Embed
Email

Motion

Document Sample

Shared by: xiuliliaofz
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
3
posted:
10/23/2011
language:
English
pages:
16
Society of Women Engineers

FY09 Board of Directors

Motion Submission Form





Date: 12/14/09 Item #: 1030 Consent

Governance



Title: Approve FY 10 November Telecon Minutes



Description: Approve FY 10 November Telecon Minutes



Motion Maker: Stuart Second: Consent





DISCUSSION PRO

This is an administrative governance motion that needs to be approved.





DISCUSSION CON



BUDGET IMPACT



STAFF RECOMMENDATION



ACTION ITEM









Page 1 of 16

Draft Minutes for 11-09-09 BOD Teleconference



1. Welcome, Call to Order, Roll Call, Certify Quorum

Meeting called to order at 7:02 pm CDT

Voting Present: Nora Lin, Siddika Demir, Frances Stuart, Joan Graf, Melissa Tata,

Linette Patterson, Lana Fountain-Flakes, Alyse Stofer, Bernice Brody, Erin McGinnis,

Dr. Mary Anderson-Rowland

Voting Absent: none

Non-Voting/Ex Officio Present: Betty Shanahan

Guests: Collegiate Board Representative: Martha Anderson, HQ Staff: none, BOT

Chair Marge Inden through Item 3a.

of 11 voting present = certified quorum at 7:0 pm CST



2. Approve Agenda

Maker: Anderson-Rowland

Second: McGinnis

Result: Passed



Consent Agenda Motions



i. B1025: Approve Extending End Date for Planned Giving Task Force

ii. B1026: Approve Sunsetting of Professional Development Committee



Result: Passed with approval of agenda



3a. i. Management of SWE Investments

Topic: Briefing of the BOT decision to have a management firm managing the SWE funds

Desired Outcomes: BOD is aware of BOT’s decision and investment approaches

After giving a brief history of the past investment strategies, BOT Chair Marge Inden

reported that the BOT had made several initial decisions about the future of investments.

After evaluating a number of firms for what is best for SWE the BOT interviewed several

firms. The BOT decided to invest 40%of SWE’s endowment fund with Common Fund.

The funds include the Scholarship, HQ, and Awards endowments. Common Fund is a

non-profit that was established in 1971 to help colleges and universities. Common Fund

currently has over 2000 clients and manages $40B. Common Fund helps with investment

strategies and offers free seminars. Each Trustee has attended at least one of the

seminars. The BOT will continue to analyze the SWE investment strategy and make

investment decisions.





4. Motions for Discussion

i. B1024: Approve Letter of Agreement with FIRST

Maker: Flakes

Second: Tata





Page 2 of 16

Result: Passed



ii. B1027: Approve Professional Development Advisory Board Charter

Maker: Patterson

Second: Brody

Result: Passed



iii. B1028: Approve Curriculum Committee Charter

Maker: Patterson

Second: Brody

Result: Postponed to December Telecon (Maker: Demir; Second: Flakes)



3b. Other Topics as Defined

i. Women in Academia

Topics: Goals and planned activities for FY 10

Desired Outcomes: BOD to provide feedback on goals and planned activities



Dr. Mary Anderson-Rowland briefed the BOD on her progress to date and future

plans for the Women in Academia effort. Action items were taken to schedule a

series of telecons for two BOD interest groups to assist Dr. A-R with her task.

The two groups are how WIA relates to the conference programming and where

WIA fits into the SWE structure including leadership.



5. Announcements and Reminders



i. Audit will be approved on December Telecon

ii. Feedback on FY 11 BOD/BOT nominees is due by November 15

iii. Next BOD telecon is scheduled for December 14 with materials due by December

7

iv. Nora reminded everyone of the BOD challenge and the need to have 100%

participation by the end of the calendar year





6. Good of the Order

i. Nora thanked Marge and the BOT for their work on the investments strategy

ii. Erin thanked the HQ Staff and SWE volunteers for a very successful recent WOW

event in Los Angeles



7. Adjourned at 8:13 pm CST





Attachments:

