Embed
Email

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Document Sample

Shared by: qinmei liao
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
3
posted:
10/25/2011
language:
English
pages:
39
Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Peter M. Voorhees, M.D.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Division of Hematology-Oncology

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Outline



• Molecular

Pathogenesis

• Classification

• Prognosis

• Treatment

Molecular Pathology of AML

• Abnormal cell proliferation

– FLT3 mutations

– Ras mutations

– Others: c-KIT mutations

• Block in differentiation

– CBF AML (t(8;21) and inv(16))

– PML-RARα (t(15;17))

– MLL translocations (11q23)

– Hox gene translocations

– C/EBPα mutations

• Suppression of apoptosis

– Bcl-2 over-expression

• Capacity for indefinite self-

renewal

Proliferation: FLT3

• A receptor tyrosine

kinase expressed in 70 –

100% of AML cases.

• Activating mutations in

FLT3 are seen in ~30%

of AML cases.

– Tandem duplication of the

juxtamembrane region.

– Point mutation within the

activation loop of the

kinase domain.

• Activation of FLT3 leads

to deregulated

proliferation of AML cells.

Proliferation: Ras

• Small guanine nucleotide binding proteins that

play a role in several cell signaling pathways.

• Activating point mutations seen in ~25% of AML

cases.

– N-Ras: 10 – 25%

– K-Ras: 5 – 15%

– H-Ras: Rare

• Activation of Ras leads to deregulated cell

proliferation.

Differentiation: Core Binding Factor

(CBF)-α in M2 AML

• CBFs: heterodimeric

complexes (CBFα and CBFβ)

that regulate expression of

genes involved in

hematopoietic cell

differentiation.

• CBFα = AML1.

• t(8;21)(q22;q22): AML1-ETO

fusion gene.

• AML1-ETO is a transcriptional

repressor.

– recruits the nuclear co-

repressor complex and

histone deacetylases to CBF

sites

Differentiation: Core Binding

Factor-β

• CBFβ is located at 16q22.

• Inv(16)(p13q22) and t(16;16)(p13;q22):

CBFβ-MYH11 fusion gene that functions

as a dominant negative inhibitor of CBF.

• The result is the suppression of

transcription of genes crucial for

hematopoiesis / differentiation.

Differentiation: the Retinoic Acid

Receptor-α (RARα) in APL

• RARα: involved in transcription of genes necessary for

hematopoiesis / differentiation.

• t(15;17)(q22;q22): fusion gene PML-RARα.

– t(11;17): PLZF-RARα

– t(5;17): NPM-RARα

• PML-RARα is a transcriptional repressor

– recruits the nuclear co-repressor complex and histone deacetylases.

Differentiation: the Mixed Lineage

Leukemia (MLL) Gene

• MLL is a protein that

regulates Hox gene

expression.

• Hox family members play

critical roles in

transcription of genes

involved in

hematopoiesis.

• Normal MLL requires

cleavage by taspase into

its mature form →

dysregulated Hox gene

expression → block in

differentiation.

Pathogenesis: Summary









• Strategies that interfere with over-activation of

signaling pathways and the block in cellular

differentiation have the potential to improve

patient outcomes in AML.

The FAB Classification

The WHO Classification

Prognosis: Cytogenetics from the MRC

AML 10 trial in patients 7 days.

– Reduced incidence of fever

• 65% vs. 85% (p=0.001)

– Decreased microbiologically-documented infections.

– Decreased gram-negative and polymicrobial

bacteremia.

– No difference in overall mortality (3% vs. 5%) or

infection-related mortality (2% vs. 4%).

Supportive care after induction:

antifungal prophylaxis?

• Cornely et al.

– Phase 3 study of posaconazole vs. fluconazole.

– AML/MDS patients with expected ANC 7 days.

– Posaconazole decreased:

• Proven and probable fungal infections (2% vs. 8%).

• Invasive aspergillosis (1% vs. 7%).

• 100-day all-cause mortality (14% vs. 21%). NNT = 14

patients.

– 2% vs. 5% fungal-specific death.

