Embed
Email

Doing Eye Tracking on the Future of Search

Document Sample

Shared by: changcheng2
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
11/6/2011
language:
English
pages:
20
Doing Eye Tracking on the

Future of Search



Gord Hotchkiss

Enquiro Research

Question:

How do you do eye tracking on what the SERP

may look like?

Problem One: Predicting the Future



• Google Universal results today

• Ask 3D results today

• Our guess as to what personalization

will look like on Google in 12 months

• Our guess as to what Google might

look like in 3 years

Problem Two: Testing the Future



• Personalization for Google:2008 and Google:

2010

• Signed our panel into a test Google account

• Gave them a scenario (see if the iPhone is for

you) and let them have a free session

• Went through search and web history and

personalized a results set for each for the

second session (Google:2008)

• Extensively personalized a search portal for

each for the third session (Google:2010)

Golden

Triangle vs

“Chunking”

E Shaped Scanning

rather than F

Scanning with

Universal

Results:

The First 2

seconds

Scanning with

Universal

Results:

The First 2

seconds

Scanning with

Universal

Results:

The First 2

seconds

Scanning with

Universal

Results:

The First 2

seconds

Scanning with

Universal

Results:

The First 2

seconds

Session Example of “Chunking”

Graphics

“Fencing”

Scanning

Does Personalization Work?

• Organic Non Personalized Personalized

listings 3, 4

and 5

personalized

• Study of 16

individuals

• Tracked

History from

a previous

session

• Provided

listings

based both

on past

clickstream

and

assumed

place in

buying

funnel

Does Personalization Work?

• Organic Non Personalized Personalized

listings 3, 4

and 5

personalized

• Study of 16

individuals

• Tracked

History from

a previous

session

• Provided

listings 60

55.56

based both

on past 50



clickstream 40.4 40.95

40

and

assumed 30

place in 20.57

18.91

buying 20

15

funnel

10





0

Non Personalized Personalized







% of Time Spent % of Fixations % of Clicks

Perhaps Personalization Works Too Well…









3

“the concern 1

might be if the

natural results are

getting better and

2

better why would

someone want to

click on the ads

anyway?”

Our Search: 2010 Panel







Jakob Nielsen Larry Cornett Michael Ferguson Chris Sherman









Marissa Mayer Greg Sterling Danny Sullivan Justin Osmer

Google: 2010?

Buyers

Heatmap



45







40







35







30







25







20







15







10







5







0





Organic S hop Loc al Top Buy iPhone

Results Sponsored Now





% of Time Spent

Google: 2010?

Researcher’s

Heatmap



45







40







35







30







25







20







15







10







5







0





Organic Consumer Buy iPhone iPhone

Results Rev iews Now News





% of Time Spent

Thank You



Full Whitepaper Available

gord@enquiro.com



Related docs
Other docs by changcheng2
Trust Meeting Dates for 2010
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Puer Nobis Nascitur
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Newsletter 7th Edition
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Euro Vin Inventory20080802
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
llethi
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
newsnow dummy
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
229315-upload-00001
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
amyot
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!