Embed
Email

Me

Document Sample

Shared by: cuiliqing
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
11/2/2011
language:
English
pages:
7
EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH





CERN-INTC-2005-017

INTC-P-171









Proposal to the ISOLDE and Neutron Time-of-Flight Experiments Committee





Measurement of Gas and Volatile Elements Production Cross Section in a Molten Lead-

Bismuth Target: addendum









L. Zaninia, M. Fallotc, H. Frånberga,b, F. Gröschela, T. Kirchnerc, U. Kösterb, E.

Manfrina, H. Ravnb, Y. Tallc, W. Wagnera, M. Wohlmuthera

a

Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland

b

CERN, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland

c

SUBATECH, 44307 Nantes-cedex 3, France







Spokesperson: L. Zanini

Contactperson: U. Köster





Abstract



Preliminary results from the IS419 experiment indicate that the ISOLDE facility can provide

valuable data for the MEGAPIE experiment. Production rates for many elements from He to

At, following interaction of the 1.4 GeV proton beam with an ISOLDE target filled with

LBE, were measured. Following the first measurement runs of the IS419 experiment in 2004,

we propose additional measurements during the 2005 run which should yield further essential

information.





Summary of preliminary results from the first measurement run



The first measurements were performed in April/May 20041,2. The spallation target consisted

of a standard ISOLDE cylindrical tantalum container filled with liquid LBE (lead bismuth

eutectic alloy). Protons pulses of 1.4 GeV and variable intensity (up to 1013 protons/pulse with

a rate of one pulse every 16.8 s) impinged on the target.

An additional measurement was planned with the same target at the energy of 1 GeV;

however, following ion source failure, it was decided instead to proceed with a measurement

at the same energy using a target filled with liquid Pb.



1

Yields were measured using three different techniques of common use at ISOLDE. Online

yields of stable isotopes and of some radioactive ones were measured by a Faraday cup

inserted in the beam line. A special data acquisition system3 was developed to trigger the

current measurement by a picoampèremeter with the arrival of the proton beam on target, thus

allowing the measurement of the gas release curves, characteristic of each element.

For short-lived  emitting isotopes, beams were directed to a dedicated tape station and yields

were measured with a plastic scintillator detector.

A third measurement method was used for longer lived (T1/2 ≥ 5 min)  emitting

radioisotopes; ion beams were implanted on thin Al foils, then after irradiation an offline 

detection was performed using a calibrated HPGe detector. Collection measurements were

performed for a number of isotopes.

For a given isotope, the measured yield has two components, one from direct production from

the target and one from the decay of parents. Isotopes were collected in an order chosen so

that the first ones to be measured were the first reaching equilibrium, having parents with

shorter half-lives. In this way most of the measured isotopes were in equilibrium with their

parents, with only a few exceptions.

In order to obtain the absolute production rates from the measured yields, the efficiency of the

ion source had to be measured. For this purpose, known amounts of different gas mixtures

(consisting of Ar/Xe, He/Ne/Ar/Kr/Xe, and 3He/Ar/Xe mixtures) were leaked into the ion

source, thus having the possibility to measure the efficiencies at any time during the

experiment.

For the measurements with the LBE target, the temperatures of the target were of 400 ºC and

600 ºC. The Pb target was at a temperature of 520 ºC. These temperatures are in the range of

the LBE temperature in MEGAPIE during operation, which varies from 300 ºC to 400 ºC

depending on the position inside the target. Temperature differences within these ranges are

not expected to affect the released fraction of the long-lived noble gas and Hg isotopes which

are determining for the overall radiotoxicity assessment. On the other hand, differences are

expected for some isotopes such as I, Cd and Po. Having performed the experiments at higher

temperatures than in MEGAPIE will allow to conclude, in case the release of a specific

isotope is not observed at 600 ºC, that no release should be observed in MEGAPIE for the

same isotope at 300-400 ºC, even for longer irradiation times.

During the first measurement, with the LBE target, it was found that the short term

component of the release curve exhibited discontinuities probably related to splashing effects

in the target which reduced for a few tens of ms the ionization efficiency of the ion source.

While this affects only slightly the absolute release, which is dominated by the long

component, it makes it more difficult to fit the release curve. No such effect was observed

during the second measurement, with the Pb target, where the proton beam intensity was

reduced to 1.5×1012 protons/pulse.

We present in the following the most relevant results obtained from the preliminary data

analysis.



