Docstoc

run_at_rate

Document Sample
run_at_rate Powered By Docstoc
					                                                                             Supplier Run@Rate Capacity Evaluation

                                                                            Guidelines
        P06_27_7.1
TEN Document n° Revision:          DRAFT1                       5/31/2006          GSCM/SBD&Q

Purpose :
The purpose of Run @ Rate is to verify that the supplier's manufacturing process is capable of producing components that meet the Customer on-going quality
requirements, at quoted tooling capacity for specified period of time. Furthermore that the supplier's process conforms the manufacturing and quality plan documented by the
supplier in the PSW documentation and other required documentation.



Set-up
The run at rate verification form is used to verify the supplier has acceptable capacity in place based on the established work schedule, volumes, projected utilization and
actual run-off results. Tenneco expects a basic level of mistake proofing to be implemented for identifying non-conforming product during the actual run-off. Results will not
be compromised due to inadequate ability to determine quality output. Action plans may be required for standard checklist items as well as other items determined by the
Tenneco representive after the run-off trial.




-1- Run @Rate Evaluation

The Tenneco Capacity Evaluation consists of 3 phases :

                1:
          PhaseInput Standard times




                2:
          PhaseCapacity Data




                3:
          PhaseRun@Rate results




-2- Process Capability calculation
                                                                                Run@Rate Capacity Evaluation
CUSTOMER:                                                                       SUPPLIER:                                                            TEN Part Description
                             TENNECO inc.                                                                                                            TEN Part Number
                                                                                                      Supplier name                                  Revision
                                                                                                                                                     Tenneco Annual requirement
CUSTOMER RESPONSIBLE PERSON:                                                    SUPPLIER RESPONSIBLE PERSON:                                         PROJECT INFORMATION
Contact :                                                                       Contact :                                                            Tenneco Customer
Phone n° :                                                                      Phone n° :                                                           Platform Code
e-mail :                                                                        e-mail :
TEN Document n°                                                                               P06_27_7.1              Revision:          DRAFT1                                    5/31/2006              GSCM/SBD&Q

                        Process / Operation                                            OP 1                OP 2             OP 3         OP 4             OP 5             OP 6                OP 7            OP 8
     Standard time




                        Process describtion
                        Working hours/shift                          hours                   10.00
                        Shifts/ day                                  shifts                      2
                        Days / week                                   days                     5.00
                        Weeks/year                                   weeks                       48
                        Total Available Time                        hour/year                 4800
                        Availability for TENNECO parts                 %
                        Line Efficiency                                %
     Capacity Data




                        Theoretical Cycle Time                      pcs/hour
                        Calculated scrap rate                          %
                        Net Available Time                          hour/year                    0
                        Theoretical capacity                        pcs/year
                        Calculated production rate                  pcs/hour
                        Line Utilization                               %

                        Monitored production run                     hours
     Run@Rate results




                        Unplanned Downtime                           hours
                        Total Parts Run                               pcs
                        Total Defects                                 pcs
                        Operating Time                               hours
                        Achieved net output                         pcs/hour
                        Achieved Rate of Quality                       %
                        Achieved utillization                          %                     0.0%             0.0%                0.0%        0.0%             0.0%               0.0%            0.0%            0.0%
                        Deviation Cycle time                           %
                        SHADED CELLS ARE CALCULATED and protected                                                                                              SUMMARY
                             The Results are acceptable and meet capacity planning volume requirements:
                                                                                                                                                      Overall Process Utilization %                   Status
                             The attached capability study results meet requirements:
                             Corrective actions are required:
                             New production readiness trial run is required:

                        Date Run@Rate completed:
                        Supplier representative signature:                                                                                Auditor signature:
                                                              Run@Rate Capability Evaluation
CUSTOMER:                                                        SUPPLIER:                                                TEN Part Description
                     TENNECO inc.                                                                                         TEN Part Number
                                                                                                                          Revision
                                                                                                                          Tenneco Annual requirement
CUSTOMER RESPONSIBLE PERSON:                                     SUPPLIER RESPONSIBLE PERSON:                             PROJECT INFORMATION
Contact :                                                        Contact :                                                Tenneco Customer
Phone n° :                                                       Phone n° :                                               Platform Code
e-mail :                                                         e-mail :
TEN Document n°                                                             P06_27_7.1         Revision:      Draft1      Revision date:                    5/31/2006                   GSCM/SBD&Q

SPECIFICATION DATA AND MEASUREMENT RESULTS
                                                                                 Critical or     Sample                      Standard             Upper              Lower
                            Characteristic or Specification                                                 Average                                                Specification           PpK
                                                                                Signficant?       Size                       Deviation      Specification Limit
                                                                                                                                                                      Limit
  1                                                                                  SC
  2                                                                                  NA
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10

ATTRIBUTE DATA RESULTS
                                                                                 Critical or   Inspected                                                                  95% ppm confidence level
                            Characteristic or Specification                                              defected parts         ppm              est. Cpk
                                                                                Signficant?      parts                                                                  worst case       best case
  1        pipe routing
  2
  3
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  9
 10
                                            Run@Rate Capacity Evaluation

                                              History
TEN Document n°    P06_27_7.1   Revision:    DRAFT1     Revision date:   5/31/2006       GSCM/SBD&Q

Document Revision History :
                                                                                                      Rank Failure
INDEX      DATE   Change                                                             Author

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:46
posted:10/25/2011
language:English
pages:5