– Posaconazole increased SAEs probably or possibly

drug-related (6% vs. 2%).

Blood product support

• Leukoreduced products

– Reduced febrile infusion reactions

– Decreased platelet alloimmunization

– Decreased likelihood of transplkant rejection

– Decreased CMV exposure in seronegative patients

• Irradiated products

– Prevent GVHD.

• At UNC, all products are leukoreduced.

– Irradiation must be requested.

– Once requested, all subsequent products are

irradiated.

Treatment: Post-Remission

Chemotherapy

• Mayer et al. NEJM 331:

896, 1994.

– Phase III trial comparing 3

different consolidation

strategies for patients with

AML in CR (HIDAC, IDAC,

low-dose cytarabine).

– In patients 60, the DFS

was 16% or less for all

groups.

Post-Remission Chemotherapy: How many

cycles of consolidation should be given?

• 3-4 HIDACs are better than 1 in good risk patients

– Byrd et al. JCO 17: 3767, 1999. Byrd et al. JCO 22: 1087,

2004.

– 3-4 cycles of HIDAC vs. 1 cycle of HIDAC followed by 2 cycles of

combination chemotherapy.

– Subset analysis of t(8;21) and inv(16) / t(16;16) patients.

– RFS was better for both subtypes, although OS benefit was only

seen in the t(8;21) group.

• Are 4 HIDACs better than 3?

– Farag et al. JCO 23: 482, 2005. Comparison of patients treated

on different CALGB studies.

– Patients

50% in 70% of patients.

– > 50% reductions in bone marrow blast burden in 6 of

57 patients.

– Combination trials ongoing.

• Others

– MLN518

– SU11248

– CEP-701

Novel Therapies: Others

• Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

• Proteasome Inhibitors

• AKT / mTor inhibitors

• Clofarabine

• Apoptotic agents

– Genasense

• MDR modulators

– Zosuquidar

Treatment of Relapsed and

Refractory AML: The EPI

• European Prognostic – Age at relapse

Index • ≤ 35: 0 points

• 36 to 45: 1 point

– Relapse-free interval

• > 45: 2 points

from first CR

• ≤ 6 months: 5 points

– Prior transplant

• 7 to 18 months: 3 points • No: 0 points

• > 18 months: 0 points • Yes: 2 points



– Original cytogenetics – 5-year overall survival

• Good: 0 points • 1 to 6 points: 22 to 46%

• Intermediate: 3 points • 7 to 9 points: 12 to 18%

• Bad: 5 points • 10 to 14 points: 4 to 6%

Treatment of Relapsed and

Refractory AML

• Transplant when possible

– 5 year OS in first relapse or second CR:

• First CR > 6 months: 35%.

• First CR < 6 months: 20%.

– Primary treatment failure: 15%

– Beyond second CR or refractory first relapse: 5%

• Clinical trials!!!

• Salvage chemotherapy

– MEC

– ME

– HIDAC

– HIDAC + L-asparaginase

– Gemtuzumab

AML Therapy in the Elderly

• Advanced age is a poor prognostic factor.

• Disease biology different.

– Frequent adverse cytogenetic profile.

– High levels of MDR1 (P-glycoprotein)

expression.

– Frequent antecedent hematologic disorder.

• These patients should be referred for a

clinical trial when possible.

AML Therapy in the Elderly

• Standard induction chemotherapy, esp. for

patients with intermediate or good risk

cytogenetics.

– A phase III trial comparing best supportive care and

induction chemotherapy with cytarabine,

daunorubicin, and vincristine demonstrated improved

survival (21 vs. 11 weeks) and no difference in days

hospitalized.

• Low-dose cytarabine.

– Similar overall response rate and less toxicity c/w

cytarabine and rubidazone.



Related docs
Other docs by qinmei liao
Q CMA ExperienceRequirement
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Lipid Learning Activity
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
MATERIAL SAFETY AND DATA SHEETS
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Financial Planning The Ties That Bind
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Inflammatory Pain
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
Group goal setting workshop
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
MEETINGS REPORT ACTION SHEET
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!