Embed
Email

Calvetti_no_photos

Document Sample

Shared by: gegeshandong
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
10/27/2011
language:
English
pages:
87
MORIOND 2005



AGENDA:



1) Neutrinos



2) Dark matter, Axions, LFV search.



3) Kaons and B-mesons

What to answer if you are ask:

4) LEP,Hera and the Tevatron …….what’s new in Moriond?



5) Hints of new physics?







M.Calvetti

INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati

and Università di Firenze

7





Super-Kamiokande atmospheric ’s



For 13~0 and m2~0, a very simple formula fits all SK data (+ MACRO & Soudan2)









1st oscillation dip still visible Strong constraints on the

despite large L & E smearing parameters (m2, 23)









E.Lisi

L.Sulak Super-Kamiokande atmospheric ’s

K.Miknaitis

SNO’s Three Reactions



•Detect the e-

Charged Current:

•  e energy spectrum

(CC)  e  d  p  p  e -

• Weak directional

sensitivity





Neutral Current: •Detect the n through

secondary capture

(NC)  x  d   x  p  n • No directional or

neutrino energy info





•Detect the e-

Elastic Scattering:

•Mainly sensitive to e

(ES)  x  e-  x  e- •Highly directional

K.Miknaitis

Energy Isotropy









20









Direction Radius

K.Miknaitis

391- day salt results!

CC  1.68  0.06

0.06 (stat.) 0..09 (syst.)



0 08



CC

 NC  4.94  0.21

(stat.)  0.38

(syst.)  0.340  0.023(stat.) 0..031



0 029

0.21 0.34

NC

ES  2.35  0.22

0.22 (stat.) 0..15 (syst.)



0 15





(In units of

10 6 cm 2s 1 )

SOLAR SNO

K.Miknaitis









 Ratio of the measured CC,ES,NC reaction rates to the

SSM prediction, assuming undistorted CC, ES energy spectra.

14





Exercise: (1) Change MSW potential “by hand,” V aMSWV

(2) Reanalyze all data with (m2,12,aMSW) free

(3) Project (m2,12) away and check if aMSW~1









(… a way of “measuring”

GF through solar

neutrino oscillations …)









Results: with 2004 data, aMSW~1 confirmed within factor of ~2

and aMSW~0 excluded  Evidence for MSW effects in the Sun



But: expected subleading effect in the Earth (day-night

difference) still below experimental uncertainties.





E.Lisi

What about the neutrino masses? We have only limits…..

 2( N  D) 

Day-Night Asymmetries (II)  A 

K.Miknaitis  ND 









Constraining ANC to be zero:



ACC= -0.037 ± 0.063(stat.) ±0.032(syst.)

AES= 0.153 ± 0.198(stat.) ±0.030(syst.)









Combine with analogous ACC from

In the pure-D2O the salt phase:

phase,

0.013 A salt  D O  0.037  0.040

Ae  0.070  0.049 0.012

2









Convert Super-Kamiokande AES to

(shape constrained, Ae, and combine with SNO:

ANC constrained) A SNO  SK  0.035  0.027

…..but …do neutrinos oscillate also on earth?

First Reactor Antineutrino Result

• Observed neutrino disappearance:

(Nobs–NBG)/Nno-osc = 0.611  0.085 (stat)  0.041 (syst)

• “Standard” e propagation ruled out at the 99.95% confidence level





Rate!

Energy









Bruce Berger Rencontres de Moriond – March 6, 2005 11

Direct observation of the oscillation



Goodness of fit:

0.7% - decay

1.8% - decoherence

11.1% - oscillation

(0.4% - constant suppression)

• Data prefer oscillation to other

hypotheses









L0/E Plot



Data vs.

No-oscillation

expectation

Bruce Berger Rencontres de Moriond – March 6, 2005 12

K2K experiment

~1 event/2days

~1011 m/2.2sec ~106 m/2.2sec

12GeV protons (/10m10m) m (/40m40m)



p+ m SK 

Target+Horn

200m 100m ~250km

decay pipe

p monitor

Near  detectors

m monitor (ND)

(monitor the beam center)





Signal of  oscillation at K2K

 Reduction of m events

 Distortion of m energy spectrum



C.Mariani@XLth Rencontres de Moriond (6th March 2005)

C.Mariani

1KT Flux measurement



 The same detector technology as Super-K.

