0.55
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38         0.79     3.64      0.59
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.46         0.68     3.73      0.52
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.47         0.67     3.67      0.55
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.44         0.71     3.62      0.62
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.40         0.69     3.66      0.51
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.41         0.69     3.73      0.45
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.42         0.80     3.68      0.54
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.43         0.65     3.64      0.48
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.44         0.65     3.69      0.51
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.41         0.65     3.62      0.53
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.45         0.65     3.68      0.47
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.55         0.68     3.85      0.36
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.31         0.77     3.48      0.80
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.38         0.70     3.70      0.46
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.36         0.72     3.72      0.45
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40         0.69     3.75      0.44
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.79     3.65      0.56
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.71         0.71     2.94      0.53
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.71         0.67     3.06      0.60
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.80         0.56     2.75      0.52
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.38         0.68   3.42        0.67
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.44         0.67   3.67        0.51
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.49         0.68   3.66        0.59
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.55         0.61   3.70        0.46
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.65         0.54   3.83        0.38
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.48         0.58   3.66        0.52
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.40         0.95   2.86        1.04
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.55         0.58   3.67        0.52
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.60         0.53   3.76        0.43
Number of Observations                           9637                 979                 40
           Department of Urban and Regional Planning Comparative SIRS Mean Scores,
                                          Fall 2009

3.90


3.80


3.70


3.60


3.50                                                                                                              University
                                                                                                                  College
3.40                                                                                                              Department



3.30


3.20


3.10


3.00
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
COLLEGE OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283
           College of Science, Engineering and Technology Comparative SIRS Mean
                                      Scores, Fall 2009

3.55

3.50

3.45

3.40

3.35

3.30
                                                                                                                    University
                                                                                                                    College
3.25

3.20

3.15

3.10

3.05

3.00
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE SCIENCES (AFROTC) MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88     3.40      0.78
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91     3.41      0.78
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83     3.44      0.70
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90     3.46      0.66
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76     3.45      0.51
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83     3.36      0.58
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93     3.48      0.60
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89     3.50      0.61
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69     3.45      0.51
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96     3.29      0.56
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72     3.55      0.51
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88     3.52      0.60
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81     3.53      0.51
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69     3.50      0.51
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80     3.47      0.51
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67     3.42      0.51
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68     3.56      0.51
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81     3.61      0.50
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82     3.39      0.50
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80     3.39      0.50
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74     3.47      0.51
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79     3.44      0.51
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92     3.50      0.51
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72     3.35      0.49
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73     3.59      0.51
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77     3.53      0.51
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69     3.61      0.50
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71     3.56      0.51
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84     3.61      0.50
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80     3.56      0.51
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76     3.47      0.51
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79     3.53      0.51
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81     3.41      0.51
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81     3.59      0.51
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75     3.41      0.51
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74     3.50      0.52
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78     3.31      0.60
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70     3.31      0.79
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72     3.31      0.60
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77     2.50      0.73
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71     2.06      0.57
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61     2.40      0.63
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70   3.27        0.46
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69   3.33        0.62
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68   3.47        0.52
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65   3.50        0.52
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62   3.47        0.52
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66   3.36        0.50
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95   2.00        1.13
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65   3.27        0.80
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59   3.40        0.51
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283                 11
             Department of Aerospace Sciences (Air Force ROTC) Comparative SIRS Mean
                                         Scores, Fall 2009

3.70



3.60



3.50



3.40

                                                                                                                  University
3.30                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department

3.20



3.10



3.00



2.90
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88     3.19      0.89
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91     3.09      0.90
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83     3.20      0.78
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90     3.23      0.86
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76     3.36      0.75
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83     3.26      0.79
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93     3.11      0.89
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89     3.31      0.83
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69     3.28      0.72
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96     2.88      0.97
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72     3.28      0.70
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88     3.28      0.84
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81     3.24      0.76
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69     3.32      0.67
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80     3.26      0.75
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67     3.33      0.68
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68     3.30      0.69
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81     3.35      0.80
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82     3.20      0.78
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80     3.22      0.75
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74     3.30      0.72
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79     3.26      0.75
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92     3.24      0.87
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72     3.37      0.69
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73     3.35      0.70
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77     3.33      0.73
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69     3.30      0.71
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71     3.32      0.72
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84     3.34      0.81
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80     3.24      0.73
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76     3.28      0.70
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79     3.22      0.74
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81     3.22      0.75
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81     3.42      0.75
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75     3.30      0.71
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74     3.32      0.69
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78     3.27      0.74
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70     3.34      0.69
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72     3.31      0.70
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77     2.57      0.76
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71     2.39      0.69
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61     2.82      0.59
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70   3.36         0.65
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69   3.37         0.66
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68   3.42         0.65
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65   3.43         0.61
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62   3.51         0.63
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66   3.30         0.63
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95   1.94         0.91
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65   3.42         0.61
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59   3.44         0.58
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283                 708
                     Department of Biology Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.55


