Embed
Email

Insurance

Document Sample

Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
10/31/2011
language:
English
pages:
122
The customer is the most important visitor in our premises.

He is not dependent on us. We depend on him.

He does not disturb our work. He is the purpose of it.

He is not a stranger in our business. He is a part of it.

We do not do him a favour when we serve him.

He does us a favour by giving us an opportunity to do it.

-- Mahatma Gandhi





Introduction





The service sector accounts for more than half of India's GDP: 51.16 per

cent in 1998-99. This sector has gained at the expense of both the

agricultural and industrial sectors through the 1990s. The rise in the service

sector's share in GDP marks a structural shift in the Indian economy and

takes it closer to the fundamentals of a developed economy (in the

developed economies, the industrial and service sectors contribute a major

share in GDP while agriculture accounts for a relatively lower share).





The service sector's share has grown from 43.69 per cent in 1990-91 to

51.16 per cent in 1998-99. In contrast, the industrial sector's share in GDP

has declined from 25.38 per cent to 22.01 per cent in 1990-91 and 1998-99

respectively. The agricultural sector's share has fallen from 30.93 per cent to

26.83 per cent in the respective years.





Some economists caution that if the service sector bypasses the industrial

sector, economic growth can be distorted. They say that service sector







Page 1

growth must be supported by proportionate growth of the industrial sector;

otherwise the service sector grown will not be sustainable





Within the services sector, the share of trade, hotels and restaurants

increased from 12.52 per cent in 1990-91 to 15.68 per cent in 1998-99. The

share of transport, storage and communications has grown from 5.26 per

cent to 7.61 per cent in the years under reference. The share of construction

has remained nearly the same during the period while that of financing,

insurance, real estate and business services has risen from 10.22 per cent to

11.44 per cent. The fact that the service sector now accounts for more than

half the GDP probably marks a watershed in the evolution of the Indian

economy.





Customer satisfaction predominates the success of an enterprise. In the

service industry where intangibles are marketed, the importance of customer

satisfaction is all the more significant. Service is said to be the sharpest edge

of marketing strategy. Sales and service are the two important wings of

service industry like LIC, ITI and the post office. If one of the wings turns

weak the organization cannot rise because the weaker wing will hamper its

flight. Hence the emphasis should not be concentrated only on the sales but

on service aspects too. Besides a supportive role in promoting sales effort,

servicing influences the institutional image. Prompt and effective service

boosts the morale of the sales force to present a bold form and hold their

prospects. Service encompasses the service rendered to clients before,

during, and after sales. A few examples of services are the Hotel industry,

Airline industry, Insurance industry, Transportation industry, etc.







Page 2

Insurance may be described as a social device to reduce or eliminate risk of

loss to life and property. Under the plan of insurance, a large number of

people associate themselves by sharing risks attached to individuals. The

risks, which can be insured against, include fire, the perils of sea, death and

accidents and burglary. Any risk contingent upon these, may be insured

against at a premium commensurate with the risk involved. Thus collective

bearing of risk is insurance.









Page 3

Definitions





General Definition

In the words of John Magee, “Insurance is a plan by themselves which large

number of people associate and transfer to the shoulders of all, risks that

attach to individuals.”





Fundamental Definition

In the words of D.S. Hansell, “Insurance accumulated contributions of all

parties participating in the scheme.”





Contractual Definition

In the words of justice Tindall, “Insurance is a contract in which a sum of

money is paid to the assured as consideration of insurer‟s incurring the risk of

paying a large sum upon a given contingency.”









Page 4

Characteristics of Insurance





1. Sharing of risks

2. Cooperative device

3. Evaluation of risk

4. Payment on happening of a special event

5. The amount of payment depends on the nature of losses incurred.

6. The success of insurance business depends on the large number of

people insured against similar risk.

7. Insurance is a plan, which spreads the risk and losses of few people

among a large number of people.

8. The insurance is a plan in which the insured transfers his risk on the

insurer.

9. Insurance is a legal contract which is based upon certain principles of

insurance which includes utmost good faith, insurable interest,

contribution, indemnity, causes proxima, subrogation, etc.

10.The scope of insurance is much wider and extensive.









Page 5

Scope or Kinds of Insurance





Broadly, insurance may be classified into the following categories:

i. Classification on the basis of nature of insurance

ii. Classification from business point of view

iii. Classification from risk point of view





I. On The Basis Of Nature Of Business

On the basis of nature of business, insurance may be the following types:

1. Life insurance

2. Fire insurance

3. Marine insurance

4. Social Insurance, and

5. Miscellaneous insurance.

a) Vehicle insurance on buses, trucks, motorcycles, etc.

b) Personal accident insurance

c) Burglary insurance - (against theft, dacoit etc.)

d) Legal liability insurance (insurance whereby the assured is liable

to pay the damages to property or to compensate the loss of

personal injury or death. This is in the form of fidelity guarantee

insurance, automobile insurance and machines etc.)

e) Crop insurance (crops are insured against losses due to heavy

rain and floods, cyclone, draughts, crop diseases, etc.)

f) Cattle insurance - (insurance for indemnity against the loss of

castles from various kinds of diseases) In addition to the above,

insurance policies are available against crime, medical insurance,







Page 6

bullock cart insurance, jewelry insurance, cycle rickshaw

insurance, radio-T.V. insurance, etc.





II. Classification from Business Point of View

From business point insurance can be classified into two broad categories:

1. Life insurance; and

2. General Insurance

General insurance business refers to fire, marine, and miscellaneous insurance

business whether carried on singly or in combination with one or more of

them but does not include capital redemption business and annuity certain

business.





III. Classification from Risk Point of View

From risk point of view, insurance can be classified into four categories:

1. Personal insurance

2. Property insurance

3. Liability insurance

4. Fidelity guarantee insurance

Functions of Insurance





Primary Functions

1. Provide protection: - Insurance cannot check the happening of the risk,

but can provide for the losses of risk.

2. Collective bearing of risk: - Insurance is a device to share the financial

losses of few among many others.

3. Assessment of risk: - Insurance determine the probable volume of risk

by evaluating various factors that give rise to risk



Page 7

4. Provide certainty: - Insurance is a device, which helps to change from

uncertainty to certainty.





Secondary Functions

1. Prevention of losses: - Insurance cautions businessman and individuals

to adopt suitable device to prevent unfortunate consequences of risk by

observing safety instructions.

2. Small capital to cover large risks: - Insurance relives the businessman

from security investment, by paying small amount of insurance against

larger risks and uncertainty.

3. Contributes towards development of larger industries.





Other Functions

Means of savings and investment.

Origin and Development of Insurance





Insurance in the modern form originated in the Mediterranean during 13/14th

century. The earliest references to insurance have been found in Babylonia,

the Greeks and the Romans. The use of insurance appeared in the account of

North Italian merchant banks who then dominated the international trade in

Europe at that time. Marine insurance is the oldest form of insurance followed

by life insurance and fire insurance. The patterns that have been used in

England followed in other countries also in these kinds of insurance. The

origin and growth of Marine Insurance, life Insurance, Fire Insurance and

miscellaneous insurance are given below:





1. Marine Insurance



Page 8

The oldest and the earliest records of marine policy relates to a Mediterranean

voyage in 1347. In the year 1400, a book written by a merchant of Florence,

indicates premium rates charged for the shipments by sea from London to

Pisa. Marine Insurance spread from Italy to trading routes in other countries of

Europe.





 Marine Insurance in India

There is evidence that marine insurance was practiced in India some three

thousand years ago. In earlier days travelers by sea and land were exposed to

risk of losing their vessels and merchandise because of piracy on the open

seas. Moreland has maintained that the practice of insurance was quite

common during the rule of Akbar to Aurangzeb, but the nature and coverage

of insurance in this period is not well known. It was the British, insurers who

introduced general insurance in India, in its modern form. The Britishers

opened general insurance in India around the year 1700. The first company,

known as the Sun Insurance Office Ltd. was set up in Calcutta in the year

1710. This followed by several insurance companies of different parts of the

world, in the field of marine insurance. In 1972, the government of India

nationalized the general insurance business by forming GIC.





2. Life Insurance

The early developments of life insurance were closely linked with that of

marine insurance. The first insurers of life were the marine insurance

underwriters who started issuing life insurance policies on the life of master

and crew of the ship, and the merchants. The early insurance contracts took

the nature of policies for a short period only. The underwriters issued

annuities and pension for a fixed period or for life to provide relief to widows



Page 9

on the death of their husbands. The first life insurance policy was issued on

18th June 1583, on the life of William Gibbons for a period of 12 months.





 Life Insurance in India

The British companies started life insurance business in India, by issuing

policies exclusively on the lives of European soldiers and civilians. They

sometimes issued policies on the lives of Indian‟s by charging extra. Different

insurance companies like Bombay Insurance Company LTD. (1793) and

Oriental Life Assurance Company (1818) was formed to issue life assurance

policies in India. Gradually, the first Indian Company named as Bombay

Mutual Life Insurance Society Ltd. was formed in Dec. 1870. By 1971, the

total numbers of companies working in India were 15, out of which 7 were

Indian and the remaining were British companies.

After several changes have been made for the period from 1930 to 1938, the

Government of India passed Insurance Act, 1938. The act still applies to all

kinds of insurance business by instituting necessary amendments from time to

time.





3. Fire Insurance

Fire insurance has its origin in Germany where it was introduced in

municipalities for providing compensation to owners of the property, in return

for an annual contribution, based on the rent of those premises. The fire

insurance in its present form started after the most disastrous fire in human

history known as the 'Great Fire' in London, which had destroyed several

buildings. It drew the attention of the public and the first fire insurance

commercially transacted in 1667. The Industrial Revolution (1720-1850) gave







Page 10

much impetus to fire insurance. The Nineteenth century marked the

development of fire insurance.





 Fire Insurance in India

In India, fire insurance was started during the British regime. The oldest of

these companies include the Sun Insurance Office, Calcutta (1710), London

Assurance and Royal Exchange Assurance (1720), Phoenix Assurance

Company (1782), etc.









4. Miscellaneous Insurance

Due to the increasing demands of the time, different forms of insurance have

been developed. Industrial Revolution of 19th century had facilitated the

development of accidental insurance, theft and dacoit, fidelity insurance, etc.

In 20th century, many types of social insurance started operating, viz.,

unemployment insurance, crop insurance, cattle insurance, etc. This way the

business of insurance developed simultaneously with human and social

development. Today, the use of computers in the field of insurance is

frequently increasing. Insurance becomes an inseparable part of human

development.









Page 11

Pre-Liberalization Scenario



Indian History: Time to turn the clock back-and open up insurance



Fifty years ago, India had a bustling, if somewhat chaotic, entirely private

insurance industry. The year after Independence, 209 life Insurance

companies were doing business worth Rs712.76 crore (which grew to an

amazing Rs 295,758 crore in 1995-96). Foreign insurers had a large market

share 40 per cent for general insurance but there were also plenty of Indian

companies, many promoted by business houses like the Tatas and Dalmias.

The first Indian-owned life insurance company, the Bombay Mutual Life

Assurance Society, was set up in 1870 by six friends. It Insured Indian lives

at the normal rates instead of charging a premium of 15 to 20 percent as

foreign insurers did. Its general insurance counterpart, Indian Mercantile

Insurance Company Ltd., opened in Bombay in 1907.



A plethora of insufficiently regulated players was a sure recipe for abuse,

especially because there was no separation between business houses and the





Page 12

insurance companies they promoted. The Insurance Act, 1938, introduced

state controls on insurance, including mandatory investments in approved

securities, but regulation remained ineffective. In 1949, Purshottamdas

Thakurdas, chairman of the Oriental Assurance Company, admitted: "We

cannot deny that, today, there is a tendency on the part of insurance

companies in general to make illicit gains. Can we overlook the cutthroat

competition for acquiring business? And still worse is the dishonest practice

of adjusting of accounts." After a 1951 inquiry, the government was

dismayed that companies had high expense and premium rates, were

speculating in shares, and giving loans regardless of security. No wonder

that between 1945 and 1955, 25 insurers went into liquidation and 25

transferred their business to other companies.



This reckless record stoked the pro-nationalization fires. The 1956 life

insurance Nationalization was a top-secret intrigue; for fear that

unscrupulous insurers would siphon funds off if warned. The government

resolved to first take over the management of life insurance companies by

ordinance, then their ownership. The then finance minister C.D. Deshmukh

later wrote: 'Seth Ramakrishna Dalmia‟s extraction of Rs.225 crore

(misappropriation by the Bharat Insurance Company) was a heaven-sent

opportunity. We were ready to nationalize, with every detail worked out."

On 19 January 1956, the news was announced on the radio, though even the

director- general of AIR was not shown the speech. The next morning, at 9

am, while executives were frantically seeking details over the trunk

telephone, says Deshmukh in his autobiography, our officers walked into the

respective insurance offices, showed their authority and then took over the

business. I believe this will be regarded as one of the best kept secrets of the





Page 13

Government of India in all times to come." The ordinance transferred control

of 245 insurers to the government. LIC, established eight months later, took

over their ownership. General Insurance had its turn in 1972, when 107

insurers were amalgamated into four companies headquartered in the four

metros, with GIC as a holding company. Nationalization brought some

benefits. Insurance spread from an urban-oriented, high-end business to a

mass one. Today, 48 per cent Of LIC's new business is rural. Net premium

income in general insurance grew from Rs222 crore in 1973 to Rs 5,956

crore in 1995- 96. Yet, rigid controls hamper operational flexibility and

initiative so both customers service and work culture today are dismal. The

frontier spirit of the early insurers has been lost. Insurance companies have

also been timid in managing their investment portfolios. Competition

between the four GIC subsidiaries remains illusory. If Nationalization ever

had a purpose, it has been served. It's now time to turn back the clock in

some respects, and open up the sector again. The government already

intends to insist on large minimum capital requirements, a strong regulator,

and a healthy distance between insurers and industry. To ensure that history

doesn't repeat itself.









Page 14

Three Questions about Insurance Liberalization



The decision to allow private companies to sell insurance products in India

rests with the lawmakers in Parliament. Opening up the insurance sector

requires crossing at least two legislative hurdles. These are the passage of

the Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA) Bill, which will make IRA a

statutory regulatory body, and amending the LIC and GIC Acts, which will

end their respective monopolies. In 1994 the government appointed a

committee on insurance sector reforms (which is known as the Malhotra

Committee) which recommended that insurance business be opened up to

private players and laid down several guidelines for orchestrating the

transition. In particular, we do not address many other related questions such

as whether foreign (and not just private) players should be allowed, what cap

should there be on foreign equity ownership, whether banks and other

financial institutions should be allowed to operate in the insurance business,

whether firms should be allowed to sell both life and non-life insurance, and

so on. The three questions that we address are:







Page 15

1) Why allow entry to private players?