 Sensitive to low energy neutrinos.





N exp

N obs



 SK ( E ) ( E )dE



M SK  SK



 KT ( E ) ( E ) dE

M KT  KT

SK KT





Far/Near Ratio (by MC)~1×10-6

M: Fiducial mass MSK=22,500Kton, MKT=25ton

: efficiency SK-I(II)=77.0(78.2)%, KT=74.5%



obs

N

exp

SK =150.9 +12

-10 N SK =107

C.Mariani@XLth Rencontres de Moriond (6th March 2005) C.Mariani

Data are consistent with the oscillation.

 With 8.9×1019 POT, K2K has confirmed neutrino oscillations at 4.0

(hep-ex/0411038).

 Disappearance of m 3.0

 Distortion of E spectrum 2.6





preliminary

m2[eV2]









Best Fit

KS prob.=36%









sin22

Erec[GeV]

C.Mariani@XLth Rencontres de Moriond (6th March 2005) C.Mariani

Introducing MiniBooNE:

The Booster Neutrino Experiment

LMC





m+

?

K+

8GeV p+ m

νμ→νe

Booster

magnetic horn decay pipe 450 m dirt detector

and target 25 or 50 m









•The goal: to check the LSND result.



Gordon McGregor

Conclusions

• MiniBooNE is running well.

• Currently 4.57×1020 protons on target.

• νμ  νe appearance results by hopefully late 2005.









Gordon McGregor

Neutrino masses in 3-neutrino schemes

From present evidences of atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillations



eV eV

m 2

atm  0.05 eV

msun  0.009 eV

2







solar m0

atm

atm



solar









3 degenerate massive neutrinos

Σmν = 3m0



S.Pastor

Conclusions





Cosmological observables efficiently constrain

some properties of (relic) neutrinos







ν Bounds on the sum of neutrino masses from CMB

+ 2dFGRS or SDSS, and other cosmological data

(best Σmνreduction of ~ 2 (4) with respect to MiDBD-II (I)







arXiv:hep-ex/0501034 v1





DBD0 result:

T1/2130Te > 1.8 x 1024 y

=0.02÷0.1 eV 5 years =0.01÷0.06 eV





…very interesting……





S.Capelli

LFV in the Standard Model

Neutrino oscillations  flavour mixing in lepton sector

•Extensions of SM with massive Dirac neutrinos allow LFV also

with charged leptons (me , e , meee , me)









larger mass scale

needed  SUSY

2

( m  e )    2  m 2 

   sin 2   2   10 55

M  not observable!

( m  e )  2p   W 

D.Nicolò

Conclusions

• m are sensitive probes of physics beyond the Standard Model



• SUSY-SUGRA theories predicts LFV not far from present existing upper limits



• Strong case for experimental searches in all channels



• m+e+ results are expected in 2007 (10-13)



• m-e- conversion search is planned at the level of 10-16



• m-e- conversion is not accidental background limited could benefit of new

high intensity pulsed beams









…….to work hard….. D.Nicolò

Proton life time ….a lower limit…









PROTONS (do not) DECAY……..

L.Sulak

P life-time



IMB limits 45 decay modes

...S-K 7 times bigger than IMB,

limits generally 7 times better

...mass is everything!!!





MEGATON is needed,

20 times bigger than S-K









L.Sulak

CAST: Principle of detection



Axion X-ray (same energy and momentum) X-ray

detector



L

[Sikivie PRL 51 (1983)]





• Expected number of photons in the x-ray

detector:

dΦ a Differential axion flux at the Earth

dΦ a

Nγ   Pa  γ S t dE a dE a (cm-2 s -1 keV -1 )

dE a Conversion probability of

Pa  γ

For gaγγ =1×1O-10 GeV-1 an axion into photon ( (B×L)2)

t=100 h , S=15 cm2 S Magnet bore area (cm2)

N γ ≈ 30 events t Measurement time (s)

CAST 2003 result

Axion exclusion plot









• Combined upper limit

obtained (95% C.L.):

gaγγ 10 !

