Full-scale y-axis 149 mm
NormFact NormFact determined
Detector AngDeg Millimeters Scale Signal by Wyatt
7 44.5 90 0.5 0.302 0.967 0.97
8 54 100 0.5 0.336 0.870 0.869
9 64.9 97.4 0.5 0.327 0.893 0.888
11 90 87 0.5 0.292 1.000 1
12 102.9 93.1 0.5 0.312 0.934 0.921
13 115.1 109 0.5 0.366 0.798 0.791
14 126 119.9 0.5 0.402 0.726 0.722
15 135.5 51.8 1 0.348 0.840 0.831
16 143.9 78 1 0.523 0.558 0.548
Divide intensity by
intensity at 90
intensity by
intensity at 90
Full-scale Y-axis
c1 c2
Norm X
Detector AngDeg q2/cm-2 Norm DAWN Scale/Voltsmm
7 44.5 1.00E+10 0.967 1.483E-05 1 62.5 70
8 54 1.44E+10 0.870 1.335E-05 1 68.4 76
9 64.9 2.01E+10 0.893 1.370E-05 1 60.6 95
11 90 3.49E+10 1.000 1.534E-05 1 58.2 66
12 102.9 4.27E+10 0.934 1.433E-05 1 63.3 71.2
13 115.1 4.97E+10 0.798 1.224E-05 1 73.8 83
14 126 5.54E+10 0.726 1.113E-05 1.25 64 72.4
15 135.5 5.98E+10 0.840 1.288E-05 1.5 46.2 52.5
16 143.9 6.31E+10 0.558 8.555E-06 2 53.5 60
dn/dc in cm^3/g 0.198
With the exception of a few points, this looks OK. The polymer i
Opt.Const mol-cm2-g-2 2.836E-07
too small to size by SLS.
ScaleConst 0.000E+00
1.4E-04
Get intercepts visually! 1.2E-04
conc q=0 intrcpts
0.00103 4.7
0.00129 5.3 1.0E-04
0.00167 6.15
0.00209 7
Kc/R (mol/g)
0.00247 7.65 8.0E-05
0.00489 12.79
6.0E-05
Conc Dependence
14 y = 2081.4x + 2.6027
4.0E-05
12 c=0 guide lines q=0 guidelines
x
2.0E-05
10 1.00E+10 0 ybottom 0 0.00
1.00E+10 1.00E-04 ytop 0 1.00E-04
Kc/R x 10^5
8 1.44E+10
0.0E+00 0 ybottom 0 0.00
1.44E+10
0.00E+00 ytop
1.00E-04 2.00E+10 0 1.00E-04
4.00E+10
6 2.01E+10 0 etc 0.00
0 +kscale*c (both in cm^
q2
2.01E+10 1.00E-04 0 1.00E-04
4 3.49E+10 0 0 0.00
3.49E+10 1.00E-04 0 1.00E-04
2 4.27E+10 0 0 0.00
4.27E+10 1.00E-04 0 1.00E-04
0 4.97E+10 0 0 0.00
-0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006
-0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005
4.97E+10 0.006
1.00E-04 0 1.00E-04
5.54E+10 0
5.54E+10 1.00E-04
5.98E+10 0
5.98E+10 1.00E-04
6.31E+10 0
6.31E+10 1.00E-04
149 mm DAWN const : 1.534E-05
c3 c4 c5 c6 c1 g/mL c2 g/mL c3 g/mL c4 g/mL c5 g/mL c6 g/mL
0.00103 0.00129 0.00167 0.00209 0.00247 0.00489
Rayleigh factor
76.9 86 92 108 6.220E-06 6.966E-06 7.653E-06 8.559E-06 9.156E-06 1.075E-05
85 95 102 119 6.127E-06 6.807E-06 7.613E-06 8.509E-06 9.091E-06 1.066E-05
93.5 93 100 118 5.573E-06 8.736E-06 8.598E-06 8.552E-06 9.196E-06 1.081E-05
73.7 82.3 89 105 5.992E-06 6.795E-06 7.588E-06 8.473E-06 9.163E-06 1.083E-05
79.4 89 96 114 6.090E-06 6.850E-06 7.639E-06 8.562E-06 9.236E-06 1.097E-05
93.2 104 112 134 6.064E-06 6.820E-06 7.659E-06 8.546E-06 9.203E-06 1.099E-05