Helium



After hydrogen, helium is the volatile element produced in larger quantity during the

operation of MEGAPIE, and it is therefore of great interest. In Fig. 1 the 4He current

measured by a Faraday cup for 6 s after the arrival of the proton beam on the Pb target is

shown.

The ionization and transmission efficiency from the ion source to the Faraday cup was

measured to be 0.05 % for 3He. Assuming the same ionization and transmission efficiency for

4

He, the production rate for 4He is 0.77 atoms/p, with a systematic uncertainty of about 20 %.

The value obtained with the LBE target is slightly lower, possibly because of a systematic



2

effect from the splashing due to the higher intensity proton beam from the first run. This value

is in good agreement with calculations with MCNPX with the Bertini/Dresner models (see

explanation below), giving 0.84 atoms/p, while the MCNPX run with the INCL4/ABLA

models give a value a factor of 2 lower.









FIGURE 1. Current of 4He (in pA) measured by the Faraday cup.







Mercury



Hg isotopes are extremely important from the safety point of view as during MEGAPIE

operation this element is going to dominate the activity as far as volatile elements are

concerned.

In Figure 2 the measured cumulative production rates for  emitting Hg isotopes (measured

with the collection foils technique) are presented and compared with Monte Carlo

calculations. Long-lived Hg isotopes are expected to be completely released at the

temperature of 600 ºC.

The ionization efficiency was not measured for Hg, as it was only measured for noble gases.

In this case only indicative results can be extracted: based on previous results from Ref. [4],

we considered an efficiency of a factor 1.5 higher than the measured Xe efficiency of

3.7(11)%. However, given the importance of the Hg measurement, it would be highly

recommended to have a direct measurement of the ion source efficiency in the Hg mass range.

The measured values are in line with expected cumulative production rates calculated using

the Monte Carlo transport codes FLUKA5 and MCNPX6. The two codes were coupled with

the evolution codes ORIHET37 and SP-FISPACT8, respectively. In the case of MCNPX,

results are shown here with two different model combinations for the intranuclear cascade and

evaporation models. The circles represent results from using the Bertini intranuclear cascade

model with the Dresner evaporation code. The diamonds are obtained using the recently

implemented INCL4/ABLA9 model combination. The trend observed in the data as a function

of the atomic mass is well reproduced by the three calculations. One should note that for

193

Hg, 195Hg and 197Hg, there are isomeric states of 11.1 h, 40 h and 23.8 h half-lives,

respectively. For these three isotopes, equilibrium was not achieved between formation and

decay of the respective isomeric states, a process which is difficult to properly calculate with



3

existing Monte Carlo codes. Overall these results confirm the expected production rates of Hg

isotopes in a thick LBE target.









Figure 2. Production rates for Hg isotopes. Measured points (black squares) are compared with

calculations: open circles: MCNPX (Bertini/Dresner model combination); diamonds: MCNPX

(INCL4/ABLA); stars: FLUKA.







In Figure 3 a comprehensive display of the experimental results for Hg isotopes obtained with

the three techniques with the LBE target is shown. Data refer to measurement with the target

at 400 ºC, with the exception of the collection data which were taken at 600 ºC. However, it is

apparent from the figure that at the two temperatures the released fraction of long-lived

isotopes is very similar.

With the exception for the points for A>204 (where background of stable Pb and Bi is

relevant), there is an excellent agreement between the Faraday cup and collection data. Monte

Carlo calculations will be performed with higher statistical precision to calculate also the tail

of the atomic mass distributions of the production rates.









Figure 3. Measured production rates for Hg isotopes from the Faraday cup (triangles),  spectroscopy

from collection data (squares), and  detection from the tape station (circles).



4

Xenon and iodine



Results for Xe isotopes, also measured with the LBE target at T=600 ºC, are shown in Fig. 4.

In this case there is a clear disagreement between the values calculated with MCNPX with

Bertini/Dresner, and the results from the other two calculations. The data, with a measured

ionization efficiency of 3.7 % for Xe isotopes seem to favor the other two calculation results,

thus confirming recent experimental findings10.

Similar results are obtained for the iodine isotopes. However, iodine is not completely

released and observed production rates at 600 ºC are a factor 10 lower than the calculated

FLUKA and MCNPX (INCL4/ABLA) values.









FIGURE 4. Same as Fig. 2 but for Xe isotopes.



While production of Hg isotopes from Pb/Bi target is due to direct spallation, the Xe and I

isotopes are the results from a later stage of the spallation process, the fission of highly

excited spallation fragments, or as a two-step process due to neutron induced fission from

high energy spallation neutrons. Thus the evaporation models, the Dresner and ABLA, are

probably most responsible for the differences observed in the calculations.