1. Approved Agenda

2. B1024 Approve Letter of Agreement with FIRST

3. B1025 Approve Extending End Date of Planned Giving Task Force Charter

4. B1026 Approve Sunsetting of Professional Development Committee

5. B1024 Approve Letter of Agreement with FIRST

6. B1027 Approve Professional development Advisory Board Charter









Page 3 of 16

Approved Agenda for 11-09-09 BOD Teleconference



8:00 pm EST, 7:00 pm CST, 6:00 pm MST, 5:00 pm PST



Call-In Information: 877.740.2201; Participant Pass Code: 334823





1. Welcome, Roll Call, Certify Quorum Nora Lin 10 minutes

Fran Stuart



2. Approve Agenda Nora Lin 5 minutes

Fran Stuart

Consent Agenda Motions (approved with agenda

approval)

i. B1023: Approve BOD 2 Minutes

ii. B1025: Approve Extending End Date for

Planned Giving Task Force

iii. B1026: Approve Sunsetting of Professional

Development Committee



3a. Other Topics as Defined

i. Management of SWE Investments Marge Inden 10 minutes

Topic: Briefing of the BOT decision to have a (guest presenter)

management firm managing the SWE funds

Desired Outcomes: BOD is aware of BOT’s decision

and investment approaches







4. Motions for Discussion

i. B1024: Approve Letter of Agreement with Lana Flakes 10 minutes

FIRST

ii. B1027: Approve Professional Development Linette Patterson 10 minutes

Advisory Board Charter

iii. B1028: Approve Curriculum Committee Linette Patterson 10 minutes

Charter



3b. Other Topics as Defined

Mary Anderson- 15 minutes

ii. Women in Academia

Rowland

Topics: Goals and planned activities for FY 10

Desired Outcomes: BOD to provide feedback on goals

and planned activities









Page 4 of 16

5. Announcements and Reminders 2 minutes

v. Audit will be approved on December Telecon





6. Good of the Order 2 minutes





7. Adjourn







Attachments:

B1024 Motion to Approve Letter of Agreement with FIRST

B1025 Motion to Approve Extending End Date for Planned Giving Task Force

B1026 Motion to Approve Sunsetting of Professional Development Committee

B1027 Motion to Approve Charter for Professional Development Advisory Board

B1028 Motion to Approve Charter for Curriculum Committee









Page 5 of 16

Society of Women Engineers

FY09 Board of Directors

Motion Submission Form



Passed

Date: 11/9/09 Item #: B1024 Discussion

MOU



Title: Letter of Agreement with FIRST



Approve the Letter of Agreement with FIRST. LOA is an attachment to the

Description:

motion.



Motion Maker: Flakes Second: Tata





DISCUSSION PRO

SWE members have been supporting FIRST events for many years, but without a formal

relationship between the organizations. Approximately 10 years ago SWE had a one year MOU

with FIRST that was not renewed. This LOA gives SWE the opportunity to leverage this

informal relationship for more visibility and impact with a leading program in engineering

outreach.



DISCUSSION CON

Although FIRST supposedly supports women and minority students, the motion is not seen to

include any words about diversity being a goal for their teams. If we are going to encourage

young women to participate in FIRST, FIRST should do two things:



 Include diversity in their goals, specifically that women and minority students are

encouraged to participate in FIRST.



 Each FIRST team shall include at least two women and two underrepresented minority

students on its team.



From one board member’s knowledge of FIRST, teams are often made up of all males, and often

all white males. If the students are to gain the full potential from working in teams, the team

needs to be diverse, including both women and underrepresented minority students.



T there has not been an appreciable increase in the participation of women in FIRST over the

years. Signing this MOU will not necessarily change that since teams are formed at the local

level. If we can get FIRST to change their structure on teams that compete, we will have made a

difference.







Page 6 of 16

BUDGET IMPACT

None except for time of staff and volunteers.





STAFF RECOMMENDATION

Staff supports. Outreach Manager Randy Freedman and Deputy Executive Director Karen

Horting have been negotiating with FIRST on behalf of SWE.





ACTION ITEMS:



1. Karen Horting and Randy Freedman are to work with FIRST to develop and track

statistics to document the impact of the partnership; also to encourage FIRST to

value diversity

2. Director of Regions to communicate partnership to Regions, Sections, and MALs and to

encourage involvement with local FIRST activities.



3. BOD to reevaluate partnership in FY11









Notes: LOA is in a .pdf format and could not be incorporated

into this document. It has been provided as a

separate document.









Page 7 of 16

Society of Women Engineers

FY10 Board of Directors

Motion Submission Form



Passed

Date: 11/9/09 Item #: B1025 Consent

Charter



Title: Extend the Duration of Planned Giving Taskforce



Description: Move to extend the duration of the planned giving taskforce.



Motion Maker: Lin Second: Patterson





DISCUSSION PRO

The task force was officially created in late June 2009. Since then the task force has had two

face-2-face meetings, two conference calls and many email communications among its

members. There is a list of action items still to be completed by the task force. By extending

the duration of the taskforce for 6 months will allow the task force to complete its planned

activities and achieve the desired outcomes stated in its charter.





DISCUSSION CON

According to the charter, the task force is supposed to complete all its work by calendar year

end of 2009. Due to the amount of work remaining, the task force will not be able to complete

its work without additional time.





BUDGET IMPACT

Overall the impact to budget should be minimal and be able to be absorbed within FY10

budgets.

