The data below was used to create the three funnel plot graphs showing centres' multiple pregnancy, elective single embryo
treatments carried out in January to December 2009
This data was extracted from the HFEA’s data warehouse containing Register data as at 23/06/2010. At this time the HFEA ha
which centres were asked to confirm the accuracy of information on treatment cycles carried out up to and including 30/06/2
and outcome information used in this analysis has therefore not been confirmed by centres and may be subject to change as
corrects information they have previously supplied.
Please note that the data is aggreagated for all ages. Therefore it is not meaningful to directly compare centres' eSET and ove
age and medical history of the patients each individual centre treats.
Data for the 2009 multiple pregnancy funnel plot
X axis on graph
(sample size)
Number of
Centre Number of early multiple
number Centre name pregnancies pregnancies
0004 Ninewells 162 44
0005 Peninsular Centre for Reproductive Medicine 95 18
0006 Lister 853 160
0007 Hewitt Centre for Reproductive Medicine 265 37
0008 Midland Fertility 291 68
0013 Coventry 125 23
0015 Eastbourne 101 28
0016 Care Northampton 197 49
0017 Newcastle centre for life 242 58
0019 Aberdeen 162 25
0021 Hull IVF Unit 122 24
0026 Priory 151 43
0030 Herts and Essex 198 49
0031 Hartlepool 28 8
0033 Manchester fertility services 255 51
0035 Oxford 427 108
0037 Glasow Royal Infirmary 222 66
0044 The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health 373 116
0049 IVF Wales 146 37
0052 CLOSED - Clarendon Wing - Leeds 237 55
0055 James Cook 97 17
0057 Wessex 181 35
0059 London Women's Clinic, Swansea 159 38
0061 Care Sheffield 219 55
0063 CLOSED - St James' Hospital Leeds 208 38
0064 Chiltern 89 25
0067 St Marys Mancehster 155 37
0068 Leicester Fertility Centre 66 3
0070 London Bridge 591 202
0075 London Women's Clinic, Darlington 57 21
0076 Nurture Nottingham 229 85
0077 Belfast 163 33
0078 IVF Hammersmith 629 186
0086 BMI Chelsfield Park Hospital 107 29
0088 London Fertility Centre 147 40
0094 Barts 419 78
0100 Bourn Hall 447 100
0101 CARE Nottingham 446 123
0102 Guys and St Thomas' 459 102
0105 London Women's Clinic 272 82
0109 Kings 129 35
0115 Nuffied Health Glasgow 73 23
0119 Birmingham Womens 205 37
0123 CLOSED - Fertility Unit, Hilingdon Hospital 0 0
0133 Winterbourne 39 16
0139 Bath 132 23
0143 The London Female and male Fertility Cente 7 1
0144 The Woking Nuffield Hospital 199 40
0148 Shropshire and Mid- Wales Fertilty centre 133 31
0153 Homerton 190 50
0157 ARGC 541 190
0158 Chelses and Westminster Hospital 60 17
0161 BMI Chaucer 138 34
0165 Brentwood 25 7
0170 The Gateshead fertility Unit 87 21
0179 South West Centre for Reproductive Medicine 95 27
0184 Burton 54 8
0185 CareManchester 541 141
0186 CLOSED -Harley Street Fertility Centre 17 2
0188 Isis Colchester 49 8
0196 Sheffield 189 26
0197 Salisbury 74 12
0198 St Judes 38 9
0199 CRM London 232 74
0200 Origin 90 23
0201 Edinburgh 233 60
0208 South East Fertility Clinic 108 26
0250 Glasgow Centre for Reproductive Medicine 195 64
0254 The Agora 56 10
0295 Bristol Centre for Reproductive Medicine 399 121
0299 Create Health 74 12
0313 IVF Scotland 0 0
0314 Leeds Centre for Reproductive Medicine 0 0
Total 14194 3544
Please note that the data is aggregated for patients of all ages. The proportion of eSET cycles that a centre needs to carry out
pregnancy target will also be affected by the age and medical history of the patients they treat. For example younger patients
embryos, will typically have better chances of getting pregnant and therefore be more at risk of conceiving a multiple pregna
more younger patients would need to carry out more eSET cycles to lower their multiple pregnancy rate.
