Docstoc feed for: Legal->Court & Cases->Supreme Court

секс знакомства павлоград, секс знакомства барнаул, секс знакомства в дмитрове, секс знакомства в германии

SeksZnak — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:14:17 GMT

shared by: SeksZnak on: Saturday, January 02, 2010

секс знакомства павлоград, секс знакомства барнаул, секс знакомства в дмитрове, секс знакомства в германии, секс знакомства в бресте, секс знакомства северодвинск, интим знакомства в перми, секс знакомства услуги, интимные знакомства в москве, секс знакомства советск, секс знакомства в саранске, частное порно фото знакомства, секс знакомства хмельницкий, интимные знакомства в красноярске, секс знакомства он лайн, познакомлюсь с парой для секса

Power Of Attorney _Special_

sarturn — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:13:53 GMT

shared by: sarturn on: Friday, December 18, 2009

Power Of Attorney (Special)

Constitutional Law II Outline

mnieman101 — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:19:18 GMT

shared by: mnieman101 on: Wednesday, December 09, 2009

good outline for constitutional law. Equal Protection Clause and Substantive Due Process

DERIVATIVE CLAIM

jag4biz — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:18:21 GMT

shared by: jag4biz on: Wednesday, November 25, 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. PASQUALE DAVID ROSSETTE, DOUGLAS W. BACHELOR, and LEASENET GROUP, INC., an Ohio Corporation, as successor by merger to LeaseNet Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants Below, Appellees. JOHN A. GENTILE, VICTORIA S. CASHMAN, B

Murder Man 24 held in bludgeoning death of father - SignOnSanDiego.com

DarrenChaker — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:57:56 GMT

shared by: DarrenChaker on: Saturday, November 21, 2009

News article related to when I, Darren Chaker, was the sole person to respond to the screams of a woman whose husband was allegedly murdered by her son. I received praise in two respects, (1) I helped someone who screams echoed and hundreds heard but no one came, and (2) I helped the lone police officer access the building by ripping open an exterior door of the apartment building, which allowed us to rush up the stairs to help.

Murder Witnesses Heard Blood Curdling Screams - NBC San Diego

DarrenChaker — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:57:43 GMT

shared by: DarrenChaker on: Saturday, November 21, 2009

murder Son Enters Plea in Bludgeoning Death of Father - San Diego 6

DarrenChaker — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:57:28 GMT

shared by: DarrenChaker on: Saturday, November 21, 2009

murder SDPD Investigates Homicide In University City - San Diego News Story - KGTV San Diego

DarrenChaker — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:57:19 GMT

shared by: DarrenChaker on: Saturday, November 21, 2009

Notice of Intent

NootkabearMcDonald — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:20:03 GMT

shared by: NootkabearMcDonald on: Friday, November 20, 2009

COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIAJAMES B. STEGEMAN Appellant v. FRANK J. LILLIG, III Appellee* * * CASE No. A10A0383 * *NOTICE OF INTENT Comes now, James B. Stegeman, Appellant in the above Appeal and files this Notice of Intent to apply for certiorari to The Supreme Court of Georgia. This 6th day of November, 2009, By: ______________________

Trans National Legal Outline

JohnMValentine — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:58:06 GMT

shared by: JohnMValentine on: Thursday, November 19, 2009

TRANSNATIONAL OUTLINE RED GREEN DARK BLUE ORANGE CASES Advanced Organizers Principles of International Law Emmanuel’s1CHAPTER 1 : THE NATURE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, The HISTORY of INTERNATIONAL LAW, AN INTERNATIONAL LAW SAMPLER CASES: McCann v. United Kingdom Filartiga v. Pena-Irala ADVANCED ORGANIZERS 1-6 1. What is PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

Fall Torts Outline for Law Legal School

JohnMValentine — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:58:03 GMT

shared by: JohnMValentine on: Thursday, November 19, 2009

Torts Outline The Nature of Tort LawCompensation: The overall purpose of tort law is to compensate plaintiffs for unreasonable harm that they havesustained.Competing Policy Reasons:i) ii) iii) iv) Compensation for victims Deterrence: Deter accidents and defendants from taking risks Judicial administration: stare decisis, bright line rul

