Embed
Email

Hyundai Motor Company – Beijing Automotive Joint Venture

Document Sample
Hyundai Motor Company – Beijing Automotive Joint Venture
Hyundai Motor Company –

Beijing Automotive Joint Venture

April 30th, 2003

Topics in Emerging Markets

Richard Lee

Kevin Park

Michael Cheng

Agenda.

 Case Study Introduction

 Hyundai Motor Company

 South Korea Overview

 Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis

 China Overview

 Chinese Automotive Industry

 Hyundai Financial Analysis

 Case Solution

Case Introduction.

 In 2003, Hyundai has an investment of $250 million in China in

conjunction with Beijing Automotive to produce 100,000 units per

year

 Hyundai projects and plans production to be 200,000 units per year

by 2005





Investment Decision: Does Hyundai invest the

necessary $1.1 billion in year 2005 to increase

production that will yield 500,000 units per year by

2010?



A great test run and indicator of Hyundai’s potential as it

plans to become a global automotive player

Agenda.

 Case Study Introduction

 Hyundai Motor Company

 South Korea Overview

 Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis

 China Overview

 Chinese Automotive Industry

 Hyundai Financial Analysis

 Case Solution

Hyundai History & Development

 Established in 1967, Hyundai is presently South Korea’s #1

carmaker, manufacturing dozens of models of cars, vans, and

minivans

 Throughout the past two decades, Hyundai introduced various

models: Pony, Excel, Scoupe, Sonata, and Accent.

 In 1990, Hyundai introduced its own engine design, the Alpha.

Two years later, it introduced its second-generation engine,

the Beta.

 Acquired a 51% stake in Kia Motors in 1998

 In 2001, Hyundai sold a 9% stake to DaimlerChrysler to

strengthen its global market position and to boost sales

abroad

Hyundai Current Market Share

Agenda.

 Case Study Introduction

 Hyundai Motor Company

 South Korea Overview

 Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis

 China Overview

 Chinese Automotive Industry

 Hyundai Financial Analysis

 Case Solution

South Korea Economic Study

 South Korea went from having a GDP as low as Algeria’s in

1961 to becoming the world’s 11th largest economy

 Started to export goods like steel, automobiles, and ships.

 South Korea came a long way from the days when it siphoned

its scarce capital into strategic industries

 Politicians and bureaucrats became the instruments for large

businesses, large wage increases and foolish business

decisions diminished competitiveness, and banks were

ordered by the government to prop up large firms

 These things were all for not when the Asian Financial Crisis

hit South Korea.

South Korea Economic Study

 The Korean Won fell by 54% to 1962

Won/$

 The KOSPI fell by more than 65% in 1997-

1998

 Several major companies went bankrupt

 GDP shrank by 5.8% during this crisis time

South Korea Political Climate

 In 1997, Kim Dae-Jung was elected as President

 Kim won a Nobel Peace Prize for his commitment to Democracy

and his reconciliation efforts with the North

 Historical, first meeting between the North and the South

to discuss joint unification in 2000

 South Korea’s foreign policy calls for the peaceful resolve of

their situation with Communist North and any action

necessary to maintain its own state of democracy

 Political tension continues to brew within the Korean

peninsula to this day

Agenda.

 Case Study Introduction.

 Hyundai Motor Company

 South Korea Overview

 Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis

 China Overview

 Chinese Automotive Industry

 Hyundai Financial Analysis

 Case Solution

Asian Financial Crisis: Pre-crisis

 South Korea’s postwar economy was envy

of other developing countries. System of:

• High savings

• Close cooperation between government and

business

• Export oriented

• GNP rose from US$200 (1960) to US$11,500

(1996)

Asian Financial Crisis: Crisis

 Fostered corruption and speculation

 Business bankruptcies and employment insecurity

• Sharp rise in interest rates

• Dramatic fluctuations of exchange rate

• Collapse of stock price

• Exodus of foreign currency





 Major economic crisis and subsequent labor

unrest in 1997

 General strike called

 Biggest-ever IMF bailout, $57 billion rescue package

Asian Financial Crisis: Recovery

 Strong recovery in 1999-2000, negatively affected by

global economic slowdown, recover in 2002

 Fuelled by domestic demand

 Increased government spending







 Reasons for recovery:

 Break the hold of chaebols over financial sector

 Economy opened up to short and long-term capital from abroad

 Companies comply with international accounting standards

 Foreigners account for 40 percent of stock market transactions

South Korea GDP (1990-2007)



700,000

600,000

500,000

400,000

300,000

200,000

100,000

0

90



92



94



96



98



00



02



04



06

19



19



19



19



19



20



20



20



20

Agenda.

 Case Study Introduction.