Data for the 2009 eSET funnel plot
X axis on graph
(sample size)
Number of
Number of embryo transfers that
Centre Centre name transfers are eSET
0004 Ninewells 477 56
0005 Peninsular Centre for Reproductive Medicine 335 22
0006 Lister 2527 464
0007 Hewitt Centre for Reproductive Medicine 1119 144
0008 Midland Fertility 830 71
0013 Coventry 695 89
0015 Eastbourne 337 55
0016 Care Northampton 554 95
0017 Newcastle centre for life 966 70
0019 Aberdeen 518 121
0021 Hull IVF Unit 380 94
0026 Priory 495 39
0030 Herts and Essex 550 120
0031 Hartlepool 161 3
0033 Manchester fertility services 931 108
0035 Oxford 1270 99
0037 Glasow Royal Infirmary 995 58
0044 The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health 881 65
0049 IVF Wales 509 22
0052 CLOSED -Clarendon Wing Leeds 1188 117
0055 James Cook 319 16
0057 Wessex 728 0
0059 London Women's Clinic, Swansea 533 56
0061 Care Sheffield 539 29
0063 CLOSED - St James' Hospital Leeds 749 65
0064 Chiltern 249 33
0067 St Marys Mancehster 660 0
0068 Leicester Fertility Centre 403 216
0070 London Bridge 1609 49
0075 London Women's Clinic, Darlington 258 8
0076 Nurture Nottingham 536 62
0077 Belfast 707 46
0078 IVF Hammersmith 1852 152
0086 BMI Chelsfield Park Hospital 452 46
0088 London Fertility Centre 550 5
0094 Barts 1230 59
0100 Bourn Hall 1656 40
0101 CARE Nottingham 1197 219
0102 Guys and St Thomas' 1341 245
0105 London Women's Clinic 734 2
0109 Kings 473 87
0115 Nuffied Health Glasgow 336 31
0119 Birmingham Womens 615 172
0123 CLOSED - Fertility Unit, Hilingdon Hospital 0 0
0133 Winterbourne 151 9
0139 Bath 530 94
0143 The London Female and male Fertility Cente 37 0
0144 The Woking Nuffield Hospital 762 63
0148 Shropshire and Mid- Wales Fertilty centre 356 42
0153 Homerton 658 2
0157 ARGC 1236 30
0158 Chelses and Westminster Hospital 301 16
0161 BMI Chaucer 444 6
0165 Brentwood 134 3
0170 The Gateshead fertility Unit 301 43
0179 South West Centre for Reproductive Medicine 335 3
0184 Burton 231 92
0185 CareManchester 1626 43
0186 CLOSED -Harley Street Fertility Centre 64 1
0188 Isis Colchester 244 22
0196 Sheffield 625 167
0197 Salisbury 304 24
0198 St Judes 129 0
0199 CRM London 628 72
0200 Origin 378 20
0201 Edinburgh 607 65
0208 South East Fertility Clinic 476 6
0250 Glasgow Centre for Reproductive Medicine 654 36
0254 The Agora 200 19
0295 Bristol Centre for Reproductive Medicine 1076 41
0299 Create Health 357 14
0313 IVF Scotland 0 0
0314 Leeds Centre for Reproductive Medicine 1 0
Total 46289 4483
Please note that the following pregnancy data is aggregated for patients of all ages. Therefore it is not meaningful to directly
data between clinics, as this will be affected by the age and medical history of the patients that the centre treats. For exampl
higher proportion of older patients will typically have a lower overall pregnancy rate than a centre that treats more younger
centres carry out relatively few treatment cycles, and therefore their pregnancy data may give a less reliable indication of tha
than a centre that carries out a large number of treatment cycles.