Fall Semester Property Outline for Law School

JohnMValentine — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:58:01 GMT

shared by: JohnMValentine on: Thursday, November 19, 2009

Theories:There are several different theories of property rights: They include: 1. Economic theory of property (Demsetz theory: communal property) 2. Natural rights theory 3. Locke theory 4. First in time theory 5. Utilitarian theory 6. Personality theoryEconomic theory of property rights: 1. Bottom line: Common property leads to exploitation a

Fall Contracts Law Outline for Law School

JohnMValentine — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:57:57 GMT

shared by: JohnMValentine on: Thursday, November 19, 2009

A contract is a promise or set of promises for the breech of which the law gives remedy, or the performance of which the law in some way recognizes as a duty.Enforceable Promises: An Introduction:The law of contracts deals with interpretation and enforcement of promises. Much of the law is found in the restatement of contracts, the UCC, and c

Fall Civil Procedure Law School Outline Legal

JohnMValentine — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:57:54 GMT

shared by: JohnMValentine on: Thursday, November 19, 2009

Civil Procedure outlineOverview of Civil Procedure: Main points on 20-page handout Constitutional Limits in Litigation Two types of jurisdiction: Legislative and Judicial. Judicial Jurisdiction: Personal Jurisdiction and Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction: Power of the court over this Defendant Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Power of

Comparison of 2008 and 2009 Massey Opinions

brianmpeterson — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:16:33 GMT

shared by: brianmpeterson on: Thursday, November 12, 2009

Link to PDF file IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2008 Term September 2009 TermNo. 33350HUGH M. CAPERTON, HARMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HARMAN MINING CORPORATION, AND SOVEREIGN COAL SALES, INC., Plaintiffs Below , Appellees,V.A.T. MASSEY COAL COMPANY, INC., ELK RUN COAL COMPANY, INC., INDEPENDENCE COAL COMP

United States v. Seale, Supreme Court Decision

lmhstrumpet — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:35:11 GMT

shared by: lmhstrumpet on: Monday, November 09, 2009

Supreme Court Decision 2009

Muhammad v. Kelly, Supreme Court Decision

lmhstrumpet — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:35:11 GMT

shared by: lmhstrumpet on: Monday, November 09, 2009

Supreme Court Decision 2009

DTD Enterprises, Inc. v. Wells, Supreme Court Decision

lmhstrumpet — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:35:10 GMT

shared by: lmhstrumpet on: Monday, November 09, 2009

Supreme Court Decision 2009

Corcoran v. Levenhagen, Supreme Court Decision

lmhstrumpet — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:35:10 GMT

shared by: lmhstrumpet on: Monday, November 09, 2009

Supreme Court Decision 2009

Bobby v. Van Hook, Supreme Court Decision

lmhstrumpet — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:35:10 GMT

shared by: lmhstrumpet on: Monday, November 09, 2009

Supreme Court Decision 2009

Sindh High Court Bar Association VS Fed. of Pakistan

jusnrem — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:42:30 GMT

shared by: jusnrem on: Monday, November 09, 2009

INDEXS. No.1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.Issues/Points/DetailsShort order Prayer Facts Notice to General Pervez Musharraf Arguments of Mr. Rashid A. Rizvi, ASC Arguments of Mr. Hamid Khan, Sr. ASC Oral prayer made by Mr. Hamid Khan Arguments of Mr. M. Akram Sheikh, Sr. ASC Arguments of Attorney General for Pakistan Arguments of Mr. Yo

Kennedy VS Louisiana Supreme Court Opinion and Dissent

lw2182001 — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:31:28 GMT

shared by: lw2182001 on: Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Kennedy VS Louisiana Supreme Court Opinion and Dissent

Supreme Court of the US Oct Term 2003 Syllabus

xprophecy — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:13:27 GMT

shared by: xprophecy on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009

No description

Supreme Court of the US Oct Term 2008 Syllabus

xprophecy — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:11:14 GMT

shared by: xprophecy on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009

(Bench Opinion)OCTOBER TERM, 2008 Syllabus1NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader

Supreme Court of the US Oct Term 2007 Syllabus

xprophecy — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:42:48 GMT

shared by: xprophecy on: Tuesday, October 13, 2009

(Slip Opinion)OCTOBER TERM, 2007 Syllabus1NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.