The choice between public and private might amount to choosing between

the lesser of two evils. An insurance contract is a "promise to pay"

contingent on a specified event. In the case of insurance and banking,

smooth functioning of business depends heavily on the continuation of the

trust and confidence that people place on the solvency of these financial

institutions. Insurance products are of little value to consumers if they

cannot trust the company to keep its promise. Furthermore, banking and

insurance sectors are vulnerable to the "bank run" syndrome, wherein even

one insolvency can trigger panic among consumers leading to a widespread

and complete breakdown. This implies the need for a public regulator, and

not public provision of insurance. Indeed in India, insurance was in the

private sector for a long time prior to independence. The Life Insurance

Corporation of India (LIC) was formed in 1956, when the Government of

India brought together over two hundred odd private life insurers and

provident societies, under one nationalized monopoly corporation, in the

wake of several bankruptcies and malpractice‟s'. Another important

justification for Nationalization was to raise the much-needed funds for

rapid industrialization and self-reliance in heavy industries, especially since

the country had chosen the path of state planning for development. Insurance

provided the means to mobilize household savings on a large scale. LIC's

stated mission was of mobilizing savings for the development of the country

and also conducting business in the spirit of



1. A comprehensive historical account of Life insurance business in

India and LIC in particular is provided in LIC (1970) and LIC (1991)

respectively.



Page 16

2. This latter emphasis on trusteeship was relevant then, in light of major

insolvencies and fraudulent practices of so many private insurance

companies prior to 1956.









 Trusteeship



The non-life insurance business was nationalized in 1972 with the formation

of General Insurance Corporation (GIC). Thus the fact that insurance is a

state monopoly in India is an artifact of recent history the rationale for which

needs to be examined in the context of liberalization of the financial sector.

If traditional infrastructure and "semi-public goods" industries such as

banking, airlines, telecom, power, and even postal services (courier) have

significant, private sector presence, continuing a state monopoly in provision

of insurance is indefensible. This is not to deny that there are some valid

grounds for being cautious about private sector entry. Some of these

concerns are:



a) That there would be a tendency of private companies to "skim" the

markets; thus private players would concentrate on the lucrative

mainly urban segment leaving the unprofitable segment to the

incumbent LIC.







Page 17

b) That without adequate regulation, the funds generated may not be

deployed in sectors (which yield long-term social benefits), such as

infrastructure and public goods; similar without regulation, private

firms may renege on their social sector investment obligations.

Meeting these concerns requires a strong regulatory body. Another

commonly expressed fear is that there would be massive job losses in

the industry as a whole due to computerization. This however does not

seem to be corroborated by the countries' experience'.



Moreover, apart from consideration based on theoretical principles alone,

there is sufficient evidence that suggests that introduction of private players

in insurance can only lead to greater benefits to consumers. This can be seen

from the fact that the spread in insurance in India is low compared to

international benchmarks. The two convention measures of the spread of

insurance are penetration and density. The former measure (premiums per

unit) of GDP, and the latter, premiums per capita. Less than 7% of the,

population in India has life insurance cover. India has the biggest life

insurance sector in the world if we go by the number of policies sold, but the

number of policies sold per 10 persons is very low.



The demand for insurance is likely to increase with rising per-capita

incomes, rising literacy rates and increase of the service sector, as has been

seen from the example of several other developing countries. In fact,

opening up of the insurance sector is an integral part of the liberalization

process being pursued by many developing countries. There are several

other factors that call for private sector presence. Firstly, a state monopoly

has little incentive to innovate or offer a wider range of products. This can

be seen by a lack of certain products from LlC's portfolio, and lack of



Page 18

extensive risk categorization in several GIC products, such as health

insurance. In fact, it seems reasonable to conclude that many people buy life

insurance just for the tax benefits, since almost 35 per cent of the life

insurance business is in March, the month of financial closing. This suggests

that insurance needs to be sold more vigorously. More competition in this

business will spur firms to offer several new products, and more complex

and extensive risk categorization. The system of selling insurance through

commission agents needs a better incentive structure, which a state

monopoly tends to stifle. For example LIC pays out only 5 per cent of its

income as commissions, whereas this share in Singapore is 16 per cent, and

in Malaysia it is close to 20 percent.



Finally, private sector entry into insurance might be simply a fiscal

necessity. Since large scale funds form long term contractual savings need to

be mobilized, especially for investment in infrastructures the option of not

having more (private) players in the insurance sector is too costly.



2) What should be the market structure?



In this section, we analyze the question whether there should be unlimited

private entry insurance markets or whether only a few players are allowed to

operate.



This question hinges around the issue of "adverse selection" described

below. Individuals buying an insurance contract pay a price (called the

"premium") to the insurance company and the insurance company in turn

provides compensation if a specified event occurs. By making such

contractual arrangements with a large number of individuals and







Page 19

organizations the insurance company can spread the risk. This gives

insurance its "social" character in the sense that it entails pooling of

individual risks. The price of insurance i.e., the premium is based on average

risk. This premium is too high for people who perceive themselves to be in a

low risk category. If the insurer cannot accurately determine the risk

category of every customer and prices insurance on the basis of average risk,

he stands to lose all the low risk customers. This in turn increases the

average risk, which means premium have to be revised upwards, which in

turn drives away even more customers and so on. This is known as the

problem of "adverse selection". Adverse selection problem arises when a

seller of insurance cannot distinguish between the buyer's type i.e., whether

the buyer is a low risk or a high type. In the extreme case, it may lead to the

complete breakdown of insurance market.



Another phenomenon, the problem of "moral hazard" in selling insurance,

arises when the unobservable action of buyer aggravates the risk for which

insurance is bought. For example, when an insured car driver exercises less

caution in driving, compared to how he would have driven in the absence of

insurance, it exemplifies moral hazard.



Given these problems unbridled, competition among large number of firms

is considered detrimental for the insurance industry. Furthermore, even the

limited competition in insurance needs to be regulated. Insurance companies

can differentiate among various risk types if there is a wide difference in risk

profile of the buyers insuring against the strong insurers. It also called for

keeping life insurance separate from the general insurance. It suggested the

regulation of insurance intermediaries by IRA and the introduction of

brokers for better „professionalisation'.



Page 20

3) The Role of IRA



(a) the protection of consumers' interest,

(b) to ensure financial soundness of the insurance industry and

(c) To ensure healthy growth of the insurance market.



These objectives must be achieved with minimum government involvement

and cost. IRA's functioning can be financed by levying a small fee on the

premium income of the insurers thus putting zero cost on the government

and giving itself autonomy. Protection of Customer Interests



IRA's first brief is to protect consumer interests. This means ensuring proper

disclosure, keeping prices affordable but also insisting on some mandatory

products, and most importantly making sure that consumers get paid by

insurers.



Ensuring proper disclosure is called Disclosure Regulation. Insurance

contracts are basically contingency agreements. They can be full of

inscrutable jargon and escape clauses. An average consumer is likely to be

confused by them. IRA must require insurers to frame transparent contracts.

Consumers should not have to wake up to unpleasant surprises, finding that

certain contingencies are not covered.



The IRA also has to ensure that prices of products stay reasonable and

certain mandatory products are sold. The job of keeping prices reasonable is

relatively easy, since competition among insurers will not allow any one

company to charge exorbitant rates. The danger often is that prices may be

too low and might take the insurer dangerously close to bankruptcy. As for

mandatory products, those that involve common and well-known risks,





Page 21

certain standardization can be enforced. Furthermore, IRA can insist that for

such products the prices also be standardized.



From the consumer's point of view the most important function of IRA is

ensuring claim settlement. Quick settlement without unnecessary litigation

should be the norm. For example, in motor vehicle insurance, adopting no-

fault principle can speed up many settlements. Currently, LIC in India has a

claims settlement ratio of 97%, an impressive number by any standards.

However, it hides the fact that this settlement is plagued by long delays,

which reduce the value of settlement itself.



If consumers have a complaint against an insurer they can go to a body

formed by association of insurers. The decision of such a body would be

binding on the insurers, but not on the complainant. If complainants are not

satisfied, they can go to court. Some countries such as Singapore have such a

system in place. This system offers a first and quicker choice of settling out

of court. IRA can encourage the insurers to have such a grievance redressal

mechanism. This system can serve the function of adjudication, arbitration

and conciliation.



The second area of IRA's activity concerns monitoring insurer behavior to

ensure fairness. It is especially here that IRA's choice of being a bloodhound

or a watchdog would have different implications. We think that an initial

tough stance should give way to a more forbearing and prudential approach

in regulating insurance firms. When the industry has a few firms there is

some chance of collusion. IRA must be alert to collusive tendencies and

make sure that prices charged remain reasonable. However, some

cooperation among the insurance companies could be considered desirable.





Page 22

This is especially in lines where claim experience of any one company is not

sufficient to make accurate forecasts. Collusion among companies on

information sharing and rate setting is considered "fair'.



IRA must have severe penalties in case of fraud or mismanagement. Since

insurance business involves managing trust money, in some countries the

appointment of senior managers and "key personnel" has to be approved by

the insurance regulatory agency. Ensuring Solvency of Insurers



There are basically four ways of ensuring enough solvencies. First is the

policy of a price floor. Second is the restriction on capital and reserves, i.e.,

on what kind of investments and speculative activities firms can make. Third

is putting in place entry barriers to restrict the number of competitors. Fourth

is the creation of an industry financed guarantee fund to bail out firms hit by

unexpectedly high liabilities. Entry restrictions of the IRA are implemented

through a licensing requirement, which involves capital adequacy among

other things. Since there are economies of scale and scope in insurance

operations it might be better to have only a few large firms. There is

however no magic number regarding the optimal number of firms.

Restricting competition provides a scope for higher profits to the companies

thereby strengthening their solvency position.



After qualifying, the entrants are continuously subjected to restrictions on

reserves and investments, which ensure ongoing solvency. Additionally, a

guarantee fund, created by mandatory contributions from all insurance

companies is used to bail out any insurance company, which might be in

financial trouble. This guarantee fund does not imply that firms can charge

whatever they wish to their consumers. All insurance companies would have





Page 23

an incentive to monitor the activities of their rival peer firms. This is because

insolvency of any insurance company would entail a price, which all the

insurance companies would have to shoulder. Peer review of accounts can

also be institutionalized.



IRA can have several ways for early detection of a potential insolvency. For

example, in the USA there is an Insurance Regulatory Information System

(IRIS) that regularly computes certain key financial ratios from financial

statements of firms. If some of these ratios fall outside given limits the

company is asked to take corrective action. Insolvency can also arise out

of reinsurers abandoning insurance companies in the lurch, as witnessed in

the USA in 1980's. Reinsurance is a bigger business dominated by large

international reinsurers. Such litigation between reinsurer and insurance

companies involves cross boundary legalities and can drag on for years. IRA

must evolve a set of operational guidelines to deal with reinsurance matters.



 Overseeing Insurance Intermediaries



Insurance intermediaries such as agents, brokers, consultants and surveyors

are also IRA‟s jurisdiction. IRA has to evolve guidelines on the entry and

functioning of such intermediaries. Licensing of agents and brokers should

be required to check against their indulging in activities such as twisting,

rebating, fraudulent practices, and misappropriation of funds. IRA can also

consider allowing banks to act as agents (as opposed to underwriters) of

insurers in mass base types of products. Given their wide network of

branches and their customer base, the banks can access this market for

insurance products and also earn commission income. The incremental cost

of providing such insurance products would be much lower. Promoting





Page 24

Growth in the Insurance Industry a society experiences many benefits from

the spread of insurance business. Insurance contributes to economic growth

by enabling people to undertake risky but productive activity. In the past,

growth of trade has been facilitated by the development of insurance

services. One only needs to look at the history of insurance to see how

evolution of insurance helped trade flows along various trade routes.

Promotion of insurance also provides for long-term funds, which are utilized

to fund big infrastructure projects. These projects typically have positive

externalities, which benefit society at large. IRA can ensure growth of

insurance business with better education and protection to consumers, and

by making the insurance business a level playing field. They can also

support Indian insurance companies in the international field.



IRA thus has to frame the rules, design procedures for enforcement and also

make operational guidelines. All this with virtually no relevant historical

data makes the task very difficult. An initial conservative approach (the

bloodhound) is justified since there is no prior experience to fall back on,

and it would be prudent to err by regulating more‟ rather than less. As

experience accumulates, the IRA can relax its initial harsh stance and adopt

a more accommodating stance (the watchdog). Regulation is always an

evolutionary process and experience constantly has to feed into policy

making. Care must be taken so that this process does not slow down and

cause regulatory lags.



Repeat IRA can also consider allowing banks to act as agents (as opposed to

underwriters of insurers in mass base types of products. Given there wide

network of branches their customer base, the banks can access this market

for insurance products and also commission income. The incremental cost of



Page 25

providing such insurance products would be much lower. Such a move of

allowing banks to operate insurance business and, versa is consistent with a

worldwide trend of greater integration of banking and insurance.









Post Liberalization Scenario



While no aspect of the reform process in India has gone smoothly since its

inception in 1991, no individual initiative has stirred the proverbial hornets'

nest as much as the proposal to liberalize the country's insurance industry.

However, the political debate that followed the submission of the report by

the Malhotra Committee has presumably come to an end with the ratification

of the Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA) Bill both by the central Cabinet

and the standing committee on finance. This section traces the evolution of

the life insurance companies in the US from firms underwriting plain vanilla

insurance contracts to those selling sophisticated investment contracts

bundled with insurance products. In this context, it brings into focus the

importance of portfolio management in the insurance business and the nature

and impact of portfolio related regulations on the asset quality of the

insurance companies. It also provides a rationale for the increased

autornatisation of insurance companies, and the increased emphasis on

agent-independent marketing strategies for their products. If politicized,

regulations have potential to adversely affect the pricing of risks, especially

in the non-life industry, and hence the viability of the insurance companies.









Page 26

Finally, the backdrop of US experience provides some pointers for Indian

policymakers.









Introduction

The insurance sector continues to defy and stall the course of financial

reforms in India. It continues to be dominated by the two giants, Life

Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and the General Insurance Corporation

of India (GIC), and is marked by the absence of a credible regulatory

authority.





The first sign of government concern about the state of the insurance

industry was revealed in the early nineties, when an expert committee was

set up under the chairmanship of late R.N.Malhotra. The Malhotra

Committee, which submitted its report in January 1994, made some far--

reaching recommendations, which, if implemented, could change the struc-

ture of the insurance industry. The Committee urged the insurance compa-

nies to abstain from indiscriminate recruitment of agents, and stressed on the

desirability of better training facilities, and a closer link between the

emolument of the agents and the management and the quantity and quality

of business growth. It also emphasized the need for a more dynamic man-

agement of the portfolios of these companies, and proposed that a greater

fraction of the funds available with the insurance companies be invested in



Page 27

non-government securities. But, most importantly, the Committee recom-

mended that the insurance industry be opened up to private firms, subject to

the conditions that a private insurer should have a minimum paid up capital

of Rs. 100 crore, and that the promoter's stake in the otherwise widely held

company should not be less than 26 per cent and not more than 40 per cent.

Finally, the Committee proposed that the liberalized insurance industry be

regulated by an autonomous and financially independent regulatory author-

ity like the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).



Subsequent to the submission of its report by the Malhotra Committee, there

were several abortive attempts to introduce the Insurance Regulatory

Authority (IRA) Bill in the Parliament. It is evident that there was broad

support in favour of liberalization of the industry, and that the bone of

contention was essentially the stake that foreign entities were to be allowed

in the Indian insurance companies. In November 1998, the central Cabinet

approved the Bill which envisaged a ceiling of 40 per cent for non-Indian

stakeholders: 26 per cent for foreign collaborators of Indian promoters, and

14 per cent for nonresident Indians (NRI‟s), overseas corporate bodies

(OCB‟s) and foreign institutional investors (FII‟s). However, in view of the

widespread resentment about the 40 per cent ceiling among political parties,

the Bill was referred to him, standing committee on finance. The committee

has since recommended at each private company be allowed to enter only

one of the three areas of business-life insurance, general or non-life

insurance, and reinsuranced that the overall ceiling for foreign stakeholders

in these companies be reduced to 26 per cent from the proposed 40 per cent.