 Hyundai Motor Company

 South Korea Overview

 Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis

 China Overview

 Chinese Automotive Industry

 Hyundai Financial Analysis

 Case Solution

China Macro Overview

 China’s doors opened to the world in 1978

 Experienced over 20 years unprecedented

economic growth



 Convertfrom command economy to

market economy



 Role of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs)

 Challenge of dismantling

China and the WTO

15 years of attempts, China joined

 After

the World Trade Organization on

September 15, 2001



 Over next 5 years, China will remove

barriers to entry

 Improve external economic relations

 Bring in increased competition

 Increase speed of economic reform

Economic Performance

 Large increases in per capita income

 Rise in non-state sector activity

 Growth in exports and domestic demand



GDP (1980-2007)



12000

10000

China

8000 Hong Kong

6000 Taiwan

4000 Japan

South Korea

2000

0

80



84



88



92



96



00



04

19



19



19



19



19



20



20

Foreign Direct Investment

 During 2002, China

was the world’s

leading recipient of

FDI



 China has reduced its

import tariff on

automobiles and auto

parts

Agenda.

 Case Study Introduction.

 Hyundai Motor Company

 South Korea Overview

 Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis

 China Overview

 Chinese Automotive Industry

 Hyundai Financial Analysis

 Case Solution

China’s Automobile Industry

 State of undergrowth

 Due to past regulation of Chinese government



 Currently about 25 factories

 Manufacturers cannot meet quotas



 Steady development and progress over

last couple years

 Yearly increase of 6.63% from 1995

Automotive Industry Outlook

 Very promising future



• Opening up of

Chinese Market



• Implementation of

mass production

techniques



• Increase in

manufacturing

technology

Agenda.

 Case Study Introduction.

 Hyundai Motor Company

 South Korea Overview

 Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis

 China Overview

 Chinese Automotive Industry

 Hyundai Financial Analysis

 Case Solution

Hyundai Financial Analysis.

 After the financial crisis:

 Sales of $20 billion worldwide

 Hyundai has invested $6.25 billion in global

expansion

 From 300% D/E to 50% D/E

 Doubled financial ratios across the board

• Assets, Revenue, Units Sold, & Return on Sales

 Currently trades around 24,000 KRW (4/9/03)

Cost of Capital Inputs.

 Goldman Sachs Integrated Model:

R  rf  SYS   m

 Model Inputs:

 Risk Premium

• Instead of using the US risk premium of 4.89% which

represents the geometric mean of the historical returns

from 1961, we decided to use a risk premium of 9.44%.

Our reasoning for this change primarily deals with our

assumption that the previous risk premium wouldn’t be an

accurate representation of returns in this particular model.

The latter risk premiums are those returns only from 1991,

a reasonable change being that we were valuing an

emerging market company.

Cost of Capital Inputs.

 Sovereign Yield Spread

• To calculate this spread, which is crucial in this

model, we subtracted the 10 year US bond rate of

3.87% from the 10 year Korean bond rate of

8.80%.

 Although we could only find a 3 year Korean bond rate,

we prorated this rate over 10 years.

 Appropriate Discount Rate

• 13.71%

Equity Valuation.

Goldman Sachs Integrated Model Inputs:

Riskfree Rate

4.91% Bloomberg as of March 28, 2003

Beta

Korean MSCI World Beta 0.41 Information taken from J.P. Mei

Source http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~jmei/b40/L9s1.ppt

Risk Premium

1991-2001 9.44% Geometric average from Damadoran

Source http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pc/datasets/histimpl.xls

Market Value of Equity

Market Cap 5,477,000,000,000.00

Shares Outstanding 219,080,000.00

Share Price W25,000

Source Yahoo! Finance as of March 28, 2003

Government Rates

10 Year US Bond Rate 3.87% Bloomberg Website

10 Year Korean Bond Rate 8.80% www.businessweek.com:/2000/00_02/b3663255.htm

Sovereign Yield Spread

4.93% SYS = Local Market Bond Rate - US Bond Rate

Source SYS Formula taken from J.P. Mei lecture March 10, 2003

Discount Rate Formula

r= rf+SYS+β(US Market Premium) 13.71% Goldman Sachs Integrated Formula



Growth Rate: 7.00%



Free Cash Flow to Equity 2002: 420,500,000,000.00 Information taken from Deutsche Bank Valuation of Hyundai Motor



Equity Valuation: FCFt+1/(r-g) 6,705,039,938,006.68

Price Per Share: 30,605.44 Korean Won



Actual Price 3/38/03 25,000 Korean Won



Recommendation: BUY Hyundai is undervalued.

Equity Valuation Summary.

 Conclusion on Hyundai Motor Company:

 Using the Gordian Growth stable growth DCF model

for equity valuation, we found the value of the

company as 6.7 trillion won.

 Hyundai, having 219 million shares outstanding,

translates into a target price of 30,605.44 won.

 Currently, Hyundai Motor Corp (Ticker: 05380.KS),

last traded at 25,000 won on March 28, 2003.

