Embed
Email

force-majeure-outline

Document Sample

Shared by: Kerala g
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
11/4/2011
language:
English
pages:
1
REASONS THE COMPANIES’ FORCE MAJEURE CLAIMS

ARE NOT VALID:



1. THEY ARE NOT PREVENTED FROM DRILLING OR GETTING

PERMITS;

a. ONLY FROM HIGH VOLUME, HORIZONTAL FRACKING

IN THE MARCELLUS;

b. USING THE SHORT CUT–SGEIS

2. THEY CAN STILL:

a. DRILL VERTICAL WELLS;

b. FRACKING INTO ANY OTHER ROCK FORMATION;

c. USE A LONG FORM ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT &

FULL SEQRA REVIEW FOR MARCELLUS

3. WHY HAVE THEY WAITED ALMOST 3 YEARS TO NOTIFY:

a. PATERSON–June 2008

4. THEIR LETTERS DO NOT SPECIFY WHAT THEY ARE

PREVENTED FROM DOING TO FULFILL CONTRACT

5. THEIR “SHOTGUN” APPROACH–

a. SENDING TO EVERYONE

b. EXACT SAME LETTER,

c. EVEN TO THOSE WITH NO FORCE MAJEURE CLAUSE

IN LEASES



Other docs by Kerala g
union-budget-2012-13-highlights
Views: 38  |  Downloads: 0
notification M.Tech_05-03-09
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 0
India_Customs Regulation 1
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
CE Notification 39-2011-12.9.2011
Views: 28  |  Downloads: 0
STATISTICS
Views: 44  |  Downloads: 0
A Hero (R.K. Narayan)
Views: 59  |  Downloads: 6
RRBPatna-Info-HN
Views: 77  |  Downloads: 0
RRB-Notice-Para
Views: 80  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!