The committee has also recommended that the minimum paid up share









Page 28

capital of the new insurance companies be raised to Rs. 200 crore, double

the amount proposed by the Malhotra Committee.









 Economic Rationale



The insurance industry is a key component of the financial infrastructure of

an economy, and its viability and strengths have far reaching consequences

for not only its money and capital markets,' but also for its real sector. For

example, if households are unable to hedge their potential losses of wealth,

assets and labour and non-labour endowments with insurance contracts,

many or all of them will have to save much more to provide for events that

might occur in the future, events that would be inimical to their interests. If a

significant proportion of the households behave in such a fashion, the

growth of demand for industrial products would be adversely affected.

Similarly, if firms are unable to hedge against "bad" events like fire and the-

job injury of a large number of labourers, the expected payoffs from a

number of their projects, after factoring in the expected losses on account

such "bad" events, might be negative. In such an event, the private invest-

ment would be adversely affected, and certain potentially hazardous

activities like mining and freight transfers might not attract any private

investment. It is not surprising, therefore, that economists have long argued

that insurance facility is necessary to ensure the completeness of a market.









Page 29

 Organizational Structures and their Implications



Insurance companies can be broadly divided into four categories: stock

companies, mutual companies, reciprocal exchanges, and Llyod's

companies. The former two are the dominant forms of organizational

structures in the US insurance industry. A stock company is one that initially

raises capital by issue of shares, like a bank or a non-bank financial

institution, and subsequently generates more funds for investment by selling

insurance contracts to policyholders. In other words, there are three sets of

stakeholders in a stock insurance company, namely, the shareholders,

managers and the policyholders. A mutual company, on the other hand,

raises funds only by selling policies such that the policyholders are also

partners of the companies. Hence, a mutual company has only two groups of

stakeholders, namely, the policyholder cum part owners and the managers.









 The Role of Portfolio Management



Portfolio and asset-liability management are important for both life and

property-liability insurance companies. However, the latter face the problem









Page 30

that their liabilities are far more unpredictable than the liabilities of the life

insurance companies.



For example, given a stable mortality table and other historical data, it is

easier to predict the approximate number of death claims, than the

approximate number of claims on account of car accidents and fire. As a

consequence of such uncertainty, and perhaps also moral hazard stemming

from reinsurance facilities, asset-liability management of property-liability

companies in the US has left much to be desired. Hence, a meaningful

discussion about the changing nature and role of portfolio management for

US's insurance companies is possible only in the context of the experience of

its life insurance companies.



Although the role of an insurance policy is significantly different from that

of investments, economic agents like households have increasingly viewed

insurance contracts as a part of their investment portfolio. This change in

perception has not affected much the status of the property liability or non-

life insurance policies, which are still viewed as plain vanilla insurance

contracts that can be used to hedge against unforeseen calamities.



As a consequence of these changes, which brought about a bundling of

insurance and investment products, portfolio management of life insurance

companies today is similar to that of a bank or non-bank financial company.

They have to, (i) look out for arbitrage opportunities in the market place

both across markets and over time, (ii) use value-at-risk modeling to ensure

that their reserves are adequate to absorb market related shocks, (iii) ensure

that there is no mismatch of duration between their assets and liabilities, and

(iv) ensure that the risk-return trade-off of their portfolios remain at an





Page 31

acceptable level. During the 1980s, the life insurance companies gradually

reduced the duration of the fixed income securities in their portfolio, thereby

ensuring greater liquidity for their assets. They also moved away from long-

term and privately placed debt instruments and increasingly invested in

exchange traded financial paper, including mortgage-backed securities.

However, while the increased liquidity of their portfolios reduced their risk

profiles, they also required active management of these portfolios in

accordance with the changing liability structures and market conditions.

Today, while life insurance companies compete for market share by

changing the nature and structure of their products, their viability is critically

dependent on the quality of their portfolio and asset liability management.









 Implications of Cost Management



As is the case with most competitive industries, profitability and viability of

a firm in the insurance industry significantly depends on its market share,

and its ability to minimize its cost of operations without compromising the

quality of its service and risk management. Perhaps the easiest way to reduce

cost is to reduce the cost of processing and underwriting policy applications.

In the US, the average cost of processing and underwriting an application

has been estimated to be in excess of USD 250. As a consequence, insurance

companies have increasingly resorted to replacement of personnel by

computer-based "expert" systems which apply the vetting models used by

the companies' (human) experts to a wide range of problems."









Page 32

However, the US companies have found it more difficult to reduce their cost

of marketing and distribution. A significant part-of these expenses accrue on

account of the commissions paid to exclusive and/or independent agents, the

usual rate of commission being 15-30 per cent, depending on the line of

business.



In order to mitigate the cost-related problem, insurance companies in the US

are increasingly looking at alternative ways to market and distribute their

products. Direct marketing has gained popularity, as has marketing by way

of selling insurance products through other financial organisations like banks

and brokers. These actions might lead to significant reduction of cost of

operations of insurance companies, but it is not obvious as yet as to how the

small policyholders will fare in the absence of powerful intermediaries with

bargaining power vis-à-vis the insurance companies.







 The Impact of Regulation



While portfolio and cost management are important determinants of the

viability of insurance companies, the US experience indicates that the nature

and extent of regulation too plays a key role in determining the viability of

these companies. The insurance industry in the US has historically been one

of the most regulated financial industries. The nature of regulation of life

insurance companies, however, has differed significantly from the nature of

regulation of property-liability companies. Regulation of the former has

typically emphasized asset quality, while the regulation of the latter has

largely concerned itself with policyholder's "welfare."









Page 33

Further, the non-life industry has suffered significantly as a consequence of

changing legal ethos. In the recent past, the US courts have retroactively

granted citizen-policyholders coverage against hazards, like those from use

of asbestos, that were not factored into the actual insurance contract. As a

consequence, the premia actually earned by the property liability companies

fell short of the "fair" prices of these contracts, and hence these companies

had to bear huge losses on account of these policies. However, while politics

and changing ethos might together have dealt an unfair blow to the non-life

insurance companies, the importance of regulation cannot be

overemphasized. The cyclical nature of the firms‟ profitability requires that

they be monitored/regulated such that they are not in default during the

unfavorable phases of the cycle. The property-liability cycle is typically

initiated by an exogenous shock which increases the industry's profits. The

higher profits enable the companies to underwrite more policies at a lower

price. During this phase, the insurance market is believed to be "soft." The

decrease in price during the soft phase, in turn, reduces the profitability of

the companies, and initiates the downturn in the cycle leading to the "hard"

phase. Hard markets are characterized by higher prices and reduced

volumes. Once the higher prices restore the industry's profitability, the

market softens again and the cycle starts again.









 Summing up: Pointers for Indian Policymakers



A significant part of the activities of the insurance industry of an economy

entails mobilization of domestic savings and its subsequent disbursal to

investors. At the same time, however, they guarantee minimum payoffs to





Page 34

both individuals and companies by way of the put-like insurance contracts.

As discussed above, these contracts can significantly affect behavior of

economic agents and, in general, are perceived to lead to better outcomes for

economies.



For example, it is not difficult to imagine the closure of a company that had

not made provisions for damages on account of (say) product related liability

because it had believed that it was protected from such damages by an

insurance policy." The consequent insolvency of the company can affect a

number of banks and other companies adversely, and a systemic problem

will be precipitated. In other words, the insurance industry in any country

should be subjected to regulations that are at least as stringent as, and

perhaps more stringent than those governing the activities of other financial

organisations.



It is evident from the above discussion that decisions about what constitutes

acceptable portfolio quality, and the extent of price regulation hold the key

to insurance regulation in a post-liberalization insurance market. As the US

experience suggests, insurance companies are usually subjected to stringent

asset quality norms. Indeed, while a part of their portfolio might comprise of

equity, mortgages and other relatively risky securities, much of their

portfolio is made up of bonds and. liquid (and highly rated) mortgage backed

securities. An Indian insurance company, on ,the other hand, is constrained

by the fact that the market for fixed income securities is very illiquid such

that only gilts and AAA and AA+ rated corporate bonds have liquid

markets. At the same time, absence of a market for liquid mortgage backed

securities denies these companies the opportunity to enhance the yield on

their investment without significantly adding to portfolio risk. This might



Page 35

not pose a problem in the absence of competition, especially if the

government helps to increase the returns to the policyholders by way of tax

breaks, but might pose a serious problem if liberalization leads to "price"

competition among a large number of insurance companies



Subsequent to liberalization, the Indian insurance industry might also be at

the receiving end of regulations governing insurance prices /premia.

Specifically, there might be highly politicized interventions in the markets

for workers' compensation and medical insurance. The government might

also be under pressure to "regulate" the prices of infrastructure related lines

like freight and marine insurance. In principle, the risks associated with such

liability insurance policies may be hedged by way of reinsurance. But if the

reinsurers price the risks' accurately and the Indian insurance companies are

forced to under price the risks, the margins of the insurance companies will

be affected adversely, thereby reducing their long term viability. In view of

these political and financial realities, it might be better to subsidize the

policyholders of politically sensitive lines directly or indirectly through tax

benefits, if at all, rather than distort the pricing of the risks themselves.



At the end of the day, it has to be realized that while competition enhances

the efficiency of market participants, the process of "creative destruction,"

which ensures the sustenance and enhancement of efficiency, is not strictly

applicable to the financial markets. Hence, while exit is perhaps the most

efficient option for insolvent firms in many markets, insolvency of financial

intermediaries‟ calls for government action and usually affects the

governments' budgetary positions adversely. At the same time, other things

remaining the same, the risk of insolvency is perhaps higher for insurance

companies than for other financial intermediaries because of the option-like



Page 36

nature of their liabilities. Therefore, competition in the insurance industry

has to be tempered with appropriate prudential norms, regular monitoring

and other regulations, thereby making the robustness of the industry

critically dependent on the efficiency of and regulatory powers accorded to

the proposed Insurance Regulatory Authority.









 Effect Of Reforms



A number of concerns are being expressed regarding the opening up of the

Insurance sector. But most of them seem to be unfounded. The national

interest lies in increasing the penetration of insurance products, increasing

the retention of premia in India and mobilizing resources for infrastructure

needs. Competition means that players aggressively target potential

customers and this will increase the penetration of insurance.



The retention of premia in India has become a sensitive issue with some

people who demand that the present outgo of around Rs.10 bn by the way of

reinsurance be stopped. These people in the name of safeguarding the

national interest are in fact compromising the interests of the nation. If no

reinsurance is taken it implies that the insurance company is underwriting

the entire risk itself. Thus a single earthquake or a cyclone can wipe out the

entire company.



One recent example is the calamity that struck the state of Gujarat wherein

total claims stood at Rs.120 bn. Only Rs.29 bn was settled locally with

overseas reinsurers settling the balance.







Page 37

The Insurance sector is a service industry and international companies will

help build local professionals with world class expertise by introducing the

best global practices. Competition will also develop a better understanding

of consumer requirements leading to more customized products apt for the

market place. Besides it would also improve the tertiary sector

tremendously. Development of the tertiary sector would include new

avenues for actuaries, accountants, stockbrokers and others.



Thus it is seen that the apprehensions being expressed do not hold much

water and the opening up of the Indian insurance sector would bring about

sweeping changes not only for the consumers but the economy as a whole.





 The Current Scenario: Effects on Policy Holders



The primary reasons for buying an insurance policy, whether life or non-life

is to protect us from vagaries of life. We do not invest in insurance for

returns; rather we invest in it for regrettable necessities. Though a large

proportion of policies available in the country provide for returns, but

nobody is looking for returns to the inflation rate.



Some people do look for tax concessions, but lots of things have changed

now. First, tax rates are not as high as they used to be. Secondly,

concessions are still limited to a 20% tax shield. Finally other tax saving

schemes, like public provident fund offers better returns.



In India insurance is sold and not bought. Life Insurance Corporation has

nearly eighty products, but investors know only about a handful. That‟s









Page 38

because the agents of LIC push policies with the highest premium to pocket

a higher premium.



Same is the case with General insurance. Companies offering General

insurance products-like medical, housing, motor and industrial insurance-

have more than 150 products to sell. But awareness is even lower than life

insurance products. It becomes obvious that GIC lacks the marketing results.









 Change



Whether public sector companies like it or not change is the around the

corner. General insurance sector will soon be opened up to private and

foreign competition. The potential for the new entrants is immense; life and

non-life premiums add up to around 2% of the GDP, where as the global

average stands at 8%. Indians as such have a high savings rate and bridging

the existing gap points at immense potential.



- What does this mean for the consumer?



Insurance companies will introduce more term policies. These policies

provide protection for a specified time period, and do not offer any returns.

These will cover simple requirements of the insurance for the investor. In

effect a term policy translates into low premium outgo, which frees the

capital for investment into other investment vehicles, which offer better

returns. Currently term policies constitute only1% of the total number of

policies issued by LIC, while the global average is 15-20 per cent. Apart









Page 39

from the plain vanilla policies, new entrants will also offer consumers a

choice of products with low premiums.



Endowment policies will change too. The insurer, in line with his precise

risk appetite, will be able to invest in a variety of indices or sector specific

where in the returns would be higher. Instead of current fixed returns

schemes insurance companies will issue unit linked schemes, indexed funds,

or even real estate funds. Another opportunity is offered by a pension

contract. Here the options offered could be indexed annuity, immediate

annuity or a deferred annuity. The scope of new products is also immense in

the non-life segment. Companies would offer products for niche segment,

like disability products, workers compensation insurance, renter‟s coverage

and employment practices liability insurance. The general insurance industry

is expected to grow at the rate of 25% per annum. Scared of new entries in

the insurance sector, GIC has started offering new policies like Raj

Rajeshwari. It covers disability from accidents, the accidental death of the

spouse and legal expenses resulting from the divorce. At present some of the

good policies offered to consumer with their respective benefits are.



PRODUCTS BENEFITS

Pure term insurance (pure life without Very low premiums; effective risk

insurance policy). coverage.

Disability policy Covers disability to a longer tenure to

life time disability

First to die policy Beneficial for a couple; low premium

outgo







Page 40

Replacement policy Saves the customer the trouble of

making claims and repurchasing the

products.

Flexibility in home insurance policy Policy-holder has the flexibility of

choosing one of the risk covers

instead of the entire package.









- Channels



Insurance companies will also get savvy in distribution. Enhanced marketing

thus will be crucial. Already many companies have full operation

capabilities over a 12-hour period. Facilities such as customer service center

are already into 24-hour mode. These will provide services such as motor

vehicle recovery. Technology will also play a important role on the market.

Effects of technologies are discussed in another section.



- Rural areas



According to Malhotra committee report the penetration of insurance in

India is around 22%. This indicates that a vast majority of rural population is

not covered. Though GIC offers many products for this segment like, crop

policy, silk worm policy etc, But due to poverty majority of the population







Page 41

cannot offered to get insured. Despite this, new entrants are hopeful of

covering the vast tract of rural masses.



Insurance industry in the next century, has uncovered trends that show

increasing diversity that adds to challenges and opportunities.