3.50


3.45


3.40


3.35


3.30                                                                                                              University
                                                                                                                  College
3.25                                                                                                              Department


3.20


3.15


3.10


3.05


3.00
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88     3.06      0.88
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91     2.83      0.93
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83     2.90      0.84
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90     2.93      0.98
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76     3.23      0.76
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83     3.05      0.83
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93     2.77      0.91
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89     3.02      0.93
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69     3.24      0.70
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96     2.57      1.02
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72     3.12      0.71
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88     2.97      0.95
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81     2.89      0.86
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69     3.18      0.71
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80     2.94      0.82
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67     3.18      0.67
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68     3.20      0.69
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81     3.13      0.84
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82     2.93      0.84
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80     3.00      0.82
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74     3.09      0.76
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79     2.96      0.82
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92     2.95      0.98
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72     3.22      0.73
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73     3.22      0.75
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77     3.13      0.81
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69     3.23      0.67
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71     3.22      0.67
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84     3.13      0.88
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80     2.87      0.84
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76     2.98      0.79
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79     2.87      0.82
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81     2.83      0.88
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81     3.12      0.88
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75     3.03      0.76
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74     3.11      0.73
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78     3.01      0.83
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70     3.15      0.73
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72     3.21      0.74
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77     2.94      0.73
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71     2.67      0.70
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61     2.89      0.63
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70   3.20         0.72
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69   3.26         0.70
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68   3.31         0.69
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65   3.28         0.67
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62   3.52         0.60
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66   3.19         0.65
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95   1.98         0.94
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65   3.31         0.63
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59   3.34         0.63
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283                 292
                   Department of Chemistry Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.60


3.50


3.40


3.30


3.20
                                                                                                                  University
3.10                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department
3.00


2.90


2.80


2.70


2.60
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88     3.28      0.85
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91     3.13      0.90
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83     3.13      0.89
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90     3.22      0.90
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76     3.36      0.71
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83     3.26      0.81
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93     3.06      0.94
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89     3.33      0.79
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69     3.29      0.72
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96     2.91      0.96
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72     3.24      0.78
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88     3.27      0.88
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81     3.13      0.83
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69     3.30      0.66
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80     3.11      0.87
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67     3.30      0.68
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68     3.27      0.69
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81     3.29      0.82
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82     3.20      0.83
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80     3.21      0.80
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74     3.27      0.73
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79     3.26      0.74
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92     3.27      0.89
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72     3.41      0.56
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73     3.37      0.65
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77     3.36      0.68
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69     3.34      0.69
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71     3.28      0.75
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84     3.30      0.85
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80     3.30      0.70
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76     3.31      0.71
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79     3.23      0.78
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81     3.31      0.73
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81     3.40      0.77
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75     3.16      0.80
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74     3.23      0.75
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78     3.21      0.78
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70     3.32      0.63
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72     3.28      0.65
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77     2.94      0.64
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71     2.89      0.62
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61     2.74      0.59
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70   3.22         0.74
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69   3.41         0.55
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68   3.44         0.56
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65   3.34         0.57
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62   3.47         0.53
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66   3.34         0.56
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95   2.44         0.94
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65   3.27         0.58
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59   3.40         0.52
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283                 130
               Department of Civil Engineering Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.55


3.50


3.45


3.40


3.35


3.30                                                                                                              University
                                                                                                                  College
3.25                                                                                                              Department