Staff (salaried) will support this taskforce thus there will be an opportunity cost associated with

their time but it is expected that the outcomes of this work will provide a favorable ROI in the

long run.

There may also be some costs to produce the “tools” for this work (e.g., brochures) but these

should be able to be absorbed in current budgets with minimal impact as the volume will be low.





STAFF RECOMMENDATION



ACTION ITEMS

Post the revised charter with the other approved charters (Secretary)









Page 8 of 16

Title: Planned Giving Taskforce Charter

Effective Date: November 9, 2009 Revision: A Supersedes: New

Approved with BOD Motion

B1025



Purpose The Planned Giving Taskforce is tasked with developing a process to discuss

giving opportunities with our members including estate planning and

unrestricted gifts.



Background: Many of our members have the ability to provide generous donations to help

SWE further our progress towards our goals. Some of our members would

like to include SWE in their estate planning process. We need to provide our

members tools and knowledge on how to do this. We also need to have our

members be the catalysts for the first conversations on this subject. It takes a

member to ask for a significant contribution.



Scope  In scope:

o Identifying the “value proposition” specific to our members for

planned giving opportunities. (e.g., what would make them give to

SWE at a higher level than they have and/or include SWE in their

estate plan, what recognition would be of meaning to our

members).

o Developing a process that will engage SWE members in starting

the discussion with members on planned giving. Including

identification and commitment of members to perform this task for

FY10. Include a method for refreshing this group when needed.

o Working with targeted members for initial discussions.

o Review and provide customer input (both from a member

perspective and that of a recruiter perspective) for tools and

materials.

o Determine best methods of thanking our significant donors.

o Development of material and tools for this process. (HQ liaison

will take the lead on development and volunteer members of

taskforce will provide input and review)

 Out of scope:

o HQ will assist with development of target lists (including past

donors, long time members).

o HQ will provide follow up with targets after initial conversations

by members.





Resources and  Gift acceptance policy. Prior work and notes on this subject.





Page 9 of 16

References

Authority &  Expenditures are expected for development and production of tools and

Limitations brochures. It is expected that these would be within the authorized HQ

Operations budgets.



Deliverables  Development of a toolkit (e.g., brochures, conversation scripts) for

members to participate in the initial discussions of this process.

 Hold or schedule initial discussions with initial targets during WE09.

 Governance/leadership structure needed for continued success.



Membership1  Chairperson

 The composition of the task force may include, but is not limited to, past

board members, board of trustees members (past and current), and

members with experience in planned giving.

 HQ Staff. Suggested that this be Deputy Executive Director and Fund

Development Manager



Criteria for  Tools, people, and process in place to begin discussions at WE09.

Success  Clear roles and responsibilities between staff and volunteers for the

ongoing future of this process.

 Method to recruit new members in these roles in the future.

Report To President, Virginia Connolly for FY09 and transitioning to Nora Lin as FY10

President



Duration Have a draft plan for working this process in October 2009 at WE09 Long

Beach. Finalize plans and bring to a continuation state by the end of fiscal

year FY10.









Notes:

1. Membership are selected via the process defined in the National Leader and Team Member Selection

Procedure; dated 10/10/06









Page 10 of 16

Society of Women Engineers

FY09 Board of Directors

Motion Submission Form



Passed

Date: 09/09/09 Item #: 1026 Consent

Administrative



Title: Approve Sunsetting of Professional Development Committee



Description: Sunset Professional Development Committee



Motion Maker: Patterson Second: Brody





DISCUSSION PRO

 The Professional Development Committee has not been active and does not currently

have a chair.

 The Professional Development Committee did not create a charter for itself.

 The Professional Development Committee is being superseded by the Professional

Development Advisory Board.





DISCUSSION CON



BUDGET IMPACT



STAFF RECOMMENDATION



ACTION ITEM









Page 11 of 16

Society of Women Engineers

FY10 Board of Directors

Motion Submission Form



Passed

Date: November 9, 2009 Item #:B1027 Consent

Charter



Title: Approve Professional Development Advisory Board Charter



To approve the Professional Development Advisory Board Charter (Revision:

Description:

New)



Motion Maker: Patterson Second: Brody





DISCUSSION PRO

The Professional Development Advisory Board will replace the existing Professional

Development Committee (that is inactive with no charter or committee chair). The Advisory

Board will provide high level and strategic input on future professional development

programming (outside of the annual conference).

The Advisory Board members represent various groups within SWE that deliver components of

the SWE professional development strategy. The new board would foster greater

communication, collaboration, and synergy between HQ, the BOD, and these groups.





DISCUSSION CON

This is an additional responsibility for the committee chairs who are members of the Advisory

Board.





BUDGET IMPACT

The committee will meet 2-4 times annually via conference call. The expenses for these calls

can be absorbed within the existing Professional Development budget.