Challenges/Opportunities



The study, "21st Century Demographics for the Life-Health Industry,

"delineates the following challenges and opportunities:



Population around the world is aging; number of people in the old age

bracket is growing continuously. As the population ages products such as

annuities, IRAs and defined contribution retirement plans have enormous

growth potential.



The changing composition of households from traditional family units to

single households also presents untapped markets with real needs for life,

health and retirement products. Growing income inequality means that

insurers should find a way to market cost-effectively to all economic sectors,

particularly the middle class, who run the risk of being abandoned by





Page 42

insurers chasing the wealthy. Insurers must recognize that small businesses

now make up a growing portion of the world economy, presenting a huge

opportunity for growth in this market.



The opening up of this sector has been long standing and with the passing of

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority - IRDA bill a

significant step has been taken.



IRDA is formed as an authority to protect the interests of holders of

insurance policies, to regulate, promote and ensure orderly growth of

insurance industry and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.









With the Insurance Regulatory and Development Act, the focus shifted to

the following:



 The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) should

give priority to health insurance while issuing certificates of

registration;

 Policyholders' funds will be invested in the social sector and

infrastructure. The percentage may be specified by the IRDA and such

regulations will apply to all insurers operating in the country;

 Insurers will be expected to undertake a certain percentage of business

in the rural or social sector and provide policies to persons residing in

rural areas, workers in the unorganized and informal economically

back;









Page 43

 In case the insurers fail to meet the social sector obligation a fine of

Rs.2.5 mn would be imposed the first time. Subsequent failures would

result in cancellation of licences.









 Bank Assurance



In the developed nations of USA and UK, banks account for 20% and 19%

of all insurance products sold. This figure is 50% for France. This shows the

extent of scope that Bank assurance.



When talking of banks we need to remember that there will be two

regulating bodies, IRDA and RBI. It is said that this is the reason for the

slow reaction of the banks towards this sector. However there are the NBFCs

that are also in the foray. However, the non-banking finance companies

(NBFCs) planning to enter the insurance sector will be subjected to stringent

performance and net worth parameters set by the Reserve Bank of India.



The RBI regulations come in light of the fact that most banks are looking at

their NBFC outfits for foraying into insurance sector. Some NBFCs are

planning seriously to enter into memorandum of understanding with foreign

insurance companies. In a set of draft guidelines issued to all scheduled

commercial banks (SCBs) and select financial institutions (FIs), the central

bank had laid out parameters that need to be met as of March 31, 2000:



 A minimum net worth of Rs 5 bn;

 A minimum capital requirement of Rs.1 bn,(this is mandatory for any

player in the sector, including banks)





Page 44

 A minimum capital adequacy ratio of 10 per cent

 Entry through a joint venture

 A net profit record for last three years;

 Net non-performing assets (NPAs) that "are reasonable"and

 A good track record in the case of subsidiaries as well.



For NBFCs, the other eligibility criteria for joint venture participant will be:



The capital adequacy ratio of the NBFC engaged in loan and investment

activities holding public deposits should be not less than 15 per cent and for

other NBFCs at 12 per cent; and the level of non-performing assets should

be not more than 5 per cent of the total outstanding leased/hire purchase

assets and advances taken together.



In India, when one talks of banks, the largely influential and effective,

Cooperatives cannot be far behind. Their hand in the success of banking in

rural and other non-urban areas cannot be by any means, underestimated.

The coming chapter takes a look at their plans and their strengths vis-à-vis

their foray in the insurance market.









 Cooperatives



The cooperative banks in the nation cover over 65% of the rural population

and have over 0.453-mn cooperative societies cover all the villages. These

cooperatives cover what the insurance sector needs to be targeted at - The

mass of the rural Indian population. However, the norms laid down for entry

in the insurance sector immediately washed away this sectors hope to get in





Page 45

this line of business. However, after representations to IRDA, it was allowed

to enter into the health sector for a start.



In fact the cooperatives will be better equipped and willing to bring the

insurance products to the rural Indians and educate them on the benefits of

insurance and help mobilize funds from them, which can be effectively used

for long-term national benefits. In fact, one of the largest cooperatives in

Singapore, NTUC INCOME, is working in the



The esteemed Mr. Sharad Pawar is also forging a cooperative alliance to

benefit from the new regulations. It is the cash rich Maharashtra Cooperative

that the politician is trying to get into this sector. The cooperative is planning

to apply for a national cooperative licence so that it can be a national

cooperative insurance player.



Non profit organisations are also likely to help tap that class of people that

would have otherwise been neglected by the new players. While groups like

SEWA are tying up with new players to let them meet their targets of social

and rural sector, similarly other groups are likely to tie-up too, to use their

knowledge and database of people.









 Agents / Brokers:



The guidelines governing are expected by end of October 2000, but what is

known so far is that the agents in insurance business will now be allowed to

sell atleast the products of three life or three non-life insurance companies.

Mr. Rangachary has said that a minimum capital of Rs 2.5 mn would be





Page 46

required for undertaking brokerage in life and general insurance products,

and Rs 12.5 mn for taking up a composite agency.



IRDA also proposes to reduce the level of income paid to brokers/agents of

life and general insurance business. Currently they receive 17.5% of the

premium payable on the policy. The regulator feels that these levels are quite

high and they need to be brought down to more internationally realistic

levels considering the new insurance environment.



IRDA is going to allow three kinds of brokerage firms to operate in the

Indian insurance sector, Insurance, Re-insurance and Composite. It is going

to allow a minor foreign equity stake in them with a cap of 49%. Composite

brokers are the ones who can sell Life & General insurance products and

reinsurance products also. The capital requirement for the broking firm will

be Rs.2.5 mn. The IRDA is also likely to cap the brokerage commissions to

15%.



 Investment Criteria



All insurers will be governed by the investment criteria laid down by the

IRDA. They are read as below:



- For Life insurer



Life insurance companies will have to invest 25% in the government and

another 25% in other approved securities. 15% of investment will have to be

invested in the infrastructure sector and social sector. The balance 35% will

be available to the companies to invest in the capital markets were the return

on investment are significantly higher.





Page 47

- Rural sector



The criteria for investment in the rural sector for Life Insurance companies

is the following % of the total policies written in the corresponding year, 5%

in the 1st financial year, 7% in the 2nd financial year, 10% in the 3rd

financial year, 12% in the 4th financial year, 15% in the 5th financial year,



- Prudential norms



 The insurers, both Life and Non-life, should not invest more than 15%

of the total capital employed in equity shares and debentures.

 Loans are not to form more than 10% of the estimated annual

accretion of funds.

 On accounting norms for the sector separate statements would be

required for any activity which yields 10 per cent or more revenue.

 To ensure that there is never a lack of audit in the insurance company,

there will be two auditors, one with a tenure of four years and the

second with a five year tenure.



Any insurance company would be looking at 10% growth in business in a

short term of 10 years and 20% over long-term i.e. 20 years. The company

cannot be expected to put aside its money for the development of schools

and sanitation facilities and village funds development and see the money

giving no / negligible return. Moreover the infrastructure projects in India

are never sure of seeing the light of the day. They invariably get lost in the

vast bureaucratic system and corruption prevailing in the nation. Thus this

demand was seen to be unreasonable, but the foreign players are not too

unhappy, as they see themselves to be long term players in the nation.







Page 48

 Dreams That Turned Nightmare



As in any successful joint venture, the partners have to be equals. If there is

any expectations that are not lived upto by the partner then we see feelings

of discomfort arising in the venture. When India announced that it will open

up its insurance sector, foreign insurers saw the unthinkable and latched on

to the opportunity presented before them. They set up representative offices,

signed MoU with numerous domestic players. The urgency of it all saw to it

that there was no careful reading of the scenario and the competencies of

their partners.









A few of the reasons for the breakdown in the ventures are enlisted herewith:



1. This was also the time when the IRDA was setting out the guidelines.

Once they were out, and it allowed only 26% equity participation for

the foreign players in the market, foreign insurers realized that their

pies were not going to be as big as they had envisaged. Many decided

to close shops in India and left the nation leaving their domestic

partners in the cold.

2. Also, now with the guidelines out for all to read, the foreign insurers

realised that the investment criterion was inhibiting profit growths.

The returns did not justify the investments, was their understanding.

3. With the majority stake being with the domestic partner, foreign

insurers would not have say in the management of the company and

important decisions could be considered without them. Pay packages,



Page 49

technology transfer, products and their pricing when offered by the

foreign insurers would not mean that they would run the show.

4. Domestic insurers realised that they had the upper hand in the day to

day working of the company and asked for a bigger pie in the venture.

Their greed only scared the already tensed foreign insurers.









The above are the broad reasons that saw a number of insurance joint

ventures fall by the lane and not see the light of the day. The following is the

list of joint ventures that turned sour.



 Dabur-Allstate

 CGNU-Bombay Dyeing

 Chubb-Kotak Mahindra

 Eaglestar-ITC

 Rothschilds-Godrej

 UAP-Integrated Finance

 Cigna-Ranbaxy

 Manulife-UTI

 GIO-Sanmar Group

 Allianz-Alpic

 Dabur-Liberty Mutual

 Royal&Sun alliance-DCM Shriram







Page 50

The above list of failed joint ventures has not deterred the other players and

they have decided their channels of distribution.









 Channels of Distribution



The distribution network of banks is what a lot of players are interested in.

Initially, SBI was asking a premium for it to be partnering with any insurer

on the sole premise that the bank commands a network that is unparalleled in

the banking industry in India today. Similarly other banks are becoming

insurers to leverage their network of branches, in joint ventures with foreign

players who have the expertise in the insurance sector.



Marketing alliances with people/companies having a physical presence is a

good distribution strategy too.



The online world is not going to be left behind. A number of sites have

started offering policies online. What needs to be borne in mind is that no

matter what channel one may use, the following factors will be critical in

deciding the success or failure of the venture:



- Initial setup cost

- High margin to agents/brokers

- Trained and experienced personal will be critical to the success of

the insurer.





Page 51

- An internal control mechanism to keep tab on expenses.









 Likely Factor Of Success



In the now open sector on insurance, the following is what I feel will

determine the success of the company in particular and the industry in

general:



- A change in the attitude of the population



Indians have always been wary of employing their hard-earned money in a

venture that will pay them on their death. Insurance has always been used as

a Tax saving tool. No more, no less. It is upto the insurers to educate the

people to secure/insure their future against any unknown calamity and make

a shield around their families and businesses.







- An open and transparent environment created under the

IRDA.



The reason for this being on the top of our understanding is that when ever

we have seen any sector open up in India there are always grey areas and

unsure policies. These are not exactly what any player, be it Indian or







Page 52

foreign, looks for. It creates an air of uncertainty in all the decision making

process. Insurance as a sector requires players who are strong financially and

are willing to wait for returns. Their confidence can be bolstered only if

there is an open and a transparent policy guidelines. This will also help the

consumers feel safe that the regulatory is an active one and cares to do

everything possible to keep things under control and help the insurance

environment grow maturely.









- A well-established distribution network.



To cater to the largest democracy in the world is by no means a cakewalk.

Insurance profits are directly related to number of insured and this is in turn

related to the reach. The case in example is of the State Bank of India. The

joint ventures announced have a flavour of network being a critical decider.

This is so because as per the guidelines 15% of the policies written by the

5th financial year will have to come from the rural area. The banks are the

only ones who have that reach.









- Trained professionals to build and sell the product.



It is said that the insurance agent is the best salesman in the world. He makes

you pay, regularly, an amount promising to pay back only on your death.

Thus the players will require an excellent sales team to sell their products in







Page 53

the now competitive environment. The importance can be seen from the fact

that a lot of LIC/GIC personal is being poached by the new players.









- A more rationale approach to the investment criteria.



This is a very critical area as far as the government and the players are

concerned. The government as fixed up the investment pattern for the

players to meet its social obligations. The players feel that the compulsion is

unjust and will affect their return on investments. One may wonder then why

is it that I have listed it as success factor. The reason, my dear, is that it is in

the larger interests of the society. The more the people insured, the better the

revenues, followed by better security, followed by better morale and

productivity. On a national level the criteria's ensure that the money does not

go out of the nation. We also need to bear in mind that the insurers are here

not for charity but for profits. So their interest are also to be kept in mind.









- Encouragement of newer and better products and letting the

hackneyed ones die out.



This will itself ensure the market grows. And that every class/society gets a

product that best suits them.









- A stringent accounting practice to prevent failures amongst the

insurers.





Page 54

Every insurer will have the hard-earned money of the masses. Any failure of

the insurer on account of unwarranted profligacy will cost the nation in

general and the insured in particular. To prevent any underhand workings of

the insurer and to prevent them from going bust, a stringent accounting

practice is imperative.









- A level playing field at all stages of development in the sector

for all the players.



An unbiased environment is where the best comes out of the players. Their

real strength shines through. This is the beauty of capitalism that we are

trying to achieve in our customized manner. This will only help the industry

grow and so will the society.



And last but not the least patience amongst the players and consumers to

wait for the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.









Page 55

A potential for profit: untapped opportunities will be vital for new entrants

to choose their product and service offerings carefully. In doing so they must

consider two possible pitfalls.



First, when estimating the potential of the Indian insurance market it is

tempting to look at macro-economic variables such as the ratio of premium

to GDP which is indeed comparatively low in India. For example, India‟s

life insurance premium as a percentage of GDP is 1.3 per cent against 5.2

per cent in the US, 6.5 per cent in the UK or 8 per cent in South Korea.

Given India‟s large population, the number of potential buyers of insurance

is certainly attractive.



The second trap is the tendency to target the business of existing companies

rather than expanding the market. New players find it easier to try to capture









Page 56

existing customers by offering better service or other advantages. Yet, the

benefits of this strategy are likely to be limited.



For example, 50 per cent of the current demand for general insurance comes

from the corporate segment. We do expect that after the market opens up,

companies will move between insurers as they shop around for the best

rates, products and service. Nevertheless, we anticipate that the corporate

segment as a whole will not be a big growth area for new entrants. This is

because penetration is already good, companies receive good service

because of their size and rates are tariff-governed. In both volumes and

profitability therefore, the scope for expansion is modest.



A better approach may be to examine specific niches where demand can be

met or stimulated. In our view new entrants would be best served by a

micro-level approach on two fronts.



First, they should target specific niches which are currently served poorly or

not at all. Life insurance products provide a good example. They compete

with investment and savings options like mutual funds. It is imperative that

they should offer comparable returns and flexibility. For instance, pure

protection products like term assurance account for up to 20 per cent of

policies sold in developed countries. In India, the figure is less than one

percent because policies are inflexible. Besides, no Indian life assurance

product is linked to non-traditional investment avenues such as stock market

indices. Therefore, returns are lower than those on other savings instruments.



Similar problems apply to pensions. The lack of a comprehensive social

security system combined with a willingness to save means that Indian







Page 57

demand for pension products will be large. However, current penetration is

poor. By March 1998, LIC‟s pension premium was only Rs. one billion.

Making pension products into attractive saving instruments would require

only simple innovations already common in other markets. For example,

their returns might be tied to index-linked funds or a specific basket of

equities. Buyers could be allowed to switch funds before the annuities begin

and to invest different amounts at different times.



