Embed
Email

Case 2-1 - Solution

Document Sample
Case 2-1 - Solution
Shared by: garrickWilliams
Stats
views:
61
posted:
8/19/2009
language:
English
pages:
10
Case 2-1 - Solution



Estimated time to complete this case is 1 to 1.5 hrs



1. Thousand Trails’ revenues from membership sales increased

by $40 million or almost 100% in the 1981 - 1983 period.

Two issues need to be addressed with respect to these

revenues. First, revenues were recognized in the year of

the sale even though customers who bought them were

granted “lifetime” privileges from the company. Secondly,

(for a portion of the sales) revenue was recognized prior

to cash collection as sales were made on an installment

basis with an average term of 5 years (61 months).

These two issues speak directly to the two major

criteria underlying revenue recognition;



1. Has the company provided all or substantially all the

service to its customers?

2. Was cash collectibility reasonably assured?



With respect to criterion 1, it can be argued that

part of the lure of membership was the accessibility of

both current and future campgrounds promised by Thousand

Trails. Thus Thousand Trails' service was complete only

when future campgrounds materialized. This point is,

however, not relevant. Under the terms of the membership

sales agreement, however, no refunds were available once

memberships were sold, even if future campsites were not

completed. Thus this criterion suggests that revenue

recognition was appropriate.

The second criterion is more problematic. The potential

for a lag between cash collections and revenue

recognition is highlighted by the following

(interrelated) issues:

• What percentage of sales was made for cash?

• For installment sales, what was the creditworthiness

of the customers and what were the terms of payment?

Note that the customer base was individuals rather

than companies.



These questions, in addition to having relevance for

criterion 2, also reopen consideration of criterion 1.

While it is true that the company did not have to refund

any moneys collected if customers canceled, at the same

time, it had no recourse in terms of collecting any



Solutions Chapter 2- P. 1

unpaid balances upon cancellation. Thus, if customers

stopped paying (effectively canceling their memberships),

previously recognized revenues might have to be reversed.

As customers purchased memberships with the expectation

that future campsites would be opened and/or current ones

would be upgraded, if these expectations were not met

they might well stop paying the remaining balances owed

on their memberships. Thus the appropriateness of the

revenue recognition may well hinge on whether the company

has “provided all or substantially all the service to its

customers”



2. For expense recognition, Thousand Trails’ took the

opposite tack. Expense recognition of preserve

improvements was deferred to years after the actual cash

outlay for those improvements.

Note that Thousand Trails’ “percentage of

completion” method of recognizing expenses differs from

the one discussed in the chapter. In the chapter, the

customer for the project had already contracted for it.

For Thousand Trails, the customer had still to be found.

The appropriateness of their expense recognition

method was clearly a function of whether the planned

sales would occur. Note that management forecast that

total memberships (based on existing preserves) would be

three times the current level. Management forecasts used

as accounting inputs must be examined carefully as

misestimation, whether purposeful or not, may have

significant effects on reported earnings and asset

values.

Taken together with Thousand Trails' revenue

recognition methods, the following picture emerges.

Thousand Trails attempted to have the best of both

worlds. It made large outlays for preserve improvements

based on optimistic estimates of future cash flows.

Current cash outflows were capitalized (deferred to

future periods), while all estimated future cash inflows

were recognized as revenue immediately.



3. Thousand Trails took an “aggressive” position in

recognizing revenues (and expenses). Sales were

recognized in full, although only a portion of the cash

was collected. Expenses, on the other hand, were deferred

to periods following the cash outlay. Given the long

collection period, there was a built-in lag between

present cash outflows and future cash inflows. Thus





Solutions Chapter 2- P. 2

reported income was not a good indicator of near-term

cash flows.

Moving beyond the issue of whether this accounting

complied with GAAP, the implications of the gap between

revenue and expense recognition and cash flows should be

clear. Assuming for the moment that the growth rate could

be maintained, the gap would still indicate potential

liquidity and solvency problems.

However, analysis suggests that maintaining

Thousand Trails' past growth rates was unlikely. The only

way to maintain the growth rate was for membership sales

to grow at the same rate as in the past. These sales

would require new campgrounds, which would result in

further cash outlays and deferral of costs. This cycle

assumed, to some extent, the existence of a large

untapped market. Even if this market existed, the cash

flow (liquidity) constraint could eventually overwhelm

the company.

All markets reach saturation eventually. For every

company that maintains a very high growth rate year after

year (Wal-Mart, for example), there are others that fail

to sustain earlier high rates of growth. In most cases,

the current growth rate of sales and income must be

expected to decline in the future.