3.20


3.15


3.10


3.05


3.00
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88     3.58      0.79
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91     3.53      0.73
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83     3.49      0.73
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90     3.64      0.65
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76     3.58      0.64
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83     3.59      0.63
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93     3.42      0.88
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89     3.53      0.74
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69     3.63      0.50
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96     3.16      0.94
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72     3.54      0.62
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88     3.56      0.75
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81     3.47      0.77
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69     3.51      0.67
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80     3.48      0.70
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67     3.62      0.53
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68     3.56      0.61
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81     3.65      0.63
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82     3.52      0.66
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80     3.41      0.77
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74     3.61      0.55
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79     3.58      0.59
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92     3.44      0.86
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72     3.65      0.56
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73     3.64      0.60
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77     3.49      0.74
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69     3.61      0.57
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71     3.59      0.56
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84     3.65      0.65
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80     3.38      0.63
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76     3.55      0.64
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79     3.50      0.69
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81     3.52      0.69
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81     3.71      0.57
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75     3.50      0.65
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74     3.55      0.59
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78     3.51      0.63
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70     3.59      0.59
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72     3.53      0.67
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77     2.95      0.75
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71     2.88      0.62
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61     2.70      0.56
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70   3.53        0.61
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69   3.65        0.50
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68   3.62        0.63
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65   3.60        0.63
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62   3.69        0.61
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66   3.55        0.64
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95   2.69        0.93
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65   3.56        0.64
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59   3.66        0.50
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283                 60
            Department of Computer Engineering Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall
                                           2009
3.80


3.70


3.60


3.50


3.40                                                                                                              University
                                                                                                                  College

3.30                                                                                                              Department



3.20


3.10


3.00


2.90
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88     3.14      0.88
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91     3.04      0.88
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83     3.10      0.80
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90     3.13      0.86
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76     3.21      0.79
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83     2.91      0.89
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93     2.79      0.95
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89     2.98      0.95
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69     3.32      0.66
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96     3.31      0.75
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72     3.30      0.69
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88     3.13      0.85
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81     3.11      0.77
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69     3.26      0.67
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80     3.13      0.76
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67     3.32      0.62
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68     3.34      0.64
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81     3.24      0.82
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82     3.12      0.80
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80     3.10      0.79
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74     3.23      0.72
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79     3.14      0.77
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92     3.04      0.96
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72     3.26      0.74
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73     3.29      0.73
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77     3.20      0.77
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69     3.30      0.65
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71     3.26      0.68
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84     3.22      0.82
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80     3.10      0.81
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76     3.18      0.72
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79     3.09      0.78
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81     3.14      0.77
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81     3.29      0.83
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75     3.13      0.80
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74     3.21      0.72
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78     3.19      0.81
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70     3.30      0.70
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72     3.29      0.74
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77     2.77      0.82
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71     2.62      0.72
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61     2.86      0.62
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70   3.24         0.73
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69   3.33         0.66
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68   3.36         0.72
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65   3.34         0.71
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62   3.51         0.67
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66   3.23         0.70
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95   2.15         0.90
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65   3.37         0.68
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59   3.45         0.56
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283                 251
              Department of Computer Science Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.60


3.50


3.40


3.30


3.20                                                                                                              University
                                                                                                                  College

3.10                                                                                                              Department



3.00


2.90


2.80


2.70
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
ENGINEERING MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88     2.86      0.94
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91     3.05      1.00
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83     3.00      0.92
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90     2.85      1.23
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76     3.55      0.51
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83     3.44      0.62
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93     2.79      1.27
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89     3.40      0.68
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69     3.11      0.88
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96     3.00      1.00
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72     3.26      0.81
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88     2.94      1.16
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81     3.06      0.94
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69     3.17      0.86
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80     3.00      0.94
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67     3.24      0.75
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68     3.17      0.71
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81     3.00      1.21
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82     3.25      0.93
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80     3.29      0.85
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74     3.50      0.52
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79     3.50      0.52
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92     3.19      0.91
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72     3.37      0.50
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73     3.37      0.50
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77     3.40      0.51
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69     3.36      0.50
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71     3.36      0.50
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84     3.14      0.95
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80     3.27      0.80
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76     3.36      0.63
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79     3.29      0.61
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81     3.29      0.61
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81     3.43      0.65
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75     3.07      0.88
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74     3.00      0.93
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78     2.93      0.96
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70     3.27      0.59
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72     3.43      0.51
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77     3.07      0.80
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71     2.80      0.86
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61     2.33      0.82
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70   3.00        0.65
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69   3.40        0.51
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68   3.47        0.52
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65   3.43        0.65
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62   3.57        0.51
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66   3.47        0.52
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95   2.53        1.19
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65   3.27        0.59
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59   3.33        0.49
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283                 11
                       Engineering (Unit) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