STAFF RECOMMENDATION

Staff Supports





ACTION ITEMS









Page 12 of 16

Title: Professional Development Advisory Board

Effective Date: 11-09-09 Revision: New Supersedes: N/A

Approved with BOD Motion

1027



Purpose To provide high level and strategic input on future professional development

programming (outside of the annual conference).

Background:  The Professional Development Committee has been in operation for many years

focused on setting the SWE Professional Development strategy, evaluating

leadership curriculum, and ensuring quality programming throughout the

organization. The committee did not have an approved charter.

 Currently, the Professional Development Committee has no Chair and is

inactive. The Director of Professional Development and the former Professional

Development Committee Chair met to discuss a potential reorganization. The

former chair agreed that there needs to be more synergy between the various

groups involved in professional development. The existing position remains

open at this time.

 The Director of Learning and Development was hired in 2008 to help implement

and drive the SWE professional development strategy. Since joining the team,

the Professional Development Committee has played less of a role in strategy.

 Advisory Board members represent various groups within SWE that deliver

components of the SWE professional development strategy. The new board

would foster greater communication, collaboration, and synergy between HQ,

the BOD, and these groups.

Scope  Establish a stronger network of members focused on professional development

activities

 Actively engage the membership to pursue lifelong learning

 Support and encourage partnerships with external partners in the area of

professional development

 Identify and leverage synergies between the various committees devoted to

professional development

 Support evaluation and continuous improvement of SWE professional

development activities



Resources and  Committee collateral and resources

References  HQ staff



Authority &  The Professional Development Advisory Board sets strategy but each committee

Limitations is responsible for implementation



Deliverables  Insight on ways to support and establish an active network

 Focused input on PD programming

 Develop and implement strategy devised within the advisory board within

their own committees







Page 13 of 16

 Support the Director of Professional Development and Director of Learning and

Development as needed



Membership  Director of Professional Development

 Director of Learning and Development

 Leadership Coaching Committee Chair

 Collegiate Leadership Coaching Committee Chair

 Curriculum Committee Chair

 Collegiate Interest Committee Chair

 Collegiate Leadership Forum Coordinator

 Conference Programming Board Chair

 International Member Coordinator

 Multicultural Committee Chair

 Women in Government Chair

 Women in Academia Chair



Criteria for  New programming that meets the professional development needs of the

membership

Success

 SWE is recognized as a respected and vital resource of professional (and

leadership) development curriculum for women in STEM

 The advisory board is a respected resource for input and insight on professional

(and leadership) development within SWE

Report To Director of Professional Development



Duration Review in FY12









Notes:

1. Membership are selected via the process defined in the National Leader and Team Member Selection

Procedure; dated 10/10/06









Page 14 of 16

Society of Women Engineers

FY10 Board of Directors

Motion Submission Form



Postponed

Date: November 9, 2009 Item #: B1028 Consent

Charter



Title: Approve Curriculum Committee Charter



Description: To approve the Curriculum Committee Charter (Rev: New)



Motion Maker: Patterson Second: Brody





DISCUSSION PRO

The Curriculum Committee will recommend topics and input for future professional

development programming (outside of the annual conference). This includes:

 Providing input on, and supporting academic professional development activities at the

regional conferences, section events, and virtual training.

 Advising on and supporting the development of new professional development

programing for SWE by serving as the “voice” of the membership in determining new

topics that will support different target audiences.

 Bringing cohesion amongst the different committees working on professional

development by maintaining high standards of quality and promote lifelong learning

within SWE.

 Keeping program tracks consistent across our training activities and events (objectives &

outcomes defined) through the high-level review process.

 Participating in the high level review of program evaluation data.

This activity was done as part of several committees historically. Forming a cohesive group to

do this will ensure we have people with the right skill set evaluating the content. It will also

ensure this activity isn’t overlooked by already busy groups.

As SWE seeks avenues to offer internal Continuing Education Units/Credits, we are required to

have a group and process to conduct reviews of curriculum content on a regular basis.





DISCUSSION CON

This is an incremental add of a new committee to SWE’s leadership structure.









Page 15 of 16

BUDGET IMPACT

The committee will meet 2-4 times annually via conference call. The expenses for these calls

can be absorbed within the existing Professional Development budget.





STAFF RECOMMENDATION

Staff Supports





ACTION ITEMS









Page 16 of 16



Related docs
Other docs by xiuliliaofz
March 08 Concussion BIggg.pub
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Pro_CV_Wadud
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
NSF-DMP_EAR_UvaTemplate with Guidance
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
MicroficheList04
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Report - by Incheon
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
21_B2_U10A
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
EOC EFCOG 2006
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2010 budget
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
PS20090413 NYIPG2 only _2_
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!