People v. Diggins

Blaster57 — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:08:54 GMT

shared by: Blaster57 on: Thursday, October 08, 2009

No description

COMUNICADOS_DE_PRENSA_No_40_Comuni_

riarcas — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:10:06 GMT

shared by: riarcas on: Friday, October 02, 2009

COMUNICADOS DE PRENSA - No. 40 Comunicado 22 de Septiembre de 2009 ______________________________________________________________________ SENTENCIA C-662/09Ley Sandra Ceballos, por la cual se establecen las acciones para la atencin integral del Cncer en Colombia.Repblica de ColombiaCorte ConstitucionalPresidenciaCOMUNICADO No. 40

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. O CENTRO ESPIRITA BENEFICENTE UNIAO DO VEGETAL

visionaries — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:51:18 GMT

shared by: visionaries on: Saturday, September 19, 2009

A religious sect with origins in the Amazon Rainforestreceives communion by drinking a sacramental tea,brewed from plants unique to the region, that contains ahallucinogen regulated under the Controlled SubstancesAct by the Federal Government. The Government concedesthat this practice is a sincere exercise of religion, butnonetheless sought to prohibit the small American branchof the sect from engaging in the practice, on the groundthat the Controlled Substances Act bars all use of thehallucinogen. The sect sued to block enforcement againstit of the ban on the sacramental tea, and moved for apreliminary injunction.

Citizens United v Federal Election Commission

luxdesigns — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:38:40 GMT

shared by: luxdesigns on: Wednesday, September 09, 2009

Reargument of Case 08-205, Citizens United v. The Federal Election Commission before the Supreme Court of the United States on September 9, 2009.Transcript.

Legal services

Sanjeewa34old — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:20:34 GMT

shared by: Sanjeewa34old on: Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Legal services

Zatko v. California 502 U.S. 16 (1991)

Pennoyer — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:49:25 GMT

shared by: Pennoyer on: Sunday, August 23, 2009

Supreme Court case Zatko v. California, 502 U.S. 16 (1991).

Mireles v. Waco 502 U.S. 9 (1991)

Pennoyer — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:33:28 GMT

shared by: Pennoyer on: Sunday, August 23, 2009

Supreme Court case Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9 (1991).

United States v. Ibarra 502 U.S. 1 (1991)

Pennoyer — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:23:11 GMT

shared by: Pennoyer on: Sunday, August 23, 2009

Supreme Court case United States v. Ibarra.

International Shoe v. Washington

Pennoyer — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:37:46 GMT

shared by: Pennoyer on: Sunday, August 23, 2009

Supreme Court case International Shoe v. Washington.

A.F.A. Tours v. Whitchurch

cyberlaw — Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:30:14 GMT

shared by: cyberlaw on: Friday, August 21, 2009

Brief of the case A.F.A. Tours v. Whitchurch.

US Supreme Court Rules 2007

jhmasdeu — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:04:43 GMT

shared by: jhmasdeu on: Monday, August 17, 2009

RULESOF THESupreme Court of the United StatesADOPTED JULY 17, 2007 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2007CLER$$RULFSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, N. E. Washington, DC 20543Clerk of the Court ............................... (202) Reporter of Decisions.......................... (202) Marshal of the Court.................

Hooggeregshof besonderhede van vordering - verbandakte 090801

socialnetworx — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:21:38 GMT

shared by: socialnetworx on: Friday, August 07, 2009

BESONDERHEDE VAN VORDERING1.[[PLA_FORMAL]]2.[[DEF_FORMAL]]3.Ingevolge 'n Verbandakte Nr. [[EXTRA_FIELD_1]] gedateer [[EXTRA_FIELD_2]], is [[THEIR_PARTY]] wettiglik verskuldig aan [[OUR_PARTY]] vir die terugbetaling van 'n bedrag van [[EXTRA_FIELD_3]] tesame met 'n addisionele bedrag van [[EXTRA_FIELD_4]].4.Voormelde

High court notice of objection to amendment of pleading 090802

socialnetworx — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:18:11 GMT

shared by: socialnetworx on: Friday, August 07, 2009

[[BOX_NO]]Case Number: [[CASE_NUMBER]]IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA ([[DIVISION]]) In the matter between:[[PLA_TITLE_1]][[PLA_TITLE_2]]and[[DEF_TITLE_1]][[DEF_TITLE_2]]NOTICE OF OBJECTION IN TERMS OF RULE 28(4)TAKENOTICEthattheabovenamed[[OUR_PARTY]]herebyobject[[OUR_NOUN15]] t