4.00



3.50



3.00



2.50

                                                                                                                    University
2.00                                                                                                                College
                                                                                                                    Unit

1.50



1.00



0.50



0.00
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88     3.12      0.91
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91     2.91      0.96
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83     3.00      0.89
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90     3.05      0.97
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76     3.31      0.84
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83     3.19      0.90
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93     2.97      1.00
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89     3.17      0.99
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69     3.36      0.71
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96     3.02      0.98
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72     3.26      0.75
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88     3.15      0.94
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81     3.12      0.88
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69     3.28      0.74
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80     3.11      0.87
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67     3.33      0.71
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68     3.34      0.70
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81     3.29      0.86
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82     3.12      0.90
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80     3.09      0.90
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74     3.26      0.82
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79     3.13      0.88
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92     3.06      1.00
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72     3.31      0.82
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73     3.28      0.82
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77     3.25      0.85
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69     3.33      0.72
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71     3.33      0.76
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84     3.25      0.91
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80     3.04      0.89
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76     3.13      0.85
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79     3.12      0.86
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81     3.04      0.91
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81     3.29      0.90
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75     3.24      0.80
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74     3.19      0.83
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78     3.21      0.83
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70     3.32      0.74
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72     3.31      0.78
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77     3.00      0.79
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71     2.74      0.72
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61     3.00      0.63
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70   3.31         0.76
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69   3.32         0.80
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68   3.39         0.76
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65   3.40         0.70
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62   3.49         0.63
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66   3.22         0.71
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95   2.18         0.94
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65   3.24         0.72
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59   3.37         0.63
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283                 510
                   Department of Mathematics Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.60



3.50



3.40



3.30

                                                                                                                  University
3.20                                                                                                              College
                                                                                                                  Department

3.10



3.00



2.90



2.80
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS, ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES AND GENERAL SCIENCE MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88     3.37      0.78
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91     3.22      0.83
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83     3.26      0.76
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90     3.27      0.85
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76     3.42      0.67
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83     3.40      0.71
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93     3.26      0.83
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89     3.42      0.77
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69     3.39      0.64
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96     3.07      0.91
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72     3.36      0.71
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88     3.36      0.79
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81     3.34      0.72
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69     3.42      0.63
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80     3.34      0.71
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67     3.41      0.63
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68     3.41      0.61
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81     3.43      0.73
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82     3.34      0.70
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80     3.36      0.69
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74     3.42      0.70
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79     3.39      0.70
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92     3.36      0.81
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72     3.42      0.67
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73     3.41      0.66
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77     3.38      0.72
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69     3.35      0.67
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71     3.37      0.70
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84     3.37      0.78
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80     3.37      0.70
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76     3.41      0.66
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79     3.34      0.70
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81     3.37      0.69
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81     3.48      0.71
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75     3.36      0.70
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74     3.38      0.68
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78     3.34      0.71
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70     3.39      0.65
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72     3.37      0.67
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77     2.90      0.67
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71     2.59      0.72
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61     2.81      0.54
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70   3.37         0.70
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69   3.39         0.69
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68   3.49         0.63
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65   3.49         0.62
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62   3.54         0.60
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66   3.39         0.62
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95   2.07         0.95
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65   3.40         0.60
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59   3.50         0.57
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283                 207
            Department of Physics, Atmospheric Sciences and General Science
                       Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.55

3.50

3.45

3.40

3.35

3.30                                                                                                              University
                                                                                                                  College
3.25                                                                                                              Department