81 91 98 118 5.976E-06 6.761E-06 7.564E-06 8.497E-06 9.151E-06 1.097E-05
59 66 71 85 5.991E-06 6.808E-06 7.651E-06 8.559E-06 9.247E-06 1.102E-05
67 76 82 98 6.144E-06 6.890E-06 7.694E-06 8.727E-06 9.416E-06 1.125E-05
Kc/R
nts, this looks OK. The polymer is
4.696E-05 5.252E-05 6.189E-05 6.926E-05 7.651E-05 1.290E-04
4.768E-05 5.375E-05 6.221E-05 6.966E-05 7.706E-05 1.301E-04
5.242E-05 4.188E-05 5.509E-05 6.931E-05 7.618E-05 1.284E-04
4.875E-05 5.384E-05 6.242E-05 6.996E-05 7.645E-05 1.281E-04
4.797E-05 5.341E-05 6.200E-05 6.923E-05 7.585E-05 1.265E-04
4.817E-05 5.364E-05 6.184E-05 6.936E-05 7.612E-05 1.261E-04
4.888E-05 5.412E-05 6.262E-05 6.976E-05 7.655E-05 1.264E-04
4.876E-05 5.374E-05 6.190E-05 6.925E-05 7.576E-05 1.258E-04
4.755E-05 5.310E-05 6.156E-05 6.792E-05 7.440E-05 1.232E-04
q2+kscale*c c1
1.00E+10 1.00E+10 1.00E+10
c2 1.00E+10 1.00E+10 1.00E+10
1.44E+10 1.44E+10 1.44E+10
c3 1.44E+10 1.44E+10 1.44E+10
2.01E+10 2.01E+10 2.01E+10 2.01E+10 2.01E+10 2.01E+10
c4
3.49E+10 3.49E+10 3.49E+10 3.49E+10 3.49E+10 3.49E+10
4.27E+10 4.27E+10 c5
4.27E+10 4.27E+10 4.27E+10 4.27E+10
4.97E+10 4.97E+10 4.97E+10
c6 4.97E+10 4.97E+10 4.97E+10
5.54E+10 5.54E+10 5.54E+10 5.54E+10
SampleGuideLine 5.54E+10 5.54E+10
5.98E+10 5.98E+10 5.98E+10 5.98E+10 5.98E+10 5.98E+10
6.31E+10 6.31E+10 6.31E+10 6.31E+10 6.31E+10 6.31E+10
4.00E+10 6.00E+10 8.00E+10
kscale*c (both in cm^-2)
<<<<
Full-scale Y-axis 149 mm DAWN const :
c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 c1 c2
Ang Norm / Scale/
Det. Deg q2/cm-2 Norm sin(q) Volts mm of signal from printouts Signal
7 44.5 1.00E+10 0.967 1.379 1 62.5 70 76.9 86 92 108 0.579 0.648
8 54 1.44E+10 0.870 1.075 1 68.4 76 85 95 101.5 119 0.494 0.549
9 64.9 2.01E+10 0.893 0.986 1 60.6 95 93.5 93 100 118 0.401 0.629
11 90 3.49E+10 1.000 1.000 1 58.2 66 73.7 82.3 89 105 0.391 0.443
12 103 4.27E+10 0.934 0.959 1 63.3 71.2 79.4 89 96 114 0.407 0.458
13 115 4.97E+10 0.798 0.881 1 73.8 83 93.2 104 112 134 0.437 0.491
14 126 5.54E+10 0.726 0.897 1.25 64 72.4 81 91 98 118 0.482 0.545
15 136 5.98E+10 0.840 1.198 1.5 46.2 52.5 59 66 71.3 85 0.557 0.633
16 144 6.31E+10 0.558 0.947 2 53.5 60 67 76 82 98 0.680 0.762
This sheet was an attempt to fake out the GuiDe program. So far, I
have not succeeded at this. Maybe something wrong with the
baseline subtraction???
1.53E-05
c3 c4 c5 c6
0.712 0.796 0.852 1.000
0.613 0.686 0.733 0.859
0.619 0.616 0.662 0.778
0.495 0.552 0.597 0.706
0.511 0.573 0.618 0.733
0.551 0.615 0.663 0.791
0.609 0.685 0.737 0.884
0.712 0.796 0.860 1.025
0.851 0.966 1.042 1.245
program. So far, I
ng wrong with the
0.02137
0.384615