Embed
Email

ACTA & Reno Public vs Private Funding Streams

Document Sample
ACTA & Reno  Public vs Private Funding Streams
Shared by: mm6889
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
11/1/2011
language:
English
pages:
15
ACCESSING PRIVATE CAPITAL

FOR TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE

PROJECTS





Transportation

Infrastructure

Finance OVERVIEW AND KEY

Workshop PLANNING FACTORS

Chicago, Illinois







April 29, 2008 David Seltzer, Principal

Capital Investment Needs and Funding

Gap (by Mode)

Annual

Modal “Needs” * $30 B $155 B $15 B $10 B



100%



80%



60%



40%



20%



0%

Transit Highways Airports Freight Rail



private public funding gap



2 * Annual Capex Requirements stated in 2007 $, as estimated by NCHRP, FHWA, ACI & AASHTO.

How Best to Fill the Funding Gap?



Identify New Revenue Streams

Total Monetize Existing Revenues

“Needs” (Leverage)

Either

Reduce Costs…

Funding

Gap





Funding

Resources

…Or Increase

Save on Construction Costs Resources

Accelerate Schedule

3 Reduce Financing Expense

Role of Public Private Partnerships (“P3”)

in Helping to Fill the Investment Gap?



To answer that question, we need to determine:



What do we mean by “P3” and “private capital”?

What underlying revenue stream pays the return to

investors?

What institutional structure should be used?

What are the potential sources of investment capital?

Which financing tools are best suited to the project?



4

Potential Advantages of P3





Accelerated Project Completion



Operating Efficiency thru Financial Incentives



Risk Transfer to Private Sector



Innovation/Enhanced Project Management



Access to New Sources of Capital *

* (requires identifying a source of return for investors.)



5

“Private” Investment in Context



Highway Capital Spending 1993-2007

($905 Billion Total)

Tax-Backed

Muni Debt

$140 B (16%)





Concession Financing

(Taxable)

$9 B (1%)









Public Grant Funding

$697 B (77%)

User-Backed Grants &

Muni Debt

$59 B (6%)







6

Categorizing P3 Activity to Date





Major Highway PPP Projects 1993-2006*

($26 Billion Total)









Design-Build with

Public Funding

Concession $4.2 B

Project Financing

$7.6 B D-B with

Innovative

Financing /

Operation $4.3 B





Tax-Exempt

Project Financing

$9.8 B

* As of September 2006

Source: Public Works Financing



7

P3 approaches have been used for

transportation projects nationwide

Northwest Hiawatha Light Rail Line

Tacoma Narrows

Parkway Denver E-470 Chicago Skyway

Bridge

Lease

I-15 Reconstruction CREATE

Indiana Toll Road

Lease Jamaica

Reno Rail JFK Airtrain

Corridor



Hudson Bergen

-

Light Rail Line

Las Vegas

Monorail Camden Trenton

Light Rail Line

Alameda Corridor

Dulles

Foothill Eastern Greenway

Toll Road

Pocahontas

Parkway

San Joaquin Hills SR 125

Toll Road Toll Road

Southern Connector

AZ-17

NM 44 (US 550)

Project Location

Intermodal Projects in Green Central Texas Osceola Parkway

-

Trans Texas Turnpike

Highway Projects in Blue Corridor

Miami Intermodal

Transit Projects in Red Center



8 Selected transactions; Source: Public Works Financing

Key Project Finance Planning Factors



Identify the Revenue Stream

(Sources of Repayment or Return)