3.20

3.15

3.10

3.05

3.00
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University             College            Department
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean    Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.21         0.88     3.57      0.69
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.06         0.91     3.54      0.62
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.14         0.83     3.57      0.56
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.18         0.90     3.63      0.61
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.34         0.76     3.55      0.60
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.22         0.83     3.57      0.60
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.04         0.93     3.57      0.61
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.24         0.89     3.65      0.62
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.33         0.69     3.52      0.60
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     2.97         0.96     3.48      0.67
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.29         0.72     3.59      0.57
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.23         0.88     3.68      0.58
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.18         0.81     3.56      0.58
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.31         0.69     3.56      0.59
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.19         0.80     3.58      0.59
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.33         0.67     3.62      0.58
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.33         0.68     3.57      0.59
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.32         0.81     3.71      0.56
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.18         0.82     3.62      0.57
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.18         0.80     3.59      0.59
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.29         0.74     3.63      0.57
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.22         0.79     3.60      0.59
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.18         0.92     3.73      0.56
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.35         0.72     3.64      0.58
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.34         0.73     3.64      0.57
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.30         0.77     3.58      0.59
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.33         0.69     3.56      0.58
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.32         0.71     3.59      0.61
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.30         0.84     3.68      0.57
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3..17        0.80     3.57      0.60
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.23         0.76     3.61      0.58
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.18         0.79     3.62      0.61
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.17         0.81     3.60      0.58
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.37         0.81     3.72      0.56
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.25         0.75     3.60      0.58
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.27         0.74     3.57      0.60
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.24         0.78     3.57      0.59
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.33         0.70     3.57      0.60
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.32         0.72     3.56      0.60
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.80         0.77     2.64      0.67
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.59         0.71     2.61      0.62
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.85         0.61     2.62      0.55
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.32          0.70   3.47        0.62
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.36          0.69   3.61        0.60
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.41          0.68   3.59        0.60
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.41          0.65   3.60        0.59
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.52          0.62   3.61        0.54
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29          0.66   3.50        0.57
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   2.09          0.95   2.21        1.02
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35          0.65   3.51        0.61
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.43          0.59   3.66        0.48
Number of Observations                           9637                 2283                 99
                   Department of Technology Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.80


3.70


3.60


3.50


3.40                                                                                                              University
                                                                                                                  College

3.30                                                                                                              Department



3.20


3.10


3.00


2.90
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall  High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of  Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of   Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
DIVISION OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University            Division
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.29        0.80
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.18        0.83
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31        0.72
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.34        0.81
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.41        0.71
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.33        0.76
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.26        0.81
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39        0.79
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.32        0.70
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.10        0.89
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34        0.71
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.40        0.77
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.38        0.68
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40        0.67
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.40        0.67
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.41        0.66
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.37        0.68
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.43        0.74
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.36        0.71
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.35        0.70
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.42        0.67
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.40        0.69
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38        0.79
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.45        0.64
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.45        0.66
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.41        0.69
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.39        0.66
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.42        0.65
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.44        0.73
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.36        0.69
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40        0.67
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.39        0.68
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.37        0.70
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.47        0.71
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.39        0.66
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39        0.70
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.37        0.68
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40        0.65
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.40        0.66
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.21        0.81
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.23        0.75
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.58        0.63
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.35         0.66
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.39         0.65
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.47         0.62
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.48         0.60
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.50         0.61
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29         0.67
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   1.82         0.89
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35         0.67
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.42         0.61
Number of Observations                           9637                 744
              Division of Undergraduate Studies Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.55




3.50




3.45



                                                                                                                    University
3.40
                                                                                                                    College




3.35




3.30




3.25
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
EMFL (UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES) MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University            Division                 Unit
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.29        0.80      3.63        0.58
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.18        0.83      3.55        0.58
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31        0.72      3.59        0.58
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.34        0.81      3.70        0.57
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.41        0.71      3.68        0.53
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.33        0.76      3.63        0.55
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.26        0.81      3.71        0.49
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39        0.79      3.75        0.56
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.32        0.70      3.69        0.46
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.10        0.89      3.40        0.87
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34        0.71      3.72        0.49
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.40        0.77      3.73        0.61
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.38        0.68      3.71        0.53
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40        0.67      3.76        0.43
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.40        0.67      3.80        0.41
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.41        0.66      3.76        0.47
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.37        0.68      3.76        0.43
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.43        0.74      3.82        0.43
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.36        0.71      3.74        0.44
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.35        0.70      3.67        0.51
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.42        0.67      3.75        0.44
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.40        0.69      3.71        0.50
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38        0.79      3.80        0.45
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.45        0.64      3.67        0.55
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.45        0.66      3.75        0.48
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.41        0.69      3.65        0.55
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.39        0.66      3.75        0.44
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.42        0.65      3.73        0.45
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.44        0.73      3.78        0.46
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.36        0.69      3.67        0.47
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40        0.67      3.72        0.45
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.39        0.68      3.72        0.45
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.37        0.70      3.67        0.47
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.47        0.71      3.85        0.36
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.39        0.66      3.68        0.47
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39        0.70      3.77        0.43
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.37        0.68      3.71        0.46
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40        0.65      3.66        0.48
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.40        0.66      3.71        0.50
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.21        0.81      2.37        0.77
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.23        0.75      2.39        0.60
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.58        0.63      2.70        0.46
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.35         0.66   3.51        0.70
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.39         0.65   3.54        0.61
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.47         0.62   3.71        0.46
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.48         0.60   3.64        0.60
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.50         0.61   3.64        0.60
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29         0.67   3.57        0.50
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   1.82         0.89   2.28        0.88
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35         0.67   3.65        0.48
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.42         0.61   3.65        0.52
Number of Observations                           9637                 744                 43
               Undergraduate Studies (English) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.90