 Recommendation: BUY

 Hyundai is an undervalued company that has great

global potential..

Agenda.

 Case Study Introduction.

 Hyundai Motor Company

 South Korea Overview

 Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis

 China Overview

 Chinese Automotive Industry

 Hyundai Financial Analysis

 Case Solution

Case Study Summary.

 Hyundai agreed to pay $250 million in a

joint venture with Beijing Automotive.

 Starting at 100,000 units in 2003, plans to

expand to 200,000 units by 2005.

 If the production is a success, Hyundai will

invest $1.1 billion to increase productivity to

500,000 by 2010.

the investment in China’s emerging

 Is

market a good move by Hyundai?

Project Summary Inputs.

 Cash Flows Assumptions:

 Invoice prices of the Sonata & Elantra are

global prices

 After finding this revenue stream, we

calculated the cost of each car by using

Hyundai’s historic profit margin per car of

20%.

 50% of revenue would go to Beijing

Automotive

Project Summary Inputs.

 Cost of Capital:

 In our previous valuation of Hyundai, we

calculated the relative cost of capital for all

Hyundai’s future projects of 13.71%.

 Appropriate discount rate since Hyundai will

finance the project with firm assets like equity

and cash.

Project Summary Inputs.

 Production

 Starting at 100,000 units, production will

increase by 50,000 till 2005 ultimately

producing 200,000 units

 From 2005 to 2010, production will increase

60,000 units per year

Hyundai-Beijing Motor

Project Valuation.

DCF Valuation on Hyundai-Bejing Auto Joint Venture in China



Year: 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Units: 100,000 150,000 200,000 260,000 320,000 380,000 440,000 500,000

Elantra: 50,000 75,000 100,000 130,000 160,000 190,000 220,000 250,000

Sonata: 50,000 75,000 100,000 130,000 160,000 190,000 220,000 250,000



Revenue: In Millions

Elantra @ $ 11,274.00 $ 563,700 $ 845,550 $ 1,127,400 $ 1,465,620 $1,803,840 $2,142,060 $2,480,280 $2,818,500

Sonata @ $ 13,822.00 $ 691,100 $ 1,036,650 $ 1,382,200 $ 1,796,860 $2,211,520 $2,626,180 $3,040,840 $3,455,500



Cost:

Elantra @ $ 9,019.20 $ 450,960 $ 676,440 $ 901,920 $ 1,172,496 $1,443,072 $1,713,648 $1,984,224 $2,254,800

Sonata @ $ 11,057.60 $ 552,880 $ 829,320 $ 1,105,760 $ 1,437,488 $1,769,216 $2,100,944 $2,432,672 $2,764,400



Profit:

Elantra: $ 112,740 $ 169,110 $ 225,480 $ 293,124 $ 360,768 $ 428,412 $ 496,056 $ 563,700

Sonata: $ 138,220 $ 207,330 $ 276,440 $ 359,372 $ 442,304 $ 525,236 $ 608,168 $ 691,100

Total: $ 250,960 $ 376,440 $ 501,920 $ 652,496 $ 803,072 $ 953,648 $1,104,224 $1,254,800



Hyundai's Share

50% Share of Profits: $ 125,480 $ 188,220 $ 250,960 $ 326,248 $ 401,536 $ 476,824 $ 552,112 $ 627,400



Cost of

capital: 13.71%



NPV: In Millions

Investments: ($250,000) ($1,100,000)

Cashflows: $ 125,480 $ 188,220 $ 250,960 $ 326,248 $ 401,536 $ 476,824 $ 552,112 $ 627,400

PV of Plant: $ 110,351 $ 145,569 $ 170,690 $ 195,143 $ 211,218 $ 220,580 $ 224,614 $ 224,468



NPV $152,633.45 POSITIVE!!!!

Project Summary.

 After doing a DCF valuation of the Hyundai-

Beijing Motor project, we get a positive NPV of

$152,633,450 for the 8 year project.

 Although this valuation may not be entirely

accurate because factors like inflation, political,

social and economic risk are not wholly

accounted for, we believe that it is a reasonable

and rational valuation and will offer a reference

point for the project.

Project Outlook

 In order to be successful:

 Must form synergies on all levels with China

and Beijing Automotive

 Hyundai must use their experience in

investing in 4 other plants in China

 Take advantage of the first mover opportunity

in China’s deregulated auto market

Relevance

 Great opportunity for Hyundai’s business

development

 Tremendous global growth potential





Bottom line: There is lots of money to be

discovered and made in the emerging

markets of Korea and China!!!

Thank You.



Questions?


Related docs
Other docs by garrickWilliam...
Associate in Arts(10100ELEM)
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
DRAFT SYLLABUS!!!
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 0
pages.stern.nyu.edu~mjohnsondbmsLecture14.ppt
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 0
POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (Diploma)
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 1
Tunis Agenda
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 1
Demande d'admission pour Associés
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!