Health insurance is another segment with great potential because existing

Indian products are insufficient. By the end of 1998, GIC‟s Mediclaim

scheme covered only 2.5 million people. Indian products do not cover

disability arising out of illness or disability for over 100 weeks due to

accident. Neither do they cover a potential loss of earnings through

disability.



The second prong of a new insurer‟s strategy could be to stimulate demand

in areas that are currently not served at all. For example, Indian general

insurance focuses on the manufacturing segment. However, the services

sector is taking a large and growing share of India‟s GDP (an estimated 48

per cent in 1998-99). This offers expansion opportunities. For example,

revenue from remote processing activities in information technology is

estimated at USD 50 billion in the next ten years. Insurers could respond

with various liability covers.



Potential buyers for most of this insurance lie in the middle class. New

insurers must segment the market carefully to arrive at appropriate products

and pricing. Existing players can also profitably exploit these areas.









Page 58

Recognizing the potential, in the past three years, the nationalized insurers

have already begun to target niches like pensions, women or children.









- Reaching out: distribution issues



We anticipate that distribution will be a key determinant of success for all

insurance companies regardless of age or ownership. The nationalized

insurers currently have a large reach and presence. New entrants cannot-and

do not-expect to supplant or duplicate such a network. Building a

distribution network is expensive and time consuming. Yet, if insurers are to

take advantage of India‟s large population and reach a profitable mass of

customers, new distribution avenues and alliances will be imperative. This is

also true for the nationalized corporations, which must find fresh avenues to

reach existing and new customers.



We expect substantial shifts in the distribution of insurance in India. Many

of these changes will echo international trends. Worldwide, insurance

products move along a continuum from pure service products to pure

commodity products (see chart).









Page 59

Chart









Initially, insurance is seen as a complex product with a high advice and

service component. Buyers prefer a face-to-face interaction and place a high

premium on brand names and reliability.



As products become simpler and awareness increases, they become off-the-

shelf, commodity products. Sellers move to remote channels such as the

telephone or direct mail. Insurance is sold by various intermediaries, not

necessarily insurance companies. In the UK for example, retailer Marks &

Spencer now sells insurance products. At this point, buyers look for low

price. Brand loyalty could shift from the insurer to the seller.









Page 60

Some potential Indian players hope that their anticipated technology

advantage will allow them to increase their reach, partly by using remote

channels. However, financial services companies globally and in India find

that customers are making the shift to such channels slowly and only for less

complex transactions. In India, insurance, especially life insurance is still a

service product. Indeed, even the successful international direct insurers

focus on standard covers such as motor insurance. We therefore believe that

in India technology will not replace a distribution network, though it will

offer advantages like better customer service.



Yet, we expect changes in distribution along other parameters. Banks and

finance companies will emerge as an attractive distribution channel for

insurance. This trend will be led by two factors which already apply in other

world markets. First, banking, insurance, fund management and other

financial services will all form a set of services rather than disparate ones.

Second, banks and finance companies are being driven to increase their

profitability and provide maximum value to their customers. Therefore, they

are themselves looking for a range of products to distribute.



In India too, banks hope to maximize expensive existing networks by selling

a range of products. We anticipate that rather than formal ownership

arrangements, a loose network of alliance between insurers and banks will

emerge. In the US, banks lease space to insurers within their bank branches

or retail products from multiple insurers.



Insurers in India should also explore distribution through non-financial

organisations. For example, insurance for consumer items such as

refrigerators can be offered at the point of sale. This piggybacks on an





Page 61

existing distribution channel and increases the likelihood of insurance sales.

Alliances with manufacturers or retailers of consumer goods will be

possible. With increasing competition, they are wooing customers with

various incentives, of which insurance can be one.



Another potential channel that reduces the need for an owned distribution

network is worksite marketing. Insurers will be able to market pensions,

health insurance and even other general covers through employers to their

employees. These products may be purchased by the employer or simply

marketed at the workplace with the employer‟s co-operation.



Finally, some potential Indian entrants into insurance hope to ride their

existing distribution networks and customer bases. For example, financial

organisations like ICICI, HDFC or Kotak Mahindra intend to tap the

thousands of customers who already buy their deposits, consumer loans or

housing finance. Other hopeful entrants anticipate specific alliances such as

with hospitals to provide health cover.



Different distribution channels bring their own challenges. First, companies

will have to ensure a strong brand identity. Distribution through third parties

means that it is those companies rather than the insurers who often reap the

benefits of customer loyalty. This accelerates the shift of insurance to a

commodity product. Second, since many new companies already offer other

financial services products, they will be tempted to sell only their own

products. They must balance this against the advantages of offering

customers a wide product range. This is especially important because we

anticipate the rise of pure financial service retailers who do not have any









Page 62

owned products and offer a broad range of products from different providers

to consumers.



- Avoiding the pitfalls: other issues



Most of the opportunities and challenges that we have discussed apply

equally to existing and new insurers.



It must be emphasized that the opening of the insurance market is far from a

bad thing for nationalized insurers. With a strong presence, a wide network

and considerable brand equity, they are in a good position to tap the very

same segments profitably, while improving their product and service

offerings. We anticipate that they will continue to hold a strong market share

position.



All insurers in a liberalized Indian market will have to address a host of

other issues. They will have to:



 Leverage information technology to service large numbers of

customers efficiently and bring down overheads. Technology can

complement or supplement distribution channels cost-effectively. It

can also help improve customer service levels considerably.

 Use data warehousing, management and mining to gauge the

profitability and potential of various customer and product segments

and ensure effective cross selling. Understanding the customer better

will allow insurance companies to design appropriate products,

determine pricing correctly and increase profitability.

 Ensure high levels of training and development not just for staff but

for agents and distribution organisations. Existing organisations will





Page 63

have to train staff for better service and flexibility, while all

companies will have to train employees to cope with new products

and an intensive use of information technology. The importance of

alliances and tie-ups means that companies will have to integrate

related but separate providers into their systems to ensure seamless

delivery.

 Build strong relationships with intermediaries such as agents. The

agency force is an important customer interface and companies must

partner with this group to reach customers and serve them effectively.



Indian insurance is on the threshold of deep and fundamental changes. The

life insurance industry was nationalised in 1956 and the general insurance

industry in 1972. Before that India had a thriving and competitive insurance

industry with hundreds of private and foreign operators. Indian companies

held a 60 per cent market share even then.



Yet, insufficient regulation also meant that there were a number of abuses. In

a re-opened Indian insurance market, regulators must formulate strong and

fair guidelines and make sure that old and new players are subject to the same

rules. Companies, meanwhile must be prepared to set and meet high standards

for themselves. The big challenge for both companies and regulators is to

ensure that they replicate the benefits of the past while eliminating its ills.









Page 64

7 P‟s Of Services Marketing Mix



In the 7 P‟s we will be concentrating on Life insurance segment.



Product Mix

Life insurance is a device or plan of spreading a possible financial loss over a

large number of persons, which is too heavy to be conveniently borne by an

individual. It seeks to reduce the financial uncertainties arising from the

natural contingencies - old age and death. It is a guarantee given by one (Life

Insurance company) to another (insured/policyholder) whereby the former

undertakes to pay a sum of money to the latter (or nominee in case of death)

on the happening of the event insured against.





Life insurance is a peculiar product. It is quite different from other

commercial products. First, what Life Insurance sells is not a tangible product

but an intangible one at present - a promise to inform in future. When this

obligation is met, i.e., the insured event takes place, the money, whose

presence can be felt, replaces the promise. With this amount the insured

person or his dependents can meet obligations on account of food, clothing

and shelter. Secondly, life insurance product continues to exist over a long

period of time and for making its service available, the insured person has to

go on paying the purchase price (premium) throughout the term of the policy.

This ensures that the benefits already accrued under “sale'' are not lost.

Finally, the seller (in India, the Life Insurance Corporation of India) has not

only to sell his product but also to keep the contract in force by continuous

and efficient serving. In other words, with respect to life insurance products





Page 65

sales and services go together.





A peculiar feature of the Life Insurance market in India is that though it is a

buyer's market, by and large, the seller, i.e., the Life Insurance Corporation of

India has to take a decision whether to sell a particular policy to a particular

person or not, on the basis of the information disclosed by the buyer himself

in the proposal form.





Again, Life Insurance market can be divided into two-broad segments –

„source‟ and „use‟ market. The former implies the sum total of policyholders

of LIC and the latter the various industries, electricity boards, housing finance

institutions, government who have made use of the economic reservoir created

out of premium money collected. This pair restricts to „source‟ market only.





 LIC’s Product Mix

Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India has various plans of insurance

policies. A new scheme is launched as per the marketing budget. The co-

coordinated efforts of Marketing Divisions, the Marketing Manager, the

Development Officer and finally the agents are responsible for the launch of

any new scheme. At present, LIC services around 70 plans with various

policies attached to it.

Some of their famous or recently launched policies are:-

- New Jeevan Shree;

- New Bima Kiran;

- Jeevan Sneha;

- Children‟s Money Back Policy;

- Jeevan Surabhi;



Page 66

- Bima Plus;

- Bima Nivesh Triple Cover.









The Price Mix

Premium is the price, which the person seeking insurance pays to the LIC for

purchasing in the Life Insurance policy. It is nothing but the cost of insurance

from purchaser‟s point of view. It is the consideration paid by each insured for

building up a certain asset called the „assured sum‟ with the insurer. The

amount of premium has a bearing on the risk involved in covering a life. The

risk in turn in has a bearing on the age of the life to be covered, his or her

habits, sex, family, race, habitat, food habits, education, etc. Life insurance

premium increases with the age since the probability of death increases,

however the insurance for the convenience of clientele and their own

administrative convenience, charge a level premium uniform throughout the

contract period. Actually, slightly more premium being paid at the initial

stages, along with investment returns on it. It will be set of against the

increases in premium at later ages. The actual process of accepting a person

for Life Insurance and coating appropriate premium is known as underwriting.









 LIC’s Price Mix

There are three main factor‟s considered before fixing any price for a policy.

They are as follows: -



Page 67

- Mortality Rating

There is a Population Census, which is conducted regularly in the country.

LIC uses the information from this census and derives a comparison between

the different age groups and the death/mortality rate per 1000 people in that

particular age group. The ones with higher mortality are given the least rating.

These would be the population group with a high death rate. Thus the groups

with the least death rate having a longer life span would require insurance

cover more than the other age group/s. Thus they would be rated highly and

the price of that policy would be fixed accordingly.





- Insurable Interest

The concept of insurable interest means that the insured should have a genuine

need for taking an insurance cover. Thus to ensure this there is an initial

Premium amount which has to be paid. Depending on this initial amount

collected, the price of the plan is decided.





- Management’s Expenses

These would consist of the administrative and selling expenses as there would

be nil cost of production. They could be in the form of fixed office expenses

like rent, electricity, stationary and salaries to all the employees and other

such related cost.





The Promotion Mix and Place Mix

As Life insurance is a personalized service, personal selling plays an

important role in promoting the same. Place and promotion are being

highlighted here since the agents and development officer who form the



Page 68

pillars of Life Insurance market structure discharge these two important

functions. Agents are PR men of insurance companies at the grassroot level.

The role in building up good customer relation is crucial. They work under the

guidance and direct supervision of development officers. They together sell

the right type of policies suitable to the needs of clients for the right amount at

the right time (age). The agents render various other services and also play a

vital role in policy servicing. The Development Officers under each Branch

office beside guiding and supervising activities of the agents are also

responsible for their recruitment and training so as to develop a stable agency

force. They activate the existing agents and motivate the new ones. Also they

render all such services to the policyholders as will produce better policies.

Agents and development officers, as the intermediaries in the distribution

system of the whole, develop and increase the Life Insurance business in a

planned way.





For promoting Life Insurance business, sales promotion activities are also

carried out by the agents. Calendars, bags, diaries, etc. are also given to the

policyholders as a token of gifts. LIC also trains their agents, as they do not

tend to increase or update their knowledge regularly so as to serve better to

their customers. Special training programs are held for them.









 LIC’s Place Mix

LIC has one corporate office at „Yogekshma‟, which is in Mumbai. They have

18 Main Branches, which make up one Division. There are total 18 such

divisions which make up a zone. There are total seven Zonal Offices.







Page 69

Yogekshma







7 Zonal Offices







18 such divisions







18 Main Branches

A single branch of LIC consists of four different

departments namely:



Sales New Business Accounts Policy Servicing







These branches work as per the co-coordinated efforts of these departments.

For the employees of LIC (development Officers/ Agents), there is no such

fixed formula of Insurance.









Now within a branch, following is the decentralized organization structure in

LIC:

Manager/Administrative Officer







Development Officer (P.R.O.)







Agent/ High Grade Assistance



Page 70

Peons, etc

From the above decentralized organization structure, we find that there is a

main Manager/ Administrative Officer, is responsible to control the

employees under him. Then we have the Development Officer, who according

to LIC is their PR officer. This Development Officer carries out the duties of a

PR officer. Under the Development Officer, there are the agents who are

mainly responsible for carrying out the task of selling the policies to the

respective clients.





 LIC’s Promotion Mix





- Communication Strategy

LIC mainly uses direct selling as their means of communicating with its

customers. The agents directly contact the clients and vice-versa. They

advertise through various media like newspapers, magazines, television,

hoardings, etc. For internal communication there are journals, which are

distributed among the employees. These magazines give a 10-15 years past

information about the company. They also give a layman all the knowledge

about LIC‟s progress. The cost of this journal amounts to only Rs. 15. Also

companies like Siemens use the group Super-Annuition Scheme of LIC as a

perquisite to all its employees in the form of pensions and other retirement

benefits. In this way, LIC ensures that it is not just the human being who







Page 71

should be ensured but even the company where he is employed is equally

responsible of taking care of the future social welfare of the employee.





- Media

The basic media used by LIC is by way of Direct Communication with the

customers. This may be through written correspondence or face-to-face

communication via the telephone. The website www.licindia.com provides

detailed information to any layman about the company, its policies, its

branches, and its network as such.









The Process Mix

The process involved in the insurance industry should be customer friendly.

The speed and accuracy of payment is of vital importance. The processing

methodology should be such that it provides ease and convenience to the

customers. Installment schemes should also be streamlined to cater to the

growing demands of the customers and keep pace with the competition in the

market. The new developments, which will smoothen the process flow, are IT

and Data Warehousing. Firstly, information technology will help in servicing

large number of customers efficiently and bring down overheads. Technology

can complement and supplement distribution channels cost effectively. It can

also help improve customer service levels considerable. Secondly, the use of

data warehousing, management and mining will help to gauge the profitability

and potential of various customer and product segments. Understanding the

customer better will allow insurance companies to design appropriate

products, determine pricing correctly and increase profitability.







Page 72

The People Mix

Being a service industry involving a high level of people interaction, it is

important to use this resource efficiently in order to satisfy customers as also

to have a competitive edge in the market. The two key areas, which need to be

kept under consideration, are training and development and strong

relationships with intermediaries.

Training the employees to introduce them to new products, use of information

technology for efficiency, both at the staff and the agents level or the

distribution organizations is one of the key areas to look into. Also building

strong relationships with intermediaries, such as agents, will help in meeting

customer needs and serve them effectively.









 Customer Groups

The various customer groups can be categorized in the following manner:-

1. Direct Customer

The direct customer is the owner of the insurance policy. It is under his

name that the policy has been approved. He may not be the final

beneficiary of the service provided. In case of corporate insurance, services

like pensions, group incentives are enjoyed by the respective individual.





