Embed
Email

INTERNET TRAFFIC USING RMON

Document Sample

Shared by: xiaohuicaicai
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
10/27/2011
language:
English
pages:
7
internet traffic using RMON page 1





INTERNET TRAFFIC USING RMON







TABLE OF CONTENTS





topic Page.no



What is RMON ? 2



Goal of RMON 3



Internet traffic 3



Illustration for internet traffic 4



Monitoring difficulties 4



Internet monitoring using RMON 5



synopsis 7







Courtesy: http://www.csu.edu.au/special/auugwww96/proceedings/wang/wang.html

http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~jain/cis788-97/ftp/net_monitoring/index.htm









Prepared by: T.ANTANY , II M.C.A









Prepared by : T. ANTANY , II M.C.A

Prepared on : 14th August 2006

internet traffic using RMON page 2









What is RMON ?

Remote network monitoring (RMON) is the standard of how to monitor internet

traffic. This is a standard that is supposedly implemented by internet device vendors so

that a network using RMON-compliant devices can be monitored using RMON-

compliant software. For RMON to work, network devices, such as hubs and switches,

must be designed to support it.



RMON (Remote Network Monitoring) provides standard information that a

network administrator can use to monitor, analyze, and troubleshoot a group of

distributed local area networks (LANs) and interconnecting T-1/E-1 and T-2/E-3 lines

from a central site. RMON specifically defines the information that any network

monitoring system will be able to provide. It's specified as part of the Management

Information Base (MIB) in Request for Comments 1757 as an extension of the Simple

Network Management Protocol (SNMP). The latest level is RMON Version 2

(sometimes referred to as "RMON 2" or "RMON2").



RMON can be supported by hardware monitoring devices (known as "probes") or

through software or some combination. For example, Cisco's line of LAN switches

includes software in each switch that can trap information as traffic flows through and

record it in its MIB. A software agent can gather the information for presentation to the

network administrator with a graphical user interface. A number of vendors provide

products with various kinds of RMON support.



RMON collects nine kinds of information, including packets sent, bytes sent,

packets dropped, statistics by host, by conversations between two sets of addresses, and

certain kinds of events that have occurred. A network administrator can find out how

much bandwidth or traffic each user is imposing on the network and what Web sites are

being accessed. Alarms can be set in order to be aware of impending problems.



RMON is originally standardized by RFC 1271 in November 1991, but it is

updated by RFC 1757 in February 1995. RFC 1757 has become the standard which talks

about the implementation of RMON.









Prepared by : T. ANTANY , II M.C.A

Prepared on : 14th August 2006

internet traffic using RMON page 3









Goal of RMON

The overall goal for RMON is to allow RMON-compliant network monitoring

devices to be constructed. These devices are usually, referred to as monitors or probes,

which measure specific aspects of the network without interfering normal operations.

These devices are usually stand-alone devices and located in remote part of the network

or even across network boundaries. The RMON standard allows these devices to

communicate over the network they are monitoring. Usually, RMON is defined so that it

can be implemented in a generic network. But some specification is created for

monitoring Ethernet networks, since it is one of the most popular network used in the

internet.









What is internet traffic ?

Web traffic is the amount of data sent and received by visitors to a web site. This is

determined by the number of visitors and the number of pages they visit. Sites monitor

the incoming and outgoing traffic to see which parts or pages of their site are popular and

if there are any apparent trends, such as one specific page being viewed mostly by people

in a particular country.



The commercialization of the Internet has not only resulted in an increase of the

number of users. Probably the most important problem that arises is the accounting of the

transferred data. Traditionally, the Internet was a network between research and

educational institutions. The connected institutions usually payed a fixed fee for their

connection. Nowadays, Internet providers would like to charge their clients depending on

the volume of data they transfer. To do this, they need powerful tools that are able to

count the transferred amount of data. The higher the line speeds are, the more difficult

this is.



It is still a very common practice for providers to charge fixed monthly fees for

Internet access. Very often the only reason for this is that they have no means to do an

exact accounting for all clients.









Prepared by : T. ANTANY , II M.C.A

Prepared on : 14th August 2006

internet traffic using RMON page 4









Graphics to illustrate the internet traffic around the globe









Monitoring Internet

Internet is a network of many networks. Each individual network is owned and

operated by different organizations. Monitoring the internet is different from monitoring

a single network because in a single network, all components are usually under the

control of a single network management, but in the case of internet, each individual

network has different base layer platform and is managed by different network

management.



Monitoring difficulties

The internet is getting more and more difficult to monitor because more and more

users are added to it everyday, and there is a lack of measurements of the quality for the

internet as a whole. There is no standardized metric being used in measuring the internet.

But usually host response time, time delay, and loss rate are being measured by

individual network. The users of the internet has to measure aspects of the internet which

tell them the performance of their network applications.



There is no standardized monitoring tool for monitoring the internet. Different

people use different tools in monitoring the internet. The most common internet

monitoring tools are public domain softwares because they are available for the internet

at extremely low cost and also these public domain softwares can be easily customized.