Select the Determine

Transportation

Best Institutional

Infrastructure

Financing Projects Structure

Tools









Assess Capital Sources

9

1. Identify the Revenue Streams



“Private” Sources— Public Sources—

User Fees Tax & Grant Supported

Federal Funds

--General Appropriations

Direct Passenger Charges

--Custom Fees

-- Tolls

General State

-- Fares

Appropriations

Broad-Based Taxes

-- Sales Taxes

Direct Goods Charges

-- Customs Charges

-- Throughput Charges

-- Gate Fees Broad-Based User Fees

-- Motor Fuels

-- Motor Vehicles

Corporate Pledges Indirect/ Value Capture

-- Special Assessments

-- Development Impact Fees



Tax Credits / Depreciation

10 Benefits

2. Determine Optimal Institutional Structure

Based on the Bundle of Services to be Provided





D-B with Governmental Private

Traditional Innovative Tax-Exempt Concession

Project Governmental D-B with Financing or Project Project

Activity Delivery Public Funding Operation Financing Financing

Delivery Public Private Private Private Private

Public or Public or

Operation Public Public Private

Private Private

Public or

Financing Public Public Public Private

Private



Ownership Public Public Public Public Private



Examples Utah I-15; Route 3 (MA); TCA Toll Roads Dulles Greenway

Conway Bypass US 550 (NM) (CA); (VA);

(SC) Denver E-470 Chicago Skyway







Increasingly Public Increasingly Private

11

3. Assess Potential Sources of Investment Capital



Private Sector Public Sector

Capital Sources Capital Sources



Strategic Equity

Tax-Oriented Equity Governmental Equity

Equity Grants & “Equity”

Financial Equity Contributed Capital









Vendor Financing Grant Funded Loans

--State Infrastructure Banks

--Section 129 Loans

Private Placements

(Banks & Lessors) State/City Funded Loans

Debt Debt

--State Revolving Funds

Public Capital Markets

–Tax-Exempt

--Taxable

Federal Credit

--TIFIA / RRIF

--Tax Credit (?)

12

4. Select Appropriate Financing Mechanism



Transport

Project



Does the Project have its own Revenue Stream?





Government

Yes No Grants







User Value General Indirect

Charges Capture Taxes Fees





Is the Revenue Stream from Fees or Taxes “Bankable”?



Yes No



Private

TIFIA SIB Tax Exempt Tax Credit Pay-As-You-Go

13 Support Assistance Govt Bonds

Activity

Bonds

Financing

Issues to Consider During the Workshop





P3 encompasses a wide range of private participation in project

delivery, operation, ownership and financing.



P3 does not generate resources in and of itself;

it requires an underlying revenue stream of some sort –

user charges, federal grants, state/local taxes.



P3 can help shift risks, accelerate projects, introduce innovations

and bring efficiencies.



P3 can also help leverage revenues to generate upfront cash for

certain projects--but so can municipal bonds.



The Challenge: Matching the Project Sponsor’s objectives with the

best-suited Approach, on both financial and transportation policy

grounds.

14

“Private Capital Investment” vs.

“Investment of Private Capital”



“Western” Column “Eastern” Column

Private Revenue Stream Public Revenue Stream

(User Charges) (Tax Dollars)



“Northern” Row NW–

NW– NE –

Public Capital Source

Public Investment Public Investment

• Government Grants Sandusky Interchange (OH)

SR 125 (CA)

• SIB Assistance (SIB Loan Payable from

(TIFIA Loan Payable

• Federal Credit from Tolls) State Highway Fund)

• Public Pension Funds





SE –

“Southern” Row SW – Public Investment

Private Capital Source Private Investment

• Route 44/U.S. 550 (NM)

• Tax Exempt (GARVEE Bonds)

Bonds

• SR 125 (CA) • Cooper River Bridge (SC)

• Taxable Bonds (Bank Debt and Equity) (Tax-

(Tax-Exempt Bonds

• Lease or Vendor

Financing • Pennsylvania Turnpike Payable from

(Toll Revenue Bonds???) State Sources)

• Private Equity

15


Related docs
Other docs by mm6889
THE NETI DIARIES - Miriam Axel-Lute
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
Home Furnishings
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
north queen auto parts ltd
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Pan Arab Journal of Oncology(1)
Views: 29  |  Downloads: 0
GOLF CART OWNER REGISTRATION
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!