2. Indirect Customer

The indirect customers are the family members or the persons for whom

the protection of the insurance cover has been taken. For example, the

insurance policy taken by an earning class person for insuring the future of







Page 73

his family incase of any unforeseen events. The future benefits are enjoyed

by the family members, which are the indirect customers.





3. Regulator

The insurance business is regulated by the IRDA (Insurance Regulatory

and Development Authority) as per the new economic reforms.





4. Competitors

LIC has a clean monopoly over the market. As per LIC‟s claims this

monopoly will remain for at least another five years as the gestation period

for the new entrants to become potent players is also expected to be the

same. But there are threats from the new and emerging private sector. The

various competitors for LIC in the private sector are ICICI Prudential,

HDFC Standard, TATA AIG, Birla Sun Life Insurance and many others.









5. Internal Customers

The employees of LIC are the internal customers. The details regarding

their hierarchy are designation have been covered in the „people mix‟.









Physical Evidence

In the case of Insurance, physical evidence can be the appearance and dressing

of the agents and the frontline staff, the office décor, the office building on the

whole, the quality of paper used in the forms, etc.









Page 74

The 4 I‟s of Services Marketing



Intangibility

Insurance as we know is guarantee against risk, and neither guarantee nor risk

is tangible. Hence Insurance business falls under the category of Services

marketing. Though marketers try to bring in some amount of tangibility

through written documents like policy forms and authorization letters.





Inseparability

At the time of making a contract and through out the proceedings, both the

parties have to be present. The service cannot take place without the presence

of both the parties, which are the service provider and the client. But this is

not the case in life insurance policy; though the client does nominate his

nominee hence again there has to be a person present.







Page 75

Inconsistency

After all it is people dealing with people and not machines dealing with

people, hence some amount of inconsistency does take place always. Private

firms are trying to reduce this and trying to standardize the working but

companies like LIC (govt. owned) do not take much interest in such matters.





In companies like LIC the systems are not strong; hence employees do not

behave well. Hence the behaviour of the employees, agents etc. are not

consistent, therefore a customer might get a different experience each time he

interacts with the company.





Inventory

There is inseparability and intangibility in insurance therefore the question of

inventory doesn‟t arise. The companies cannot produce the service first and

store it to give it to the ultimate consumer. Hence there can be no inventory

for services.









Page 76

Market Segmentation



The entire market is segmented into four categories:-





1.) Business Class

These are the customers which are self-employed. They are targeted with

policies relating to the upper end of the market.





2.) Service (Earning) Class

These are the customers which belong to the limited salaried income class.

They are mainly targeted with policies of social security considering their

limited income and future situation is taken into consideration. These policies

serve as a protection to the families of the salaried income man in case of any

unexpected death.





3.) Agricultural Laborers







Page 77

The laborers are those who work on the farm. They don‟t own that particular

holding. They are mainly serviced in the rural areas of the country. The

policies targeted are the one‟s which fall under the lower end of the segment,

giving a sense of protection to the needy/poor worker in case of any

unforeseen events.





4.) Farmers

Like the laborers, even they are targeted mainly in the rural areas, but the

difference is that they own the particular land holding. They are further

divided into the small, marginal and large holdings. Again they are targeted

with various plans as per their purchasing power.



Services Marketing Triangle



The concept of services marketing triangle in comparison of LIC is as

follows:-









Page 78

COMPANY-LIC









Internal External

Marketing Marketing









Interactive Marketing

CONSUMERS-

PROVIDER-AGENTS POLICY HOLDERS









The above diagram explains the services triangle with its three constituents,

namely, the company, the provider and the consumer. Each can be explained

in the following manner:-





 Company





The company LIC makes various promises to its customers through external

marketing. The way and means of marketing have already been covered in the

marketing mix.









 Provider







Page 79

The LIC agents and the Development Officers act as the front-line staff and

they are in direct contact with the potential or existing customers. They are the

ones who keep or satisfy the promises made by the company. The marketing

of insurance basically comes under concept selling. The LIC agents are thus

given various incentives, rewards, commissions and all the necessary training

required. As regards incentive, they receive PLI (Productivity Linked

Incentive) which is based on the increase in premium amount and the sums

assured by the agent. They are also given extra commissions in case of

policies which are of high value. There are normal promotions for any good

work done on a regular basis. The LIC agents, generally, work under the

training and guidance of their respective Development Officers. But as per a

new rule, the applicant has to under preliminary training from the Insurance

Institute of India which is recognized by LIC like IFSERT, Pune and the other

one in Hyderabad. Then he applies and gets a licence to practice business. He

also undergoes a test from LIC and after passing this test, he works under the

training of the Development Officer. Apart from the above, there are MDP

(Management Development Centre) which is for the Managers and other

executives above them and the DTC (Development Training Centre) which is

for the Development Officers. The various Executive, the Directors and the

Zonal Managers undergo T & D at LIMRA, Singapore









 Consumers









Page 80

The consumers/ buyers are the policy holder. Apart from the routine life

insurance policies, LIC also deals in Housing Finance, Mutual Funds, Pension

and Group Insurance as its allied business activities. Thus the range of

consumers is far and wide.









Analyzing the Service



1. Categorizing the Service Process.



The two parameters used in this are:-





Page 81

 Nature of the act: - it is intangible, because one cannot physically see

the result, which occurs after the performance of the service in this case.

 Recipient of the service: - here it is the information that is given to the

customer that is in process. Any action that is done by the provider is not

directed towards the body, mind or any good. Hence we can say that it is

an information-processing because it is the information that will decide

whether the customer will avail of the service or not.









2. Methods of Service Delivery



The two parameters used in this are:-



 Nature of interaction

 Availability of service outlets: - here the customer has a choice of going

to the closest branch or local office. That is there are a number of outlets

or offices from which he can avail of the services. Or he can always

contact the provider or the agents through easy access and availability.

Hence multiple set of outlets.









3. Nature of Demand for the Service - Related to its Supply.



The two parameters used in this are:-









Page 82

 Extent to which supply is limited: - in this case there are very few times

when there is peak demand. At such times the demand can be usually be

met without a major delay. Thus the supply is enough to meet the sudden

spurt in demand.

 Extent of demand fluctuation overtime: -it is very narrow. This means

that the rise in demand is not that wide that it cannot be managed. A

narrow demand fluctuation occurs.





4. Attributes of the Service Experience



The two parameters used in this are:-



 Extent to which people are part of the service: - as customer

involvement is very high we can say that they form an important part of

the service. Based on the requirement of each customer every policy will

have to be tailored to suit him, and accordingly he will be able to avail of

certain policies and not all.

 Extent to which equipment are part of the service: - as it relies more

on the people, it is not that dependant on technology. Hence we can say

that it is low on this parameter. This is because technology is not that

extensively used in this industry as it still follows the traditional

distribution channels.









5. Relationship with Customers



The two parameters used in this are:-





Page 83

 Nature of service delivery: - as a customer once takes a policy, he has to

keep in touch with the insurer for payment of premium, maturity date etc.

Hence it is an on-going process, so we can say that there is continuous

service delivery.

 Type of relationship between customer and provider: - only a

customer who has taken a policy can avail of the facilities provided by

the insurer. That means that there is the existence of the relationship

between them, due to the formation of a membership relationship that

exists between them.









The Flower of „Service‟









Page 84

The concept of the Flower of service has been compared in relation to the

practices of LIC. In the following lines, the various petals which surround the

core product of LIC have been briefly explained.





 Core Product

Apart from primarily servicing life insurance policies, LIC is also engaged in

businesses relating to Housing Finance, Mutual Funds, Pension and Group

Insurance, and Social Security.





 Supplementary Services

The various supplementary services which fall under various categories are

explained as follows:-





- Information

LIC has its own Information Centres in Santacruz (W.), Mumbai and Pune.

By dialing 6125555, one can find out any information regarding any policies,

plans, operations or any information relating to LIC. The other number

6187655 gives the individual policy holder, information about his policy as

regards premium, duration, and any other information relating specifically to

his policy. The Pune number is 5536161. LIC has its official website,

www.licindia.com, which gives all the information regarding their products,

services and all the information about LIC‟s operations. LIC also has an in-

built „plan suggestor‟ on its website, which automatically processes the

information supplied by the potential customer and the respective policy is

suggested.





- Consultation



Page 85

LIC‟s mainly provides consultancy services through its information centre, its

website, and its agents which work on a personalized basis and offer advices

relating to various plans and policies.





- Order-taking

As far as order-taking is concerned, LIC has its personnel categorized as

Agents, Development Officers, Assistant Branch Manager, Branch Manager

and various other executives in the top management. The order is taken

depending on the amount/value of the service. Policies ranging from 8-10

lakhs are serviced by the agents, and then ones between one lakh to five lakhs

are serviced by the Development Officer. There are also the Sales Manager,

Senior Divisional Manager which have their own range of policy servicing.

The Sales Manager is in charge of policies which are priced above Rs. 1

Crore.





The order taking mechanism is mainly by way of application forms. These

forms are made available through the agents or they can also be downloaded

from the website. The various forms belong to various age categories like the

„Form No. 300‟ which is a proposal for insurance on own life, the „Form No.

360‟ is for policy duration of 10 years or more and various other forms.





The potential policy holder has to pay the initial premium amount and then

undergo a medical examination of various cardiological, pathological and

radiological tests.



After such physical examinations are successfully completed, the plan or

proposal is transacted.





Page 86

- Billing

The policy holder has to pay the premium amount in fixed durations as per the

agreement. LIC sends reminders to the policy holders by way of post to

inform the policy holder regarding various details like amount, due date,

policy under which it belongs, etc.





- Payment

A policy holder can make the payment of the premium amount in the

following ways:-

1. He can send the cheques directly to branch,

2. There are rural banks which have tie-ups with LIC,

3. The payment can be done through www.billjunction.com,

4. The payer can send a draft or a standing order to the bank.









Pest Analysis







 Political-Legal Factors









Page 87

- Insurance Sector Reforms

There are various efforts made by the government to make the industry more

dynamic and customer friendly. To begin with, the Malhotra committee was

set up with the objective of suggesting changes that would achieve the much

required dynamism.





- The Malhotra Committee Report

In 1993, Malhotra Committee, headed by former Finance Secretary and RBI

Governor R. N. Malhotra, was formed to evaluate the Indian insurance

industry and recommend its future direction. In 1994, the committee

submitted the report and gave the following recommendations:





- Structure

 Government stake in the insurance Companies to be brought down to

50%.

 Government should take over the holdings of GIC and its subsidiaries

so that these subsidiaries can act as independent corporations.

 All the insurance companies should be given greater freedom to

operate.









- Competition

 Private Companies with a minimum paid up capital of Rs.1bn should be

allowed to enter the industry.

 No Company should deal in both Life and General Insurance through a

single entity.



Page 88

Foreign companies may be allowed to enter the industry in

collaboration with the domestic companies.

 Postal Life Insurance should be allowed to operate in the rural market.

Only one State Level Life Insurance Company should be allowed to

operate in each state.

 Regulatory Body.

 The Insurance Act should be changed.

 An Insurance Regulatory body should be set up.

 Controller of Insurance (Currently a part from the Finance Ministry)

should be made independent.





- Investments

 Mandatory Investments of LIC Life Fund in government securities to

be reduced from 75% to 50%

 GIC and its subsidiaries are not to hold more than 5% in any company

(There current holdings to be brought down to this level over a period

of time)









- Customer Service

 LIC should pay interest on delays in payments beyond 30 days

 Insurance companies must be encouraged to set up unit linked pension

plans

Computerization of operations and updating of technology to be

carried out in the insurance industry









Page 89

 Overall, the committee strongly felt that in order to improve the

customer services and increase the coverage of the insurance industry

should be opened up to competition.

 But at the same time, the committee felt the need to exercise caution

as any failure on the part of new players could ruin the public

confidence in the industry.





Hence, it was decided to allow competition in a limited way by stipulating the

minimum capital requirement of Rs.1 bn. This amount is not very high for

foreign firms, as it translates to only about US$25 million. Further, to date it is

unclear whether equity should be payable in one go or should be brought in as

installments. Also, the foreign equity participation was to be restricted to only

40%.





The committee felt the need to provide greater autonomy to insurance

companies in order to improve their performance and enable them to act as

independent companies with economic motives. For this purpose, it had

proposed setting up an independent regulatory body.









The industry and analysts find that there is lack of clarity in the following

areas:-





 Though coverage of rural areas was to be made compulsory, it raises

the question as to who would subsidize the rural policies as they would

be difficult to service and hence costs will go up.







Page 90

 There is some confusion with respect to investments. Where the funds

should be invested? Currently 70% of the funds with LIC & GIC are

invested in Government securities. Would new entrants be allowed to

invest in GOI securities?

 The report also does not enumerate exit options available to the new

entrants. In the event of failure, there should be an arrangement made

whereby the other companies pool in to bail the customers, who in all

probability would be middle class individuals.





On the basis of the report, the then Finance Minister P. Chidambaram

proposed the opening up of insurance to the private sector, including

multinational companies.





With the notification of the constitution of the Insurance Regulatory and

Development Authority (IRDA) in April 2000, the decks are finally cleared

for foreign investment in the insurance sector. The government notified the

constitution of the IRDA as a statutory authority. N. Rangachary will be its

chairman till June 2003. The notification of the bill's passage was delayed as it

could only be done with the constitution of the IRDA on April 19, 2000. This

IMI looks at the growth prospects in the sector in the near future.





Following the passage of the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority

Bill by both the houses of the Indian Parliament late 1999, the stage is now set

for the establishment of a fundamentally new legal regime for insurance sector

in India. The new Act opens the sector to private participation, establishes an

independent regulator, and allows foreign entry into the market through equity

participation up to a level of 26 percent. Individual Indian companies will be



Page 91

required to bring down their equity holding to 26 percent through sales of

shares to the public within 10 years.





After the passage of the Bill last year, in April 2000 the government notified

the constitution of the IRDA as a statutory authority. N. Rangachary will be

its chairman till June 2003. The notification of the bill's passage was delayed

as it could only be done with the constitution of the IRDA on April 19, 2000.

With the notification of IRDA and rules for opening up the sector in place, the

first private insurance company with foreign participation can start operation

by the fall of 2000. The IRDA law is the culmination of the recommendations

made by the R.N. Malhotra committee that was constituted in 1994 with the

objective of suggesting changes that would achieve the required dynamism in

the insurance sector. Overall, the committee strongly felt that in order to

improve the customer services and increase the coverage of the insurance

industry should be opened up to competition. Hence, it was decided to allow

competition in a limited way by stipulating the minimum capital requirement

of Indian Rupees 1 billion. This amount is not high for foreign firms, as it

translates to only about USD 23 million.





The Insurance Regulatory Development Authority (IRDA) is the regulatory

authority, which looks over the related aspects of the insurance business. The

IRDA bill provides guidance for three levels of players – Insurance

Companies, Insurance Brokers and Insurance Agents.









 Economic Factors







Page 92

Effect of Reforms





- Penetration Of Insurance

Though the Public Sector Insurance Companies have been successful in

achieving and contributing to the National Exchequer over the years, a huge

market lies untapped due to reasons like: -

 The monopolistic nature of the market;

 Focused marketing;

 Indian psyche.

