Deriving tariffs from costs

Reviews
Shared by: keonfurtch
Stats
views:
0
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
8/20/2009
language:
English
pages:
0
Deriving prices from Costs Seminar on Regulatory and Tariff issues for the Caribbean countries Montego Bay (Jamaica) July 4-7, 2000 Deriving prices from Costs Deriving Tariffs from Costs Pape Gorgui TOURE pape-gorgui.toure@itu.int The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the ITU or its membership. Tariff versus Cost • The Tariff is what the end-user should pay for a unit of a given service or product; • The unit cost is what the service provider incurs to produce a unit of a given service or product Deriving prices from Costs Problematic • tariffs are of the policy domain and may include considerations depending on the realities of a local market; • the competition tends to push tariffs towards cost; • in the international telecommunication market, the outgoing settlement rate can be a significant cost element; Deriving prices from Costs • The outgoing settlement rate is a tariff under the sovereign jurisdiction of the country of destination; • it may include non-cost elements that the call originating operator may which to be allocated in a fair and transparent manner. Deriving prices from Costs Costs that are accepted as such • • • • • fixed asset network operation and maintenance cost Business costs common costs cost of capital Deriving prices from Costs Cost causation • there are costs which can be traceable to a given service (direct cost) • there are costs which can be allocated to some services using different methods: it is expected that the cost allocation method be as objective as possible • cost causation is is foundation of transparency Deriving prices from Costs forward looking costs • the fixed asset costs are expected to be actual: reflecting the replacement cost of the infrastructure, in consideration of the new and efficient technologies; • the adjustment to current costs must take into account the monetary erosion; • there are operators who expect that the other costs be as close as possible to those that an efficient new entrant would incur; Deriving prices from Costs Current Cost Adjustment CCA=DEP*((1+τ)D/2 /(1-ε)D/2 –1) Where : CCA=Current Cost Adjustment DEP=Annual Depreciation τ=Compound Annual Growth Rate of the cost of telecommunication equipments ε=Compound Annual loss of local currency purchasing power D=Depreciation/life time Deriving prices from Costs inefficiency costs • inappropriate excess capacity costs should be taken out when it comes to establish interconnection or incoming settlement rate; • the growth rate of a network is a factor to be considered when evaluating inefficiency costs; Deriving prices from Costs inefficiency K’= Max(0 ;∆K - K u*[(1+τ)N-1] ) où: K ’ = the inefficient capacity; ∆K = the unused capacity; Ku = the capacity in use; t = the compound annual growth rate of the capacity in use N the time needed to add new capacity Deriving prices from Costs Deriving prices from Costs Regional Cost Models characteristics The TAS Cost Model • lack of account separation • no efficiency consideration • refinement intended for cost causality Deriving prices from Costs The TAL Cost Model • no information about spare capacity • include USO as a basic cost element without explanation Deriving prices from Costs The TAF Cost Model • fulfils the expectation • practicability to be measured after practical implementation Deriving prices from Costs Other Elements for tariffs determination Deriving prices from Costs • corporate tax • USO fund • Access deficit Corporate tax • tax on operation profits • financial profits are not subject to a corporate tax • the total corporate tax is given by: Deriving prices from Costs L benefits τ = 1−τ levy levy * ρ capital * Capital Universal Service Obligation A country may impose a levy on the revenues of an operator in order to fund the USO costs. USO may be combined or not with Access deficit Where applicable, Where kSi and Ti are the unit cost and the volume of service Si n   USO = ρ uso *  Lbenefit + ∑ k si * T i    i =1 Deriving prices from Costs Access deficit (1/3) Access deficit arises when a regulation authority opposes the necessary increase of the components hereunder: connection fee monthly subscription fee price of a minute of urban call price of a minute of interurban call Deriving prices from Costs Access deficit (2/3) Deriving prices from Costs Before reallocating the access deficit, it must be taken care that only the local subscribers are paying the connection rate and the monthly subscription fees. The tariff of outgoing communication should be reduced by: ( ∆Parc * R + msf * Nbsubscr * 12 * conn ) k ∑T k si n' j =1 j sj Access deficit (3/3) The following relation gives a measure of the access deficit: Deriving prices from Costs D = Turb* k'urb − purb +Tinterub * k'int erub − pint erurb ( ) ( ) Deriving prices from Costs Tariffs rebalancing Objectives of tariffs rebalancing • The access deficit reflects the cross subsidisation of domestic communications by international incoming and outgoing communications; • the tariff are balanced when the access deficit become insignificant. Deriving prices from Costs Rebalancing process • An example of process • In the real life, tariff rebalancing should be a step by step goal setting process to support the pricing policy • The TAF Model has implemented the rebalancing process (a special session could be organised if needed); Deriving prices from Costs • END Tariff rebalancing Example of the process Calculate services cost per minute, including domestic services (A) Collect the services price including access fee and monthly subscription fees =>(F) Calculate the annual payments of the local users as regards access and monthly subscription fees =>(B) Collect the USO rate, the corporate tax rate Apportion (B) to the outgoing communications costs and draw from there the per minute impact on each service =>(D) Calculate the per minute services cost variation taking into account the corporate tax and the USO =>(C) Deriving prices from Costs Subtract (D) from (C) =>(E) Add (E) to the unit cost of services =>(G) Calculate the Access Deficit =>(H) Display (A)+(E)+(J) Apportion all or part of the (H) to the services =>(J) If ABS(Access deficit) > epsilon Yes Tariffs= (A)+(E)+(J) Display tariffs END OF REBALANCING

Related docs
Other docs by keonfurtch
Howard v Kunto
Views: 1995  |  Downloads: 33
at140
Views: 112  |  Downloads: 0
As The Deer
Views: 247  |  Downloads: 1
Aronson Evidence Outline
Views: 519  |  Downloads: 19
Ullman Robert Judyth
Views: 121  |  Downloads: 0
For insurance premium
Views: 204  |  Downloads: 0
The First Noel
Views: 166  |  Downloads: 3
Japanese Food
Views: 1305  |  Downloads: 66
Career Opportunities for Biology Majors
Views: 552  |  Downloads: 7
State Rubbish v Silizoff
Views: 479  |  Downloads: 2
Surocco Vincent Briefs- Necessity
Views: 337  |  Downloads: 0
Trespassers
Views: 154  |  Downloads: 1
Lord I Lift Your Name on High
Views: 313  |  Downloads: 6
course07-1
Views: 206  |  Downloads: 4
ch100
Views: 161  |  Downloads: 1