March. 7, 2005 Moriond Electroweak, 2005, W. de Boer, Univ. Karlsruhe 40

March. 7, 2005 Moriond Electroweak, 2005, W. de Boer, Univ. Karlsruhe 41

Instead of conclusions

sneutrino-driven me probably

chaotic inflation nonthermal leptogenesis observable in the next

in inflaton decay round of exps.

(Chankowski et al.,2004)





masses of 2 singlet enhancement of 1 from me unobservable

neutrinos small mass splittings of

degenerate at the singlet neutrinos partly

GUT scale compensated due to

(kt,2004) consistency conditions,

but leptogenesis OK



large neutrino successful leptogenesis

Yukawa couplings from small M1 due to

cancelling out in the overcoming DI bound r=1 for m0=100 GeV, M1/2=200 GeV

seesaw formula

(Raidal et al.,2005)

K.Turzynski

…interesting….but……









……new results coming……..









March. 7, 2005 Moriond Electroweak, 2005, W. de Boer, Univ. Karlsruhe 43

U.Gastaldi

PVLAS

Laser light

….big discovery!!!...

….but…do we belive to it….

U.Gastaldi

Observed dichroism of Vacuum

with infrared Laser light 1eV



…..Spin 0 boson……



-+

0

-3

m=10 eV

5

M=5 10 GeV



Axion????

Dark matter???

….to be confirmed……..

….to be young … 20 GeV,

 

ET >25 GeV, (ET , l or j) , veto on jets,

light (
D: Obs: 9 evts; Bkgnd:11.1  3.2

Signal: 0.27  0.004 (mH=160 GeV)





*BR(H→WW)< 5.6pb

For MH=160 GeV

CDF: Obs: 8 evts;

Bkgnd: 8.9  1

Signal: 0.17  0.02

(mH=180 GeV)

Maximum likelihood

limit on the ll

distributions for

x 20? mH=140-180 GeV





Gregorio Bernardi / LPNHE-Paris

AND B-PHYSICS…….









……the hunt to the new physics continue……..







Hints of new physics?

H.Kakuno

VII: Summary and Future CLEO

(1) New results on BF D+  m and fD

BD   m  )  3.5  1.4  0.6)104

f D  202  41  17) MeV











(2) Exclusive BF of semileptonic decays coming (pretty) soon.

• With just 60 pb-1, stastistical power of many decay modes already

at the world best.

• The world first events of D 0    e  and D    e 

• We have two analysis options available: With and wo DTag

3) Inclusive BF of D Xe and D Xl, l coming.

(4) Currently we are running at (3770) with 12 “8-pole” wigglers.

More data is coming on (3770), Ds threshold, etc.

fDs



D.Kim

Polarization in B  V V decay

Angles in transversity basis









Differential cross section looks so complicated,

but not, actually.



Physics implication and recent experimental results

are reviewed here.



K.Snyo

B  V V tree decay









Diagrams and tables are from presentation of P.J. Clark@FPCP2004







Yes, it is true for trees.

fL~1



K.Snyo

Polarization puzzle in pure penguin

decays: B   K*±/0 and B   K*0





Today





275



275







275



Rescattering?

An enhanced New Standard Model Amplitude?

Diagrams and tables are from presentation of P.J. Clark@FPCP2004



But, this is not true in B   K* and K*0!!

New Physics?

K.Snyo

fL deviates from 1 in both Belle and BaBar.

Conclusions:



A lot of work still to be done………





Best wishes to you all !!





And…..arrivederci!



Other docs by gegeshandong
Mar - Mr Hanson
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
WhatDoYouMeanHighest.Price
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
core data
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
jan-18-2009b
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Status - California State University
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
PHASE ONE
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!