Given the “lifetime” nature of membership sales,

customers do not return for second purchases, and future

membership sales are purely a function of demographics

and population trends. Note it took at least three years

to reach a membership level of 50,000. How long might it

take to reach its forecast of 100,000 more members on its

current campgrounds? The increase in memberships was

dependent to some extent on new campgrounds being opened,

which, again would require expansion of the market. The

answer to this question exists outside the financial

reports. Demographic and population trends, competition,

and other factors would need to be examined; parameters

which require data from outside of the financial

statements.



4. Once saturation is reached, the company's main source of

income would be annual dues and interest on installment

sales rather than membership sales. Thus, for “long-run”

analytic purposes, we must recognize that these recurring

components of income are more important than income from

membership sales, which had historically been the most

prominent factor.





Solutions Chapter 2- P. 3

This does not mean that historical membership

sales are irrelevant. On the contrary, they are the

primary inputs in estimating the level of future annual

membership dues. This underscores the use of financial

statements in general, and the income statement in

particular, as (part of) a database used to predict the

company's future.



5. Assets represent economic resources that provide future

benefits. Consistent with a long-run “going concern”

perspective of the firm, these future benefits can be



• their earnings generating ability; or

• their cash collectibility.



Fixed assets and inventory, for example, are assets

primarily because they help generate future sales and

earnings. In the Thousand Trails case, operating preserves

represent such assets. Receivables, which arise after the

earnings generating process has been completed, are

forecasts of cash collections. They are an asset to the

extent that they will result in the collection of cash.

The service has already been provided; conversion to cash

is now awaited.

Our previous discussion indicated some question as

to the eventual collectibility of Thousand Trails’

receivables due to both the creditworthiness of the

customers and the limits to growth.

Furthermore the cash outflows for operating

preserves and improvements therein are assets if they are

expected to provide future services. Our analysis

questions this assumption. For the operating preserves to

be an asset, nearly three times the current membership

levels would have to be reached. If anticipated future

sales do not materialize and a ready market1 for the

assets does not exist, then the carrying value of the

assets should be viewed as nothing more than unexpired

costs; “expenses waiting to happen.” When there is no

expectation of future revenues, there is nothing to



1

For the operating preserves, although the land may have had some market

value (for alternative uses), most of the carrying cost was for

improvements. These have value only if used as campgrounds, which, we

have already pointed out, depended on the achievement of optimistic

assumptions.









Solutions Chapter 2- P. 4

“match” those expenses against, and the carrying amount of

the assets will be overstated.

To a great extent therefore, these assets

(receivables and operating preserves) exist only as a

function of Thousand Trails' revenue and expense

recognition methods.

The seriousness of this issue can be brought home

if we take a peek at Exhibit 3C-2 (text p.121). Thousand

Trails' December 31, 1983, balance sheet shows that

approximately 85% of Thousand Trails' assets of $151.8

million consisted of receivables (56%) and operating

preserves (29%):





% of Total Assets

Receivables (net of allowance)

Current $20.8 million 13.7%

Noncurrent 64.1 42.2%

Total $84.9 million 55.9%



Operating preserves $43.8 million 28.8%



Take these “assets” away and there are few assets left.









Solutions Chapter 2- P. 5

PROBLEMS - Ch. 2

6.{S}A. (i) and (ii)



19X6: Revenue = 20% x $6 million = $1.2 million



Costs incurred = 20% x $4.5 million = $.9 million.



(Income recognized is $.3 million difference.)





19X7: Revenue = 60% x $6 million = $3.6 - $1.2 = $2.4

million



Costs incurred (cumulative) = 60% x $4.8 million =

$2.88 million. As 19X6 recognition was $.9 million,

19X7 recognition must be $ 1.98 million ($2.88 -

$0.9).



(Income recognized is $.42 million difference,

making cumulative recognition $.72 million for two

years.)



B. There should be no effect; expenditures that do not

contribute to the completion of the project do not affect

revenue or income under the percentage of completion

method.









Solutions Chapter 2- P. 6

11.{M} This problem provides a good opportunity to discuss the

subtleties and implications of revenue and expense

recognition criteria.2



A. Revenue recognition is predicated on the following two

criteria:

(1) Collectibility of cash

(2) Provision of service.



Criterion (1) is satisfied as the license fee is paid in

advance.



The focus of the question becomes criterion (2) -

provision of service. Some students will argue that the

service is only provided when the games are actually

played. This argument holds only for the revenues from

the season tickets themselves not the license fee - as

the former is refundable if games aren't played

(player's strike) or if the team "folds". The license

fee is presumably nonrefundable no matter what happens.

Thus, it is reasonable to recognize the full amount of

the license fee as revenue immediately.



[The discussion can be enhanced by considering what

would happen if the Raptors did not sell the ticket and

license fee separately but rather sold lifetime season

tickets --- i.e. one payment up front entitled the buyer

to attend all games forever without additional payment.

