Embed
Email

OhioBallot

Document Sample
OhioBallot
Shared by: Stuart Whatley
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
3630
posted:
10/27/2011
language:
English
pages:
3
Memorandum



From: Brian Rothenberg, Executive Director, ProgressOhio



To: Friends and Supporters



Date: 10/25/11



RE: Upcoming Ohio Ballot Measures



Confidential—



DO NOT FORWARD









Thank you for all your hard work the past few months. Thousands of volunteers,

Democrats and Republicans, union and non-union workers, have been working all

across the state, showing up to knock on doors, leafleting at local festivals and talking to

Ohioans – one voter at a time – and telling them to vote “No on 2,” the unfair and unsafe

law that hurts Ohio’s middle class families.



While we have reason to feel good about where things currently stand considering

how far we’ve come, none of us should get a false sense of security from recent

public polling, as they are incredibly lofty and unlikely to resemble the final

margin. Make no mistake, this race will tighten between now and Election Day.



Just as they ran a dishonest ad infamously twisting the words of a great grandmother

whose son and great-granddaughter were saved by firefighters from a burning home,

Governor John Kasich and his Right Wing allies will spend and do whatever it takes to

manipulate Ohio voters in order to protect an extreme anti-middle class, pro-corporate

agenda.



Just recently in Wisconsin many pundits including groups from our own side predicted

Democrats had it in the bag, but the Koch Brothers and other shady Right Wing groups

spent tens of millions of dollars in the final weeks and Democrats came up just short on

Election Day from taking back the state senate.



I’ve heard from too many of our supporters, long-time activists, and others close to the

campaign who believe and are acting as if we have already won. That is an extremely

dangerous mentality for our side to have going into Election Day.



We can't afford to have our supporters sit home because they don't think their vote is

needed. We also can't afford to have our volunteers have the mistaken impression that

1

their tireless efforts are not absolutely critical. We must implore our supporters to keep

working and finish the job we set out to do.



The following is our most candid assessment of where the “Issue 2” measure currently

stands and why we must redouble our efforts between now and November 8th. None of

us can afford to wake up on November 9th with any regrets.





Public Polling is Unreliable



Polling on complicated issues like this is unreliable. Those predicting a blowout

for our side are basing their analysis on flawed public polling samples.



Modeling turnout for an off year ballot initiative is notoriously difficult. This is especially

true in a state like Ohio where polling on ballot initiatives has been very unreliable.



Public polling on a 2004 same-sex marriage ban showed proponents with a single-digit

lead, but the amendment passed by a whopping 24 point margin.



2005 "Reform Ohio Now" amendments to reform Ohio's elections and redistricting

process were widely thought to be headed toward passage, but they were defeated by a

2-to-1 margin on Election Day.



In 2009, a measure to build casinos in four Ohio cities was expected to pass in a

blowout but passed with only 53 percent of the vote.



Bottomline: It’s nearly impossible to develop a reliable likely voter model for ballot

initiatives and public polling only relies on registered voters instead of likely voters.



The recent public polling on Issue 2 from Public Policy Polling (October 19th) and

Quinnipiac University (October 25th) showed Issue 2 headed for defeat by a lopsided 56-

36 margin and a 57- 32 margin respectively.



The PPP poll asks respondents how they will vote on Senate Bill 5 (SB 5), while the

Quinnipiac Poll asks, “Do you think this new law which limits collective bargaining for

public employees should be kept or repealed?”



Keep in mind, neither of these polls tested the actual ballot language.



Our side did a wonderful job of driving up negatives on “SB 5 before” we were certified

as “Issue 2.” However a massive amount of voter confusion remains on what a “yes” or

“no” vote on “Issue 2” means. It’s a safe bet, if the actual “Issue 2” language were polled

that the margin would have been substantially narrower.



The lesson here is that while we would be ecstatic with a 20 or 25 point victory on

November 8th there are simply too many unknowns to believe these numbers are

credible or even remotely possible.



Right Wing Dirty Tricks







2

In their quest for victory over working families in Ohio, our opposition has pulled out all

the stops to confuse voters and muddy the electoral waters for opponents of “Issue 2.”

The following is just a sampling of Right Wing dirty tricks our opponents have used:



“Issue “3 - Corporate backed Right Wing front groups like Freedom

Works have funded and coordinated the placement of “Issue 3” (anti-

Affordable Health Care Act) on the ballot for the sole purpose of driving

their base to the polls to vote “yes” on “Issue 2.” Yard signs and

campaign literature for our opponents say "Yes On 2 & 3" and equate

“Issue 2” with what they call "Obamacare" in an attempt to peel off our

moderate supporters.



Misleading and Phony Ads – “Building a Better Ohio,” a right wing

extremist group has gone to extreme lengths to increase voter confusion

on “Issue 2.” They even deceptively edited a “We are Ohio” ad to imply an

“Issue 2” opponent was a supporter. Our opponents know that our

message of community safety is resonating, so they are co-opting it to

make it seem as though a YES vote will provide adequate staffing for

police and fire departments. There is anecdotal evidence that their tactic

is working.



Deceptive Mailers – In a further attempt to confuse the electorate, the

Alliance for American’s Future, a Virginia based independent expenditure

group run by Liz Cheney, has flooded Ohio mail boxes with deceptive

mailers tying “Issue 2” and President Obama. Ohioans' mailboxes have

been flooded with literature that implies that a YES vote on “Issue 2” will

support our teachers and other public employees. These mailers have

caused confusion even among our core supporters.





Unfortunately, the millions of dollars that “Building a Better Ohio” and their out of

state cooperate allies have spend misleading voters has worked.



Voters remain in need of clarification on the meaning of their vote.



With Kasich’s allies continuing to saturate the airwaves with dishonest ads, and with our

opponents' voter suppression operation in full swing, we need to fight harder than ever in

the homestretch in what we expect to be a very close election on November 8th.









3


Other docs by Stuart Whatley
GreenCountyGOP
Views: 178384  |  Downloads: 1703
20120413_FinancialCrisisResponse_FINAL_FORWEB
Views: 36430  |  Downloads: 970
20120413_FinancialCrisisResponse_FINAL
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 1
Supreme Court Health Care Law
Views: 85304  |  Downloads: 647
Torture, Transfers and Denial Of Due Process
Views: 36926  |  Downloads: 57
Letter To Obama
Views: 153453  |  Downloads: 872
budget
Views: 106616  |  Downloads: 1783
0126brewer-letter
Views: 653145  |  Downloads: 1765
Obama Mortgage Unit
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
Obama recess appointments DOJ decision
Views: 167120  |  Downloads: 457
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!