The business of Insurance, by way of generating premium income, adds

significantly to the GDP of developed countries. Though the potential market

in India for the Insurance business is large, yet the products offered and

penetration achieved is far less compared to international standards. Estimates

show that a meager 35-40 million, out of the total Indian population have so

far come under the insurance umbrella.





The Life Insurance sector is one of the key areas where enormous business

potential exists. In India currently the life insurance premium as a percentage

of GDP is 1.3 % against 5.2 % in the U.S. Estimates say that the potential

market is so huge that it can grow by 15-17 % per annum. With the entry of

private insurance companies, the Indian insurance market may finally be able

to make deeper penetration into newer segments and expand the market size

manifold and can augment the flow of long-term financial resources for the

growth of infrastructure.





General Insurance is another segment, which has been growing at a fast pace.

As per the current comparative statistics, the general insurance premium has



Page 93

been lower than life insurance. General Insurance as a percentage of GDP was

a mere 0.5 % in 1996.





- More Competition

A number of concerns are being expressed regarding the opening up of the

Insurance sector. But most of them seem to be unfounded. The national

interest lies in increasing the penetration of insurance products, increasing the

retention of premia in India and mobilizing resources for infrastructure needs.

Competition means that players aggressively target potential customers and

this will increase the penetration of insurance.





The retention of premia in India has become a sensitive issue with some

people who demand that the present outgo of around Rs.10 bn by the way of

reinsurance be stopped. These people in the name of safeguarding the national

interest are in fact compromising the interests of the nation. If no reinsurance

is taken it implies that the insurance company is underwriting the entire risk

itself. Thus a single earthquake or a cyclone can wipe out the entire company.





The argument that foreign companies will repatriate premium income through

reinsurance is misplaced. Even now a significant part of the premium is

distributed to reinsurers and much of the high insurance risks are reinsured

overseas. One recent example is the calamity that struck the state of Gujarat

wherein total claims stood at Rs.120 bn Only Rs.29 bn was settled locally

with overseas reinsurers settling the balance. Moreover, every regulator

prescribes that the premium earned is retained in the country and the liabilities

under the contract are matched with assets in the same country. In fact the







Page 94

opening up of the sector will increase the retention of premia in India and thus

reduce outgo of the valuable foreign exchange.





The apprehension that there would be a flight of capital is also not borne by

the experience of other countries. If anything, there has been a strong inflow

of foreign capital in the first 5 years for introducing new products and

maintaining the requisite capital adequacy ratio.





The fear that new companies will displace existing players is also unfounded.

In fact in China, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand where insurance firms

were allowed entry the foreign companies account for only 10% of the market

share. In South Korea the opening up of the sector saw the Big Six domestic

players, who initially controlled the entire market, increase their business from

3 to 37 trillion won by 1997. The foreign companies were not able to capture

more than 0.4% of the domestic market. Closer home, we have the experience

of the banking sector where despite the presence of 39 foreign banks their

share in overall business is less than 10%.





Thus it is seen that the apprehensions being expressed do not hold much water

and the opening up of the Indian insurance sector would bring about sweeping

changes not only for the consumers but the economy as a whole.





- Opening Of the Insurance Sector

In India, approx. 60% of the total health expenditure comes from self paid

category as against government‟s contribution of 25-30 %. A majority of

private hospitals are expensive for a normal middle class family. The opening

up of the insurance sector to private players is expected to give a shot in the



Page 95

arms of the healthcare industry. Health Insurance will make healthcare

affordable to a large number of people. Currently, in India only 2 million

people (0.2 % of total population of 1 billion), are covered under Mediclaim,

whereas in developed nations like USA about 75 % of the total population are

covered under some insurance scheme. General Insurance Company has never

aggressively marketed health insurance. Moreover, GIC takes up to 6 months

to process a claim and reimburses customers after they have paid for treatment

out of their own pockets. This will give a great advantage to private players

like Cigna which is planning to launch Smart Cards that can be used in

hospitals, patient guidance facilities, travel insurance, etc.









- Broadening The Benefits: Opening Up

What is the likely impact of opening up India‟s insurance sector? An often-

voiced concern is that private players, especially foreign ones, will swamp the

market, grabbing a large share. This hypothesis has been disproved in

emerging markets worldwide. We believe the threat has been over-played in

India.





Multinational insurers are indeed keenly interested in emerging insurance

because their home markets are saturated while emerging countries have low

insurance penetrations and high growth rates. International insurers often

derive a significant part of their business from multinational operations. As

early as 1994, many of the UK‟s largest life and general insurers derived 40

per cent to 60 per cent of their total premia from outside their home markets.

The figure at Commercial Union was 76 per cent in that year.



Page 96

While the impact of global operations on their business may be large,

typically foreign insurers take only a small share of an individual country‟s

market. In Taiwan for example, foreign companies took only a 3 per cent

share even seven years after opening up. In Korea, their share was 1 per cent

after 20 years. In China, a large and complex market like India, private

insurers have not made much headway.





Yet, new entrants find insurance attractive because even a small share of a

large and growing market can be profitable. The Korean insurance market for

example, was only the 30th largest market in the world by premium volume in

1971. It moved up to 6th largest in 1996. In any case, in India multinational

insurers will be restricted to a minority shareholding in new companies. The

new entrants will therefore be private Indian companies.





Nationalized insurers are hampered by their large scale of operations, public

sector bureaucracies and cumbersome procedures. Therefore, potential private

entrants expect to score in the areas of customer service, speed and flexibility.

They point out that their entry will mean better products and choice for the

consumer. Critics counter that the benefit will be slim, because new players

will concentrate on affluent, urban customers as foreign banks did until

recently.





This might seem a logical strategy. Start-up costs-such as those of setting up a

conventional distribution network-are large and high-end niches offer better

returns. However, we believe that the middle-market offers the greatest







Page 97

potential. This may be still being an urban market but goes beyond the

affluent segment.





Insurance, even more than banking, is a volumes game. A very exclusive

approach is unlikely to provide meaningful numbers. Therefore, private

insurers would be best served by a middle-market approach, targeting

customer segments that are currently untapped.





We anticipate that many new players will indeed take this approach, extending

the benefits of a freer marketplace to a wide base of customers. Faced with

competition, we believe that the nationalized insurers will improve their game,

as they are already trying to do. The customer will be the beneficiary.

- A Changing Landscape: Competition and Alliances

Many potential entrants are existing financial organizations with a strong

infrastructure, good customer bases and brand equity. Before locking into

company structures or alliances, they must understand their own capabilities.





In our experience, most emerging market organizations looking to enter

insurance go through a similar cycle, driven by the stages of competition (see

chart 1). Initially, after the government first allows private competition, entry

barriers such as capital requirements are high. Expertise and capital are the

scarce resources. Companies that are new to the business conclude that they

need an established insurer as a partner. This is partly because they over-

estimate the expertise required and partly because the partner‟s capital

contribution is valuable.









Page 98

Next, they decide that a joint venture is the appropriate vehicle for such a

partnership. In fact, many other forms of alliance are possible. For example,

agreements with information technology vendors can ensure strong systems,

or distribution alliances can ensure reach. Since expertise and systems can be

bought, new companies eventually realize that the scarce resource is brand

strength. They typically find that the partner is unable to deliver everything

that they expect, or that the same results can be achieved alone. They

therefore move to a stand-alone basis relatively quickly.









The reason for this unsatisfactory cycle is that organizations do not spend

enough time understanding their own strengths. A virtuous cycle for a new

insurer would begin with a strategic review to determine which segments of

insurance to enter, followed by a review to identify internal capabilities.

Based on this information companies can examine alliance selection,

answering questions like:

 What support do we need? Do we need a partner or merely a supplier to

provide this support?

 What form of alliance is appropriate?

 What can third-party organizations actually offer?





They can then select the right partners; negotiate alliances and move on to

business planning, product design and pricing. However, our experience

indicates that most organizations start by selecting a partner, devoting too

little time to the preceding steps. Indeed, some agreements between potential

Indian and international entrants have fallen through already. New entrants



Page 99

would be well advised to look ahead to the stage where brand strength will be

a big competitive advantage and sketch their alliances accordingly. In fact we

believe that alliances related to distribution rather than to products or

technology will prove most valuable in the long run.





There is tremendous scope for foreign companies in this sector. Clearly, there

is considerable scope to raise per capita life premium if the market is

effectively tapped. With an insurable population of 300 million, per capita life

premium can be raised to a level of USD 200 to 300 and hence the market can

expand by 50 to 75 times over the existing size. India has traditionally been a

highly savings oriented country. If the insurance market is properly tapped, it

is possible to raise life premium as a percentage of GDP from the existing

level of 1.29 percent to 10 percent. This will bring an eight-fold increase in

the existing volume of life premium.





Life premium as a percentage of GDS (gross domestic saving) is quite low in

India and it is possible to raise life premium as a percentage of GDS in India

from the existing levels. The big question is whether the players are able to

effectively exploit the potential by creating and marketing attractive insurance

products with high rates of return on premium investments.









 Social-Cultural Factors





- Population Mix

India has an amorphous middle-class of about 250-300 million people who

can afford to buy life, health, and disability and pension plan products. Out of



Page 100

this only 22 percent have insurance and that too covers only 25 percent of

their needs and financial capacity. The remaining 80 percent have no

insurance cover. The life insurance market of India, therefore, is practically

untapped.









- Shrinkage Of Jobs

The apprehension that competitive Insurance will result in shrinkage of jobs is

equally untrue. The number of people working in Insurance sector is much

less as compared to UK, USA, and Thailand etc. With expected increase in the

business the job opportunities will increase rather than decrease.





The Insurance sector is a service industry and international companies will

help build local professionals with world class expertise by introducing the

best global practices. Competition will also develop a better understanding of

consumer requirements leading to more customized products apt for the

market place. Besides it would also improve the tertiary sector tremendously.

Development of the tertiary sector would include new avenues for actuaries,

accountants, stockbrokers and others.



- Rural-Urban Mix



It must be borne in mind that India is a predominantly rural country and will

continue to be so in the near future. New players may tend to favor the

"creamy" layer of the urban population. But, in doing so, they may well miss a

large chunk of the insurable population. A strong case in point is the current

business composition of predominant market leader – the Life Insurance



Page 101

Corporation of India. The lion's share of its new business comes from the rural

and semi-rural markets. In a country of 1 billion people, mass marketing is

always a profitable and cost-effective option for gaining market share. The

rural sector is a perfect case for mass marketing.









Competition in rural areas tends to be "kinder and gentler" than that in urban

areas, which can easily be termed cutthroat And the generally smaller policy

amounts in rural areas would be more than offset by the higher volume

potential in these areas in contrast with urban areas. Identifying the right

agents to harness the full potential of the vibrant and dynamic rural markets

will be imperative.



Rural insurance should be looked upon as an opportunity and not an

obligation. A smaller bundle of innovative products in sync with rural needs

and perception and an efficient delivery system are the two aspects that have

to be developed in order to penetrate the rural markets.







 Technological Factors



- Information Technology And LIC



LIC has been one of the pioneering organizations in India who introduced the

leverage of Information Technology in servicing and in their business. Data

pertaining to almost 10 crore policies is being held on computers in LIC. We

have gone in for relevant and appropriate technology over the years.









Page 102

1964 saw the introduction of computers in LIC. Unit Record Machines

introduced in late 1950‟s were phased out in 1980‟s and replaced by

Microprocessors based computers in Branch and Divisional Offices for Back

Office Computerization. Standardization of Hardware and Software

commenced in 1990‟s. Standard Computer Packages were developed and

implemented for Ordinary and Salary Savings Scheme (SSS) Policies.





- Front End Operations

With a view to enhancing customer responsiveness and services, in July 1995,

LIC started a drive of On Line Service to Policyholders and Agents

through Computer. This on line service enabled policyholders to receive

immediate policy status report, prompt acceptance of their premium and get

Revival Quotation, Loan Quotation on demand. Incorporating change of

address can be done on line. Quicker completion of proposals and dispatch of

policy documents have become a reality. All our 2048 branches across the

country have been covered under front-end operations. Thus all our 100

divisional offices have achieved the distinction of 100% branch

computerization. New payment related Modules pertaining to both ordinary &

SSS policies have been added to the Front End Package catering to Loan,

Claims and Development Officers‟ Appraisal. All these modules help to

reduce time-lag and ensure accuracy.





- Metro Area Network

A Metropolitan Area Network, connecting 74 branches in Mumbai was

commissioned in November, 1997, enabling policyholders in Mumbai to pay

their Premium or get their Status Report, Surrender Value Quotation, Loan

Quotation etc. from ANY Branch in the city. The System has been working



Page 103

successfully. More than 10,000 transactions are carried out over this Network

on any given working day. Such Networks have been implemented in other

cities also.









- Wide Area Network

All 7 Zonal Offices and all the MAN centres are connected through a Wide

Area Network (WAN). This will enable a customer to view his policy data

and pay premium from any branch of any MAN city. As at May 2002, we

have 91 centers in India with more than 1320 branches networked under

WAN.





- Interactive Voice Response Systems (IVRS)

IVRS has already been made functional in 59 centers all over the country.

This would enable customers to ring up LIC and receive information (e.g. next

premium due, Status, Loan Amount, and Maturity payment due, Accumulated

Bonus etc.) about their policies on the telephone. This information could also

be faxed on demand to the customer.





- LIC On The Internet

Our Internet site is Informative. We have displayed information about LIC &

its subsidiaries-LIC (International) E.C., LIC (Nepal) Ltd, LIC Mutual Fund,

LIC Housing Finance and their products. Efforts are on to upgrade our web

site to make it dynamic and interactive. The addresses/e-mail Ids of our Zonal

Offices, Zonal Training Centers, Management Development Center, Overseas

Branches, Divisional Offices and also all Branch Offices with a view to speed

up the communication process.



Page 104

- Payment Of Premium And Policy Status On Internet

LIC has given its policyholders a unique facility to pay premiums through

Internet absolutely free and also view their policy details on Internet premium

payments. There are 11 service providers with whom L I C has signed the

agreement to provide this service.





- Information Kiosks

We have set up 150 Interactive Touch screen based Multimedia KIOSKS in

prime locations in metros and some major cities for dissemination information

to general public on our products and services. These KIOSKS are enabling to

provide policy details and accept premium payments.





- Info Centers

We have also set up 8 call centers, manned by skilled employees to provide

you with information about our Products, Policy Services, Branch addresses

and other organizational information.









Page 105

Grievance Handling Mechanism for Policy Holders







LIC has more than 8 lakh agents all over the country. They are the first and

nearest points of contact for policy holders for redressal of their grievances

with regard to the policies taken by them. Their agents are well trained and

assist the policy holds in most areas of policy servicing.





However, to take care of the problems which agents find difficult to solve.

Grievance redressal officers have been appointed at the branch, zonal and

central offices. In the branch, the branch manager is the designated

Grievance Redressal Officer. The marketing managers at these Regional

and Divisional offices are other designated officers. These officers set aside

2 hours on every Monday to hear the grievances of the policy holders,

without any prior appointments. There are also free telephone lines provided

to the policy holders at Mumbai for calling the designated officers at the

divisional\zonal and central offices in connection with the redressal of their

grievances.