The first issue that would have to be addressed is

similar to the above; i.e. what is refundable if games

are canceled? If it was assumed that nothing is

refundable then would one recognize the full amount as

revenue immediately even though no games were played?

This would lead to the team recognizing revenues without

as yet incurring expenditures in performing the service.

If one argued that the revenues should be recognized

pro-rata -- over how many years should the revenues be

recognized? Remember the tickets are sold as a

"lifetime" right. Finally, if one made the pro-rata

argument for this latter case, one would have to argue

as to why it is different than the license portion in

the case where there is a separate license and season

ticket fee.]

2

Conceptually, the issues in this problem are similar to those in the Thousand

Trails case. The license fee is similar to the initial membership sales and the

season tickets are similar to the annual membership dues.



Solutions Chapter 2- P. 7

B. A corporation that purchased the license fee would have

a “lifetime” asset. For accounting purposes, therefore,

it should probably not recognize any expense for the

license fee. Practically speaking, however, one would

expect the firm to amortize the fee over some arbitrary

number of years (probably 40).



C. In analyzing expected earnings, license fees for a given

seat sold are a one-time event. Although licenses for

other seats may be sold in future years, as capacity is

fixed, in the long run revenues from license fees are

nonrecurring. The long-run earnings potential depends on

season ticket sales.

The license fees, however, provide a valuable input

in forecasting future season ticket sales. It is

reasonable to assume that (relative to a season ticket

holder without a license) there is a greater probability

that a licensee will either buy season-tickets

themselves or (if they are not interested) they will

try to find someone to sell their license to who would

be willing to buy season tickets.

Thus, the number of licensees acts as a base or

threshold level for anticipated season tickets sold each

year. The more licenses sold the higher the expected

recurring revenues from season ticket sales.









Solutions Chapter 2- P. 8

14.{M}A.& B. ATT’s adjusted income before nonrecurring charges is computed by adding

back the non-recurring charges to reported income.

All Data in Billions of $

1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

Revenues 63.2 62.0 60.7 62.1 61.6 63.2 64.5 66.6 69.4 75.1 79.6



Income

Reported 3.6 1.0 4.1 -2.5 4.8 5.4 1.4 6.5 6.5 7.9 1.2

Restructuring 0.0 3.2 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 7.8

Adjusted 3.6 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.8 5.4 5.9 6.5 7.0 7.9 9.0

Comparing the adjusted and reported amounts, we find that the adjusted amounts follow a smooth

pattern mirroring that of the revenue stream. The reported amounts however are erratic and

although, overall, the trend is upwards, the path is volatile and follows no discernible pattern.



10 80



8 70



60

6









Revenues

50 Reported

Income









4

40 Adjusted

2 Revenues

30

0

20

1985





1986





1987





1988





1989





1990





1991





1992





1993





1994





1995

-2 10



-4 0





C. At first glance it would seem that if the objective is to forecast future reported recurring

operating data then the adjusted data are more relevant. They follow a smooth trend consistent

with that of revenues, are recurring in nature and are not subject to random fluctuation.

However, the repetitive nature of AT&T’s “non-recurring” restructuring charges indicates that

the firm is engaging in smoothing/big bath behavior. The firm is storing costs and periodically

charging them out in order to make “recurring” operating income look better. Thus, to analyze

AT&T’s actual economic performance or future earnings power the non-recurring items must

be considered and the reported operating income used. Over the 11 year period, nonrecurring

items totaled $22.7 billion. Charging an average of approximately $2 billion to each year

results in the “smoothed” line on the graph (below). It still follows the pattern implied by

revenues, albeit at a much lower level.



10 80



8 70



60

6

Reported

Revenues









50

Income









4 Adjusted

40

Smoothed

2

30 Revenues

0

20

1985





1986



1987





1988



1989





1990





1991





1992



1993





1994



1995









-2 10



-4 0







Solutions Chapter 2- P. 9

D. AT&T adopted SFAS 121 in 1995 and took a $7.8 billion pretax restructuring charge that

year. Included in that restructuring charge is a charge for asset impairments as provided by

SFAS 121. That charge did affect ATT’s reported results. However, the adoption of SFAS

121 did not affect the results as AT&T claims that it would have made the identical charge

whether or not SFAS 121 was in effect. (Given the empirical findings discussed in pp. 403-

406 of the text, that statement is debatable.]









Solutions Chapter 2- P. 10


Related docs
Other docs by garrickWilliam...
Associate in Arts(10100ELEM)
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
DRAFT SYLLABUS!!!
Views: 30  |  Downloads: 0
pages.stern.nyu.edu~mjohnsondbmsLecture14.ppt
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 0
POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (Diploma)
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 1
Tunis Agenda
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 1
Demande d'admission pour Associés
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!