Embed
Email

Judith Woodhall

Document Sample

Shared by: xiuliliaofz
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/5/2011
language:
English
pages:
4
Approved Meeting Notes from the EM-TC Telecon

Date: Sept 13, 2011

Next meeting: Sept 27, 2011 Telecon

A quorum was in attendance.



1. Attendance



Aymond, Patti Leinenweber, Lewis

Bowen, William McGarry, Donald

Brooks, Rex O'Donnell, Darrell

Duncans, Charlene Osterloh, Camille

Gooch, Martena Timm, Gary

Grapes, Tim Torchon, Robert

Gustafson, Robert Vandame, Richard

Ham, Gary Waters, Jeff

Joerg, Werner Wilkins, Brian

Jones, Elysa



2. The meeting notes for the Aug 30 meeting were reviewed and corrected. Gary made and

Rex seconded a motion to accept the notes as amended. All agreed.

3. Notes from the chair.

a. Rex will be presenting the outcome of the Documents and Collateral

Subcommittee of the Adoption Technical Committee during the meeting. He

asked that everyone pull up the recommendation to the TC for the new CAP logo.

b. While the members brought the logo up for review, Elysa announced that the

Emergency Interoperability Member Section voted last week to donate $1000 to

support the Crises Camp tour. We have discussed how this effort that supports

the use of open standards for emergency management and particularly the EDXL

suite of Standards. The specifics for the tour and dates are posted. We were

happy to be able to support their efforts.

c. Rex presented the Documents & Collateral presentation of CAP logo

recommendation.



i. Gary Timm asked if it indicated that it was tied to RSS and ATOM. Elysa

offered that the thought was the exclamation point as read left to right

depict emergency information, the consecutive circles to signify getting

the message out. Rex added that there was extensive discussion on this

point and it was felt that one of the major uses of the symbol would be for

RSS feeds to identify them. He thinks the idea of an “!” to get across the

idea that it is an an alert then the two arcs to imply broadcast is a good

connotation to carry. We also needed for it to be legible at 25%.



ii. Werner asked that the separation from top to bottom and side to side be

the same, Rex agreed. The discussion about color was to insure it was an

absolute red where this one had a bit of orange in it. Rex will verify the

proper color and indicated that it will vary from one monitor to another.



iii. Gary asked about the use of the logo saying that a square rather than a

rectangle was preferred for putting on a map. There was additional

discussion on this point with Gary Ham, Don, Rich and others indicating

that a square is preferred. We agreed that we could have two logos, one

with and one without the letters “CAP”



iv. Don moved and Rex seconded a motion to have two logos, one being an

icon used for maps with the first of the two recommendations Rex

presented. It would be square and have the exclamation point and

concentric circles. There would also be one with the whole rectangular

piece, extended just a bit so to have even spacing on either side. With no

further discussion, the vote was taken and all agreed to approve the logo,

none opposed.



v. Werner commented that we want in no way to imply any level of

compliance or certification with the use of this logo. All agreed.



vi. Rex and Werner will work together to finalize the color and details to

insure proper documentation. Once it has been finalized, Elysa agreed to

send to the people from the CAP workshop 2011 where the request was

made to develop this. Rex agreed to put it on the CrisisCommons trail,

Darrel said he would announce it at the upcoming Canadian MASAS

initiative meeting. Everyone was encouraged to publish it wherever they

could.



4. Subcommittee Reports.



a. SitRep 1.0. Tim reported that they are getting closer to announcing a completed

draft for TC review. Don and his staff have posted more material and Lew is

working on the links and references for the GML Simple Features. They agreed it

should be ready for the next EM-TC meeting. Elysa encouraged everyone to keep

an eye out for these final postings and review them to be prepared for discussion

at our Sept 27 meeting.



b. DE 2.0. Jeff reported that a zip file of the most recent schema has been uploaded.

He thanked Lew and Don for their work on Common Types that allowed him to

just pull these pieces from the RIM and integrate into the DE 2.0 draft without

much trouble. With this done, they will be doing the final updates to the draft

specification. It could possibly be ready to finalize by the next meeting.

c. HAVE 2.0. Don reported that now that his work with SitRep is complete, he will

resume his focus on HAVE. He will arrange with Lee Tincher to resume

meetings in October. Tim commented and others agree that there is a lot of work

coming up to include TEP, Australian CAP Profile, etc.



d. TEP. Tim reported that they had a meeting last Thursday to bring folks up to

speed on the artifacts and deliverables. The New Zealand participants are back

involved. The group is about half way through the original requirements. Tim

would still like to get more people engaged. There are about two more

documents to get through before they begin development of the requirements and

draft document. After going through a 60 item list of open issues and submitting

them to the process, they will determine what is next, confirm the process, tools,

etc. they will dive into developing the specification. Elysa asked if an HL7

liaison had been defined. Tim said Mike Glickman is contacting John Quinn.

They are still interested in the talking about the routing of payloads per the TEP

point of contact. No one has been specifically named for the HL7 liaison but Tim

will continue to reach out.



e. RIM. Rex reported they are breaking ground on the ontology for EDXL data

model. They did some preliminary work on CAP v1.2 and are ready to start on

the ontology more seriously and develop a complete data model. He asked if other

had comments to share about the RIM and ontology.



i. Werner had nothing more to add about ontology but reminded the group

that there was work yet to be done Common Types



ii. Jeff said it is an ideal goal for RIM is to have place where all components

of standards in one reference model. One way is with ontology. They are

exploring in the RIM SC how best to utilize that tool. They are beginning

to address that and will make some decisions at next meeting. They will

come up with an early draft for review and go from there. Rex added that

Jeff has put together toolkits to look at how using an ontology would

benefit the work, for instance use of EDXL-DE and selection for how to

distribute a simple message.



iii. Elysa asked Werner what the next steps are for Common Types. He said

that at the last meeting, we voted last time to advance EDXL GML Simple

Features Profile Version 1.0 WD09 as a Committee Specification Draft

1.0. Lew explained that during last meeting discussion there was one part

of the schema for simple features, the schema location, was not correct

and would not allow schema to validate. A fix was made to that URL.

That was the only change and specifically for XLINK. The change was

made to the schema and repackaged as Working Draft 10 along with the

specification. Numbering for both was updated to 10 so numbering would

match. That was the only change and it makes it clear and usable. It is

now posted in RIM Common Types folder.



iv. After some discussion about process, Rex moved and Lew seconded a

motion to approve made a motion to approve WD 10 EDXL GML Simple

Features Profile Version 1.0 WD09 as a Committee Specification Draft

(CSD01) (located at ) All agreed.





5. Other business.



a. Elysa reported that in her role as chair of the IAEM standards and practices

committee, she offered to introduce the EDXL Sit Rep Standard at that committee

meeting during the IAEM Annual Meeting. The committee will meet for 2 hours

on Sunday, November 13th. This will be a good time to get some visibility of the

new work during he time it should be out for review. We would like to have as

much visibility as possible. There will be an OASIS booth at the conference and

will highlight companies that are at the show using OASIS Standards.



With our agenda accomplished Tim made and Rex seconded the motion to adjourn. All agreed,

none opposed.



Respectfully submitted,



Elysa Jones, Chair

OASIS EM-TC



Related docs
Other docs by xiuliliaofz
Dreaming
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Maurice White BDSc Melb
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
article-7901
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Application - City of Laramie
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Project Outline - TeacherWeb
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
NSSE EDUCATION
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
me344_f03
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Experiment_11a
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CHAPTER 16
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Distributed Data Base Systems
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!