Data for the 2009 overall pregnancy funnel plot
X axis on graph
(sample size)
Number of
pregnancies
Number of embryo (>0 gestational
Centre Centre name transfers sac)
0004 Ninewells 477 162
0005 Peninsular Centre for Reproductive Medicine 335 95
0006 Lister 2527 853
0007 Hewitt Centre for Reproductive Medicine 1119 265
0008 Midland Fertility 830 291
0013 Coventry 695 125
0015 Eastbourne 337 101
0016 Care Northampton 554 197
0017 Newcastle centre for life 966 242
0019 Aberdeen 518 162
0021 Hull IVF Unit 380 122
0026 Priory 495 151
0030 Herts and Essex 550 198
0031 Hartlepool 161 28
0033 Manchester fertility services 931 255
0035 Oxford 1270 427
0037 Glasow Royal Infirmary 995 222
0044 The Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health 881 373
0049 IVF Wales 509 146
0052 CLOSED - Clarendon Wing - Leeds 1188 237
0055 James Cook 319 97
0057 Wessex 728 181
0059 London Women's Clinic, Swansea 533 159
0061 Care Sheffield 539 219
0063 CLOSED - St James' Hospital Leeds 749 208
0064 Chiltern 249 89
0067 St Marys Mancehster 660 155
0068 Leicester Fertility Centre 403 66
0070 London Bridge 1609 591
0075 London Women's Clinic, Darlington 258 57
0076 Nurture Nottingham 536 229
0077 Belfast 707 163
0078 IVF Hammersmith 1852 629
0086 BMI Chelsfield Park Hospital 452 107
0088 London Fertility Centre 550 147
0094 Barts 1230 419
0100 Bourn Hall 1656 447
0101 CARE Nottingham 1197 446
0102 Guys and St Thomas' 1341 459
0105 London Women's Clinic 734 272
0109 Kings 473 129
0115 Nuffied Health Glasgow 336 73
0119 Birmingham Womens 615 205
0123 CLOSED - Fertility Unit, Hilingdon Hospital 0 0
0133 Winterbourne 151 39
0139 Bath 530 132
0143 The London Female and male Fertility Cente 37 7
0144 The Woking Nuffield Hospital 762 199
0148 Shropshire and Mid- Wales Fertilty centre 356 133
0153 Homerton 658 190
0157 ARGC 1236 541
0158 Chelses and Westminster Hospital 301 60
0161 BMI Chaucer 444 138
0165 Brentwood 134 25
0170 The Gateshead fertility Unit 301 87
0179 South West Centre for Reproductive Medicine 335 95
0184 Burton 231 54
0185 CareManchester 1626 541
0186 CLOSED -Harley Street Fertility Centre 64 17
0188 Isis Colchester 244 49
0196 Sheffield 625 189
0197 Salisbury 304 74
0198 St Judes 129 38
0199 CRM London 628 232
0200 Origin 378 90
0201 Edinburgh 607 233
0208 South East Fertility Clinic 476 108
0250 Glasgow Centre for Reproductive Medicine 654 195
0254 The Agora 200 56
0295 Bristol Centre for Reproductive Medicine 1076 399
0299 Create Health 357 74
0313 IVF Scotland 0 0
0314 Leeds Centre for Reproductive Medicine 1 0
Total 46289 14194
pregnancy, elective single embryo transfers (eSET) and overall pregnancy data from
/06/2010. At this time the HFEA had performed a preliminary validation process in
ied out up to and including 30/06/2009 for pregnancy outcomes. Some of the cycle
es and may be subject to change as they notify us of information that updates or
ctly compare centres' eSET and overall pregnancy data as this will be affected by the
y axis on graph
% of pregnancies
that are multiple Difference from multiple
pregnancies pregnancy target?
27.2% Not significantly different
18.9% Significantly below
18.8% Significantly below
14.0% Significantly below
23.4% Significantly below
18.4% Significantly below
27.7% Not significantly different
24.9% Not significantly different
24.0% Significantly below
15.4% Significantly below
19.7% Significantly below
28.5% Not significantly different
24.7% Not significantly different
28.6% Not significantly different
20.0% Significantly below
25.3% Significantly below
29.7% Not significantly different
31.1% Not significantly different
25.3% Not significantly different
23.2% Significantly below
17.5% Significantly below
19.3% Significantly below
23.9% Not significantly different
25.1% Not significantly different
18.3% Significantly below
28.1% Not significantly different
23.9% Not significantly different
4.5% Significantly below
34.2% Significantly above
36.8% Not significantly different
37.1% Significantly above
20.2% Significantly below
29.6% Not significantly different
27.1% Not significantly different
27.2% Not significantly different
18.6% Significantly below
22.4% Significantly below
27.6% Not significantly different
22.2% Significantly below
30.1% Not significantly different
27.1% Not significantly different
31.5% Not significantly different
18.0% Significantly below
0.0%
41.0% Not significantly different
17.4% Significantly below
14.3% Not significantly different
20.1% Significantly below
23.3% Not significantly different
26.3% Not significantly different
35.1% Significantly above
28.3% Not significantly different
24.6% Not significantly different
28.0% Not significantly different
24.1% Not significantly different
28.4% Not significantly different
14.8% Significantly below
26.1% Significantly below
11.8% Not significantly different
16.3% Significantly below
13.8% Significantly below
16.2% Significantly below
23.7% Not significantly different
31.9% Not significantly different
25.6% Not significantly different
25.8% Not significantly different
24.1% Not significantly different
32.8% Not significantly different
17.9% Significantly below
30.3% Not significantly different
16.2% Significantly below
0.0%
0.0%
25.0%
les that a centre needs to carry out to reach the multiple
reat. For example younger patients with good quality
isk of conceiving a multiple pregnancy, so a centre who treats
regnancy rate.