There are Complaint cells at the divisional offices and complaint sections at

the zonal offices and central office for attending to complaints from policy

holders. Claim Review Committee has been appointed at all the zonal

offices and at all the central offices for considering the appeals against

repudiation of liability under some claims for suppression of facts material

to the assessment to the risk. The divisional offices, while repudiation

liability also inform the claimant that if he\she is not satisfied with the

decision the he/she may approach this review committee. This committee at



Page 106

the zonal offices has the benefit of the presence of a retired igh court/district

kudge besides 3 senior officers from the zonal offices. The intention of the

corporation in inducting such retired judges is to ensure not only greater

transparency in operations but also to ensure that an independent judicial

opinion maybe available so that the decision can stand by any court of law.





The Zonal Review committee will receive all appeals irrespective of the

claim amount and review them. Their decision up to net claim of 2 lakh Rs

will be final. However, claimants with net claim amounts exceeding 2 lak

and not satisfied with the decision of the Zonal Claims Review committee at

the central office and commended it. Besides, the central government in

exercise of powers conferred by the sub section1 of the section 114 of the

Insurance Act, 1938 have been pleased to frame the Redressal of Public

Grievances rules, 1998 vide notification dated 11-1-98. These rules seek to

resolve complaints relating to settlement of claims etc., in repect of

insurance companies in a cost-effective, efficient and impartial manner.

These rules also provide for the appointment of one or more persons as

Ombudsman for achieving the purpose of the said rules. The Ombudsman

under the rules may receive and consider:-

a) Grievances relating to any partial or toal repudiation of liability by

any insurer.

b) Any dispute in regard to premium









Page 107

Customer Service and Quality







Between one insurer and another, the differentiating factor will be the in this

experience of the customer. There is not much likelihood of much difference

in the terms of the policy itself. There would be no difficulty in any insurer

offering the same benefits as another insurer. Technology is not exclusive.

Premiums could be different depending on the efficiency of management.

But life insurance is seldom bought on the basis of the cheapest price. The

experience during purchase, after purchase and at the time of the claim will

make the difference. This experience is the result of the nature of customer

service.





In case of insurance, the experience after the purchase is the continued

attention and concern shown to the customer, would reassure him that the

promise he believed in while making the purchase was not misplaced. If he

does not receive such attention and expression of concern, he could start

doubting the servicing-provider. Apart from the help in processing the claim

when it occurs, post sales servicing would include regular reminders as to

the customer‟s obligation like payment of renewal, furnishing of data as may

be required, compliance with warranties and so forth.





Managements around the world have learnt that „satisfied customers‟ are the

only route for sustained growth in competitive environment. They are now

striving to make customer increasingly happy. The opportunity to do so is

not much in are available not much intangible components of products of



Page 108

products, but in intangible service components. Life Insurance, being a pure

intangible, provides plenty of option.





The quality of service is what customer says it is. He judges the organization

by his experience. The judgement is influenced by the extent to which his

presence and the needs are recognized. People get badly upset when they are

not heard, when they are ignored or spoken to impotently, when their

inquiries are treated irrelevant, when they are brusquely told to wait, etc.

they feel good when someone listens to what they have to say, shows

consideration for the problem and explains why something is done or not

done.





A grievance is a symptom that the quality is not perceived as satisfactory. A

customer has a grievance when he does not get what he thinks he is entitled

to. A grievance is to be taken seriously because it gives clues s to what is

going wrong, it indicates what customer expects or the customer may be

lost. When a grievance is attended to quickly and seriously there is

satisfaction, which, in turn, wipes out the adverse experience.









Page 109

LIC‟s Customer Relationship Management







 The Emerging Scenario

With the emergence of competition, LIC has implemented strategic moves

for business growth, as well as ensured quality improvement in service

standards. As on today, they have been providing service to around 12 crore

policy holders and their track has been well acknowledged as reflected

through continual upgradation of service standards culminating into a world

class performance in the area of claim settlement operations.

It is well acknowledged that LIC has been able to provide appropriate IT

support in furtherance of prompt service to their valued policy holders. The

complex task of conversion of computerization of all the branches with their

conversion as Front Line offices has been completed in aphase manner. In

addition to this, the launching of the IVRS facility, MAN and Wide Area

Network operations has helped the co-operation improve its servicing.





LIC‟s strength lies in:

a. Wide network of branches covering rural areas.

b. A large and well- spread agency organization.

c. An acknowledged record of performance.

d. Adequate yield with high risk cover being offered keeping the policy

holders satisfied in the existing in the economic scenario.

e. A well accepted brand equity throughout the country.





In addition to this, LIC has an established and well administered Grievance

Redressal Mechanism and with Ombudsman intervention, the customers





Page 110

appear to be well attended. However, this mechanism has to be restructured

keeping in view the additional legal provisions laid down by the regulator as

expounded in the IRDA act.





 Futuristic Approach

Till today, LIC enjoyed a monopoly. It is now that reality exists in the are of

marketing (i.e. sales and after sales service operations). It will now have to

follow a multi-faceted strategy towards customer retention and also

expanding to a new clientele. With the new face of the market, relationship

management seems to be the new mantra.





At the nucleus of this approach is the concept of Customer Relationship

management.

The need is to have a comprehensive review of the business keeping in view

customer expectations.





 Customer Orientation

LIC, to be in the reckoning, has to have an efficient feed-back system, so as

to understand what the customer desires in terms of product design, service

procedures, relationship convinience, accessibility, responses in terms of

personalized service, attendance, core and complimentary on an individual

basis. The new players in the market like ICICI, HDFC etc. will definitely

be very aggressive in the open market. LIC has to go ahead with their former

customers, existing customer, in a very gentle and courteous manner,

reassuring them of their better services with persona, attention.

Managed customer relations help to:







Page 111

1. Design the product

2. Know your competitive edge in the market with diversified product

launch by the competitors.

3. Understand customers perception of our existing service standards.

4. Predict customers future expectations.

5. Enable us to proceed with segmental marketing (either customer

oriented or product oriented).

6. Assess impact of economic changes, fiscal and commercial policies,

market and industrial operations vis-à-vis customer demand.





 Relationship Management Process

It is very important that everyone in the organization should accept and live

by the goal of customer satisfaction. All challenges should be converted to

opportunities for expansion. There has to be a philosophical and cultural

orientation. Once the process is launched, it should lead the entire

organization to achieve 100% retention of existing customers, with full

satisfaction of their expectations and this class of customers will spread

throughout the country and carry LIC‟s brand equity by word of mouth.

There should be relationship existing with former customers since they are

opinion makers. Such customers will include former policyholders and also

their intermediaries.

The intermediaries i.e., agents are their internal customers and if they are

well looked after and kept happy, they can provide a smooth pace leading to

their value customers.

 Strategic Moves

- Deploying multifunctional service tools for the convenience of

their valued customers.



Page 112

- Retention of professional agents (club members) to retain the

existing policyholders.

- Providing online data support to these professional with proper

safeguard procedures.

- Management of multiple markets includes the sales and after

sales service to prospects and customers, representing different

segments identified on the basis of economic conditions,

financial status, occupational, professional, social and cultural

differences and of course, regional diversification.

- Participation of the buyer right from the stage i.e. OFFER.

Conducting Customer Profile Surveys to know the existing

family and individual need.

- Information sharing with the valued customers: LIC‟s branch

officials and marketing officials should remain in touch with

customers at different levels through communication and

correspondence.









The Insurance Potential -- Future









Page 113

India has an amorphous middle class of about 350-300 million people who

can afford to buy life, health and other insurance products. Out of this only

22% have insurance and that too covers only 25% of their needs. The

insurance market in India is therefore practically untapped. At present the

size of insurance market in India is pegged at approximately US$ 92.5

billion. Of the total size of the market 80% is of life insurance and 20% of

non-life insurance. According to estimates drawn by some international

insurance consultants, the insurance market is likely to grow at an average

rate of about 15% for the next five years. In anticipation of tapping the huge

market, a number of insurance companies have set up their respective offices

in India and tied up with various Indian companies.





With the entry of competition, the market is witnessing a wide array of

products from players whose numbers are set to grow. In such a scenario, the

differentiators among the various players are the products, pricing and

service.





Today the Indian consumers are increasingly becoming more aware and are

actively managing their financial affairs. Today, while boundaries between

various financial products are blurring, people are increasingly looking not

just at products, but at integrated financial solutions that can offer stability of

returns along with total protection.





To satisfy these myriad needs of products, insurance products will need to be

customized. Insurance today has emerged as an attractive and stable

investment alternatively that offers total protection - Life, Health and

Wealth. In terms of returns, insurance products today offer competitive



Page 114

returns ranging between 7% to 9%. Besides returns, what really increases the

appeal of insurance is the benefit of life protection from insurance products

along with health cover benefits.

Consumers today also seek products that offering flexible options, preferring

products with benefits unbundled and customizable to suit their diverse

needs. While sales of traditional life insurance products like individual,

whole life and term will remain popular, sale of new products like single

premium, investment linked, retirement products, variable life and annuity

products are also set to rise. Firms will need to constantly innovate in terms

of product development to meet ever-changing consumer needs. However,

product innovations are quickly and easily cloned. Pricing will also not vary

significantly, with most product premiums hovering around a narrow band.





In this competitive scenario, a key difference will be the customer

experience that each insurance player can offer in terms of quality of advice

on product choice, along with policy servicing and settlement of claims.

Service should focus on enhancing the customer experience and maximizing

customer convenience. Long-term growth in the business will greatly

depend on the distribution network, where the emphasis must evolve from

merely selling insurance to acting as financial advisors, helping customer's

plan their finances depending on personal requirements. This calls for a

strong focus on training of the distribution force to act as financial

consultants and build a long lasting relationship with the customer. This

would help create sustainable competitive advantage not easily matched.





The main reason why the leading insurance companies in the world and the

leading corporate group in India have shown a keen interest in the insurance



Page 115

sector, is the vast potential for future business. Restricted, as the market has

been, through the operations of the two monopolies (LIC and GIC), it is

generally felt that the sector can grow exponentially if it is opened up. The

decade 1987-97 has witnessed a compounded growth rate of marginally more

than 10% in life insurance business. LIC predicts for itself that its business has

potential to grow by 16.27% p.a. in a decade 1997-2007 (LIC, 1997). If we

take a look at insurance coverage index for the age group of 20-59 years a

considerable gap between India and other countries in Asia can be observed.

In this scenario, naturally insurance companies see a vast potential.









SWOT Analysis

After Understand the whole Insurance Sector, I have prepared SWOT

Analysis of the Sector:





Strengths







Page 116

 The industry is growing which is a sign of recovery of the economy

leading to creation of a stable economy. It is one of the booming

sectors.

 Better living standards and quality of life. Low claim-high profit.

 ASK Good returns on investment of life funds in avenues.

 Healthy product line, competitive prices and excellent customer

services directed to customer satisfaction. Thanks to competition.

 IRDA acting as a Watch Dog.

 Technology will play a strategic role in providing a competitive edge-

be it in aiding design and administration of products or building life

long customer relationships. It will also help enhance service, ensure

effective and efficient delivery system and also will lead to greater

customization of products and greater transparency. For example,

LIC has IVRS (Integrated Voice Response System) and also provides

the facility of online premium payment through billjunction.com and

timesmoney.com

 Transparency of management by all existing players in terms of

premium collected, invested, profit generated and distributed and the

commission structure.

 Only source of safe and high yield nowadays.

Weaknesses





 It requires huge initial investment.

 The Indian companies, which have collaborated, with big foreign

insurance companies are novice to this field.

 Break even will be reached after 7 years of operations.





Page 117

 ASK No other intermediaries are allowed to sell insurance except

agents.

 ASK IRDA has specified norms, which restricts life corpus to be

invested in hot scripts that could earn higher returns and also add fuel

to economic development. The 85% of the premium amount or the

corpus must be invested in Government Securities which yields

around ASK returns could be converted into 30 –35% if managed and

churned well by allowing them to invest on stock and foreign markets.

This norm would reduce the attractiveness of the insurance policies to

the consumers, hereby, reducing the total demand for the insurance as

a whole.





Opportunities





 Pie worth Rs. 32,000 crore is waiting to be grabbed by insurers.

 India, no doubt, is a highly underinsured country, with penetrated

level of only 1.3% of GDP as against 2.86% in Israel and 2.43% in

Hong Kong.

 Total Indian insurable population is around 32%, which is insured by

15 to 22% a year against industry growth of 17%.





 Time to refurnish – By G.N. Bajpai (chairman, LIC)

So many players are in the industry, which leads to better product at

best price and above all will increase the awareness of insurance by

promotional activities.









Page 118

 Shift in customers‟ perspective to see insurance as a risk management

tool rather than a tax saving and saving tool.

 Higher disposable income and low inflation rate

Nuclear Families – the joint family system has strong roots ion the

country. In the event of calamity, other members of the family come

to rescue, especially with financial assistance.

 “See rural sector 0 rural India which is more than 60%, see them as

opportunity not as an obligation”, IRDA.

 More penetration of insurance leads to more savings leading to more

investment, which means more employment hence generating more

income, which again means increased consumption and savings. All

these leads to economic growth.

 Due to new entrants insurance is coming out of its image of

bureaucracy. It has touched new horizons thanks to competition.

 If IRDA allows Bancassurance, market will have readymade

distribution channel available in terms of PSU and Private banks

which will lead to one step and one stop financial assistance to

customers.

 The lack of a comprehensive social security system combined with a

willingness to save means that Indian demand for pension products

will be large.









Threats









Page 119

 If IRDA allows brokers, banks and other intermediaries to sell

inurance, it will be worst for agents who are not at all competitive in

this growing phase.

 To penetrate in the market very fast and to earn hefty commission

company could have also problem of wrong underwriting and due to

carelessness failure of one private player could shake out all the other

private players in the market.

 Unstable inter-national and international conditions, clouds of war

between two nations, terrorists attack, riots and other bio-wars lend

huge devastation and companies should prepare itself for it.

 As insurers claim their products as providing tax benefit. That would

not be any longer the----. Mr. Sinha has already taken a first step to

cancel out all the investment benefits on policies (both sections 80CC

and 80D) by restructuring the slab set off perks benefits.

Upto Rs. 1,50,000 20%

More than 1,50,000 10%

 Except LIC, which is known to invest all surplus to ---- economic

development, other than LIC the problem with private players is that

the “profit will be forayed in their countries which ----- our foreign

exchange deficit to smaller extent but it is to be an arguable

matter…IRDA is likely to come out with certain norms for profit

redeployment.









Recommendations









Page 120

There are a few insurances, which Indian Insurance companies do not

provide. Hence some new product development is required in this sector.

A few of the policies are,





1. Industry all risk policies

2. Large projects risk cover

3. Risk beyond a floor level

4. Extended public and product liability cover

5. Broking and captivities.

6. Alternative risk financing

7. Disability insurance

8. Antique insurance

9. Mega show insurance

10. Celebrity visits to the country.









Conclusion









Page 121

Probably, India must be one of the lowest insured countries in the world i.e.

7 per cent. This scenario has to change. We should not only have 100 per

cent insurance, but also 100 per cent social security.





Personally and patriotically I feel Indian Insurance companies should cover

Indian Insurance business, we cannot insist on the same globally. So Indian

Insurance companies have to be more customers friendly and sufficient so

that we can compete with the best in the world.





They need to improve their services and offer maximum customer

satisfaction.









Page 122


Related docs
Other docs by Jonathan Cheo...
Vehicle Insurance
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
ING Insurance Policy
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Insurance
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!