THE PROFESSOR GATES CIRCUS - A MAN'S HOME IS HIS CASTLE

mscottesq — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 09:53:02 GMT

shared by: mscottesq on: Sunday, August 02, 2009

Introductory Note: I can't resist weighing in on the circus of the arrest of Harvard Law Professor, Henry Louis Gates. The police misconduct is obvious. But it is appalling that a Harvard Law Professor does not know the principles of constitutional law sufficiently to have handled this matter more professionally. This document is a portion of a letter brief I wrote on behalf of a white defendant on astonishingly similar facts.Text in blue shows changes to the text of the excerpt of the brief or my comments regarding Professor Gates' case.If Professor Gates does not know these bedrock legal principles, he is obviously not conveying them to his students. The bottom line is simple: Under a case known as Terry v. Ohio, citizens In public places can be briefly detained, required to identify themselves and submit to a pat down search for weapons. But, absent exigent circumstances (hearing screams for help, seeing a house on fire, seeing a crime while it is being committed, etc.) police cannot enter onto private property, particularly a private home, without a warrant. And, if the police do not have a warrant and show up at your door, you do not have to talk to them (since they are trespassers). Needless to say, voluntarily talking to police – ever – is a very bad idea, unless you are making a criminal complaint. Police are allowed to lie, and they do so all the time. Anyone asked for information by a police officer who claims to be investigating a crime and just collecting information should say, “I'll be happy to cooperate. I'll have my lawyer call the prosecutor and have him issue a 'witness letter' (a document formally saying that the citizen is providing information only as a witness and is not the subject, target or 'person of interest' in any case). Give me your card, Officer. As soon as the letter arrives, I'll call you.As with all documents I post, this document does not express an opinion on the law of any jurisdiction (Even though it was part

Hak Jaksa Mengajukan PK

Paus — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 08:24:39 GMT

shared by: Paus on: Saturday, August 01, 2009

Tulisan ini merupakan ulasan atas hak jaksa untuk mengajukan peninjauan kembali sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum acara pidana di Indonesia. Dalam tulisan ini dikoreksi kesalahan yang selama ini dilakukan oleh para ahli hukum yang memandang bahwa jaksa tidak berhak mengajukan peninjauan kembali atau bahwa hanya terpidana atau ahli warisnya yang berhak mengajukan PK. Menurut penulis ini jaksa berhak mengajukan PK hanya sebatas ketentuan yang diatur dalam Pasal 263 ayat (3) KUHAP.

073109 THE HARMLESS AND PLAIN ERROR DOCTRINES - HISTORY AND ANALYSIS

mscottesq — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:00:52 GMT

shared by: mscottesq on: Friday, July 31, 2009

Introductory Note: The law on the analysis to be used by appellate courts in reviewing alleged trial and procedural errors in criminal cases, both federal and state, is very complex and often poorly understood by both lawyers and judges. Even the U.S. Supreme Court has had difficulty developing and articulating appropriate governing principles. This is a document for lawyers and judges, primarily prosecutors and criminal defense lawyers and judges who preside over criminal cases. It is a modified portion of an appellate brief I wrote for a Colorado criminal appeal, but as the text indicates, the general principles are applicable in virtually all states. Of course. non-lawyers, including law students, are free to consult itAs with all documents I post, this document does not express any opinion on the law of any jurisdiction (even though this was written as a portion of a Colorado appellate brief), and all such opinions are expressly disclaimed. Application of these principles is highly fact and issue specific, and this analysis was written in the context of an appeal of a highly specific procedural issue. Furthermore, the law on harmless and plain error remains unsettled. It is critical to consult the most recent case law, particularly the most recent decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, when addressing these issues.Users who are not criminal lawyers or judges who preside over criminal cases are urged to consult competent counsel on these issues.

070509 KRUGMAN - NYT OP-ED - "HELP" IS ON THE WAY

mscottesq — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:09:51 GMT

shared by: mscottesq on: Wednesday, July 29, 2009

This document is an open-letter to Paul Krugman, Princeton economist and Nobel Laureate, in the form of an annotated version of his Op-Ed piece in the New York Times of 07/05/2009 in support of the House HELP health care reform proposal. Among other things, I argue that a public plan in competition with private plans would violate Supreme Court decisions on "predatory pricing" as violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