Prepared by : T. ANTANY , II M.C.A

Prepared on : 14th August 2006

internet traffic using RMON page 5



Several common public domain softwares used in network monitoring are ping, ftp, and

traceroute. Ping sends a packet of user data to a specific node and the packet is echoed

back. This allows the measurement of response time and the percentage of packet loss.

Ftp transfers a file from one host to another. This allows the measurement of the data

transfer rate. Traceroute sends packets of ICMP,Internet Control Message Protocol,

messages to the host. This allows the measurement of number of hops to another host and

the performance of the route. There are many other public domain softwares for internet

monitoring. For example, arpwatch, nslookup and so on .



Right now, there is no standardized effort in monitoring the internet as a whole and

none is being researched and developed. The only way to monitoring the internet now is

to use existing public softwares and extend their functionalities. There are couple

problems with this approach. First, these public softwares are not intended for

monitoring. Their usage eats up network capacity; thus allowing only a small amount of

monitoring activities. Second, monitoring the internet is difficult and not many people are

doing it. As a result, problems are not often reported and consequently solved

infrequently. As a result, the internet performance is degrading. This phenomenon created

by the lack of monitoring is referred to "gridlock".









Internet traffic using RMON

. Traditional solutions for volume based traffic charging include:



1. Reading the SNMP Octet Counters from the Routers



Most if not all modern networking equipment offers the possibility to gather

statistics about the amount of data that was transferred via its interfaces. For this

purposes, usually counters for bytes and/or packets that are transferred over each

interface are provided. These counters can be queried using the SNMP procotol.



The disadvantage of this is that only the total amount of traffic transferred can be

accounted. It is not possible to apply different prices depending on the kind of traffic.

Additionally, since the SNMP counters are only maintained once for each hardware

port, a separate port is necessary for each client that is to be accounted. These

additional expenses for hardware make this solution very unattractive.





2. Using RMON / RMON2 probes



The RMON standard, which is described in RFC1757 [40], was designed to

provide proactive monitoring and diagnostics for distributed LAN-based networks.

Special monitoring devices, called agents or probes, allow the monitoring of critical

network segments and to set off user-defined alarms. RMON has been implemented in



Prepared by : T. ANTANY , II M.C.A

Prepared on : 14th August 2006

internet traffic using RMON page 6









special stand-alone hardware, embedded in switches and as a program running on a PC or

workstation. Communication with the probes is implemented using the SNMP protocol.

In theory, the RMON standard would be suitable for higher line speeds. It has however

shown that it is difficult to adapt RMON to protocols like 100VG-AnyLan or ATM. No

RMON implementations for those protocols are available at this time. For ATM, a first

attempt was AMON (ATM Circuit Steering MIB), which defines a way to copy traffic

from a virtual circuit (VC) to a location where an external probe can decode it. AMON -

which was proposed by Fore - has been discussed in the ATM Forum since summer

1995. However, progress has been so slow that the forum threatened to suspend the

AMON MIB group's work. In march 1996 Cisco -- although one of the founder members

of the ATM Forum -- has surprised the networking community by submitting a draft for

an ``ATM RMON MIB'' to the IETF rather than to the ATM Forum. Cisco has developed

the ATM RMON MIB without discussing it with other manufacturers of ATM hardware.

This unusual way of presenting their proposal has been the reason for controversial

discussions. It is therefore not very likely that their proposal will become a standard in

the near future. special stand-alone hardware, embedded in switches and as a program

running on a PC or workstation.









3. Using a PC or Workstation running tcpdump



The tcpdump tool mentioned above can be used to monitor all traffic that passes

through a network adapter in a PC or workstation. Using it permits as well to count the

data that is received by this network adapter. However as mentioned above the interrupt

load using tcpdump is a problem when the data is being received at higher line speeds.

When the load is getting too high, the probability for packet losses is growing. This

technique is used at a local Internet provider in Stuttgart, and it was found that even on

transfer rates of about 10 Mbit/s (standard ethernet) there is already a probability for

packet loss in the range of 1%. Obviously this solution is only practicable for lower line

speeds. It nevertheless offers maximum flexibility since a user-written program can be

used to analyze a trace of all the headers from the packets the machine receives.









Prepared by : T. ANTANY , II M.C.A

Prepared on : 14th August 2006

internet traffic using RMON page 7









Synopsis :

RMON – Remote Monitoring for Networks.



INTERNET - Network of networks.



RMON is the standard of how to monitor internet traffic.



Internet traffic is the amount of data sent and received by visitors to a web

site. This is determined by the number of visitors and the number of pages

they visit.



RMON has been implemented in special stand-alone hardware, embedded in

switches and as a program running on a PC or workstation.









Prepared by : T. ANTANY , II M.C.A

Prepared on : 14th August 2006


Shared by: xiaohuicaicai
Other docs by xiaohuicaicai
LOGFRAMES_ MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
JELSApndx3SophLanguage
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
1997TrumpetCompetitionNYTimes
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Eng_wk52_31
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME FOR
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Marketing - Ulster Business School
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
speech-swallowing
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
May_FY11_Awards_Report_Web
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Related docs
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!