Embed
Email

framing_paper_convergence

Document Sample

Shared by: Kerala g
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/4/2011
language:
English
pages:
2
Suite 4.02, 55 Mountain St

ULTIMO NSW 2007

Ph: 02 9288 4000

Fax: 02 9288 4019

Email: info@accan.org.au

www.accan.org.au







10 June 2011



Convergence Review Secretariat

DBCDE

GPO Box 2154

Canberra ACT 2601



Via email





Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Convergence Review Framing Paper.



Social Inclusion and Accessibility



We welcome the overarching proposition in the Foreword to the Paper which states that ―any

person or entity in Australia should be free to communicate with any other person or entity‖.



A fundamental principle that logically follows from this proposition is that inclusion and

accessibility considerations must underpin the policy framework.



The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Australian

Government’s Social Inclusion Agenda and the National Disability Strategy can be used as

guiding documents for this Convergence Review.



For example, the first listed priority area for action in Australia’s National Disability Strategy

is:



Inclusive and accessible communities—the physical environment including public

transport; parks, buildings and housing; digital information and communications

technologies; civic life including social, sporting, recreational and cultural life.



In accordance with this, ACCAN argues there should be two guiding Principles under

―consumer and citizen rights‖ as follows:



Australians should have access to the broadest range of telecommunications devices

and broadest range of content across platforms and services as possible.



The broadest range of devices, services and content should be accessible to people

with disabilities.





Other policy issues raised by convergence



Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman



There will need to be consideration given to the consumer protection framework which

currently prevails. In telecommunications/media areas, responsibility is split between general

state and federal consumer affairs agencies and the sector-specific Telecommunications

Suite 4.02, 55 Mountain St

ULTIMO NSW 2007

Ph: 02 9288 4000

Fax: 02 9288 4019

Email: info@accan.org.au

www.accan.org.au





Industry Ombudsman which has a tight remit for dealing with consumer issues regarding

phone and internet connections and services.



As more types of services start to be delivered over high-speed broadband, there will need

to be some consideration given to whether the TIO’s remit should be widened to include

consumer complaints regarding those services, or if not, how the consumer protection

framework might work best in an environment where many different services will acquire a

telecommunications dimension because of the way they are delivered.



Co-regulation



Both the Broadcasting Services Act and the Telecommunications Act contain co-regulatory

schemes that have been in place since the 1990s. There is ample evidence that the co-

regulatory schemes established by these pieces of legislation have not performed well,1 with

the important exception of where technical and industry operational matters are concerned.



Ultimately the values and high level principles in this Framing Paper will need to be

translated into recommendations for policies with specific enforceability and implementation

mechanisms.



ACCAN submits that lack of enforcement is the chief weakness that is common right across

our present arrangements as created by the BSA and the Tel Act – whether it relates to

content on commercial radio and TV, or telco customer service.



This Review should be looking at what changes need to be made to create a more active

and pre-emptive regulator with stronger powers and a stronger enforcement culture that will

rely less on industry codes which have weak accountability mechanisms. The time has come

for a model of regulation that involves more than doing the minimum necessary to avoid a

public outcry.



This Review is a suitable forum for considering the new types of more specific powers that

should be conferred on a regulator, and new rules for how a regulator should work.









Jonathan Gadir

Senior Policy Adviser

jonathan.gadir@accan.org.au







1

See for example, ACCAN Submission to the ACMA ―Reconnecting the Customer‖ Inquiry, 2010.



Other docs by Kerala g
union-budget-2012-13-highlights
Views: 38  |  Downloads: 0
notification M.Tech_05-03-09
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 0
India_Customs Regulation 1
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
CE Notification 39-2011-12.9.2011
Views: 28  |  Downloads: 0
STATISTICS
Views: 44  |  Downloads: 0
A Hero (R.K. Narayan)
Views: 59  |  Downloads: 6
RRBPatna-Info-HN
Views: 77  |  Downloads: 0
RRB-Notice-Para
Views: 80  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!