y axis on graph
% of embryo
transfers that are Difference from national
eSET average
11.7% Not significantly different
6.6% Significantly below
18.4% Significantly above
12.9% Significantly above
8.6% Not significantly different
12.8% Significantly above
16.3% Significantly above
17.1% Significantly above
7.2% Significantly below
23.4% Significantly above
24.7% Significantly above
7.9% Not significantly different
21.8% Significantly above
1.9% Significantly below
11.6% Not significantly different
7.8% Significantly below
5.8% Significantly below
7.4% Significantly below
4.3% Significantly below
9.8% Not significantly different
5.0% Significantly below
0.0% Significantly below
10.5% Not significantly different
5.4% Significantly below
8.7% Not significantly different
13.3% Not significantly different
0.0% Significantly below
53.6% Significantly above
3.0% Significantly below
3.1% Significantly below
11.6% Not significantly different
6.5% Significantly below
8.2% Significantly below
10.2% Not significantly different
0.9% Significantly below
4.8% Significantly below
2.4% Significantly below
18.3% Significantly above
18.3% Significantly above
0.3% Significantly below
18.4% Significantly above
9.2% Not significantly different
28.0% Significantly above
0.0%
6.0% Not significantly different
17.7% Significantly above
0.0% Significantly below
8.3% Not significantly different
11.8% Not significantly different
0.3% Significantly below
2.4% Significantly below
5.3% Significantly below
1.4% Significantly below
2.2% Significantly below
14.3% Significantly above
0.9% Significantly below
39.8% Significantly above
2.6% Significantly below
1.6% Significantly below
9.0% Not significantly different
26.7% Significantly above
7.9% Not significantly different
0.0% Significantly below
11.5% Not significantly different
5.3% Significantly below
10.7% Not significantly different
1.3% Significantly below
5.5% Significantly below
9.5% Not significantly different
3.8% Significantly below
3.9% Significantly below
0.0%
0.0%
9.7%
ore it is not meaningful to directly compare the pregnancy
that the centre treats. For example, a centre who treats a
a centre that treats more younger patients. In addition some
give a less reliable indication of that centre's performance
y axis on graph
% of embryo
transfers that
result in Difference from national
pregnancy average
34.0% Not significantly different
28.4% Not significantly different
33.8% Significantly above
23.7% Significantly below
35.1% Not significantly different
18.0% Significantly below
30.0% Not significantly different
35.6% Significantly above
25.1% Significantly below
31.3% Not significantly different
32.1% Not significantly different
30.5% Not significantly different
36.0% Significantly above
17.4% Significantly below
27.4% Not significantly different
33.6% Significantly above
22.3% Significantly below
42.3% Significantly above
28.7% Not significantly different
19.9% Significantly below
30.4% Not significantly different
24.9% Significantly below
29.8% Not significantly different
40.6% Significantly above
27.8% Not significantly different
35.7% Not significantly different
23.5% Significantly below
16.4% Significantly below
36.7% Significantly above
22.1% Significantly below
42.7% Significantly above
23.1% Significantly below
34.0% Significantly above
23.7% Significantly below
26.7% Significantly below
34.1% Significantly above
27.0% Significantly below
37.3% Significantly above
34.2% Significantly above
37.1% Significantly above
27.3% Significantly below
21.7% Significantly below
33.3% Not significantly different
0.0%
25.8% Not significantly different
24.9% Significantly below
18.9% Not significantly different
26.1% Significantly below
37.4% Significantly above
28.9% Significantly below
43.8% Significantly above
19.9% Significantly below
31.1% Not significantly different
18.7% Significantly below
28.9% Not significantly different
28.4% Not significantly different
23.4% Significantly below
33.3% Significantly above
26.6% Not significantly different
20.1% Significantly below
30.2% Not significantly different
24.3% Not significantly different
29.5% Not significantly different
36.9% Significantly above
23.8% Significantly below
38.4% Significantly above
22.7% Significantly below
29.8% Not significantly different
28.0% Not significantly different
37.1% Significantly above
20.7% Significantly below
0.0%
0.0%
30.7%