3.80


3.70


3.60


3.50                                                                                                                University
                                                                                                                    College

3.40                                                                                                                Unit



3.30


3.20


3.10


3.00
       Rating of     Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning     Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value      Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                           Rapport     Knowledge
MATH (UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES) MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University            Division                 Unit
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.29        0.80      3.34        0.79
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.18        0.83      3.16        0.86
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31        0.72      3.22        0.75
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.34        0.81      3.38        0.75
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.41        0.71      3.48        0.67
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.33        0.76      3.42        0.72
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.26        0.81      3.31        0.78
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39        0.79      3.49        0.70
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.32        0.70      3.40        0.69
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.10        0.89      3.37        0.71
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34        0.71      3.46        0.60
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.40        0.77      3.52        0.70
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.38        0.68      3.42        0.65
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40        0.67      3.47        0.58
Materials were Celar & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.40        0.67      3.39        0.69
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.41        0.66      3.48        0.57
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.37        0.68      3.48        0.62
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.43        0.74      3.48        0.70
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.36        0.71      3.37        0.68
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.35        0.70      3.30        0.68
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.42        0.67      3.46        0.64
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.40        0.69      3.40        0.68
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38        0.79      3.36        0.81
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.45        0.64      3.45        0.62
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.45        0.66      3.52        0.63
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.41        0.69      3.47        0.65
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.39        0.66      3.43        0.62
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.42        0.65      3.45        0.60
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.44        0.73      3.51        0.70
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.36        0.69      3.30        0.69
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40        0.67      3.35        0.66
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.39        0.68      3.35        0.70
Concepts v. Real Situations Discussed       3.35        0.72     3.37        0.70      3.31        0.69
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.47        0.71      3.49        0.70
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.39        0.66      3.39        0.65
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39        0.70      3.43        0.69
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.37        0.68      3.39        0.63
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40        0.65      3.40        0.62
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.40        0.66      3.41        0.62
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.21        0.81      2.69        0.73
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.23        0.75      2.69        0.74
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.58        0.63      2.85        0.61
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.35         0.66   3.51         0.58
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.39         0.65   3.46         0.59
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.47         0.62   3.49         0.60
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.48         0.60   3.48         0.62
Attend Class Rgeularly                    3.56          0.59   3.50         0.61   3.48         0.58
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29         0.67   3.33         0.60
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   1.82         0.89   2.11         0.94
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35         0.67   3.25         0.67
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.42         0.61   3.37         0.59
Number of Observations                           9637                 744                 130
                   Undergraduate Studies (Math) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores, Fall 2009

3.55



3.50



3.45



3.40
                                                                                                                      University
                                                                                                                      Division
                                                                                                                      Unit
3.35



3.30



3.25



3.20
       Rating of       Rating of   Rating of    Rating of      Rating of     Rating of     Overall    High Level of
       Learning       Instructor Instructional Organization   Interaction   Instructor    Rating of    Excellence
        Value        Enthusiasm    Methods      of Course                   Individual   Breadth of     Expected
                                                                             Rapport     Knowledge
       Undergraduate Studies (University Success) Comparative SIRS Mean Scores,
                                       Fall 2009

3.55


3.50


3.45


3.40                                                                         University
                                                                             Division
3.35                                                                         University Success


