VIEWS: 14 PAGES: 2 POSTED ON: 10/26/2011
URL: Rubric for Evaluating Web Sites Score Ideas & Content Organization Language/Convention Presentation Technical 1. Audience and Purpose are clearly 1. Inviting opening page 1. Organizational structure is 1. Web site is clearly 1. Links work properly stated draws the visitor inside clear and coherent identified; it's easy to find 2. Graphics are optimized 2. Information is accurate and current 2. Details are logical and 2. Grammar and usage are 2. The layout is clear and 3. Works well in all 3. Ideas come mainly from primary effective correct easy to follow browsers sources 3. Layout of pages provides 3. Punctuation is accurate 3. Backgrounds and text 4. Works in text-only mode Give 4. Authors show knowledge and good direction 4. Spelling is generally work well together 5. Multimedia resources (if this a insight 4. How to explore and idea correct 4. Graphical elements are any) work properly 5 or 4 5. Effective use of technology is clear 5. Site needs little or no used consistently if… demonstrated 5. Each page begins with a editing 5. Multimedia (if any) adds 6. Accuracy can be checked (sources good transition to the main purpose are cited) 6. Easy to navigate through 6. Links are appropriate 7. All information relates to the overall the pages purpose and audience 1. Audience and Purpose not clearly 1. Inconsistent structure of 1. Long or incomplete 1. Web site is easy to find 1. Not all links work identified pages paragraphs 2. The layout of most page is properly 2. Information not always clear 2. Sequencing is 2. Minor problems with easy to follow 2. Graphics are generally 3. Primary source use not always clear inconsistent grammar or usage 3. Backgrounds and text optimized Give 4. Content connections not always 3. Some pages incomplete 3. Internal punctuation were not always effective 3. Pages don't work in all this a clear 4. Some links disjointed; sometimes missing or 4. Some Inconsistent or browsers 3 or 2 5. Does not relate content to larger lack purpose wrong inappropriate graphics 4. Text-only mode could be if… context 5. Unclear connections 4. Spelling is usually correct 5. Multimedia sometimes improved 6. No way to check validity of among sections 5. Site needs some editing doesn't add to experience 5. Multimedia resources (if information 6. Sense of being lost or 6. Use of links is unclear any) work most of the 7. Strong purpose not demonstrated unsure navigating time 1. No reference to Purpose or 1. No orientation for visitors 1. Paragraph structure is 1. Web site was hard to find 1. Links don't work properly Audience 2. Sequencing unclear missing 2. Layout is confusing or 2. Graphic elements not 2. Information incomplete or 3. Pages lack closure 2. Errors in grammar or inappropriate optimized inaccurate 4. No focus for links usage noticeable 3. Backgrounds and text 3. These pages need a 3. Information not from primary 5. Pages are inconsistent 3. Many punctuation generally not effective specific browser Give sources 6. Difficult to navigate in an mistakes 4. Graphics only decorative 4. Text-only mode doesn't this a 4. Little or no overall context for organized way 4. Frequent spelling errors or confusing work 5 or 4 information 5. Site needs extensive 5. Multimedia unrelated to 5. Multimedia resources (if if… 5. Value of information is unclear editing topic any) fail to work 6. No way to check validity of 6. Too many unrelated links, information or too few links 7. Lacks sense of purpose or central theme SCORE: SCORE: SCORE: SCORE: SCORE: Adapted from original work done by Al Rogers, Global SchoolNet Foundation and CyberFair Contest: http://www.gsn.org/cf/. Adaptation done by Clarence Bakken and Sara Armstrong for Challenge 2000, CTAP Region IV Technology Leadership Academy and the Institute for Research on Learning.
Pages to are hidden for
"Score"Please download to view full document