Tape station data for some Xe isotopes are available and are in rough agreement with the

collection data. It must be noted that for some isotopes such as 125Xe and 127Xe the observed

count rates refer only to  transitions from decay from isomeric states.







Polonium and astatine



Among the other isotopes measured, it is of particular interest to discuss the Po and At.

Production rates of 207,208,209,210At of the order of 107 atoms/C (assuming the same ionization

efficiency as for Hg) were detected, with values an order of magnitude lower for 206At. Such

production rates are not of concern for an ADS. Production of At comes from several possible

reactions of Bi, but the most likely, given the high proton energy, is the double charge-

exchange reaction 209Bi(p,- xn)210-xAt. The At decay is responsible for the observed small

quantities of Po isotopes, which contrary to At is expected to be produced in large amounts.

However, as found in Ref. [11], little or no Po should be released at 600 ºC.







5

Other results



Of the other isotopes measured in the first measurement, no release of Br was observed, while

very little amounts of Cd isotopes were detected. For the Kr isotopes, some problems during

the measurement rendered the analysis questionable and such measurement was repeated with

the Pb target. The analysis of these data is in progress.





Motivation for additional measurement



Additional measurements are proposed in 2005 to fulfill the following tasks:



1) Measurement at a lower energy, of 600 MeV, which is very close to the energy of the

MEGAPIE proton beam energy (575 MeV).

2) Measurement with an extended spacing of the proton pulses (e.g. one proton pulse every

60 or 120 s only) to measure the slow release at a reduced target temperature.

3) A fraction of the shifts will be dedicated to additional measurements of the ion source

efficiency. It is apparent that this is the greater source of systematic uncertainty in the data,

and it is therefore recommended to perform additional measurements. This will include not

only the measurement by gas leak, but also by evaporation of known amounts of non noble

gas tracers, in mass regions closer to the masses of interest (for instance gold tracers for Hg).

4) A better characterization of the ion source behavior as a function of the magnetic field

applied will be performed. According to previous experience, there is a rather strong

dependence and we think that this may affect significantly our absolute measurements.

5) The finite response of the plastic scintillator at the tape station to gamma radiation will be

measured using mono-energetic gamma sources.



The experimental setup will be the same as for the previous experiment.





Beam Time request



We request eight shifts for the measurements (4 at 1.4 GeV and 4 at 600 MeV). A good

fraction (about two third of the time) of these measurements can be performed in the

GLM/GHM beamlines fully in parallel with another experiment using all remaining proton

pulses at the HRS. Only the measurements with the monitoring tape station require the use of

the central beamline.

Furthermore, two extra shifts offline for efficiency calibration with gas mixtures and one

extra shift offline for efficiency measurement with non-noble gas tracers are requested. In

total we therefore request 8 on-line and 3 off-line shifts.





References



1. F. Gröschel et al., CERN-INTC-2003-014 (2003).

2. L. Zanini et al, Volatile Elements Production Rates in a 1.4 GeV Proton-Irradiated Molten

Lead-Bismuth Target, Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and

Technology, Santa Fe, NM, USA, Sept. 26-Oct 1, 2004.

3. E. Manfrin, private communication, 2004.

4. R. Kirchner, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 126, 125 (1996).

5. A. Fassò et al., in Proceedings of the Monte Carlo 2000 conference, Lisbon, A. Kling, F.

Barao, M. Nakagawa, L. Tavora, P. Vaz eds., Sprinter-Verlag Berlin, p. 159 (2001).

6

6. L. S. Waters et al., MCNPX Users’s Manual Version 2.4.0, LA-CP-02-408 (2002).

7. F. Atchison and H. Schaal, Orihet 3 – Version 1.12, A guide for users, March 2001.

8. C. Petrovich, SP-FISPACT, A computer code for activation and decay calculations for

intermediate energies. A connection of FISPACT and MCNPX, RT/ERG/2001/10, ENEA,

Bologna (2001).

9. A. Boudard et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, 044615 (2002).

10. T. Enqvist et al., Nucl. Phys. A 686, 481 (2001).

11. J. Neuhausen et al., Radiochimica Acta 92, 917 (2004).









7



Related docs
Other docs by cuiliqing
11.1 Exploring Area and Perimeter
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Volusia County
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
choosing_topics_and_y10
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CLE Credit - rscrpubs.com
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Meeting Minutes September 8 Final
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
nov2411
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
EKG Spreadsheet - Geocities.ws
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Gift from Christ to the Church
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!