The House Health Care Plan Violates Antitrust Law

mscottesq — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:03:14 GMT

shared by: mscottesq on: Wednesday, July 29, 2009

This document is my correspondence to Fox Business arguing that the House "middle road" plan under consideration on July 23, 2009 is a non-starter because, as a practical matter, a federal plan in competition with private-sector plans would violate applicable U.S. Supreme Court precedent on "predatory pricing" under Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Notice of acceptance of offer ito Rule 34 090721

socialnetworx — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:04:24 GMT

shared by: socialnetworx on: Monday, July 27, 2009

[[BOX_NO]]Case Number: [[CASE_NUMBER]]IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA ([[DIVISION]]) In the matter between:[[PLA_TITLE_1]][[PLA_TITLE_2]]and[[DEF_TITLE_1]][[DEF_TITLE_2]]NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF SETTLEMENT IN TERMS OF RULE 34KINDLY TAKE NOTICE that the [[OUR_PARTY]] herein hereby accept[[OUR_NOUN15]] th

Liasseringskennisgewing 090721

socialnetworx — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:03:51 GMT

shared by: socialnetworx on: Monday, July 27, 2009

[[BOX_NO]]Saaknommer: [[CASE_NUMBER]]IN DIE HOOGGEREGSHOF VAN SUID-AFRIKA ([[DIVISION]]) In die saak tussen:[[PLA_TITLE_1]][[PLA_TITLE_2]]en[[DEF_TITLE_1]][[DEF_TITLE_2]]LIASSERINGSKENNISGEWINGGELIEWE KENNIS TE NEEM dat die [[DOC_FIELD_1]] van die [[OUR_PARTY]] hiermee geliasseer word.GEDATEER te [[PLACE]] op

Notice to discover ito Rule 35(10) 090721

socialnetworx — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:03:49 GMT

shared by: socialnetworx on: Monday, July 27, 2009

[[BOX_NO]]Case Number: [[CASE_NUMBER]]IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA ([[DIVISION]]) In the matter between:[[PLA_TITLE_1]][[PLA_TITLE_2]]and[[DEF_TITLE_1]][[DEF_TITLE_2]]NOTICE TO PRODUCE IN TERMS OF RULE 35(10)PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT the [[OUR_PARTY]] hereby give[[OUR_NOUN15]] notice to the [[THEIR_PARTY]] to

Writ of attachment to found jurisdiction 090711

socialnetworx — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:32:30 GMT

shared by: socialnetworx on: Monday, July 27, 2009

[[BOX_NO]]Case Number: [[CASE_NUMBER]]IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA ([[DIVISION]]) In the matter between:[[PLA_TITLE_1]][[PLA_TITLE_2]]and[[DEF_TITLE_1]][[DEF_TITLE_2]]WRIT OF ATTACHMENT – AD FUNDANDAM JURISDICTIONEMTO : THE DEPUTY SHERIFF [[DISTRICT]]YOU ARE HEREBY directed pursuant to an Order of the [[

Lasbrief tot beslaglegging om jurisdiksie te vestig 090711

socialnetworx — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:32:27 GMT

shared by: socialnetworx on: Monday, July 27, 2009

[[BOX_NO]]Saaknommer: [[CASE_NUMBER]]IN DIE HOOGGEREGSHOF VAN SUID-AFRIKA ([[DIVISION]]) In die saak tussen:[[PLA_TITLE_1]][[PLA_TITLE_2]]en[[DEF_TITLE_1]][[DEF_TITLE_2]]LASBRIEF TOT BESLAGLEGGING OM JURISDIKSIE TE BEVESTIGAAN : DIE BALJU [[DISTRICT]] U WORD HERBY GELAS ingevolge ‘n bevel van die [[DIVISION]] Afd

Precedent application for admission as attorney 090711

socialnetworx — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:31:35 GMT

shared by: socialnetworx on: Monday, July 27, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) CASE NO. ______________In the ex parte application of: [[NAME OF APPLICANT]] for his admission and enrolment as an attorney of this Honourable Court ApplicantNOTICE OF MOTIONBE PLEASED TO TAKE NOTICE THAT application will be made on behalf of the abovenamed Applic

9 Người

trananhnguyet19451 — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 04:52:26 GMT

shared by: trananhnguyet19451 on: Tuesday, July 21, 2009

1.1 http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=8713016 1.2 http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=8712909 2 http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=87126723.1 http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=8712583 3.2 http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=8712458 4 ht

BARTNICKI v VOPPER aka WILLIAMS

ProfessionalDocument — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:19:36 GMT

shared by: ProfessionalDocument on: Monday, July 20, 2009