3.30


3.25


3.20
UCUN (UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES) MEAN SCORES, FALL 2009

                                               University            Division                 Unit
Variable                                    Mean     Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.   Mean      Std. Dev.
Learned Something Valuable                  3.31        0.84     3.29        0.80      3.26        0.81
Interest in Subject Increased               3.22        0.86     3.18        0.83      3.16        0.83
Learned & Understood Subject Matter         3.28        0.78     3.31        0.72      3.31        0.71
Rating of Learning Value                    3.33        0.84     3.34        0.81      3.30        0.83
Instructor Appeared Sincere                 3.42        0.73     3.41        0.71      3.38        0.72
Instructor Was Dynamic & Energetic          3.33        0.78     3.33        0.76      3.30        0.77
Instructor Style Held Interest              3.21        0.86     3.26        0.81      3.22        0.82
Rating of Instructor Enthusiasm             3.38        0.82     3.39        0.79      3.35        0.81
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.36        0.70     3.32        0.70      3.28        0.71
Instructor Used Electronic Medium           3.07        0.93     3.10        0.89      3.02        0.91
Course Format Was Appropriate               3.35        0.71     3.34        0.71      3.30        0.73
Rating of Instructional Methods             3.36        0.82     3.40        0.77      3.35        0.79
Material Presented Clearly & Logically      3.31        0.76     3.38        0.68      3.35        0.69
Course Materials Were Prepared              3.38        0.69     3.40        0.67      3.36        0.69
Materials were Clear & Understandable       3.32        0.75     3.40        0.67      3.37        0.67
Course Objectives Were Stated               3.41        0.66     3.41        0.66      3.37        0.69
Course Implemented According to Syllabus    3.38        0.69     3.37        0.68      3.32        0.70
Rating of Organization of Course            3.42        0.78     3.43        0.74      3.40        0.75
Class Discussion Encouraged                 3.37        0.74     3.36        0.71      3.33        0.72
Students Shared Ideas, Knowledge in Class   3.37        0.73     3.35        0.70      3.34        0.71
Instructor Encouraged Questions             3.43        0.69     3.42        0.67      3.39        0.68
Instructor Encouraged Expression of Ideas   3.39        0.72     3.40        0.69      3.38        0.69
Rating of Interaction                       3.37        0.82     3.38        0.79      3.36        0.80
Instructor Was Friendly to Students         3.43        0.69     3.45        0.64      3.44        0.65
Students Seeking Help and Advice Welcomed 3.43          0.70     3.45        0.66      3.41        0.67
Instructors Helfpul without Favoritism      3.40        0.72     3.41        0.69      3.38        0.70
Instructor Available During Office Hours    3.39        0.68     3.39        0.66      3.36        0.68
Instructor Was Accessible to Students       3.40        0.68     3.42        0.65      3.39        0.67
Rating of Instructor Individual Rapport     3.42        0.78     3.44        0.73      3.41        0.74
Course Related to Other Fields & Situations 3.34        0.72     3.36        0.69      3.35        0.70
Background of Ideas and Concepts Given      3.38        0.69     3.40        0.67      3.39        0.68
Instructor Gave Different Points of View    3.35        0.71     3.39        0.68      3.37        0.68
Concepts vs.. Real Situations Discussed     3.35        0.72     3.37        0.70      3.36        0.71
Overall Rating of Breadth of Knowledge      3.49        0.72     3.47        0.71      3.43        0.72
Course Assignments Clear & Precise          3.35        0.72     3.39        0.66      3.37        0.67
Readings & Required Texts Were Valuable     3.38        0.70     3.39        0.70      3.35        0.71
Assignments Provided Better Understanding 3.35          0.72     3.37        0.68      3.34        0.70
Exam & Assignments Related to Course        3.41        0.66     3.40        0.65      3.39        0.66
Exams & Projects Graded in Timely Manner    3.37        0.71     3.40        0.66      3.37        0.67
Course Difficulty                           2.63        0.77     2.21        0.81      2.10        0.78
Course Workload                             2.56        0.71     2.23        0.75      2.12        0.73
Course Pace                                 2.77        0.59     2.58        0.63      2.51        0.63
Instructor Used Class Time Effectively    3.37          0.67   3.35         0.66   3.30         0.67
Instructor Was Punctual with Class        3.41          0.67   3.39         0.65   3.37         0.66
Instructor Was Respectful                 3.47          0.65   3.47         0.62   3.45         0.62
High Level of Excellence Expected         3.49          0.62   3.48         0.60   3.47         0.60
Attends Class Regularly                   3.56          0.59   3.50         0.61   3.49         0.62
Devote Time for Class Preparation         3.38          0.64   3.29         0.67   3.26         0.69
Hours per Week Spent Preparing            2.19          0.96   1.82         0.89   1.73         0.86
Complete Course Assignments on Time       3.42          0.64   3.35         0.67   3.35         0.68
Approached Course Ready to Meet Demands   3.48          0.58   3.42         0.61   3.41         0.62
Number of Observations                           9637                 744                 571

								
To top